Quantcast

Women’s Division I Ratings Percentage Index

Click on a column header to sort by that column.
RankTeamRPIW-L-TWin %Win % RankSOSSOS Rank
1Boston College.7035*25-0-1.98082.508716
2Minnesota.6623*23-1-4.89293.54251
3Wisconsin.6223*20-4-3.79635t.53932
4Harvard.6003*15-3-2.80004.503917
5Quinnipiac.5928*20-4-3.79635t.499918
6Boston University.568816-6-2.70838.509013
7Minnesota-Duluth.568517-7-3.68529.518510
8St. Lawrence.555315-8-3.634610t.52139
9Clarkson.551315-8-3.634610t.515611
10Cornell.549711-7-3.595212.53016
11North Dakota.548115-10-2.592613.52917
12Ohio State.544514-10-3.574114.53194
13Mercyhurst.540718-6-3.72227.463033
14Bemidji State.523614-13-1.517917.52618
15Dartmouth.513410-9-2.523816.508914
16Holy Cross.50812-0-01.0001.297335
17Princeton.506210-10-2.500018.508815
18Penn State.496513-10-4.555615.471231
19Yale.488910-11-1.477319.493920
20Northeastern.46798-13-4.400023.497019
21Maine.46599-12-3.437520.478029
22Vermont.459811-16-1.410722.480824
23Syracuse.45296-12-9.388924.480325
24New Hampshire.44947-17-1.300028.513512
25Connecticut.44667-14-6.370425.479228
26St. Cloud State.44456-20-1.240732.53185
27Robert Morris.44328-15-3.365426.476630
28RIT.442010-14-3.425921.448934
29Providence.42486-17-4.296329.479927
30Lindenwood.42287-16-1.312527.470032
31Colgate.42047-19-0.269230.485221
32Rensselaer.41465-18-4.259331.481123
33Minnesota State.40602-22-1.100035.53723
34Brown.40425-17-0.227333.480026
35Union.40414-19-4.222234.482122
36Sacred Heart.18220-3-0.000036.260236
37St. Anselm.00000-0-0.0000.000037t
38Franklin Pierce.00000-0-0.0000.000037t
39St. Michael's.00000-0-0.0000.000037t

*Team's RPI has been adjusted to remove negative effect from defeating weak opponent.

The Ratings Percentage Index is one tool used to select teams for the national collegiate ice hockey tournament. Only results from games between Division I and II teams are used. Factors involved are 1) the team's winning percentage; 2) the average winning percentage of the team's opponents; and 3) the average winning percentage of the team's opponents' opponents. These factors are multiplied by 30%, 24%, and 46% respectively.