Home Blog Page 807

Committee has the final call on classifying neutral-site games

In trying to sort out the issues stemming from the new selection criteria rolled out by the NCAA Division I Men’s Ice Hockey Committee last week, we’ve looked at one of the biggest: the differences between the old and the new as it relates to a real scenario.

Here’s another: Which games count as being played at a neutral site?

The criteria will weight results based on where the game is played, with teams getting an extra reward for winning on the road. Neutral-site games, meanwhile, receive no extra weight. But I’ve always had some uncertainty as to what qualifies for neutral status.

Some of them are obvious. When Clarkson plays New Hampshire at the Ice Breaker tournament at Minnesota’s Mariucci Arena, that’s a neutral site.

Some are a little less clear. How about when Rochester Institute of Technology takes a home game against Michigan to Blue Cross Arena in Rochester? How about RIT’s outdoor game against Niagara?

Does Minnesota have home games at the Xcel Energy Center in the North Star College Cup?

We asked the NCAA for some clarification, and we got these set of guidelines:

Home/Away/Neutral Site Games

The following guidelines and examples are for regular-season and postseason contests.

Team A is playing Team B. For results and the Rating Percentage Index (RPI), the game is considered a “home” game for Team A and an “away” game for Team B if the site of the contest:

• is the regular home site for Team A. Example: The Tennessee baseball team is hosting a tournament and is listed as the visitor for its game with Ball State. It is considered a home game for Tennessee since it is still the Vols’ home field.

• is in the same city or a reasonable distance within the metropolitan area of Team A, and its opponent, Team B, is from outside the metro area. Example: The Butler women’s basketball team has scheduled a home game with Tennessee and wants to move to a larger arena to accommodate an expected larger crowd. The game is moved to Conseco Fieldhouse, which is still in the same metro area as Butler and just a few miles away. It still is considered Butler’s home game.

• is in the same city or a reasonable distance within the metropolitan area of both teams and one team, Team A, is designated as the home team and includes the game in its season-ticket package. Example: The College of Charleston men’s basketball team is playing host to Charleston Southern. The game is moved to a larger arena to accommodate an expected larger crowd. The game is played in the North Charleston Coliseum, which is still in the same metro area of both teams. It is considered the College of Charleston’s home game since it is designated as such and is included in the season-ticket package. This game is not included in the Charleston Southern season-ticket package. In fact, the College of Charleston and Charleston Southern meet every year and rotate which team is the designated home team and includes the game in its season-ticket package. If both or neither team includes this game in its season-ticket package, then the game would be a neutral site game for both teams.

• is in the same area of Team A and Team A plays some or several “home” games there each season. Oftentimes these games are included in the season ticket package offered by the school. Example: The Connecticut men’s basketball team plays some of its home games in its hometown of Storrs; however, the Huskies play most of their games in nearby Hartford. Both sites are considered home sites.

• is in a city close by Team A and Team A designates the game as a “home” game that will count in its home attendance. The game is also included in the season ticket package offered by the school. Example: Ole Miss men’s basketball team plays a game every two to three years in Tupelo, Mississippi, which is 48 miles away from Oxford. Ole Miss always counts it as a home game and includes the game in its season home attendance.

• is a temporary “home” site while the regular home site for Team A is being renovated. Example: McGaw Hall on the Northwestern campus is being renovated, which forces the Northwestern basketball teams to move all their home games from Evanston to nearby Chicago and play in DePaul’s home arena. These games are considered home games for Northwestern since that is where the Wildcats are playing their scheduled home games during the renovation.

• is a nearby temporary emergency site while the regular home site for Team A is being repaired. Example: Owensboro Sportscenter at Kentucky Wesleyan was damaged in a tornado. This forces Kentucky Wesleyan to move its basketball home game with Southern Indiana to a nearby high school gymnasium while the Sportscenter is being repaired. Since this game was played in a nearby temporary set-up, it is still considered a home game for Kentucky Wesleyan. However, if no area arenas or gymnasiums are available and the game is moved the 40 miles away to Southern Indiana’s home court, then the game is now considered a home game for Southern Indiana.

Team A is playing Team B. For results and RPIs, the game is considered a “neutral site” game for both teams if the site of the contest:

• is at another school that is hosting a tournament. Example: The Kansas State women’s volleyball team is hosting a tournament. Arizona and Texas A&M play each other in a match in Manhattan. It’s a neutral site match for both teams.

• is at another school that is hosting a tournament, even though Team A is from the same metro area as the host school and Team B is not. Example: The Temple women’s lacrosse team is hosting a tournament and Villanova plays a game against Auburn. Although Temple and Villanova are both in Philadelphia, since Temple is hosting the tournament on its campus site, only games involving Temple would have a home site. All other games would be counted as neutral sites.

• is in the same city or metropolitan area of both teams and is not the home site for either team. Example: The Temple women’s basketball team is playing Villanova and the game is being played in the Spectrum. The Wells Fargo Center is in Philadelphia and is not the regular home site for either team even though both teams are from Philadelphia. It’s a neutral site game for both teams. The only exception is if Temple was scheduled to host the game and decided to move it to the Wells Fargo Center (a larger arena) to accommodate an expected larger crowd. Then it is Temple’s home game and Villanova’s away game.

• is not in the metropolitan area for either team. Example: The city of Denver is the site for a softball game between Southern Colorado of Pueblo and Air Force of Colorado Springs. It’s a neutral site game for both teams.

Since the determination of home/away and neutral site games can sometimes be a complicated issue, a school can appeal to the NCAA for exceptions to the rule.

• Example: Butler is playing Indiana in men’s basketball at Conseco Fieldhouse. By all indications this should be a home game for Butler since the arena is located in the same city (Indianapolis) as Butler and just a few miles from the campus. IU is in Bloomington, which is 47 miles away from Indianapolis. However, it was IU which contracted the game with Butler and rented the arena, and IU’s conference, the Big Ten, which assigned the game officials. The game was not a part of either team’s season ticket package, but was included as an option with the season tickets for priority purchasing for that game by both teams. In this case, the game will be designated as a neutral site game.

• Sometimes a team’s large fan base could come into play. If a school moves its game to a larger arena or stadium still within its home city to accommodate for an anticipated larger crowd because of the opponent school’s large fan base within that city, the game could be counted as a neutral site game.

• For Division I men’s basketball starting with the 2007-08 season, consideration is given to who controlled the game tickets, who hired the referees and other game officials, the game’s inclusion on a season ticket package, and so on.

For purposes of attendance, some games considered home and away in the RPI may be switched to neutral site games, and vice versa.

It should be noted that these are guidelines, and the final say is with the committee. So we’ll really have to wait on their rulings on those games mentioned above and others.

My initial impression from reading the guidelines is that both of those RIT games in question are home games for the Tigers. As for the new Minnesota tournament, the Gophers have been cited as the tournament’s permanent host but when they played the Icebreaker in the same building in 2007 the games were listed as neutral.

When we get more definitive word from the committee, we’ll pass it along and make sure our schedules are correct.

Yale the coaches’ choice, Rensselaer the media’s pick in ECAC preseason polls

The ECAC coaches and media differ in their assessment of how the league will stack up during the 2013-14 season.

Rensselaer was picked to win the regular-season title in the 15th annual ECAC Hockey Media Association’s 2013-14 preseason poll, receiving 18 of 33 first-place votes and 367 overall points in the poll conducted by Schenectady Daily Gazette college hockey writer Ken Schott.

It’s the first time the Engineers have been picked first in the media poll. Their previous highest finish was second in the very first media poll back in 1999-2000.

On the coaches’ side of the poll, for the first time in league history, six schools received at least one first-place vote as defending national champion Yale, Rensselaer, Quinnipiac, Union, Cornell and Dartmouth each earned a top vote.

Yale took the No. 1 spot with four first-place votes and 103 total points.

Both the media and coaches also selected an all-conference preseason team as well.

2013 ECAC PRESEASON MEDIA POLL

School (First-Place Votes)Total Points
1. Rensselaer (18)367
2. Yale (5)324
3. Quinnipiac (6)292
4. Union (3)287
5 (tie). Cornell (1)238
5 (tie). Dartmouth238
7. St. Lawrence212
8. Brown188
9. Colgate125
10. Harvard108
11. Princeton102
12. Clarkson83

2013 ECAC PRESEASON MEDIA ALL-CONFERENCE TEAM

PlayerPositionClassSchool
Greg CareyFSr.St. Lawrence
Kenny AgostinoFSr.Yale
Matt LoritoFJr.Brown
Shayne GostisbehereDJr.Union
Mat BodieDSr.Union
Jason KasdorfGSo.Rensselaer

2013 ECAC PRESEASON COACHES’ POLL

School (First-Place Votes)Total Points
1. Yale (4)103
2. Rensselaer (2)102
3 (tie). Quinnipiac (2)93
3 (tie). Union (2)93
5. Cornell (1)89
6. Harvard67
7. Dartmouth (1)64
8. Brown46
9. Colgate44
10. St. Lawrence43
11. Princeton26
12. Clarkson22

2013 ECAC PRESEASON COACHES’ ALL-CONFERENCE TEAM

PlayerPositionClassSchool
Kenny AgostinoFSr.Yale
Greg CareyFSr.St. Lawrence
Andrew CalofFSr.Princeton
Shayne GostisbehereDJr.Union
Joakim RyanDSo.Cornell
Jason KasdorfGSo.Rensselaer

Here’s how last season’s PairWise Rankings would have looked with this season’s criteria

One of the most prominent questions from college hockey coaches and fans alike in the wake of the NCAA’s announcement of changes to the selection criteria for the national tournament has been about the real-world implications.

Would the 2013 tournament field look different if it had been selected using the new set of criteria?

In terms of which teams earned at-large bids? No.

Committee chair Jim Knowlton of Rensselaer said the Division I Men’s Ice Hockey Committee used a number of analyses to determine how to adjust the selection criteria, which we represent here as the PairWise Rankings.

We asked to see how last season would have looked in the 2013-14 formula, and the NCAA agreed to release that information, which we’re including below.

The field would include the same 16 teams, although six of them would have different seeds:

• Minnesota State and North Dakota would have flipped seeds, with the Mavericks a No. 2 seed and UND in the No. 3 band.

• Wisconsin and Yale would have moved into No. 3 seeds, bumping Niagara and Denver to No. 4 seeds.

The top five spots in the PairWise are identical in each algorithm.

Here’s the NCAA’s representation of the 2012-13 season in the 2013-14 criteria (sorry in advance about the formatting; I’m working on that):

Rank Team                Record   PWCs    RPI  RK
-------------------------------------------------
  1  Quinnipiac         27- 7- 5 58- 0 | 57.06  1
  2  Minnesota          26- 8- 5 57- 1 | 56.70  2
  3 *UMass Lowell       26-10- 2 55- 3 | 56.06  3
  4 *Notre Dame         25-12- 3 55- 3 | 54.98  4
  5  Miami              24-11- 5 53- 5 | 54.89  5
  6  New Hampshire      19-11- 7 53- 5 | 54.48  6
  7  Boston College     22-11- 4 52- 6 | 54.44  7
  8  Minnesota State    24-13- 3 50- 8 | 54.28  8
  9  North Dakota       21-12- 7 49- 9 | 54.15  9
 10 *Union              21-12- 5 49- 9 | 53.89 10
 11 *Wisconsin          22-12- 7 48-10 | 53.83 12
 12  Yale               18-12- 3 46-12 | 53.63 14
 13  Niagara            23- 9- 5 45-13 | 53.86 11
 14  Denver             20-13- 5 45-13 | 53.81 13
 15  St Cloud           23-15- 1 43-15 | 53.62 15
 16  Western Michigan   19-11- 8 43-15 | 53.18 16
 17  Providence         17-14- 7 43-15 | 52.87 17
 18  Rensselaer         18-14- 5 41-17 | 52.49 18
 19  Boston University  21-16- 2 40-18 | 52.36 19
 20  Colorado College   18-19- 5 39-19 | 52.25 20
 21  Brown              16-14- 6 37-21 | 51.78 21
 22  Cornell            15-16- 3 37-21 | 51.46 22
 23  Ferris State       16-16- 5 36-22 | 51.12 23
 24  Robert Morris      20-14- 4 35-23 | 51.11 24
 25  Dartmouth          15-14- 5 35-23 | 51.05 25
 26  St Lawrence        18-16- 4 32-26 | 50.99 26
 27  Ohio State         16-17- 7 32-26 | 50.85 27
 28  Nebraska Omaha     19-18- 2 31-27 | 50.79 28
 29  Alaska             17-16- 4 31-27 | 50.64 29
 30  Michigan           18-19- 3 28-30 | 50.46 30
 31  Holy Cross         20-14- 3 28-30 | 50.06 31
 32  Northern Michigan  15-19- 4 28-30 | 50.01 32
 33  Merrimack          15-17- 6 26-32 | 49.98 33
 34  Air Force          17-13- 7 26-32 | 49.91 34
 35  Connecticut        19-14- 4 24-34 | 49.80 35
 36  Mercyhurst         19-17- 5 23-35 | 49.63 36
 37  Bowling Green      15-21- 5 23-35 | 49.39 37
 38 *Canisius           19-18- 5 21-37 | 49.19 38
 39  Colgate            14-18- 4 21-37 | 49.03 39
 40  Minnesota Duluth   14-19- 5 19-39 | 48.78 40
 41  Penn State         11-12- 0 18-40 | 48.77 41
 42  Maine              11-19- 8 16-42 | 48.43 42
 43  Lake Superior      17-21- 1 16-42 | 48.42 43
 44  Michigan Tech      13-20- 4 16-42 | 48.25 44
 45  Michigan State     14-25- 3 15-43 | 48.08 45
 46  Vermont            11-19- 6 14-44 | 48.04 46
 47  Princeton          10-16- 5 12-46 | 47.96 47
 48  RIT                15-18- 5 11-47 | 47.90 48
 49  Massachusetts      12-19- 3 11-47 | 47.90 49
 50  Clarkson            9-20- 7  9-49 | 47.29 50
 51  Harvard            10-19- 3  8-50 | 47.21 51
 52  American Int'l     12-17- 6  7-51 | 46.56 52
 53  Northeastern        9-21- 4  6-52 | 45.49 53
 54  Bentley            12-20- 3  5-53 | 45.06 54
 55  Bemidji State       6-22- 8  4-54 | 44.58 55
 56  Alaska-Anchorage    4-25- 7  3-55 | 43.56 56
 57  Army                7-22- 5  2-56 | 42.60 57
 58  Alabama-Huntsville  1-20- 1  1-57 | 38.38 58
 59  Sacred Heart        2-30- 4  0-58 | 38.18 59

You can see how last year’s PairWise and NCAA tournament actually shook out in this edition of Bracketology.

The order of teams from last year’s PairWise was:

1 Quinnipiac
2 Minnesota
3 Massachusetts-Lowell
4 Notre Dame
5 Miami
6 Boston College
7 New Hampshire
8 North Dakota
9 Denver
10 Niagara
11 Minnesota State
12 Union
13 St. Cloud State
14 Wisconsin
15 Yale
16 Canisius

Canisius, of course, was the Atlantic Hockey tournament champion and received an automatic bid.

Is the change worth much if it produces the same result in terms of deciding which teams get at-large bids? The committee wanted to be cautious about changes because of the new conference landscape and not yet knowing how that would impact things, but this could be considered overcautious.

But I guess we’ll have to let it play out and see what happens.

Massachusetts-Lowell, Boston College tie for top spot in Hockey East preseason coaches’ poll

Massachusetts-Lowell and Boston College each received 104 voting points to forge a first-place tie in the Hockey East preseason coaches’ poll released Tuesday.

Lowell earned seven first-place votes, while BC tallied the other four.

In addition, the Hockey East Writers & Broadcasters’ Association conducted their own poll and named a preseason all-conference team

2013 HOCKEY EAST PRESEASON COACHES’ POLL

School (First-Place Votes)Total Points
1 (tie). Massachusetts-Lowell (7)104
1 (tie). Boston College (4)104
3 (tie). New Hampshire84
3 (tie). Notre Dame84
5. Providence79
6. Boston University67
7. Merrimack54
8. Maine45
9. Vermont34
10. Massachusetts32
11. Northeastern28

2013 HEWBA PRESEASON POLL

School (First-Place Votes)Total Points
1. Massachusetts-Lowell (26)384
2. Boston College (8)365
3. Notre Dame (1)317
4. Providence (1)294
5. New Hampshire273
6. Boston University (1)235
7. Merrimack185
8. Maine138
9. Vermont117
10. Massachusetts71
11. Northeastern63

2013 HEWBA PRESEASON ALL-CONFERENCE TEAM

PlayerPositionClassSchool
Mike CollinsFSr.Merrimack
Johnny GaudreauFJr.Boston College
Joseph PendenzaFSr.Massachusetts-Lowell
Michael MathesonDSo.Boston College
Trevor van RiemsdykDJr.New Hampshire
Jon GilliesGSo.Providence

Hockey East/Big Ten Challenge to offer ‘tremendous opportunity to build a relationship’

With the Big Ten joining college hockey, 11 of the country’s most storied programs will compete this fall in 13 games in the inaugural Big Ten/Hockey East Challenge.

Both conferences made the announcement Tuesday.

Thirteen designated games will be played between October 18-27, with six games in Hockey East arenas on the first weekend, followed by six games in Big Ten arenas and a single game on neutral ice the second
weekend.

“The Big Ten/Hockey East Challenge will offer a tremendous opportunity to build a relationship between our two conferences and to promote the strong traditions of college hockey on a national level,” said Big Ten associate commissioner Jennifer Heppel in a statement. “The student-athletes will also benefit from the chance to take part in meaningful nonconference competition against other top programs.”

“The college hockey landscape is going through a major change this season and each conference needs to look beyond its familiar boundaries,” added Hockey East commissioner Joe Bertagna. “We have great respect for the hockey-playing institutions in the Big Ten and we hope to develop this concept to allow all of our programs to participate in this competition in future years.”

The Big Ten/Hockey East Challenge Cup will be presented to the conference that records the most points from the 13 games. Teams will earn points as follows: two points for a win, one point for a tie and a bonus point for a road win.

Should a Big Ten school utilize a shootout in any of its home games, it will not factor into the result.

Should each conference record the same number of points, the results of the Penn State-Vermont neutral-site game in Philadelphia on Oct. 26 will serve as the tiebreaker.

Big Ten/Hockey East Challenge Schedule

(All times EST and 7 p.m. unless noted)

Friday, October 18
Wisconsin at Boston College
Michigan State at Massachusetts
Michigan at New Hampshire (7:30 p.m.)

Saturday, October 19
Wisconsin at Boston University
Michigan State at Massachusetts
Michigan at New Hampshire

Friday, October 25
Boston College at Minnesota (8 p.m.)*
Boston University at Michigan#
UMass Lowell at Michigan State@

Saturday, October 26
Boston University at Michigan State
UMass Lowell at Michigan#
Penn State vs. Vermont % (Philadelphia – 5 p.m.)

Sunday, October 27
Boston College at Minnesota (2 p.m.)^

* Big Ten Network
# XFINITY Channel 900
@ Fox Sports Detroit
% Comcast Philadelphia and New England
^ Fox Sports North and Sports Time Ohio

New Hampshire’s Parkhurst wins Concannon Hockey East Media Award

Hockey East announced on Tuesday that New Hampshire broadcaster Dan Parkhurst has been named the 22nd recipient of the Joe Concannon Hockey East Media Award.

Parkhurst, who will work UNH games on television and radio during the 2013-14 season, will also call select games for the NBC Sports Network this season.

In addition to his broadcasting work, the 2013-14 season will mark Parkhurst’s 17th year as Hockey East’s website designer and coordinator. He also assists in the league’s public relations department with
multimedia solutions, as well as with day-to-day online duties and game-night updates.

During the 1997-98 season, Parkhurst called the Hockey East Online Game of the Week, one of the first online broadcasts of college hockey on the Internet. He has also covered Boston College and Merrimack.

USCHO.com’s Jim Connelly won the Concannon Award in 2012.

Minnesota starts year No. 1 in women’s D-I poll

Defending national champion Minnesota starts the 2013-14 season where it ended 2012-13 – ranked in the top spot of the USCHO.com Division I Women’s Poll.

The Gophers earned 14 of 15 first-place votes, with No. 2 Boston College getting the other No. 1 nod.

Clarkson comes in at No. 3, followed by Cornell at No. 4 and then Boston University in the fifth spot.

At No. 6 is Wisconsin, Mercyhurst sits seventh, North Dakota eighth, Harvard at No. 9 and Northeastern at No. 10 rounds out the first poll of the season.

Selection criteria changes born from coaches’ wishes, committee chair says

The process that selects at-large teams for the Division I men’s NCAA tournament is undergoing a big shakeup, with wins on the road and against the nation’s better teams getting extra emphasis.

The changes to the NCAA formula, which USCHO represents with the PairWise Rankings, were rolled out on Friday after months of discussions by the Division I Men’s Ice Hockey Committee. (See the NCAA’s full explanation here.)

They also involve the elimination of the teams under consideration criterion that limited the number of teams that were compared against each other.

Those actions reflect what the committee heard from coaches at their annual meeting in Florida in April, said incoming chair Jim Knowlton, the athletic director at Rensselaer.

“Their voice was pretty loud on the fact that they would like to see the committee look at both the home-and-away piece and then also the teams under consideration piece,” said Knowlton, who took over as committee chair at the start of September. “Both of those had the potential to have an impact on the selection criteria, and so that’s what the committee since Naples in April has looked at. What you saw come out of the NCAA was what the committee thought made the most sense for college hockey.”

Some coaches apparently were in the dark about the move as late as Thursday, and they made their schedules for this season not knowing for sure there would be more weight placed on road wins than on home wins.

Outgoing committee chair Tom Nevala, the senior associate athletic director at Notre Dame, said in May that the committee had to be careful on criteria changes because of uncertainty on how the new conference structures in place this season would impact the math.

But Knowlton said the committee studied a number of scenarios before deciding on changes and added that the new look for the selection criteria has been discussed for years.

“It’s something like most things that committees decide on: It’s not going to please everybody,” Knowlton said. “I think if you keep in mind what’s best for college hockey, usually you won’t go wrong. I know that it was a long discussion at the coaches meetings, so I know everyone at least was engaged with it.”

The changes are being made to the Ratings Percentage Index, one of the scores on which teams are compared in the PairWise. (See last season’s PairWise explanation here.)

Wins on the road and losses at home will be counted at 120 percent of their RPI value. Wins at home and losses on the road are worth 80 percent.

In addition, the NCAA is reinstituting a quality wins bonus but giving it a different look from when it was used from 2003 to 2007.

Back then, the bonus points were given for nonconference wins over teams in the top 15 of the RPI. Now, teams get points for wins against teams in the top 20 of the RPI on a sliding scale — five points for a win over the team ranked first, 4.75 for beating No. 2 and all the way to 0.25 for downing No. 20.

Those bonuses are also weighted for location, again at 120 percent for a road win, 100 percent for a neutral-site win and 80 percent for a home win.

The QWB, as the NCAA is calling it, is added to a team’s RPI after it is divided by the weighted number of games.

Some in the committee wanted a heavier weighting scale to be used, Knowlton said.

“We really wanted not to make this a drastic change,” he said. “We wanted to look at this, see what made sense. If we were going to err, we were going to err on the side of more conservative, see how this affected selection and then have a chance to go back to the coaching body and say, ‘OK, what did you think? Let’s get some feedback.'”

As those elements of the PairWise change, one is going away altogether.

Nevala said in June that the committee wanted to reduce the variability in which teams qualified as a team under consideration to make it more cut-and-dried which were in the mix.

It did so by eliminating the criterion that compared teams records to others in the group of teams under consideration, most recently those at .500 or better in the RPI.

Now, all 59 Division I schools will be compared against every other team using three criteria: RPI (including the quality wins bonus), head-to-head record and record against common opponents.

There was no indication the requirement that a team had to have a winning percentage of .500 or better has changed.

Putting more emphasis on road success may be the committee’s way of encouraging schools to reduce the disparity of home games played by teams from different conferences.

With a 20-game conference schedule, the six Big Ten schools have at least 14 nonconference games to schedule. This season, those games are taking place in Big Ten buildings more often than not.

Big Ten schools average nine home nonconference games this season and four on the road.

Compare that to the 12 Atlantic Hockey schools, who have a 27-game schedule and are averaging 1.75 nonconference home games per team and four on the road.

Encouraging big-name schools to play more road games may be an “unintended consequence,” Knowlton said.

“It may be something that happens as a result of this, but I think it really is all about rewarding teams that are on the road for a road win, which we all know is harder than a home win. That may be a second- or third-order effect, which is fine. But that’s I don’t think what the intent of the committee was.”

Regardless of the intent, Rochester Institute of Technology coach Wayne Wilson said it’s what needs to happen.

Wilson pointed to the disparity earlier this summer when talking about a push from some for on-campus regional games for the NCAA tournament.

Friday, he said the big schools’ ratio of home games to road games doesn’t need to be 1-to-1 but better than it is now.

“They do bring a lot of attention, whether it be Big Ten teams or whatever, to college hockey,” Wilson said. “They’re our driving force. RIT’s not going to be able to drive it, along with some of the smaller schools. But I think in all fairness, they do have to go on the road more than what they have in the past. And I think that just betters college hockey in general.”

Wilson, however, has a home game against Michigan on the schedule this season, and his team might not get as much out of a win in that game this year as it would have last year.

“I think we’ll play this and we’ll maybe find other holes in it,” Wilson said. “Or maybe we won’t — I hope we don’t.”

The changes were made by a committee that is fairly diverse when it comes to how the schools they represent will be impacted by the new criteria.

Knowlton’s Rensselaer team plays four of its 12 nonconference games at home, with five on the road and three at neutral sites. Army coach Brian Riley (1 home, 3 road) and Michigan Tech coach Mel Pearson (2 home, 6 road, 2 neutral) also have more road games than home games.

Minnesota associate athletic director Tom McGinnis (10 home, 4 road, 2 neutral), North Dakota AD Brian Faison (7 home, 3 road) and Vermont coach Kevin Sneddon (7 home, 4 road, 1 neutral) come from schools that play more home games than road games.

“I was very proud of the committee because they were really looking at what is best for college hockey,” Knowlton said. “I’m sure in the back of everyone’s mind — ‘How does this affect our league? How does this affect our school?’ — that may go through their mind. But really, this was about what’s the best thing for college hockey, for those 16 teams that we want to see in the NCAA tournament.”

Road wins, quality wins get boosts in changes to NCAA tournament selection criteria

The NCAA will consider road wins as more valuable than home wins in the formula that selects the at-large teams for the Division I men’s tournament starting this season.

Also, the Division I Men’s Ice Hockey Committee reintroduced a bonus system that rewards teams for victories over top-ranked teams in the Ratings Percentage Index and eliminated the criterion of comparing teams against other teams under consideration.

USCHO represents the selection criteria via the PairWise Rankings.

Stay with USCHO for more on the changes. In the meantime, here’s the memo on this year’s changes from the NCAA:

Division I Men’s Ice Hockey — 2013-14 Selection Criteria Changes

Ratings Percentage Index — Home and Away Weighting
The Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) is calculated using three factors with weightings as follows: 25% Winning Percentage, 21% Opponents’ Winning Percentage, and 54% Opponents’ Opponents’ Winning Percentage.

In calculation of the index, wins on the road and losses at home shall have a weighting factor of 1.2. Wins at home and losses on the road shall have a weighting factor of 0.8. All neutral-site games have a weighting factor of 1.0. A tie is one-half of a win and one-half of a loss, so home/road ties are treated accordingly for the teams involved.

Once the index has been fully established any team with an RPI that is adversely impacted by a win over any opponent shall have that game removed from the computation and its RPI recalculated based on remaining games.

Quality Wins Bonus
The Quality Wins Bonus is implemented to reward performance against the strongest competition, as measured by the top 20 teams in the RPI (calculated per above).

The maximum bonus of 5.00 points in any single game is earned with a win against the #1 team in the RPI. A bonus of 4.75 points is earned for a win against the #2 team, 4.50 is earned for a win against the #3 team, and so on until the smallest bonus of 0.25 points, which is earned for a win against the #20 team.

As a tie is one-half of a win, the bonus for a tie against any top 20 team is one-half of the corresponding win bonus against the same team.

The amount of bonus for any game is multiplied by the appropriate game-site factor consistent with the calculation of the RPI. If the win (or tie) takes place on the road the amount of bonus is multiplied by a factor of 1.2. If the win (or tie) takes place at home the amount of bonus is multiplied by a factor of 0.8. The bonus is unchanged for a win (or tie) at a neutral site.

Once the total bonus points have been calculated they are divided by the total weighting of all games played per the RPI calculation (with road wins/home losses weighted with a factor of 1.2 and home wins/road losses weighted with a factor of 0.8). The resulting Quality Wins Bonus (QWB) is added to the original RPI to obtain the final RPI for each team. This is the value to be used in comparing any two teams, along with the other selection criteria.

Record Against Teams with 50.00 or greater RPI
The selection criterion of Record Against Teams with an RPI of 50.00 or greater has been eliminated. Correspondingly, all Division I teams are compared against one another using the criteria of RPI (including QWB), head-to-head record, and record against common opponents.

Rensselaer adds ex-Holy Cross women’s assistant Alfama to Engineers’ staff

Rensselaer announced Thursday the hiring of former Holy Cross assistant women’s coach Derek Alfama as a new assistant women’s coach with the Engineers.

“Derek is a tireless worker and will bring great deal of experience and energy to our program,” said PRI head coach John Burke in a statement. “He has been both successful on the ice and as a recruiter. We are very fortunate to have Derek be part of the RPI family.”

Alfama was an assistant with Holy Cross from 2011-13 and an assistant at Norwich from 2008-11.

A 1996 graduate of Norwich, Alfama was a four-year member of the Cadets’ men’s team, serving as team captain during his senior season.

CHA coaches pick Mercyhurst to finish atop ’13-14 standings

Last year’s CHA tournament champion and NCAA tournament participant, Mercyhurst, collected five of six first-place votes to sit atop the league’s preseason coaches’ poll that was announced Thursday.

Mercyhurst garnered 25 total points, with Robert Morris getting the other first-place nod and finishing third.

2013 CHA PRESEASON COACHES’ POLL

Team (First-Place Votes)Total Points
1. Mercyhurst (5)25
2. Syracuse19
3. Robert Morris (1)18
4. Rochester Institute of Technology13
5. Lindenwood9
6. Penn State6

Defending national champion Minnesota picked to win WCHA women’s conference

Minnesota has won the last two women’s Frozen Four championships and according to a preseason poll of the WCHA head coaches, the Gophers are the pick to win the conference in 2013-14.

Minnesota garnered seven of eight first-place votes and 49 of a possible 50 voting points.

2013 WCHA PRESEASON COACHES’ POLL

Team (First-Place Votes)Total Points
1. Minnesota (7)49
2. Wisconsin (1)42
3. North Dakota36
4. Ohio State31
5. Minnesota-Duluth27
6. Minnesota State17
7. (tie) Bemidji State11
7. (tie) St. Cloud State11

In addition, Minnesota sophomore forward Hannah Brandt (five votes) earned preseason player of the year honors and Wisconsin senior goalie Alex Rigsby (three votes) also earned votes.

As well, Minnesota forward Dani Cameranesi (three votes) was named preseason rookie of the year. Wisconsin forward Sarah Nurse (two votes), Bemidji State goaltender Brittni Mowat, North Dakota defenseman Halli Krzyaniak and Minnesota-Duluth forward Ashleigh Brykaliuk (all with one vote) also received votes.

NCHC media tabs Miami as team to beat in preseason poll

In the first-ever NCHC preseason poll, Miami was picked to win the conference, as announced Thursday at the NCHC Media Day in Minneapolis, Minn.

The poll was voted on by a total of 16 media members (two from each NCHC team) who regularly cover their respective teams.

The RedHawks received a total of 115 points, including seven first-place votes.

2013 NCHC PRESEASON MEDIA POLL

Team (First-Place Votes)Total Points
1. Miami (7)115
2. North Dakota (5)109
3. St. Cloud State (4)99
4. Denver66
5. Western Michigan61
6. Minnesota-Duluth43
7. Colorado College42
8. Nebraska-Omaha41

Wisconsin favored in Big Ten preseason poll; Minnesota’s Rau unanimous player to watch

Wisconsin is the preseason favorite for the inaugural season of the Big Ten, as voted on by the league’s coaches and announced Thursday.

In addition, the coaches also selected a preseason Players to Watch list, highlighted by unanimous selection Kyle Rau from Minnesota.

2013 PRESEASON BIG TEN COACHES’ POLL

School
1. Wisconsin
2. Minnesota
3. Michigan
4. (tie) Michigan State
4. (tie) Ohio State
6. Penn State

2013 PRESEASON BIG TEN PLAYERS TO WATCH

Player's NamePositionClassSchool
Mac BennettDSr.Michigan
Matt BerryFJr.Michigan State
Ryan DzingelFJr.Ohio State
Alex GuptillFJr.Michigan
Jake HildebrandGSo.Michigan State
Nic KerdilesFSo.Wisconsin
Jake McCabeDJr.Wisconsin
Max McCormickFJr.Ohio State
Michael MerschFSr.Wisconsin
Kyle RauFJr.Minnesota
Mike ReillyDSo.Minnesota
Adam WilcoxGSo.Minnesota
Mark ZengerleFSr.Wisconsin

Maine women’s coach Lewis placed on paid leave as school investigates possible violations

Maine women’s head coach Maria Lewis has been placed on paid administrative leave pending an investigation of “potential personnel and NCAA compliance issues,” the school announced Tuesday.

Lewis’ leave began on Sept. 16.

The school is looking at whether Maine violated NCAA bylaws restricting the number of hours Maine players spent in activities directed or supervised by the coaching staff.

Maine has not announced if an interim coach will be in place when the Black Bears open the season at Boston College on Oct. 6.

Checking In: Former Ohio State player Matt Bartkowski

Matt Bartkowski had 11 goals and 38 points in 80 games at Ohio State (photo: Jamie Sabau/Ohio State Athletics).

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories checking in with college hockey personalities, past and present.

Matt Bartkowski’s locker was tucked in the far right corner of the room last season at TD Garden, right next to a garbage can. It was the farthest stall from the exit and the closest to the shower. Clearly, though it was posh NHL quarters overall, his nook was not prime real estate.

Such is life for a rookie — called up on an emergency basis, no less — on a Boston Bruins team loaded with veterans.

But things might be changing for this former Ohio State Buckeyes player. He authored up a solid, impromptu performance on the blue line in the postseason as Boston won the Eastern Conference for the second time in three seasons. And now that free agency has opened a few spots on Boston’s defensive depth chart, Bartkowski might just earn a full-time NHL gig this season.

And who knows, maybe he’ll improve his locker logistics along the way.

Bartkowski worked over the summer on his 6-foot-1, 196-pound frame as he tried to maintain his spring momentum. He was promoted from the AHL in Round 1 — as the Bruins battled the Toronto Maple Leafs — due to injuries suffered by veterans Andrew Ference, Wade Redden and Dennis Seidenberg.

And although he didn’t play in every Bruins playoff game, Bartkowski, 25, stuck with the big club for the remainder of the run and gained priceless experience on what a grueling grind the NHL postseason can be. He also acquired a mean playoff beard in the process.

Bartkowski talked to USCHO about the past, present and future. Here’s an edited transcript of that conversation:

USCHO: You played in seven playoff games for the Bruins, but didn’t take the ice in the final two rounds vs. Pittsburgh and Chicago. Was that frustrating after contributing to series wins over the Maple Leafs and Rangers?

Bartkowski: At times, yeah, but we have a team-first mentality here, and whatever’s best for the team is what I want to do. If that means take the ice and go out there and play, or that means get out there in the morning skate, push the guys, then head upstairs and watch the game in a suit, then, whatever they need. It’s a great experience one way or the other, and you just try to embrace it and appreciate it.

USCHO: You had a goal and an assist in seven postseason games, and the Bruins went 5-2 during your time on the ice. Surely, you wanted to be out there more, but those are positives, right?

Bartkowski: Absolutely. There’s a lot of depth here, and when it’s your time, you have to be ready. I think that’s one of the things the postseason really showed here in Boston, is the depth this team has built up, and its ability to really plug holes when needed. Things happen, the playoffs can be a marathon, and players can get banged up. To have depth at that time of year in your organization can be huge.

USCHO: You played in 80 games for the Buckeyes, had 27 assists, and really had a taste of what life was like in the CCHA. Do you think it’s a good thing that Ohio State will now be a part of the Big Ten hockey conference?

Bartkowski: It’s where the college game is headed, and it will be good exposure with television and all, so sure. I’ll always have the memories of the CCHA. Playing at Ohio State was an honor for me. To be a part of that program, to be close to home, it was a privilege for sure.

USCHO: You grew up in Pittsburgh and had a lot of opportunities to work on your game because your high school, Mt. Lebanon, had its own rink. That was rare back then, but it’s becoming more common in Western Pennsylvania, and the region is producing many college and pro players now. Do you keep tabs on your area?

Matt Bartkowski is part of a strong crop of American defensemen (photo: Will Shilling/Ohio State Athletics).

Bartkowski: I do, and there’s been a lot of ebbs and flows in American hockey at the youth level in a lot of areas, and Pittsburgh is definitely one of them. When a certain team has stars and is winning — like Pittsburgh was for me growing up with Mario Lemieux and Jaromir Jagr — you see a spike in the interest, in the amount of kids playing, and when that happens, it’s win-win for us. There was a bit of a lull in Pittsburgh when the Penguins weren’t so good, but ever since Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby have changed the scene, the game’s back to being where it was in Pittsburgh, and that’s great.

USCHO: American defensemen have been in the news lately, and you’re a part of that. Whether it’s Torey Krug and yourself making a charge through the postseason with the Bruins, or Seth Jones being selected No. 4 in the NHL Entry Draft, has it been a good time for you guys?

Bartkowski: It is, and the last 10 years, 15 years or so, American defenseman have really come a long way, and you start seeing their impact at our level. You see Torey and I in this locker room, we’ve come a long way, and Seth definitely adds to that. He has the talent, he certainly seems to have the mentality, and it’ll just be a matter of time before he’s contributing. I think it’s a great thing for American hockey.

USCHO: Speaking of the draft, you were a seventh-round selection of the Florida Panthers in 2008, the 190th player selected. Take us through your draft experience. Was it frustrating to have to wait until the final round and has that fueled you and inspired you throughout your career?

Bartkowski: Well, I don’t think about that much anymore. It was a long time ago, and I’m here now, and trying to do the best I can to stay here. At the time, yeah, it doesn’t really matter what round, to know that someone wants you, and selects you, it’s so sweet and I’ll always remember the feeling. Growing up playing hockey in this country, you never think it can happen. You hear things but you try not to worry about it. You focus on your work, you get ready, and when the call comes, wow, it was great.

Minnesota freshman Vannelli leaves school, next destination unknown

Minnesota announced Tuesday that freshman defenseman Tommy Vannelli has decided to leave the program before playing one game with the Gophers.

“After a few weeks of trying to balance academics and athletics, Tommy made the decision this morning that college hockey was not the best route for him at this time,” Minnesota coach Don Lucia said in a statement. “We accept his decision and will move on as a team.”

It is not clear where Vannelli will play this season, though his United States Hockey League rights belong to the Tri-City Storm and his major junior rights are with the Medicine Hat Tigers of the Western Hockey League.

Vannelli was drafted in the second round (47th overall) by the St. Louis Blues at the 2013 NHL draft.

Niagara picked to finish No. 1 in Atlantic Hockey preseason poll

Niagara has been picked to repeat as Atlantic Hockey regular-season champions by the league’s coaches in the 2013-14 preseason poll released Tuesday.

The Purple Eagles edged out Mercyhurst and Air Force as the top pick in a tightly-packed ranking. The Lakers and Falcons tied for second place.

Mercyhurst garnered the most first-place votes with four, followed by Niagara (three), playoff champions Canisius (three) and Air Force (two).

“It’s an honor to be chosen as the preseason pick,” said Niagara coach Dave Burkholder. “We’re not ordering plaques or trophies at this point, but Atlantic Hockey is a great league and being picked first is an honor.”

The lack of a clear frontrunner is recognition of last year’s standings and playoffs, which saw all but first and last place in play in the final regular-season weekend, and the sixth and seventh place teams advancing to the championship game.

“I talked to several coaches and we were chuckling about the poll,” Air Force coach Frank Serratore said. “I kept re-doing mine. I would think, ‘how can I have this team in ninth place,’ or ‘Wait, what about this team?’ We’re picked third and I’d take that right now. I’d take fourth right now. Because if you fall behind early in the season, you’ll never get to the top four. There are just too many good teams.”

Rochester Institute of Technology coach Wayne Wilson echoed Serratore’s comments.

“We had a tough time with [filling out] the poll,” he said. “Not just picking the top half, but the bottom half as well. Niagara got three first-place votes, but the fourth place team [Canisius] also got three first-place votes. That’s how close we think things will be.”

Team (First-Place Votes)Total Points
1. Niagara (3)102
2 (tie). Mercyhurst (4)98
2 (tie). Air Force (2)98
4. Canisius (3)92
5. Rochester Institute of Technology81
6. Connecticut79
7. Robert Morris66
8. Holy Cross59
9. Bentley53
10. Army28
11. American International22
12. Sacred Heart16

Clarkson heads up ECAC women’s preseason team, preseason poll

Clarkson is the ECAC women’s coaches’ pick to win the conference this season, as announced Tuesday in the annual preseason poll.

The Golden Knights received seven of 12 first-place votes and also placed three players on the ECAC women’s preseason all-conference team.

2013 ECAC PRESEASON COACHES’ POLL

Team (First-Place Votes)Total Points
1. Clarkson (7)117
2. Cornell (5)111
3. Harvard99
4. Quinnipiac94
5. St. Lawrence78
6. Dartmouth75
7. Princeton56
8. Rensselaer46
9. Colgate43
10. Yale37
11. Brown26
12. Union11

2013 ECAC PRESEASON ALL-CONFERENCE TEAM

Player's NamePositionClassTeam
Erica HoweGSr.Clarkson
Sarah EdneyDJr.Harvard
Erin AmbroseDSo.Clarkson
Kelly BabstockFSr.Quinnipiac
Jamie Lee RattrayFSr.Clarkson
Jillian SaulnierFJr.Cornell

Television schedules taking shape; ESPN getting back into regular season coverage

An ESPN camera operator works at the 2010 Frozen Four in Detroit (photo: Jim Rosvold).

One of the great promises of Big Ten hockey was the additional national exposure the conference could bring in the form of a national television schedule.

We’ve seen the commitment made for the conference’s debut season, and it has some impressive elements.

The Big Ten and its six teams rolled out the core of their 2013-14 TV schedules on Monday and advertised some big numbers:

• At least 70 games overall.

• 34 games on either the Big Ten Network, ESPNU or ESPNews.

• 36 games on Fox Sports regional networks, with more on local channels in the home markets.

The addition of the ESPN family of networks stood out to me in that it has been a few years since we’ve seen college hockey out of Bristol before the start of the NCAA tournament.

An ESPN spokesperson said the seven Big Ten games on either ESPNU or ESPNews came as part of the network’s most recent rights extension with the conference.

We’ve heard complaints over the years that ESPN doesn’t show up on the college hockey scene until the last 15 games of the season, and while seven games isn’t a whole lot out of the 1,000 or so that get played in the regular season, it’s a start.

It has been pointed out by Andy Johnson at Bucky’s 5th Quarter that Wisconsin athletic director Barry Alvarez once claimed BTN would show upwards of 40 games a season. Twenty-seven doesn’t quite reach that number, so I’ll be interested to hear why the actual figure didn’t reach the projected one.

For the Big Ten as a whole, will the TV schedule help in winning over those soured by the teams’ departure from the WCHA and the CCHA? Only time will tell.

With the Big Ten schedules, those for NCHC teams (the league has a deal with CBS Sports Network) and other schools that have publicized TV schedules, we have 162 games in our composite TV schedule for the 2013-14 season. There will be more to come from Hockey East, which announces its TV schedule at its media day on Sept. 24, and when NBC Sports Network reveals its plans.

Click here to see our TV schedule, and send email here to let us know of other TV schedules we can add.

Latest Stories from around USCHO