Women’s Division I PairWise Rankings: Comparison Grid

Click on a team abbreviation to see a detailed comparison.

Team

PWR

RPI

Comparisons Won

Minnesota (Mn)

.7467*

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.6182
14-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.6471	11-6-0
6-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.8182	9-2-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.6139
13-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.6786	9-4-1
7-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.5625	3-2-3
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.6058
13-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.7188	11-4-1
9-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.6111	5-3-1
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.5947
14-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.5000	7-7-1
8-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.5556	4-3-2
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.5877
14-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.5000	4-4-1
6-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.6000	3-2-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.5864
14-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.5556	10-8-0
12-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.5000	5-5-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.5712
10-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.6000	3-2-0
31-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.7586	21-6-2
4-0-0		4	H2H		0-4-0
		7	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.5583
14-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.2857	4-10-0
8-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.4000	6-9-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.5768
8-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.4286	3-4-0
27-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.7963	21-5-1
6-0-0		6	H2H		0-6-0
		9	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.5360
14-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.2857	3-9-2
7-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.5000	4-4-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.7467	1	RPI	.5354
12-0-0	1.000	1	TUC	.2941	4-11-2
5-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.7000	3-1-1
2-0-0		2	H2H		0-2-0
		5	TOT

Cornell (Cr)

.6182*

Cornell			vs.	Boston University
	.6182	1	RPI	0	.6139
10-5-0	.6667	1	TUC	0	.6538	8-4-1
9-4-0	.6923	0	COp	1	.7500	10-3-1
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		3	TOT	2

Cornell			vs.	Boston College
	.6182	1	RPI	0	.6058
11-5-0	.6875	1	TUC	0	.6562	10-5-1
14-5-1	.7250	1	COp	0	.7059	11-4-2
0-1-0		0	H2H	1		1-0-0
		3	TOT	1

Cornell			vs.	Harvard
	.6182	1	RPI	0	.5947
9-5-0	.6429	1	TUC	0	.5417	6-5-1
23-4-1	.8393	1	COp	0	.7857	21-5-2
2-1-0		2	H2H	1		1-2-0
		5	TOT	1

Cornell			vs.	Mercyhurst
	.6182	1	RPI	0	.5877
10-5-0	.6667	1	TUC	0	.5000	3-3-1
6-4-0	.6000	0	COp	1	.7500	10-3-1
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		3	TOT	2

Cornell			vs.	Clarkson
	.6182	1	RPI	0	.5864
10-5-0	.6667	1	TUC	0	.5625	9-7-0
26-5-1	.8281	1	COp	0	.7500	24-8-0
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		4	TOT	1

Cornell			vs.
	.6182	1	RPI	.5712
11-6-0	.6471	1	TUC	.3333	3-6-0
0-0-0	N/A	0	COp	N/A	0-0-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		2	TOT

Cornell			vs.
	.6182	1	RPI	.5583
10-6-0	.6250	1	TUC	.3077	4-9-0
18-4-1	.8043	1	COp	.5000	9-9-0
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Cornell			vs.
	.6182	1	RPI	.5768
11-6-0	.6471	1	TUC	.2308	3-10-0
1-1-0	.5000	0	COp	.5000	1-1-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		2	TOT

Cornell			vs.	Quinnipiac
	.6182	1	RPI	0	.5360
10-5-0	.6667	1	TUC	0	.2500	2-8-2
24-4-1	.8448	1	COp	0	.5714	14-10-4
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		4	TOT	1

Cornell			vs.
	.6182	1	RPI	.5354
7-6-0	.5385	1	TUC	.3333	4-9-2
20-4-1	.8200	1	COp	.6296	15-8-4
4-0-0		4	H2H		0-4-0
		7	TOT

Boston University (BU)

.6139*

Boston University			vs.	Boston College
	.6139	1	RPI	0	.6058
8-4-0	.6667	0	TUC	1	.7143	10-4-0
24-5-2	.8065	1	COp	0	.7833	23-6-1
1-1-1		1	H2H	1		1-1-1
		3	TOT	2

Boston University			vs.	Harvard
	.6139	1	RPI	0	.5947
8-4-1	.6538	1	TUC	0	.5000	6-6-1
19-4-1	.8125	1	COp	0	.5938	9-6-1
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		4	TOT	1

Boston University			vs.
	.6139	1	RPI	.5877
8-5-1	.6071	1	TUC	.5625	4-3-1
8-2-1	.7727	1	COp	.5385	7-6-0
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Boston University			vs.
	.6139	1	RPI	.5864
8-5-1	.6071	1	TUC	.5882	10-7-0
13-4-1	.7500	1	COp	.7059	12-5-0
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Boston University			vs.
	.6139	1	RPI	.5712
9-5-1	.6333	1	TUC	.3333	3-6-0
2-2-2	.5000	1	COp	.4000	4-6-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Boston University			vs.	Northeastern
	.6139	1	RPI	0	.5583
5-4-1	.5500	1	TUC	0	.3333	3-6-0
23-4-1	.8393	1	COp	0	.7407	19-6-2
4-1-0		4	H2H	1		1-4-0
		7	TOT	1

Boston University			vs.
	.6139	1	RPI	.5768
9-5-1	.6333	1	TUC	.2308	3-10-0
1-1-2	.5000	1	COp	.3750	4-7-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Boston University			vs.
	.6139	1	RPI	.5360
9-5-1	.6333	1	TUC	.2857	3-9-2
17-4-1	.7955	1	COp	.5263	9-8-2
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Boston University			vs.
	.6139	1	RPI	.5354
9-5-1	.6333	1	TUC	.2632	4-13-2
16-6-1	.7174	1	COp	.4048	7-11-3
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Boston College (BC)

.6058*

Boston College			vs.
	.6058	1	RPI	.5947
9-5-1	.6333	1	TUC	.5769	7-5-1
17-4-2	.7826	1	COp	.7045	14-5-3
2-0-0		2	H2H		0-2-0
		5	TOT

Boston College			vs.	Mercyhurst
	.6058	1	RPI	0	.5877
10-4-1	.7000	1	TUC	0	.5000	3-3-1
8-1-1	.8500	1	COp	0	.6818	7-3-1
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		4	TOT	1

Boston College			vs.
	.6058	1	RPI	.5864
10-5-1	.6562	1	TUC	.5882	10-7-0
13-4-3	.7250	1	COp	.7143	15-6-0
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Boston College			vs.
	.6058	1	RPI	.5712
11-5-1	.6765	1	TUC	.3333	3-6-0
3-3-0	.5000	1	COp	.4000	4-6-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Boston College			vs.	Northeastern
	.6058	1	RPI	0	.5583
8-3-1	.7083	1	TUC	0	.2222	2-7-0
20-2-3	.8600	1	COp	0	.6731	17-8-1
3-2-0		3	H2H	2		2-3-0
		6	TOT	2

Boston College			vs.
	.6058	1	RPI	.5768
11-5-1	.6765	1	TUC	.2308	3-10-0
2-2-0	.5000	1	COp	.3750	4-7-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Boston College			vs.
	.6058	1	RPI	.5360
10-5-1	.6562	1	TUC	.3077	3-8-2
16-2-1	.8684	1	COp	.4524	8-10-3
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Boston College			vs.
	.6058	1	RPI	.5354
10-5-1	.6562	1	TUC	.2778	4-12-2
14-4-1	.7632	1	COp	.4200	9-13-3
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Harvard (Ha)

.5947*

Harvard			vs.	Mercyhurst
	.5947	1	RPI	0	.5877
7-7-1	.5000	0	TUC	0	.5000	4-4-1
8-7-0	.5333	0	COp	1	.6538	8-4-1
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		1	TOT	1

Harvard			vs.	Clarkson
	.5947	1	RPI	0	.5864
6-5-1	.5417	1	TUC	0	.5333	8-7-0
21-5-2	.7857	1	COp	0	.7407	20-7-0
1-2-0		1	H2H	2		2-1-0
		4	TOT	2

Harvard			vs.	wis
	.5947	1	RPI	0	.5712
7-7-1	.5000	1	TUC	0	.3333	3-6-0
0-0-1	.5000	0	COp	1	1.000	2-0-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Harvard			vs.
	.5947	1	RPI	.5583
6-7-1	.4643	1	TUC	.3077	4-9-0
15-7-3	.6600	1	COp	.6154	16-10-0
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Harvard			vs.	North Dakota
	.5947	1	RPI	0	.5768
7-7-1	.5000	1	TUC	0	.2308	3-10-0
1-2-0	.3333	0	COp	1	.5000	1-1-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Harvard			vs.
	.5947	1	RPI	.5360
5-7-1	.4231	1	TUC	.3333	3-7-2
19-6-3	.7321	1	COp	.6346	15-8-3
2-0-0		2	H2H		0-2-0
		5	TOT

Harvard			vs.
	.5947	1	RPI	.5354
6-7-0	.4615	1	TUC	.2647	4-12-1
21-6-2	.7586	1	COp	.5938	17-11-4
1-0-1		1	H2H		0-1-1
		4	TOT

Mercyhurst (Mh)

.5877*

Mercyhurst			vs.	Clarkson
	.5877	1	RPI	0	.5864
3-3-1	.5000	0	TUC	1	.5625	9-7-0
10-3-1	.7500	1	COp	0	.7000	7-3-0
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		3	TOT	2

Mercyhurst			vs.
	.5877	1	RPI	.5712
4-4-1	.5000	1	TUC	.3333	3-6-0
6-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.9167	5-0-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Mercyhurst			vs.
	.5877	1	RPI	.5583
4-4-1	.5000	1	TUC	.2857	4-10-0
12-7-0	.6316	1	COp	.5000	8-8-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Mercyhurst			vs.
	.5877	1	RPI	.5768
4-4-1	.5000	1	TUC	.2308	3-10-0
11-1-0	.9167	1	COp	.8333	10-2-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Mercyhurst			vs.
	.5877	1	RPI	.5360
3-4-0	.4286	1	TUC	.2917	3-8-1
12-6-0	.6667	1	COp	.5000	5-5-1
1-0-1		1	H2H		0-1-1
		4	TOT

Mercyhurst			vs.
	.5877	1	RPI	.5354
4-4-1	.5000	1	TUC	.2632	4-13-2
10-3-1	.7500	1	COp	.4167	7-10-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Clarkson (Ck)

.5864*

Clarkson			vs.	wis
	.5864	1	RPI	0	.5712
10-8-0	.5556	1	TUC	0	.3333	3-6-0
1-1-0	.5000	0	COp	1	.6000	3-2-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Clarkson			vs.	Northeastern
	.5864	1	RPI	0	.5583
10-7-0	.5882	1	TUC	0	.2308	3-10-0
19-6-0	.7600	1	COp	0	.5227	11-10-1
0-1-0		0	H2H	1		1-0-0
		3	TOT	1

Clarkson			vs.	North Dakota
	.5864	1	RPI	0	.5768
9-7-0	.5625	1	TUC	0	.1818	2-9-0
0-0-0	N/A	0	COp	0	N/A	0-0-0
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		3	TOT	1

Clarkson			vs.
	.5864	1	RPI	.5360
8-8-0	.5000	1	TUC	.3333	3-7-2
23-7-0	.7667	1	COp	.6071	15-9-4
2-0-0		2	H2H		0-2-0
		5	TOT

Clarkson			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.5864	1	RPI	0	.5354
7-7-0	.5000	1	TUC	0	.2667	3-10-2
19-6-0	.7600	1	COp	0	.5926	14-9-4
3-1-0		3	H2H	1		1-3-0
		6	TOT	1

Wisconsin (Wi)

.5712*

wis			vs.
	.5712	1	RPI	.5583
3-6-0	.3333	1	TUC	.2857	4-10-0
2-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.6667	2-1-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

wis			vs.
	.5712	1	RPI	.5360
3-6-0	.3333	1	TUC	.2857	3-9-2
2-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.0000	0-1-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

wis			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.5712	1	RPI	0	.5354
3-6-0	.3333	1	TUC	0	.2632	4-13-2
2-4-0	.3333	0	COp	1	.5000	2-2-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Northeastern (NE)

.5583*

Northeastern			vs.	North Dakota
	.5583	0	RPI	1	.5768
4-10-0	.2857	1	TUC	0	.2308	3-10-0
1-0-0	1.000	1	COp	0	.5000	1-1-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Northeastern			vs.
	.5583	1	RPI	.5360
4-10-0	.2857	0	TUC	.2857	3-9-2
16-7-1	.6875	1	COp	.5714	15-11-2
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		2	TOT

Northeastern			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.5583	1	RPI	0	.5354
4-9-0	.3077	1	TUC	0	.2222	3-13-2
12-6-0	.6667	1	COp	0	.4545	8-10-4
0-1-0		0	H2H	1		1-0-0
		3	TOT	1

North Dakota (ND)

.5768*

North Dakota			vs.	wis
	.5768	1	RPI	0	.5712
1-7-0	.1250	1	TUC	0	.0000	0-4-0
21-8-1	.7167	1	COp	0	.6786	18-8-2
2-3-0		2	H2H	3		3-2-0
		5	TOT	3

North Dakota			vs.	Quinnipiac
	.5768	1	RPI	0	.5360
3-10-0	.2308	0	TUC	1	.2857	3-9-2
1-1-0	.5000	1	COp	0	.0000	0-2-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

11t

Quinnipiac (Qn)

.5360

Quinnipiac			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.5360	1	RPI	0	.5354
1-7-1	.1667	0	TUC	1	.1786	2-11-1
13-8-2	.6087	1	COp	0	.5714	14-10-4
2-2-1		2	H2H	2		2-2-1
		4	TOT	3

11t

St. Lawrence (SL)

.5354

St. Lawrence			vs.	North Dakota
	.5354	0	RPI	1	.5768
4-13-2	.2632	1	TUC	0	.2308	3-10-0
1-5-0	.1667	1	COp	0	.1250	1-7-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

*Team's RPI has been adjusted to remove negative effect from defeating weak opponent.

The USCHO.com Pairwise Ranking attempts to mimic the method used by the NCAA Selection Committee to determine participants for the NCAA Division I women's hockey tournament. The PWR compares only the top 12 teams in order of RPI (Teams Under Consideration or TUC per the NCAA Women's Division I ice hockey championship manual), judging them by these criteria: record against common opponents, record against teams under consideration, head to head competition, and the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI).

For each comparison won, a team receives one point. The final PWR ranking is based on the number of points (comparisons) won against teams under consideration. Ties are settled by the RPI.

The PWR can be reformatted and redistributed by any media outlet or person, provided USCHO's URL (http://www.uscho.com/) accompanies the results.

updated: May 25, 2013, 2:28 am CT