College Hockey:
Gallery: Yale at Harvard

Photos from Yale’s 5-1 victory over Harvard at Bright Hockey Center in Boston on Saturday:

The following is a self-policing forum for discussing views on this story. Comments that are derogatory, make personal attacks, are abusive, or contain profanity or racism will be removed at our discretion. USCHO.com is not responsible for comments posted by users. Please report any inappropriate or offensive comments by clicking the “Flag” link next to that comment in order to alert the moderator.

Please also keep “woofing,” taunting, and otherwise unsportsmanlike behavior to a minimum. Your posts will more than likely be deleted, and worse yet, you reflect badly on yourself, your favorite team and your conference.

  • Nyqi

    The ecac is going to be done today. Got lucky yesterday that afa didn’t take them out. Can’t see them beating a solid UMD team that i now playing tight d as well. We’ll see shortly but the ecac is pretty much done.

    • icing

      Then you will have to find something else to obsess over!

  • Guest

    replacing rpi with a team like bu, maine, minnesota, etc would have made for a stronger tournament. imo.

    • meh

      UND would have beat those teams, too. If you think a 5-2 game rather than 6-0 is some huge difference you will have to explain how.

    • true but not minnesota they’ve had a horrible season not even sure they are ranked

  • Union Alum ’97

    This is appropriate b/c I’ll admit that Yale was the best team in this league all year. I wasn’t impressed with Duluth yesterday. They barely beat a Union team that didn’t play with the urgency required in the NCAAs. And I am a Union grad and alum. We were lifeless and made no adjustments.

    • my 1 cent

      I thought Union started off well enough but it seemed they got frustrated as time went on. Definitely did not feel like Duluth was head and shoulders better as I’m sure our “friends” in the WCHA would have us believe.

      • Union Alum ’97

        I hear you, I am just very puzzled why after we went 0-3 on the PP, we didn’t change it up a little bit. We carried the 5 on 5 play. We just sucked on the special teams. I am not convinced UMD is better than us, but they won the game and that is all that matters.

    • mbuck7

      your right Yale probably was the best team in your league, but your league SUCKS so that isnt saying much. That was the most overrated team i have ever seeing. There biggest win of the year came friday night against air force. A team not even in the top 16 of the pairwise. Stick to what your good at East Coasters–Lacrosse.

    • WoogLips4Ever

      The dogs didn’t need to play hard to beat Union…they slept through it. No questionable call to blame.

  • InebriatedMike

    Ahh I see. The #1 seed in the region is the underdog. Laughable.

    • blah blah blah

      Actually, he didn’t say that. I know, reading is difficult skill to master.

  • Vicb

    Altogether now ECAC fans: Another dreadful performance put on by our league. UGH

  • two thumbs up for brian, that was beautifully done, and let me tell you how fun it was to be in the yale student section when the won in ot last night, even though im a colgate fan. it was legen- wait for it DARY… legendary

  • BC04

    No one, and I mean NO ONE is surprised the ECAC had another crappy showing in the tournament. Except of course for ECAC and especially Yale fans. they keep writing and commenting about how legit their legaue and teams are and all they manage is one crummy win vs Air Force. And it took Yale, the juggernaut, fan proclaimed team of the century OT to beat the 16th seed. Let’s finally end the conversation, the ECAC is a crap league and the proof is in the results.

    • enjoy the offseason

      fan proclaimed team of the century

      I think you exaggerate just a little. . . .

    • interesting point u make but bc los to colorada college the 15th seed 8-4 and yale only lost 5-3 on a horrible call. and bc lost first round. yale did better than bc so u should stop talking

      • guest

        Yale lost 5-3 on a horrible call? Thats just funny. How many garbage make up calls came after that to even it up? Only Yale’s power play couldn’t capitalize. One call in the 2nd period doesn’t decide a game, Yale’s inability to keep their composure after a questionable call decided the game. Quit being bitter.

      • BC04

        You’re right, Hockey East stinks compared to the ECAC. After winning the last 3 NC’s this year was not a great year, but when was the last Yale NC, or Frozen Four……..or ECAC NC or Frozen Four? While I accept BC didn’t play well and is out because they deserve to be, it proved to be the exception to the rule and most folks were surprised when they lost. However Yale winning and going to the Frozen Four, or any ECAC team going to the Frozen Four would be the exception to the rule, so we weren’t surprised to see the ECAC drop…………again, without going anywhere. Take it like a man, your conference stinks, shouldn’t get autobids and cannot say a damn thing until they win a few NC’s I cannot even remember the last time an ECAC team went to the Frozen Four, let alone win the NC. NO ONE was surprised when Yale lost or the other two fabulous ECAC teams dropped. The ECAC stinks, defend it all you want and blame bad calls all you want, they are both out. BC had a few bad calls too, but the ref didn’t place the puck in the net for CC, BC just lost.

  • Dlippiello

    As I sit here on a Sunday night with my head hanging low as a result of the ECAC’s poor NCAA tourney performance I have come up with an idea to maybe help myself, and other die hard ECAC fans deal with the frustration that comes our way every year right around this time. We have suffered enough since 1989 wouldn’t you say? Here is the answer: FACE REALITY, Yes I’ll say it again, “FACE REALITY.” Honestly, it pains me to say it, to face it, to think it, to acknowledge it, to FACE REALITY. In reality, we the ECAC, are just NOT THAT GOOD, in comparison to the other three major leagues in division 1 hockey (WCHA, CCHA, Hockey East) today. This is clearly the truth, a truth I have tried to ignore with excuse after excuse but at this time I have hit my bottom. I can no longer ignore the truth my college hockey loving friends. Yet, I have been thinking and I feel I have a solution that may help us ECAC fans as well as the league as a whole. I will say this now, and please Brian Sullivan let this be heard around the ECAC world. No ECAC hockey team shall be ranked in the top 10 during the regular season, no matter what, until, not one, but two ECAC teams make the Frozen Four and one wins a national championship. On top of this, no ECAC team shall be ranked in the top 15 above any team from Hockey East, the WCHA, or the CCHA until the aforementioned results are achieved. You may ask, “Well Mr. L what if an ECAC team wins the national championship in the next two or three years before another ECAC team makes the frozen four? NO NO NO. It is both goals or nothing, two teams in the Frozen Four and one winning the national championship or nothing at all my friends. It is about time the ECAC accepts it’s place in college hockey as far as strength of conference goes. If it doesn’t like it than go out and do something about it. Until then enough is enough. Next year, I have zero expectations for my beloved league and Union Dutchmen when it comes to national aspirations. As far as I am concerned, any team from our league is an underdog until proven otherwise…and no, I could care less about OOC results from the regular season.

    • Css228

      Umm I hope you’re planning on excepting Cornell from this. 2003 Frozen four, a 1-0 3 OT loss to the 2006 national champions Wisconsin in the regional final, and an OT loss to Minnesota in the ’05 regional final. You’re talking about a team that was a few bounces away from 3 Frozen Fours in the last decade. If thats not a national contender I don’t know what is.

  • VermontfaninNY

    On the other hand after tonight all of hockey east will be out. Does that mean that because ecac didn’t make it to the final four they are bad, or does the fact that none of the eastern conferences made it there mean they are bad?

    Or more likely does it mean that WCHA + CCHA is just having a good year?

North Dakota 2016 National ChampionsBNY Mellon Wealth Management