Quantcast

Some coaches see recruiting until letter of intent is signed as key to slowing early commitments

140409 12434583 Some coaches see recruiting until letter of intent is signed as key to slowing early commitments

Boston College coach Jerry York wants to see players commit to schools at older ages (photo: Melissa Wade).

Recruiting in college hockey is trending in the wrong direction. Once driven by players who were seniors in high school or playing junior hockey, top prospects are committing after just one or two years of high school, and in certain cases, even earlier.

In January, Maine received a verbal commitment from 13-year-old Oliver Wahlstrom, the youngest player ever known to have made such a nonbinding pledge. While the notion of a seventh-grader committing to a college drew headlines around the hockey community, some NCAA coaches have been concerned with this trend for years.

Up until this offseason, members of the college hockey coaching body have held a handshake agreement that they wouldn’t recruit players who were committed to other schools. Current NCAA rules allow recruiting until a player has signed a National Letter of Intent.

Some coaches believe eliminating that gentleman’s agreement will help slow the tide of players committing to schools at such young ages.

“What we have now in recruiting is the worst possible environment — 14- and 15-year old boys trying to select a college,” said Boston College coach Jerry York, who emphasized that the focus needs to be on what’s best for players, not what’s best for teams.

“I strongly feel we should follow the NCAA rule on [National Letters of Intent]. If you look at [Chris Heisenberg's recruiting list] from three years ago, it’s a radically different list now. What we have now is not working. [Recruiting to] the NLI will bring sanity back. Older players will make better, more informed decisions.”

In an informal poll of Division I men’s head coaches taken by USCHO, schools in favor of eliminating the agreement were in the significant minority. But those who responded they were in favor of dropping the agreement were power schools from major conferences.

“The schools that aren’t going to honor the agreement are the glamorous schools that are coming from a position of power,” Air Force coach Frank Serratore said. “There are valid reasons why they don’t want to honor it. Some of the teams are committing players at such a young age that other programs don’t have the chance to recruit them. Second, some schools are stockpiling recruits.”

While some schools aren’t planning on following the agreement, that doesn’t necessarily mean their coaches are planning to pick off committed recruits on a regular basis.

Michigan coach Red Berenson reiterated he had no plan to recruit committed players, but he is hoping to slow the trend of early recruiting.

“Our intent is really to do the right thing,” Berenson said. “It’s not to steal other teams’ recruits. It’s to slow down recruiting.

“I have no intentions of calling other teams’ recruits. If it happens we may even call the school and tell them first. We hope we never have to, but if we slow the recruiting with the younger players and have more of a commitment to the players we’ve recruited, we’ll all be better off.”

While slowing early recruiting is a worthy cause, many of the same schools looking to stop the trend are some of the same programs who started recruiting players early, and continue to do so.

Minnesota, a school that spoke in favor of dropping the agreement at this offseason’s American Hockey Coaches Association convention in Naples, Fla., has committed two prospects born in 1999 — one 14-year-old and one recently turned 15-year-old — since the conclusion of the college season.

“The schools that aren’t going to honor the gentleman’s agreement are the ones who said they needed to commit players before they got to major junior,” Serratore said. “It wasn’t the non-BCS schools that were committing 14- and 15-year-olds.”

While slowing early recruiting is one of the major arguments for dropping the agreement, stockpiling recruits early with no intention of bringing everyone to campus is another reason schools are looking to move away from the current system.

“Part of the problem is teams load up on recruits early and they make decisions down the road on which ones they want to bring to campus,” Berenson said. “In the meantime, [the player] could have gone somewhere else.

“I think this is going to force schools to make sure they have a serious commitment with the player. I’m going to reach out to all our recruits and make sure we’re solid.”

Rochester Institute of Technology coach Wayne Wilson said he feels schools should live up to their end of the bargain if they’ve committed to a recruit.

“If we’re going to protect and respect the verbal agreement and other teams won’t recruit your verbal commitments, then teams need to also stay committed to those players and not decommit them if they don’t work out as planned,” Wilson said. “It can’t be a one-way commitment.”

There may not be a perfect course of action for college hockey when it comes to the agreement — what’s best for one school isn’t going to be best for another. In a sport like college hockey with a significant disparity in operating budgets and school sizes, there may not be a correct answer.

At the end of the day, looking out for the best interest of the players should be the No. 1 priority.

“We’d just like to see kids make more of an informed decision,” Berenson said.

College hockey coaches see recruiting rule change as chance to better develop relationships

Editor’s note: This is the first entry in an occasional series on the major issues and big names in college hockey recruiting.

The ongoing battle for talent between college hockey and the Canadian Hockey League continues to intensify on a yearly basis. While it doesn’t appear that will change any time soon, the NCAA has taken steps recently to level the playing field in terms of recruiting and retaining elite talent.

The NCAA Board of Directors last month approved legislation that will allow NCAA schools to reach out to prospective players beginning Jan. 1 of their sophomore year. Previously, coaches weren’t allowed to contact recruits until June 15 of a prospect’s grade 10 year.

The change is significant because it moves the contact date for prospective student-athletes up 5½ months, giving college coaches the ability to form relationships with recruits before the OHL and QMJHL drafts.

Like many schools, Michigan State finds itself directly in the crosshairs of the recruiting battle, with not only seven Division I schools to compete with in-state but two OHL clubs as well. For Spartans coach Tom Anastos, the rule changes make practical sense.

“We’re in one of the most demanding markets there is with a huge CHL presence in the state,” Anastos said in a phone interview with USCHO. “It really wasn’t all that logical the way we had to go about communicating before.”

The new rule changes also remove limits on the number of phone calls, emails, text messages and Twitter direct messages that coaches can send.

Previously, NCAA schools were allowed only one phone call per month to prospective student-athletes from June 15 at the end of their grade 10 year until grade 12. Coaches were allowed unlimited email and social media contact after June 15 of a recruit’s grade 10 year, but no text messages were allowed for hockey under previous NCAA rules.

Meanwhile, CHL teams had unlimited access to these players, creating an uphill fight for many NCAA programs to “show love” to prospective recruits. The rule changes give NCAA coaches the ability to send a text message to a prospect congratulating him on a good game, or to simply keep the line of communication open.

“One of the nice parts of the changes is that you can begin to form a relationship with, or learn about a person that was very difficult before,” Anastos said. “It’s one thing if it was only seniors in high school we were going after, but some are committing at a very young age. This will help allow a normal sequence of communication.”

Not only will it allow college coaches more access to prospective student-athletes, but it will give those prospects the ability to make a more informed choice when they are going through one of the most important decisions they will ever make.

“It’s a benefit for the prospects and the colleges,” Anastos said. “Now, we can actually reach out more readily and more accessibly communicate with kids. It will be welcomed by the prospects as well so they can learn about us.

“You want to be able to have kids make an informed decision, and the rule change makes that possible.”

Recently committed impact recruits

Player: Tyler Nanne

Team: Edina (Minn.) High School

Position: Defense

Size: 5-foot-10, 180 pounds

Date of birth: March 17, 1996

College commitment: Ohio State

The impact: The grandson of hockey legend Lou Nanne, Tyler, like his brother Louie — who is committed to Rensselaer — is looking to forge his own path in the hockey world. A smooth-skating defenseman, Tyler committed to Steve Rohlik and Ohio State on Jan. 7.

Nanne, a senior at Edina, has the special ability to change the game from anywhere on the ice with his legs. Scouts love the way he can skate out of trouble with the puck in his defensive zone, and he also has the ability to create offense from the back end that should make him an effective two-way player for the Buckeyes down the road.

While he’s not a big guy, Nanne’s quickness allows him to be effective in one-on-one situations. He’ll have to continue getting stronger, and likely will do so next season in the USHL with the Sioux Falls Stampede, who recently traded for his rights.

Player: Ryan Donato

Team: Dexter School (Mass.)

Position: Center

Size: 6-foot, 174 pounds

Date of birth: April 9, 1996

College commitment: Harvard

The impact: Another name that should sound familiar to college hockey fans, Donato is the son of Harvard coach Ted Donato. Donato was one of the most sought-after players in New England this season, choosing the Crimson over Boston College and Boston University on Jan. 30.

The fact Donato is the son of a coach isn’t a surprise to anyone who has watched him play. He always seems to find himself in good spots on the ice and has the ability to process the game at breakneck speed. Donato has next-level hockey sense and the ability to slow things down and make the correct play.

While just a junior at Dexter, Donato is eligible for the 2014 NHL Entry Draft. As his game continues to grow, so does his draft stock. NHL Central Scouting recently ranked Donato as the No. 54 North American skater.

Player: Denis Smirnov

Team: Indiana Ice (USHL)

Position: Forward

Size: 5-foot-7, 171 pounds

Date of birth: Aug. 12, 1997

College commitment: Penn State

The impact: Penn State coach Guy Gadowsky landed arguably his most heralded recruit Jan. 14, when Smirnov gave a verbal commitment to play collegiate hockey for the Nittany Lions.

Originally from Russia, Smirnov came over to the United States a little over two years ago to play Bantam hockey for the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights. The Pennsylvania-based AAA team won the 2012 USA Hockey national championship, led by in part by the play of Smirnov.

A wizard with the puck on his stick, Smirnov signed a tender to play in the USHL with the Indiana Ice and has been one of the brightest young stars in the league this season. Smirnov is second on the Ice in scoring behind only fellow Penn State recruit Scott Conway, and is the only 1997-born player among the top-20 scoring leaders in the league.

BNY Mellon Wealth Management