Quantcast

After the results of March 9

Alaska’s win keeps it alive, Sunday’s game will be interesting for Alaska. Colorado College’s win makes it a TUC once more, helping Mass.-Lowell, St. Cloud, Denver and Yale. At the same time hurting Wisconsin.

Here we go, here’s how I see it after Saturday’s games.

Providence
16 Notre Dame vs. 1 Quinnipiac
12 St. Cloud State vs. 5 Boston College

Grand Rapids
15 Boston University vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 8 Denver

Toledo
13 Niagara vs. 3 Miami
11 Yale vs. 7 North Dakota

Manchester
14 Rensselaer vs. 4 Massachusetts-Lowell
9 Minnesota State vs. 6 New Hampshire

After the results of March 8

How do I see it right now?

Providence
16 Wisconsin vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Boston College vs. 8 Denver

Grand Rapids
15 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
12 Western Michigan vs. 6 St. Cloud State

Toledo
13 Niagara vs. 3 Miami
11 Minnesota State vs. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell

Manchester
14 Rensselaer vs. 4 North Dakota
10 Yale vs. 5 New Hampshire

Some changes to talk about real quickly.

Wisconsin, where did you come from? Northern Michigan and Colorado College dropping as TUCs helped Wisconsin lose four TUC losses, thus helping to turn at least the comparisons with Minnesota State (who’s loss to North Dakota also helped), Robert Morris, Providence and Cornell.

In addition, Notre Dame is hurt by losing two wins as well, and Notre Dame’s TUC record is already pretty bad.

Alaska. That loss last night hurt.

Boston College. That tie hurt last night. The Eagles lost comparisons based on RPI, because of the tie.

Teams that are close to the bubble that can kiss their seasons goodbye with a loss on Saturday night — Alaska and Dartmouth.

We’re getting closer and closer…

Two weeks out, and attendance, bracket integrity fall in line

It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology, college hockey style. It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA tournament will wind up come selection time.

It’s a look into what are the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.

We’ll keep bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced.

If you want to skip the inner workings and get to the results of the analysis, then click here.

Here are the facts:

• Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.

• There are four regional sites (East — Providence, R.I.; Northeast — Manchester, N.H.; Midwest — Toledo, Ohio; West — Grand Rapids, Mich.)

• A host institution which is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host, and cannot be moved. There are four host institutions this year: Brown in Providence, New Hampshire in Manchester, Bowling Green in Toledo and Michigan in Grand Rapids.

Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the championship committee:

In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities:

• The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals.

• Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.

• No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4.

• Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.

• Once the five automatic qualifiers and 11 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1-16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”

Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders (through all games of March 5, 2013):

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 Miami
4t Massachusetts-Lowell
4t New Hampshire
4t Boston College
7 North Dakota
8t Minnesota State
8t Denver
10t St. Cloud State
10t Western Michigan
12 Yale
13 Niagara
14t Notre Dame
14t Rensselaer
16 Alaska

Here are the current conference leaders based on winning percentage:

Atlantic Hockey: Niagara
CCHA: Miami
ECAC Hockey: Quinnipiac
Hockey East: Massachusetts-Lowell
WCHA: St. Cloud State

Notes

• Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played. i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.

• Before the conference playoffs start, I’ll use winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine who the current leader in each conference is. Once the playoffs start, I’ll use the top remaining seed. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion.

Step one

From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.

We break ties in the PWR by looking at how the teams rank in the Ratings Percentage Index, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. There are none.

From there, we can start looking at the ties and bubbles in a more detailed fashion.

The ties and bubbles consist of Massachusetts-Lowell, New Hampshire and Boston College at 4; Minnesota State and Denver at 8; St. Cloud State and Western Michigan at 10; and Notre Dame and Rensselaer at 14.

We break all of our ties based upon the RPI.

Therefore the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 Miami
4 Massachusetts-Lowell
5 New Hampshire
6 Boston College
7 North Dakota
8 Minnesota State
9 Denver
10 St. Cloud State
11 Western Michigan
12 Yale
13 Niagara
14 Notre Dame
15 Rensselaer
16 Alaska

Step two

Now it’s time to assign the seeds.

No. 1 seeds — Quinnipiac, Minnesota, Miami, Massachusetts-Lowell
No. 2 seeds — New Hampshire, Boston College, North Dakota, Minnesota State
No. 3 seeds — Denver, St Cloud State, Western Michigan, Yale
No. 4 seeds — Niagara, Notre Dame, Rensselaer, Alaska

Step three

Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals.

No. 1 Quinnipiac is placed in the East Regional in Providence.
No. 2 Minnesota is placed in the West Regional in Grand Rapids.
No. 3 Miami is placed in the Midwest Regional in Toledo.
No. 4 Massachusetts-Lowell is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.

Step four

Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible.

Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional).

If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships are played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.

But, we must assign New Hampshire, a host school, first.

So therefore:

No. 2 seeds

No. 5 New Hampshire is placed in No. 4 Massachusetts-Lowell’s regional, the Northeast Regional.
No. 8 Minnesota State is placed in No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 7 North Dakota is placed in No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 6 Boston College is placed in No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.

No. 3 seeds

Our bracketing system has one regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16, another with 2, 7, 10, 15, another with 3, 6, 11, 14 and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.

No. 9 Denver is placed in No. 8 Minnesota State’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 10 St. Cloud State is placed in No. 7 North Dakota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 11 Western Michigan is placed in No. 6 Boston College’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 12 Yale is placed in No. 5 New Hampshire’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

No. 4 seeds

One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc.

No. 16 Alaska is sent to No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 15 Rensselaer is sent to No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 14 Notre Dame is sent to No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 13 Niagara is sent to No. 4 Massachusetts-Lowell’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

The brackets as we have set them up:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Rensselaer vs. 2 Minnesota
10 St. Cloud State vs. 7 North Dakota

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Notre Dame vs. 3 Miami
11 Western Michigan vs. 6 Boston College

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Niagara vs. 4 Massachusetts-Lowell
12 Yale vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Alaska vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Denver vs. 8 Minnesota State

Our first concern is avoiding intra-conference matchups. We have St. Cloud State vs. North Dakota, Notre Dame vs. Miami and Denver vs. Minnesota State.

Let’s take care of Notre Dame vs. Miami first. What’s the best way to arrange this bracketing? Let’s go back to our method of looking at all the possible matchups between the first band and the fourth band.

We protect the overall No. 1 seed, thus we keep the matchup of Alaska vs. Quinnipiac.

And in addition, we keep the No. 1 seeds where they fall for geography. Thus, we can only move around the fourth band.

Looking at the three teams left, Niagara, Notre Dame and Rensselaer, it seems to make sense to me to send these teams to the closest geographic sites.

Thus Niagara goes to Toledo, Notre Dame to Grand Rapids and Rensselaer to Manchester. Here, the matchups become Niagara vs. Miami, Notre Dame vs. Minnesota and Rensselaer vs. Massachusetts-Lowell. That all works very nicely.

So we make that move.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 St. Cloud State vs. 7 North Dakota

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Niagara vs. 3 Miami
11 Western Michigan vs. 6 Boston College

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Rensselaer vs. 4 Massachusetts-Lowell
12 Yale vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Alaska vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Denver vs. 8 Minnesota State

Now it’s time to take care of the matchups in the second and third bands.

Once again we have two WCHA teams in the second band and two WCHA teams in the third band. Thus, our matchups are:

North Dakota/Minnesota State vs. Western Michigan/Yale
New Hampshire/Boston College vs. Denver/St. Cloud State

Like last week, let’s take a look at attendance issues at the same time.

We want to place Western Michigan in Grand Rapids. Thus we put Western Michigan in Grand Rapids and find bracket integrity. That means we have North Dakota vs. Western Michigan in Grand Rapids.

Next, we need to keep New Hampshire in Manchester. Thus, we also would like to keep Boston College in Providence.

If we use bracket integrity, then we have New Hampshire vs. St. Cloud State in Manchester and, in turn, Boston College vs. Denver in Providence.

That leaves us Minnesota State vs. Yale in Toledo.

Our brackets are now:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
11 Western Michigan vs. 7 North Dakota

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Niagara vs. 3 Miami
12 Yale vs. 8 Minnesota State

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Rensselaer vs. 4 Massachusetts-Lowell
10 St. Cloud State vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Alaska vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Denver vs. 6 Boston College

It’s a little jumbled, but given our rules, that’s about the best that I can do.

So that is it. My bracket for the week.

See you here next week for the next Bracketology.

Here’s a summary of everything that we have covered.

This week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
11 Western Michigan vs. 7 North Dakota

Toledo
13 Niagara vs. 3 Miami
12 Yale vs. 8 Minnesota State

Manchester
15 Rensselaer vs. 4 Massachusetts-Lowell
10 St. Cloud State vs. 5 New Hampshire

Providence
16 Alaska vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Denver vs. 6 Boston College

Conference breakdowns

WCHA — 5
CCHA — 4
ECAC — 3
HEA — 3
AHA — 1

On the move

In: Rensselaer, Alaska
Out: Dartmouth, Providence

Attendance woes?

I like it.

Last week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 5 North Dakota

Toledo
15 Yale vs. 3 Miami
11 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Niagara

Manchester
13 Dartmouth vs. 4 New Hampshire
12 Denver vs. 6 Boston College

Providence
16 Providence vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 7 Minnesota State

Tidbits

Three of the conferences are now into the playoffs. Is there any impact among the playoff games being played this weekend?

Robert Morris is the only TUC in the Atlantic Hockey playoffs that’s playing this weekend. Two losses to Sacred Heart would kill the Colonials’ RPI, perhaps knocking them out of the TUC range. Mercyhurst will not get to TUC status with two wins this weekend, but if they can move to next weekend, the Lakers may get their shot.

In the CCHA, Alaska has a lot to lose with a loss or two to Michigan State. Elimination from the CCHA tournament would pretty much doom Alaska’s at-large bid.

Northern Michigan’s series with Michigan is also important. With a .5006 RPI, two losses will drop NMU from TUC status. What’s the impact? The Wildcats are 0-2 against Notre Dame, 0-2 vs. Western Michigan, 1-2-1 vs. Alaska, 1-1 vs. Nebraska-Omaha, 2-0 vs. Wisconsin, 2-0 vs. St. Cloud State. It would affect Notre Dame, Western Michigan and Alaska negatively and Wisconsin and St. Cloud State positively. Notre Dame is 7-9-3 against TUCs so losing two wins there would be painful.

In ECAC Hockey, there are some good matchups. At .5003 in the RPI, Brown is hanging on. Advancement to the quarterfinal round may keep Brown as a TUC, benefiting teams such as Dartmouth (0-2), Rensselaer (0-1-1) and Union (0-1-1). Also, Cornell has an RPI of .5008. Having Cornell stay a TUC helps whom? Yale (0-2) for sure. Rensselaer? At 1-1, the Engineers would see Brown stay a TUC than Cornell. Union? Union would rather have the Big Red out of TUC range because it is 0-2 against Cornell. Dartmouth is 0-1-1 against Cornell. Denver is also 2-0 against Cornell, so Denver is rooting for the Big Red.

Dartmouth, without saying, must win to stay alive for a bid. St. Lawrence also must continue to win. Colgate is sitting at .4963 in the RPI, so two wins this weekend for Colgate against St. Lawrence might bring Colgate into the TUC range again.

There are no “bubble” matchups this weekend in Hockey East, but all the favored teams cannot afford a misstep.

In the WCHA, North Dakota vs. Minnesota State is a big matchup, and Wisconsin will try to move up against St. Cloud State.

After the results of March 2

Headed into one game on Sunday, here’s how I see it after Saturday’s games.

Providence
16 Alaska vs. 1 Quinnipiac
12 Yale vs. 8 Minnesota State

Grand Rapids
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 7 North Dakota

Toledo
13 Niagara vs. 3 Miami
9 Denver vs. 6 Massachusetts-Lowell

Manchester
15 Rensselaer vs. 4 New Hampshire
11 St. Cloud State vs. 5 Boston College

Some movement here and there, but I think the bracket is pretty even at the moment.

The Lowell-Merrimack game has some potential impact, so we’ll see where that lands us in the next edition of Bracketology.

After the results of March 1

It’s time to add to the weekly Bracketology with a quick hitting edition of what I think the bracket would look like should the season have ended after Friday, March 1, 2013.

Here goes:

Providence
15 Minnesota State vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Denver vs. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell

Grand Rapids
16 Dartmouth vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 8 St. Cloud State

Toledo
14 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
12 Niagara vs. 5 North Dakota

Manchester
13 Rensselaer vs. 4 Boston College
11 Yale vs. 6 New Hampshire

I swapped Lowell with St. Cloud, and then had to swap Dartmouth with Minnesota State.

Otherwise, it was pretty simple and there’s good attendance here too.

Three weeks out, and it’s a pick-and-choose situation

It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology, college hockey style. It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA tournament will wind up come selection time.

It’s a look into what are the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.

We’ll keep bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced.

If you want to skip the inner workings and get to the results of the analysis, then click here.

Here are the facts:

• Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.

• There are four regional sites (East — Providence, R.I.; Northeast — Manchester, N.H.; Midwest — Toledo, Ohio; West — Grand Rapids, Mich.)

• A host institution which is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host, and cannot be moved. There are four host institutions this year: Brown in Providence, New Hampshire in Manchester, Bowling Green in Toledo and Michigan in Grand Rapids.

Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the championship committee:

In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities:

• The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals.

• Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.

• No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4.

• Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.

• Once the five automatic qualifiers and 11 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1-16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”

Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders (through all games of Feb. 26, 2013):

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 Miami
4 New Hampshire
5t North Dakota
5t Boston College
7 Minnesota State
8 Niagara
9t Massachusetts-Lowell
9t Western Michigan
11 St. Cloud State
12t Denver
12t Dartmouth
14t Notre Dame
14t Yale
14t Rensselaer
25t Providence

Here are the current conference leaders based on winning percentage:

Atlantic Hockey: Niagara
CCHA: Miami
ECAC Hockey: Quinnipiac
Hockey East: Providence, based upon the first tiebreaker using percentage of head-to-head play: Providence (2-1-2) .600, Boston College (3-2-2) .570, New Hampshire (4-3-2) .550, Massachusetts-Lowell (2-5-0) .280
WCHA: St. Cloud State

Notes

• Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played. i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.

• Because there are an uneven amount of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine who the current leader in each conference is. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion.

Step one

From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.

We break ties in the PWR by looking at how the teams rank in the Ratings Percentage Index, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. We must add in Providence, which at 25 is not in the top 16.

From there, we can start looking at the ties and bubbles in a more detailed fashion.

The ties and bubbles consist of North Dakota and Boston College at 5, Massachusetts-Lowell and Western Michigan at 9, Denver and Dartmouth at 12 and then Notre Dame, Yale and Rensselaer at 14.

We break all of our ties based upon the RPI.

Therefore the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 Miami
4 New Hampshire
5 North Dakota
6 Boston College
7 Minnesota State
8 Niagara
9 Massachusetts-Lowell
10 Western Michigan
11 St. Cloud State
12 Denver
13 Dartmouth
14 Notre Dame
15 Yale
16 Providence

Step two

Now it’s time to assign the seeds.

No. 1 seeds — Quinnipiac, Minnesota, Miami, New Hampshire
No. 2 seeds — North Dakota, Boston College, Minnesota State, Niagara
No. 3 seeds — Massachusetts-Lowell, Western Michigan, St. Cloud State, Denver
No. 4 seeds — Dartmouth, Notre Dame, Yale, Providence

Step three

Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals.

We must assign New Hampshire, a host team, first.

No. 4 New Hampshire is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.
No. 1 Quinnipiac is placed in the East Regional in Providence.
No. 2 Minnesota is placed in the West Regional in Grand Rapids.
No. 3 Miami is placed in the Midwest Regional in Toledo.

Step four

Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible.

Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional).

If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships are played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.

So therefore:

No. 2 seeds

No. 8 Niagara is placed in No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 7 Minnesota State is placed in No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 6 Boston College is placed in No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 5 North Dakota is placed in No. 4 New Hampshire’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

No. 3 seeds

Our bracketing system has one regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16, another with 2, 7, 10, 15, another with 3, 6, 11, 14 and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.

No. 9 Massachusetts-Lowell is placed in No. 8 Niagara’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 10 Western Michigan is placed in No. 7 Minnesota State’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 11 St. Cloud State is placed in No. 6 Boston College’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 12 Denver is placed in No. 5 North Dakota’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

No. 4 seeds

One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc.

No. 16 Providence is sent to No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 15 Yale is sent to No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 14 Notre Dame is sent to No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 13 Dartmouth is sent to No. 4 New Hampshire’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

The brackets as we have set them up:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Yale vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 7 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Notre Dame vs. 3 Miami
11 St. Cloud State vs. 6 Boston College

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Dartmouth vs. 4 New Hampshire
12 Denver vs. 5 North Dakota

East Regional (Providence):
16 Providence vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 8 Niagara

Our first concern is avoiding intra-conference matchups. We have Denver vs. North Dakota and Notre Dame vs. Miami.

We swap Notre Dame and Yale to remedy one half of that.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 7 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
15 Yale vs. 3 Miami
11 St. Cloud State vs. 6 Boston College

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Dartmouth vs. 4 New Hampshire
12 Denver vs. 5 North Dakota

East Regional (Providence):
16 Providence vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 8 Niagara

Now it’s time to take care of the Denver vs. North Dakota matchup. Let’s approach this in a little bit of a different way.

There are two WCHA teams in the second band and two WCHA teams in the third band. So our groupings have to be:

• North Dakota/Minnesota State vs. Massachusetts-Lowell/Western Michigan
• Boston College/Niagara vs. St. Cloud State/Denver

But the questions become where are the matchups and exactly how are they paired?

In the first grouping, you would love to have Western Michigan in Grand Rapids. And you would like to keep Massachusetts-Lowell in the eastern region.

In the second grouping, you would love to have Boston College in Manchester or Providence. And you would like to have Niagara in Toledo.

Taking into account all of the preferred locations, here’s what it looks like for preference.

• Grand Rapids — North Dakota/Minnesota State vs. Western Michigan
• Toledo — Niagara vs. St. Cloud State/Denver
• Manchester — Boston College vs. St. Cloud State/Denver or North Dakota/Minnesota State vs. Massachusetts-Lowell
• Providence — Same as Manchester

Let’s look at it from a bracket point of view.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 5 North Dakota/7 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
15 Yale vs. 3 Miami
11 St. Cloud State/12 Denver vs. 8 Niagara

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Dartmouth vs. 4 New Hampshire
9 Massachusetts-Lowell/11 St. Cloud State/12 Denver vs. 6 Boston College/5 North Dakota/7 Minnesota State

East Regional (Providence):
16 Providence vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Massachusetts-Lowell/11 St. Cloud State/12 Denver vs. 6 Boston College/5 North Dakota/7 Minnesota State

Because North Dakota is the top No. 2 seed and because of attendance considerations, we place North Dakota in Grand Rapids.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 5 North Dakota

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
15 Yale vs. 3 Miami
11 St. Cloud State/12 Denver vs. 8 Niagara

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Dartmouth vs. 4 New Hampshire
9 Massachusetts-Lowell/11 St. Cloud State/12 Denver vs. 6 Boston College/7 Minnesota State

East Regional (Providence):
16 Providence vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Massachusetts-Lowell/11 St. Cloud State/12 Denver vs. 6 Boston College/7 Minnesota State

Let’s take a look at St. Cloud State or Denver in the Midwest. Based on attendance, once again we will put St. Cloud State in Toledo.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 5 North Dakota

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
15 Yale vs. 3 Miami
11 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Niagara

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Dartmouth vs. 4 New Hampshire
9 Massachusetts-Lowell/12 Denver vs. 6 Boston College/7 Minnesota State

East Regional (Providence):
16 Providence vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Massachusetts-Lowell/12 Denver vs. 6 Boston College/7 Minnesota State

Now we are left with the matchups of:

• Massachusetts-Lowell vs. Minnesota State
• Denver vs. Boston College

Where to put them? Attendance won’t make much of a difference as you have good attendance from the other two teams in each regional. So I am going to say the committee goes with bracket integrity here.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 5 North Dakota

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
15 Yale vs. 3 Miami
11 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Niagara

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Dartmouth vs. 4 New Hampshire
12 Denver vs. 6 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Providence vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 7 Minnesota State

And there’s our bracket. It’s another way to get to the end result, but I like it.

So that is it. My bracket for the week.

See you here next week for the next Bracketology.

Here’s a summary of everything that we have covered.

This week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Western Michigan vs. 5 North Dakota

Toledo
15 Yale vs. 3 Miami
11 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Niagara

Manchester
13 Dartmouth vs. 4 New Hampshire
12 Denver vs. 6 Boston College

Providence
16 Providence vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 7 Minnesota State

Conference breakdowns

WCHA — 5
HEA — 4
CCHA — 3
ECAC — 3
AHA — 1

On The Move

In: Dartmouth, Providence
Out: Boston University, Merrimack

Attendance woes?

I like it.

Last week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
14 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 2 Minnesota
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Toledo
13 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
10 Niagara vs. 6 North Dakota

Manchester
15 Notre Dame vs. 4 New Hampshire
11 Denver vs. 5 Boston College

Providence
16 Merrimack vs. 1 Quinnipiac
12 Yale vs. 7 Minnesota State

Tidbits

• Can Niagara get to 10 TUC results? Yes. Two games against Air Force this weekend could be important. If Air Force can get above .5000 in the RPI, that would get the Purple Eagles to eight games. Then, depending on who moves forward in the Atlantic Hockey tournament, you could see that come into play. In the meantime, Niagara is being boosted by its RPI, thus its high ranking.

• This is an important weekend for Rensselaer, Union and St. Lawrence. As the Saints visit Rensselaer and Union, this could determine who moves up into the top 15 or 16. SLU was at 15 after Friday night but the loss on Saturday brought them right back down. Rensselaer can get off the bubble by continuing to win. Two wins this weekend brings the bye for the Engineers, improves the RPI and gives it one more TUC result. Likewise for Union, which can also improve its situation. And for the Saints, two wins against Rensselaer and Union boosts their chances as well.

• Yale has games against Colgate and Cornell this weekend and must find a way to get back on the right foot. The win over Princeton snapped a five-game skid, so the Bulldogs must keep that up. And Dartmouth has Princeton and Quinnipiac this weekend. Two wins would be a great foundation for the Big Green. The quarterfinal weekend in the ECAC tournament will be something to watch as you could have potentially great 3-6 and 4-5 matchups with at-large berths on the line.

• What is going on in Hockey East? Providence will surely find its way after the next two weekends with Boston College and Massachusetts-Lowell on the schedule. The Friars are in win-to-get-in mode right now. Can Boston University get back up into the top 16? It’s not a good time to go slumping. With Vermont and Northeastern left on the schedule, losses will not be kind to the Terriers. Merrimack has a Valley battle with Massachusetts-Lowell coming up this weekend.

• In the CCHA, Alaska’s six losses in the last eight games has dropped it out. The Nanooks need to recover in the playoffs. A loss or two to Alaska-Anchorage this weekend will be very unkind. Notre Dame needs a strong finish, while everyone else besides Miami and Western Michigan must win to get in.

• In the WCHA there are teams fighting to move up, while Nebraska-Omaha and Wisconsin are almost certainly in win-to-get-in mode right now. Denver can help solidify its position with wins at Minnesota this weekend but then can’t slip up against Alaska-Anchorage the following week.

Four weeks out, and a lot of teams are on the move

It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology, college hockey style. It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA tournament will wind up come selection time.

It’s a look into what are the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.

We’ll keep bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced.

If you want to skip the inner workings and get to the results of the analysis, then click here.

Here are the facts:

• Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.

• There are four regional sites (East — Providence, R.I.; Northeast — Manchester, N.H.; Midwest — Toledo, Ohio; West — Grand Rapids, Mich.)

• A host institution which is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host, and cannot be moved. There are four host institutions this year: Brown in Providence, New Hampshire in Manchester, Bowling Green in Toledo and Michigan in Grand Rapids.

Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the championship committee:

In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities:

• The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals.

• Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.

• No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4.

• Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.

• Once the five automatic qualifiers and 11 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1-16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”

Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders (through all games of Feb. 19, 2013):

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 Miami
4t New Hampshire
4t Boston College
6 North Dakota
7t Minnesota State
7t Western Michigan
9 St. Cloud State
10 Niagara
11 Denver
12 Yale
13 Boston University
14t Massachusetts-Lowell
14t Notre Dame
14t Union
17t Merrimack

Here are the current conference leaders based on winning percentage:

Atlantic Hockey: Niagara
CCHA: Miami (over Western Michigan based on total goals in series)
ECAC Hockey: Quinnipiac
Hockey East: Merrimack
WCHA: St. Cloud State

Notes

• Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played. i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.

• Because there are an uneven amount of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine who the current leader in each conference is. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion.

Step one

From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.

We break ties in the PWR by looking at how the teams rank in the Ratings Percentage Index, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. We must add in Merrimack, which at 17 is not in the top 16.

From there, we can start looking at the ties and bubbles in a more detailed fashion.

The ties and bubbles consist of New Hampshire and Boston College at 4, Minnesota State and Western Michigan at 7, and Massachusetts-Lowell, Notre Dame and Union at 14.

We break all of our ties based upon the RPI.

Therefore the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 Miami
4 New Hampshire
5 Boston College
6 North Dakota
7 Minnesota State
8 Western Michigan
9 St. Cloud State
10 Niagara
11 Denver
12 Yale
13 Boston University
14 Massachusetts-Lowell
15 Notre Dame
16 Merrimack

Step two

Now it’s time to assign the seeds.

No. 1 seeds — Quinnipiac, Minnesota, Miami, New Hampshire
No. 2 seeds — Boston College, North Dakota, Minnesota State, Western Michigan
No. 3 seeds — St. Cloud State, Niagara, Denver, Yale
No. 4 seeds — Boston University, Massachusetts-Lowell, Notre Dame, Merrimack

Step three

Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals.

We must assign New Hampshire, a host school, first.

No. 4 New Hampshire is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.
No. 1 Quinnipiac is placed in the East Regional in Providence.
No. 2 Minnesota is placed in the West Regional in Grand Rapids.
No. 3 Miami is placed in the Midwest Regional in Toledo.

Step four

Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible.

Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional).

If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships are played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.

So therefore:

No. 2 seeds

No. 8 Western Michigan is placed in No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 7 Minnesota State is placed in No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 6 North Dakota is placed in No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 5 Boston College is placed in No. 4 New Hampshire’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

No. 3 seeds

Our bracketing system has one regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16, another with 2, 7, 10, 15, another with 3, 6, 11, 14 and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.

No. 9 St. Cloud State is placed in No. 8 Western Michigan’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 10 Niagara is placed in No. 7 Minnesota State’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 11 Denver is placed in No. 6 North Dakota’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 12 Yale is placed in No. 5 Boston College’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

No. 4 seeds

One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc.

No. 16 Merrimack is sent to No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 15 Notre Dame is sent to No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 14 Massachusetts-Lowell is sent to No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 13 Boston University is sent to No. 4 New Hampshire’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

The brackets as we have set them up:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Niagara vs. 7 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 3 Miami
11 Denver vs. 6 North Dakota

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Boston University vs. 4 New Hampshire
12 Yale vs. 5 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Merrimack vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Our first concern is avoiding intra-conference matchups. We have Denver vs. North Dakota and Boston University vs. New Hampshire.

We can only swap Denver to play Boston College or Western Michigan, but we can’t make a Minnesota State vs. Denver matchup. So we move Denver to play BC.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Niagara vs. 7 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 3 Miami
12 Yale vs. 6 North Dakota

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Boston University vs. 4 New Hampshire
11 Denver vs. 5 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Merrimack vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Now we have to swap out BU. Since there are three Hockey East teams in the fourth band, only Notre Dame can play New Hampshire.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
13 Boston University vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Niagara vs. 7 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 3 Miami
12 Yale vs. 6 North Dakota

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Notre Dame vs. 4 New Hampshire
11 Denver vs. 5 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Merrimack vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Now the intra-conference matchups are all taken care of.

Can we make it better? Where can we get better attendance?

Western Michigan is in the east, when we want it in Grand Rapids. There’s a fix there.

Let’s swap the entire matchup of Western Michigan vs. St. Cloud State and Minnesota State vs. Niagara.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
13 Boston University vs. 2 Minnesota
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 3 Miami
12 Yale vs. 6 North Dakota

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Notre Dame vs. 4 New Hampshire
11 Denver vs. 5 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Merrimack vs. 1 Quinnipiac
10 Niagara vs. 7 Minnesota State

Is there anything else that we can do? How about swapping Niagara and Yale? Niagara is closer to Toledo than Providence as per Google Maps.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
13 Boston University vs. 2 Minnesota
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 3 Miami
10 Niagara vs. 6 North Dakota

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Notre Dame vs. 4 New Hampshire
11 Denver vs. 5 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Merrimack vs. 1 Quinnipiac
12 Yale vs. 7 Minnesota State

I like that from an attendance standpoint too, as well as geography.

Anything else?

How about competitive balance. We always talk about protecting the No. 1 seed, how about the No. 2 seed? We should swap Boston University and Massachusetts-Lowell because of this.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 2 Minnesota
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
10 Niagara vs. 6 North Dakota

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Notre Dame vs. 4 New Hampshire
11 Denver vs. 5 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Merrimack vs. 1 Quinnipiac
12 Yale vs. 7 Minnesota State

And I think we’re done. Toledo is a little worrisome from attendance, but the rest of the regionals look good to me.

So that is it. My bracket for the week.

See you here next week for the next Bracketology.

Here’s a summary of everything that we have covered.

This week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
14 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 2 Minnesota
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Toledo
13 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
10 Niagara vs. 6 North Dakota

Manchester
15 Notre Dame vs. 4 New Hampshire
11 Denver vs. 5 Boston College

Providence
16 Merrimack vs. 1 Quinnipiac
12 Yale vs. 7 Minnesota State

Conference breakdowns

WCHA — 5
HEA — 5
CCHA — 3
ECAC — 2
AHA — 1

On the move

In: Merrimack, Massachusetts-Lowell
Out: Alaska, Dartmouth

Attendance woes?

I like it. Toledo could use a boost.

Last week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
13 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Minnesota State vs. 7 Western Michigan

Toledo
14 Dartmouth vs. 3 Miami
11 Niagara vs. 6 North Dakota

Manchester
15 Alaska vs. 4 Boston College
12 Denver vs. 5 New Hampshire

Providence
16 Boston University vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Yale vs. 8 St. Cloud State

Five weeks out, and not a lot needs to be done to the bracket

It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology, college hockey style. It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA tournament will wind up come selection time.

It’s a look into what are the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.

We’ll keep bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced.

If you want to skip the inner workings and get to the results of the analysis, then click here.

Here are the facts:

• Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.

• There are four regional sites (East — Providence, R.I.; Northeast — Manchester, N.H.; Midwest — Toledo, Ohio; West — Grand Rapids, Mich.)

• A host institution which is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host, and cannot be moved. There are four host institutions this year: Brown in Providence, New Hampshire in Manchester, Bowling Green in Toledo and Michigan in Grand Rapids.

Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the championship committee:

In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities:

• The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals.

• Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.

• No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4.

• Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.

• Once the five automatic qualifiers and 11 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1-16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”

Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders (through all games of Feb. 12, 2013):

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3t Miami
3t Boston College
5 New Hampshire
6t North Dakota
6t Western Michigan
8 St. Cloud State
9 Yale
10 Minnesota State
11 Niagara
12t Denver
12t Notre Dame
12t Dartmouth
12t Alaska
12t Boston University

Here are the current conference leaders based on winning percentage:

Atlantic Hockey: Niagara
CCHA: Western Michigan
ECAC Hockey: Quinnipiac
Hockey East: Boston College
WCHA: St. Cloud State

Notes

• Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played. i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.

• Because there are an uneven amount of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine who the current leader in each conference is. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion.

Step one

From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.

We break ties in the PWR by looking at how the teams rank in the Ratings Percentage Index, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. There are none.

From there, we can start looking at the ties and bubbles in a more detailed fashion.

The ties and bubbles consist of Miami and Boston College at 3, Western Michigan and North Dakota at 6, and the huge logjam at 12.

We break all of our ties based upon the RPI.

Therefore the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 Miami
4 Boston College
5 New Hampshire
6 North Dakota
7 Western Michigan
8 St. Cloud State
9 Yale
10 Minnesota State
11 Niagara
12 Denver
13 Notre Dame
14 Dartmouth
15 Alaska
16 Boston University

Step two

Now it’s time to assign the seeds.

No. 1 seeds — Quinnipiac, Minnesota, Miami, Boston College
No. 2 seeds — New Hampshire, North Dakota, Western Michigan, St. Cloud State
No. 3 seeds — Yale, Minnesota State, Niagara, Denver
No. 4 seeds — Notre Dame, Dartmouth, Alaska, Boston University

Step three

Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals.

No. 1 Quinnipiac is placed in the East Regional in Providence.
No. 2 Minnesota is placed in the West Regional in Grand Rapids.
No. 3 Miami is placed in the Midwest Regional in Toledo.
No. 4 Boston College is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.

Step four

Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible.

Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless it is a host school, in which case it must be assigned to its home regional).

If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships are played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.

So therefore:

No. 2 seeds

We must assign New Hampshire, a host, first.

No. 5 New Hampshire is placed in No. 4 Boston College’s regional, the Northeast Regional.
No. 8 St. Cloud State is placed in No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 7 Western Michigan is placed in No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 6 North Dakota is placed in No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.

No. 3 seeds

Our bracketing system has one regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16, another with 2, 7, 10, 15, another with 3, 6, 11, 14 and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.

No. 9 Yale is placed in No. 8 St. Cloud State’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 10 Minnesota State is placed in No. 7 Western Michigan’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 11 Niagara is placed in No. 6 North Dakota’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 12 Denver is placed in No. 5 New Hampshire’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

No. 4 seeds

One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc.

No. 16 Boston University is sent to No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 15 Alaska is sent to No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 14 Dartmouth is sent to No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 13 Notre Dame is sent to No. 4 Boston College’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

The brackets as we have set them up:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Alaska vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Minnesota State vs. 7 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Dartmouth vs. 3 Miami
11 Niagara vs. 6 North Dakota

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Notre Dame vs. 4 Boston College
12 Denver vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Boston University vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Yale vs. 8 St. Cloud State

Our first concern is avoiding intra-conference matchups. We have none. Zero, zip, nada, none.

Can we make it better?

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: attendance, attendance, attendance.

Where can we get better attendance?

I would like to bring Dartmouth back to New Hampshire and move Notre Dame to Toledo or Grand Rapids. Can we do that?

We can’t put Notre Dame in Toledo because of the CCHA-CCHA matchup it creates. We can put it in Grand Rapids, though.

But we can’t move Alaska to Toledo, either, so Dartmouth looks like the odd team out here and it can’t be moved.

So our new bracket:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
13 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Minnesota State vs. 7 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Dartmouth vs. 3 Miami
11 Niagara vs. 6 North Dakota

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Alaska vs. 4 Boston College
12 Denver vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Boston University vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Yale vs. 8 St. Cloud State

I can’t make any other moves than that. I really like the way it has shaped up.

So that is it. My bracket for the week.

See you here next week for the next Bracketology.

Here’s a summary of everything that we have covered.

This week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
13 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
10 Minnesota State vs. 7 Western Michigan

Toledo
14 Dartmouth vs. 3 Miami
11 Niagara vs. 6 North Dakota

Manchester
15 Alaska vs. 4 Boston College
12 Denver vs. 5 New Hampshire

Providence
16 Boston University vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Yale vs. 8 St. Cloud State

Conference breakdowns

WCHA — 5
CCHA — 4
ECAC — 3
HEA — 3
AHA — 1

On the move

In: None
Out: None

Attendance woes?

I like it. I’d just like Dartmouth in Manchester for more attendance.

Last week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
14 Alaska vs. 2 Minnesota
11 Denver vs. 6 Western Michigan

Toledo
13 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Yale

Manchester
15 Dartmouth vs. 4 Boston College
12 Minnesota State vs. 5 New Hampshire

Providence
16 Notre Dame vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Niagara vs. 8 St. Cloud State

Six weeks out, and the decisions are in moving and protecting teams

It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology, college hockey style. It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA tournament will wind up come selection time.

It’s a look into what are the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.

We’ll keep bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced.

If you want to skip the inner workings and get to the results of the analysis, then click here.

Here are the facts:

• Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.

• There are four regional sites (East — Providence, R.I.; Northeast — Manchester, N.H.; Midwest — Toledo, Ohio; West — Grand Rapids, Mich.)

• A host institution which is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host, and cannot be moved. There are four host institutions this year: Brown in Providence, New Hampshire in Manchester, Bowling Green in Toledo and Michigan in Grand Rapids.

Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the championship committee:

In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities:

• The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals.

• Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.

• No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4.

• Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.

• Once the five automatic qualifiers and 11 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1-16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”

Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders (through all games of Feb. 5, 2013):

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3t Miami
3t Boston College
5 New Hampshire
6 Western Michigan
7 Yale
8 St. Cloud State
9t Niagara
9t North Dakota
11 Denver
12t Minnesota State
12t Boston University
12t Alaska
15t Dartmouth
15t Notre Dame

Here are the current conference leaders based on winning percentage:

Atlantic Hockey: Niagara
CCHA: Miami
ECAC Hockey: Quinnipiac
Hockey East: Boston College
WCHA: St. Cloud State

Notes

• Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played. i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.

• Because there are an uneven amount of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine who the current leader in each conference is. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion.

Step one

From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.

We break ties in the PWR by looking at how the teams rank in the Ratings Percentage Index, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. There are none.

From there, we can start looking at the ties and bubbles in a more detailed fashion.

The ties and bubbles consist of Miami and Boston College at 3, Niagara and North Dakota at 9, Minnesota State, Boston University and Alaska at 12 and Dartmouth and Notre Dame at 15.

We break all of our ties based upon the RPI.

Therefore the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 Miami
4 Boston College
5 New Hampshire
6 Western Michigan
7 Yale
8 St. Cloud State
9 Niagara
10 North Dakota
11 Denver
12 Minnesota State
13 Boston University
14 Alaska
15 Dartmouth
16 Notre Dame

Step two

Now it’s time to assign the seeds.

No. 1 seeds — Quinnipiac, Minnesota, Miami, Boston College
No. 2 seeds — New Hampshire, Western Michigan, Yale, St. Cloud State
No. 3 seeds — Niagara, North Dakota, Denver, Minnesota State
No. 4 seeds — Boston University, Alaska, Dartmouth, Notre Dame

Step three

Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals.

No. 1 Quinnipiac is placed in the East Regional in Providence.
No. 2 Minnesota is placed in the West Regional in Grand Rapids.
No. 3 Miami is placed in the Midwest Regional in Toledo.
No. 4 Boston College is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.

Step four

Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible.

Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional).

If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships are played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.

So therefore:

No. 2 seeds

We must assign New Hampshire, a host school, first.

No. 5 New Hampshire is placed in No. 4 Boston College’s regional, the Northeast Regional.
No. 8 St. Cloud State is placed in No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 7 Yale is placed in No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 6 Western Michigan is placed in No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.

No. 3 seeds

Our bracketing system has one regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16, another with 2, 7, 10, 15, another with 3, 6, 11, 14 and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.

No. 9 Niagara is placed in No. 8 St. Cloud State’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 10 North Dakota is placed in No. 7 Yale’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 11 Denver is placed in No. 6 Western Michigan’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 12 Minnesota State is placed in No. 5 New Hampshire’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

No. 4 seeds

One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc.

No. 16 Notre Dame is sent to No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 15 Dartmouth is sent to No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 14 Alaska is sent to No. 3 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 13 Boston University is sent to No. 4 Boston College’s regional, the Northeast Regional.

The brackets as we have set them up:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Dartmouth vs. 2 Minnesota
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Yale

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
14 Alaska vs. 3 Miami
11 Denver vs. 6 Western Michigan

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Boston University vs. 4 Boston College
12 Minnesota State vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Notre Dame vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Niagara vs. 8 St. Cloud State

Our first concern is avoiding intra-conference matchups. We have two in Boston University vs. Boston College and Alaska vs. Miami.

To avoid this, we can switch Boston University with Alaska, with which it is tied in the PWR.

Our brackets are now:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Dartmouth vs. 2 Minnesota
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Yale

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
11 Denver vs. 6 Western Michigan

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
14 Alaska vs. 4 Boston College
12 Minnesota State vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Notre Dame vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Niagara vs. 8 St. Cloud State

We now have a bracket that does not have any intra-conference matchups.

Can we make it better?

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Attendance, attendance, attendance.

Where can we get better attendance?

One obvious spot is to get Western Michigan to Grand Rapids so we can draw better there.

We swap the entire matchup of WMU-Denver and Yale-North Dakota.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Dartmouth vs. 2 Minnesota
11 Denver vs. 6 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Yale

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
14 Alaska vs. 4 Boston College
12 Minnesota State vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Notre Dame vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Niagara vs. 8 St. Cloud State

Is there anything else that we can do?

There is one more switch which I would like to make: swapping Alaska and Dartmouth.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Alaska vs. 2 Minnesota
11 Denver vs. 6 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Yale

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Dartmouth vs. 4 Boston College
12 Minnesota State vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Notre Dame vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Niagara vs. 8 St. Cloud State

I need some more attendance in Providence, but the hands are a little tied. I want to bring Yale back to Providence, but there is limited movement as there are three WCHA teams in the third seeded band, so we have to move entire matchups. And that would mean moving North Dakota out of Toledo, which would decrease the attendance in Toledo. Niagara could draw well in Toledo, though.

I could bring BU back to Providence, but I can’t do that without creating a CCHA-CCHA matchup in either of the western brackets.

So maybe the question becomes which team should I bring back, Boston University or Dartmouth?

Manchester will do OK with both Boston College and New Hampshire. Getting Dartmouth there would be nice, but would having BU in Providence make attendance better than bringing Dartmouth back east?

If we hadn’t made the Dartmouth move but instead brought BU back east, what would we have? We would have to make some switches to avoid an intraconference matchup.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
16 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
11 Denver vs. 6 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
15 Dartmouth vs. 3 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Yale

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
14 Alaska vs. 4 Boston College
12 Minnesota State vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
13 Boston University vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Niagara vs. 8 St. Cloud State

I’m a little happier with this attendance situation. But there is one huge question here. This is not protecting the No. 1 seed, as has been the case in years past.

The committee has shown a pattern of protecting the No. 1 seed, leaving the 1-16 matchup in place.

Now, you can argue that in years past, the 16 seed was always the Atlantic Hockey autobid, thus, there was the perception that this autobid should always play the overall No. 1 seed. But this year, the 16 seed is not the AHA autobid.

So what do you do?

Decisions, decisions, decisions.

I think if you’re the committee, you cannot “slight” Atlantic Hockey and make this move. You have to protect the No. 1 seed as in the past.

So we don’t go this way. We stay with this.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Alaska vs. 2 Minnesota
11 Denver vs. 6 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Yale

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Dartmouth vs. 4 Boston College
12 Minnesota State vs. 5 New Hampshire

East Regional (Providence):
16 Notre Dame vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Niagara vs. 8 St. Cloud State

I really wish there could be some more moves made but this is about the best I can get it while keeping in place the principles of how the bracket is created.

That is about all we can do with this bracket.

So that is it. My bracket for the week.

See you here next week for the next Bracketology.

Here’s a summary of everything that we have covered.

This week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
14 Alaska vs. 2 Minnesota
11 Denver vs. 6 Western Michigan

Toledo
13 Boston University vs. 3 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Yale

Manchester
15 Dartmouth vs. 4 Boston College
12 Minnesota State vs. 5 New Hampshire

Providence
16 Notre Dame vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 Niagara vs. 8 St. Cloud State

Conference breakdowns

WCHA — 5
CCHA — 4
ECAC — 3
HEA — 3
AHA — 1

On the move

In: Minnesota State
Out: Massachusetts-Lowell

Attendance woes?

I am OK at the present moment, though I wish Toledo was a little stronger.

Last week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Toledo
13 Denver vs. 4 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell

Manchester
15 Dartmouth vs. 3 New Hampshire
12 Alaska vs. 6 Boston College

Providence
16 Niagara vs. 1 Quinnipiac
11 Boston University vs. 5 Yale

Interesting …

Niagara is so high in the PWR right now because of its RPI and that the Teams Under Consideration criteria is not in play with Niagara, with only four games played against TUCs at the moment.

Seven weeks out, and the bracket is intriguing

It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology, college hockey style. It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA tournament will wind up come selection time.

It’s a look into what are the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.

We’ll keep bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced.

If you want to skip the inner workings and get to the results of the analysis, then click here.

Here are the facts:

• Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.

• There are four regional sites (East — Providence, R.I.; Northeast — Manchester, N.H.; Midwest — Toledo, Ohio; West — Grand Rapids, Mich.)

• A host institution which is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host, and cannot be moved. There are four host institutions this year: Brown in Providence, New Hampshire in Manchester, Bowling Green in Toledo and Michigan in Grand Rapids.

Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the championship committee:

In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities:

• The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals.

• Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.

• No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4.

• Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.

• Once the five automatic qualifiers and 11 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1-16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”

Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders (through all games of Jan. 29, 2013):

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3t New Hampshire
3t Miami
5t Yale
5t Boston College
7 Massachusetts-Lowell
8 Western Michigan
9 St. Cloud State
10 North Dakota
11t Boston University
11t Alaska
13 Denver
14t Notre Dame
14t Dartmouth
16 Minnesota State
17 Niagara

Here are the current conference leaders based on winning percentage:

Atlantic Hockey: Niagara
CCHA: Western Michigan
ECAC Hockey: Quinnipiac
Hockey East: Boston College
WCHA: St. Cloud State

Notes

• Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played. i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.

• Because there are an uneven amount of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine who the current leader in each conference is. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion.

Step one

From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.

We break ties in the PWR by looking at how the teams rank in the Ratings Percentage Index, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. There are none.

From there, we can start looking at the ties and bubbles in a more detailed fashion.

The ties and bubbles consist of New Hampshire and Miami at 3, Yale and Boston College at 5, Boston University and Alaska at 11 and Notre Dame and Dartmouth at 14.

We break all of our ties based upon the RPI.

Therefore the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 New Hampshire
4 Miami
5 Yale
6 Boston College
7 Massachusetts-Lowell
8 Western Michigan
9 St. Cloud State
10 North Dakota
11 Boston University
12 Alaska
13 Denver
14 Notre Dame
15 Dartmouth
16 Niagara

Step two

Now it’s time to assign the seeds.

No. 1 seeds — Quinnipiac, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Miami
No. 2 seeds — Yale, Boston College, Massachusetts-Lowell, Western Michigan
No. 3 seeds — St. Cloud State, North Dakota, Boston University, Alaska
No. 4 seeds — Denver, Notre Dame, Dartmouth, Niagara

Step three

Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals.

As a host, New Hampshire must be placed first.

No. 3 New Hampshire is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.
No. 1 Quinnipiac is placed in the East Regional in Providence.
No. 2 Minnesota is placed in the West Regional in Grand Rapids.
No. 4 Miami is placed in the Midwest Regional in Toledo.

Step four

Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible.

Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional).

If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships are played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.

So therefore:

No. 2 seeds

No. 8 Western Michigan is placed in No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell is placed in No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 6 Boston College is placed in No. 3 New Hampshire’s regional, the Northeast Regional.
No. 5 Yale is placed in No. 4 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.

No. 3 seeds

Our bracketing system has one regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16, another with 2, 7, 10, 15, another with 3, 6, 11, 14 and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.

No. 9 St. Cloud State is placed in No. 8 Western Michigan’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 10 North Dakota is placed in No. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 11 Boston University is placed in No. 6 Boston College’s regional, the Northeast Regional.
No. 12 Alaska is placed in No. 5 Yale’s regional, the Midwest Regional.

No. 4 seeds

One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc.

No. 16 Niagara is sent to No. 1 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 15 Dartmouth is sent to No. 2 Minnesota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 14 Notre Dame is sent to No. 3 New Hampshire’s regional, the Northeast Regional.
No. 13 Denver is sent to No. 4 Miami’s regional, the Midwest Regional.

The brackets as we have set them up:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Dartmouth vs. 2 Minnesota
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Denver vs. 4 Miami
12 Alaska vs. 5 Yale

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
14 Notre Dame vs. 3 New Hampshire
11 Boston University vs. 6 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Niagara vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Our first concern is avoiding intra-conference matchups. We have one in Boston University vs. Boston College.

To avoid this, we can switch Boston University with Alaska, the team with which it is tied in the PWR.

Our brackets are now:

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Dartmouth vs. 2 Minnesota
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Denver vs. 4 Miami
11 Boston University vs. 5 Yale

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
14 Notre Dame vs. 3 New Hampshire
12 Alaska vs. 6 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Niagara vs. 1 Quinnipiac
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

We now have a bracket that does not have any intra-conference matchups.

Can we make it better? I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: attendance, attendance, attendance.

Where can we get better attendance?

One obvious spot is to get Western Michigan to Grand Rapids so we can draw better there.

We swap the entire matchup of SCSU vs. WMU and BU vs. Yale. In doing this we bring two Eastern teams east and two Western teams west. But that only gets WMU to Toledo. We need to get them to Grand Rapids. So we swap the entire matchups again, this time SCSU vs. WMU and North Dakota vs. Massachusetts-Lowell.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
15 Dartmouth vs. 2 Minnesota
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Denver vs. 4 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
14 Notre Dame vs. 3 New Hampshire
12 Alaska vs. 6 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Niagara vs. 1 Quinnipiac
11 Boston University vs. 5 Yale

Is there anything else that we can do?

There is one more switch which I would like to make: swapping Notre Dame with Dartmouth. These two teams are tied in the PWR, and neither is playing the No. 1 seed. So I like this swap. It gets Dartmouth to New Hampshire and it brings Notre Dame closer to its fan base.

West Regional (Grand Rapids):
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Midwest Regional (Toledo):
13 Denver vs. 4 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Dartmouth vs. 3 New Hampshire
12 Alaska vs. 6 Boston College

East Regional (Providence):
16 Niagara vs. 1 Quinnipiac
11 Boston University vs. 5 Yale

Wow, does this bracket look so good to me.

I wish I could bring Notre Dame to Toledo, but that can’t be done.

That is about all we can do with this bracket.

So that is it. My bracket for the week.

See you here next week for the next Bracketology.

Here’s a summary of everything that we have covered.

This week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
14 Notre Dame vs. 2 Minnesota
9 St. Cloud State vs. 8 Western Michigan

Toledo
13 Denver vs. 4 Miami
10 North Dakota vs. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell

Manchester
15 Dartmouth vs. 3 New Hampshire
12 Alaska vs. 6 Boston College

Providence
16 Niagara vs. 1 Quinnipiac
11 Boston University vs. 5 Yale

Conference breakdowns

WCHA — 4
HEA — 4
CCHA — 4
ECAC — 3
AHA — 1

On the move

In: Alaska
Out: Minnesota State

Attendance woes?

I am OK at the present moment, though I wish Toledo was a little stronger.

Last week’s brackets

Grand Rapids
13 Boston University vs. 2 Minnesota
12 Western Michigan vs. 7 Massachusetts-Lowell

Toledo
14 St. Cloud State vs. 3 Boston College
10 Notre Dame vs. 6 North Dakota

Manchester
15 Minnesota State vs. 4 New Hampshire
9 Dartmouth vs. 8 Miami

Providence
16 Niagara vs. 1 Quinnipiac
11 Denver vs. 5 Yale

Interesting …

Miami is west!

BNY Mellon Wealth Management