Women’s Division I PairWise Rankings: Comparison Grid

Click on a team abbreviation to see a detailed comparison.

Team

PWR

RPI

Comparisons Won

Minnesota (Mn)

.6470*

Minnesota			vs.	wis
	.6470	1	RPI	0	.6423
11-3-0	.7857	0	TUC	1	.8846	11-1-1
24-4-1	.8448	0	COp	1	.9074	24-2-1
3-1-1		3	H2H	1		1-3-1
		4	TOT	3

Minnesota			vs.	Cornell
	.6470	1	RPI	0	.6281
13-4-1	.7500	0	TUC	1	.7692	10-3-0
4-0-0	1.000	0	COp	0	1.000	6-0-0
1-0-0		1	H2H	0		0-1-0
		2	TOT	1

Minnesota			vs.
	.6470	1	RPI	.5701
14-4-1	.7632	1	TUC	.5294	8-7-2
11-2-1	.8214	1	COp	.6429	4-2-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.6470	1	RPI	.5651
14-4-1	.7632	1	TUC	.5000	4-4-2
4-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.9000	4-0-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.6470	1	RPI	.5610
14-4-1	.7632	1	TUC	.5000	4-4-0
9-1-1	.8636	1	COp	.5909	6-4-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.6470	1	RPI	.5665
12-4-1	.7353	1	TUC	.4444	4-5-0
4-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.6000	3-2-0
2-0-0		2	H2H		0-2-0
		5	TOT

Minnesota			vs.	North Dakota
	.6470	1	RPI	0	.5690
10-2-1	.8077	1	TUC	0	.3000	2-6-2
23-3-2	.8571	1	COp	0	.6731	16-7-3
4-2-0		4	H2H	2		2-4-0
		7	TOT	2

Minnesota			vs.
	.6470	1	RPI	.5626
14-4-1	.7632	1	TUC	.4333	6-8-1
6-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.4444	3-4-2
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.
	.6470	1	RPI	.5494
14-4-1	.7632	1	TUC	.4167	7-10-1
13-3-1	.7941	1	COp	.4615	6-7-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Minnesota			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.6470	1	RPI	0	.5592
10-3-1	.7500	1	TUC	0	.4091	4-6-1
23-4-2	.8276	1	COp	0	.6481	17-9-1
4-1-0		4	H2H	1		1-4-0
		7	TOT	1

Minnesota			vs.
	.6470	1	RPI	.5441
14-4-1	.7632	1	TUC	.2000	1-7-2
7-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.5556	5-4-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Wisconsin (Wi)

.6423*

wis			vs.	Cornell
	.6423	1	RPI	0	.6281
12-4-2	.7222	1	TUC	0	.7143	10-4-0
6-3-1	.6500	0	COp	1	.7778	7-2-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

wis			vs.
	.6423	1	RPI	.5701
11-4-2	.7059	1	TUC	.5625	8-6-2
7-1-0	.8750	1	COp	.3750	3-5-0
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

wis			vs.
	.6423	1	RPI	.5651
12-4-2	.7222	1	TUC	.5000	4-4-2
3-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.5000	3-3-2
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

wis			vs.
	.6423	1	RPI	.5610
11-4-2	.7059	1	TUC	.5714	4-3-0
9-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.7500	6-2-0
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

wis			vs.
	.6423	1	RPI	.5665
12-4-2	.7222	1	TUC	.3636	4-7-0
6-3-1	.6500	1	COp	.3333	2-4-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

wis			vs.
	.6423	1	RPI	.5690
9-4-1	.6786	1	TUC	.3750	4-7-1
26-5-1	.8281	1	COp	.6774	20-9-2
3-0-1		3	H2H		0-3-1
		6	TOT

wis			vs.
	.6423	1	RPI	.5626
12-4-2	.7222	1	TUC	.4333	6-8-1
6-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.4286	3-4-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

wis			vs.
	.6423	1	RPI	.5494
10-4-2	.6875	1	TUC	.4688	7-8-1
4-0-1	.9000	1	COp	.6667	4-2-0
2-0-0		2	H2H		0-2-0
		5	TOT

wis			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.6423	1	RPI	0	.5592
8-3-2	.6923	1	TUC	0	.4091	4-6-1
22-4-2	.8214	1	COp	0	.6379	18-10-1
4-1-0		4	H2H	1		1-4-0
		7	TOT	1

wis			vs.
	.6423	1	RPI	.5441
12-4-2	.7222	1	TUC	.2000	1-7-2
5-0-0	1.000	1	COp	.6250	2-1-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Cornell (Cr)

.6281*

Cornell			vs.
	.6281	1	RPI	.5701
10-4-0	.7143	1	TUC	.5294	8-7-2
20-4-0	.8333	1	COp	.6000	9-6-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Cornell			vs.
	.6281	1	RPI	.5651
10-4-0	.7143	1	TUC	.5000	4-4-2
20-3-0	.8696	1	COp	.6923	9-4-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Cornell			vs.	Mercyhurst
	.6281	1	RPI	0	.5610
8-3-0	.7273	1	TUC	0	.6000	3-2-0
9-1-0	.9000	1	COp	0	.8636	9-1-1
2-1-0		2	H2H	1		1-2-0
		5	TOT	1

Cornell			vs.
	.6281	1	RPI	.5665
8-4-0	.6667	1	TUC	.4444	4-5-0
24-4-0	.8571	1	COp	.7500	19-6-1
2-0-0		2	H2H		0-2-0
		5	TOT

Cornell			vs.
	.6281	1	RPI	.5690
10-4-0	.7143	1	TUC	.3125	4-10-2
3-1-0	.7500	1	COp	.3750	3-5-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Cornell			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.6281	1	RPI	0	.5626
8-3-0	.7273	1	TUC	0	.4583	5-6-1
26-3-0	.8966	1	COp	0	.7037	18-7-2
2-1-0		2	H2H	1		1-2-0
		5	TOT	1

Cornell			vs.	Boston University
	.6281	1	RPI	0	.5494
7-4-0	.6364	1	TUC	0	.5000	7-7-1
7-2-0	.7778	0	COp	1	.8750	3-0-1
3-0-0		3	H2H	0		0-3-0
		5	TOT	1

Cornell			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.6281	1	RPI	0	.5592
10-4-0	.7143	1	TUC	0	.3438	5-10-1
0-1-0	.0000	0	COp	1	.2000	1-4-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Cornell			vs.	Clarkson
	.6281	1	RPI	0	.5441
9-3-0	.7500	1	TUC	0	.1250	0-6-2
27-2-0	.9310	1	COp	0	.6852	17-7-3
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		4	TOT	1

Boston College (BC)

.5701

Boston College			vs.	Northeastern
	.5701	1	RPI	0	.5651
6-7-0	.4615	0	TUC	1	.6667	4-2-0
18-7-1	.7115	0	COp	1	.7600	18-5-2
2-0-2		2	H2H	0		0-2-2
		3	TOT	2

Boston College			vs.	Mercyhurst
	.5701	1	RPI	0	.5610
7-6-2	.5333	1	TUC	0	.5000	3-3-0
4-4-0	.5000	0	COp	1	.7143	5-2-0
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		3	TOT	2

Boston College			vs.	Harvard
	.5701	1	RPI	0	.5665
7-7-2	.5000	1	TUC	0	.4000	4-6-0
14-6-1	.6905	0	COp	1	.7632	14-4-1
1-0-0		1	H2H	0		0-1-0
		3	TOT	1

Boston College			vs.
	.5701	1	RPI	.5690
8-7-2	.5294	1	TUC	.3125	4-10-2
5-5-0	.5000	1	COp	.4167	4-6-2
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Boston College			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.5701	1	RPI	0	.5626
7-6-2	.5333	1	TUC	0	.4231	5-7-1
20-6-3	.7414	1	COp	0	.6458	14-7-3
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		4	TOT	1

Boston College			vs.	Boston University
	.5701	1	RPI	0	.5494
7-4-2	.6154	1	TUC	0	.3214	4-9-1
17-4-3	.7708	1	COp	0	.6346	16-9-1
1-3-0		1	H2H	3		3-1-0
		4	TOT	3

Boston College			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.5701	1	RPI	0	.5592
7-6-2	.5333	1	TUC	0	.3214	4-9-1
3-1-0	.7500	1	COp	0	.4286	3-4-0
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		4	TOT	1

Boston College			vs.
	.5701	1	RPI	.5441
7-7-2	.5000	1	TUC	.2222	1-6-2
19-6-3	.7321	1	COp	.5682	10-7-5
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Northeastern (NE)

.5651*

Northeastern			vs.	Mercyhurst
	.5651	1	RPI	0	.5610
4-4-2	.5000	0	TUC	0	.5000	4-4-0
5-4-3	.5417	0	COp	1	.8333	12-2-1
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		1	TOT	1

Northeastern			vs.	North Dakota
	.5651	0	RPI	1	.5690
4-4-2	.5000	1	TUC	0	.3125	4-10-2
6-1-0	.8571	1	COp	0	.7500	3-1-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Northeastern			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.5651	1	RPI	0	.5626
4-3-2	.5556	1	TUC	0	.3929	5-8-1
18-6-4	.7143	0	COp	1	.7500	16-4-4
0-1-0		0	H2H	1		1-0-0
		2	TOT	2

Northeastern			vs.	Boston University
	.5651	1	RPI	0	.5494
1-3-2	.3333	0	TUC	1	.4643	6-7-1
15-4-4	.7391	0	COp	1	.7708	18-5-1
3-1-0		3	H2H	1		1-3-0
		4	TOT	3

Northeastern			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.5651	1	RPI	0	.5592
4-4-2	.5000	1	TUC	0	.3438	5-10-1
3-2-2	.5714	0	COp	1	.7500	3-1-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Northeastern			vs.
	.5651	1	RPI	.5441
3-4-2	.4444	1	TUC	.2222	1-6-2
18-7-4	.6897	1	COp	.6731	15-6-5
1-0-0		1	H2H		0-1-0
		4	TOT

Mercyhurst (Mh)

.5610*

Mercyhurst			vs.	Harvard
	.5610	0	RPI	1	.5665
4-4-0	.5000	1	TUC	0	.3636	4-7-0
9-4-0	.6923	1	COp	0	.5909	6-4-1
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Mercyhurst			vs.	North Dakota
	.5610	0	RPI	1	.5690
4-4-0	.5000	1	TUC	0	.3125	4-10-2
5-2-0	.7143	1	COp	0	.5556	4-3-2
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Mercyhurst			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.5610	0	RPI	1	.5626
2-4-0	.3333	0	TUC	1	.5000	6-6-1
10-4-1	.7000	1	COp	0	.5909	6-4-1
2-0-0		2	H2H	0		0-2-0
		3	TOT	2

Mercyhurst			vs.
	.5610	1	RPI	.5494
4-4-0	.5000	1	TUC	.4167	7-10-1
9-4-1	.6786	1	COp	.5625	9-7-0
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Mercyhurst			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.5610	1	RPI	0	.5592
4-4-0	.5000	1	TUC	0	.3438	5-10-1
2-3-0	.4000	0	COp	1	.5455	6-5-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Mercyhurst			vs.
	.5610	1	RPI	.5441
4-4-0	.5000	1	TUC	.2000	1-7-2
16-4-2	.7727	1	COp	.6389	11-6-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Harvard (Ha)

.5665*

Harvard			vs.	Northeastern
	.5665	1	RPI	0	.5651
4-7-0	.3636	0	TUC	1	.5000	4-4-2
18-5-1	.7708	1	COp	0	.6538	15-7-4
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Harvard			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.5665	1	RPI	0	.5626
2-6-0	.2500	0	TUC	1	.4583	5-6-1
20-6-1	.7593	1	COp	0	.7333	20-6-4
2-1-0		2	H2H	1		1-2-0
		4	TOT	2

Harvard			vs.	Boston University
	.5665	1	RPI	0	.5494
4-6-0	.4000	1	TUC	0	.3824	6-10-1
9-4-0	.6923	1	COp	0	.6905	14-6-1
0-1-0		0	H2H	1		1-0-0
		3	TOT	1

Harvard			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.5665	1	RPI	0	.5592
4-7-0	.3636	1	TUC	0	.3438	5-10-1
1-3-0	.2500	0	COp	1	.4444	4-5-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Harvard			vs.	Clarkson
	.5665	1	RPI	0	.5441
2-7-0	.2222	0	TUC	1	.2500	1-5-2
20-7-1	.7321	1	COp	0	.6897	18-7-4
2-0-0		2	H2H	0		0-2-0
		4	TOT	1

North Dakota (ND)

.5690*

North Dakota			vs.	Harvard
	.5690	1	RPI	0	.5665
4-10-2	.3125	0	TUC	1	.3636	4-7-0
3-5-0	.3750	1	COp	0	.0000	0-3-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

North Dakota			vs.	St. Lawrence
	.5690	1	RPI	0	.5626
4-10-2	.3125	0	TUC	1	.4333	6-8-1
3-1-0	.7500	1	COp	0	.5000	1-1-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

North Dakota			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.5690	1	RPI	0	.5592
3-8-1	.2917	1	TUC	0	.2500	3-9-0
17-9-2	.6429	1	COp	0	.5714	16-12-0
1-2-1		1	H2H	2		2-1-1
		4	TOT	2

North Dakota			vs.
	.5690	1	RPI	.5441
4-10-2	.3125	1	TUC	.2000	1-7-2
3-1-0	.7500	1	COp	.5000	0-0-2
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

St. Lawrence (SL)

.5626*

St. Lawrence			vs.	Boston University
	.5626	1	RPI	0	.5494
6-7-1	.4643	1	TUC	0	.3824	6-10-1
10-5-4	.6316	0	COp	1	.6833	20-9-1
0-1-0		0	H2H	1		1-0-0
		2	TOT	2

St. Lawrence			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.5626	1	RPI	0	.5592
6-8-1	.4333	1	TUC	0	.3438	5-10-1
2-1-0	.6667	0	COp	1	.7500	3-1-0
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

St. Lawrence			vs.
	.5626	1	RPI	.5441
4-8-0	.3333	1	TUC	.2143	1-5-1
22-8-3	.7121	1	COp	.6875	20-8-4
2-0-1		2	H2H		0-2-1
		5	TOT

Boston University (BU)

.5494

Boston University			vs.	North Dakota
	.5494	0	RPI	1	.5690
6-9-1	.4062	1	TUC	0	.2857	3-9-2
3-2-0	.6000	1	COp	0	.4167	2-3-1
1-1-0		1	H2H	1		1-1-0
		3	TOT	2

Boston University			vs.	Minnesota-Duluth
	.5494	0	RPI	1	.5592
7-10-1	.4167	1	TUC	0	.3438	5-10-1
7-4-0	.6364	1	COp	0	.5000	6-6-1
0-0-0		0	H2H	0		0-0-0
		2	TOT	1

Boston University			vs.
	.5494	1	RPI	.5441
7-10-0	.4118	1	TUC	.1667	1-7-1
21-9-0	.7000	1	COp	.4412	6-8-3
0-0-1		0	H2H		0-0-1
		3	TOT

Minnesota-Duluth (MD)

.5592

Minnesota-Duluth			vs.
	.5592	1	RPI	.5441
5-10-1	.3438	1	TUC	.2000	1-7-2
3-1-0	.7500	1	COp	.2500	0-1-1
0-0-0		0	H2H		0-0-0
		3	TOT

Clarkson (Ck)

.5441

*Team's RPI has been adjusted to remove negative effect from defeating weak opponent.

The USCHO.com Pairwise Ranking attempts to mimic the method used by the NCAA Selection Committee to determine participants for the NCAA Division I women's hockey tournament. The PWR compares only the top 12 teams in order of RPI (Teams Under Consideration or TUC per the NCAA Women's Division I ice hockey championship manual), judging them by these criteria: record against common opponents, record against teams under consideration, head to head competition, and the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI).

For each comparison won, a team receives one point. The final PWR ranking is based on the number of points (comparisons) won against teams under consideration. Ties are settled by the RPI.

The PWR can be reformatted and redistributed by any media outlet or person, provided USCHO's URL (http://www.uscho.com/) accompanies the results.

updated: May 26, 2012, 7:32 am CT