Home Blog Page 1305

Ehgoetz, Ross Top CHA Award List

Junior forwards Barret Ehgoetz (Niagara) and Jared Ross (Alabama-Huntsville) have been selected as the CHA’s co-players of the year as well as earning unanimous recognition as first-team all-conference selections.

CHA regular-season champion Bemidji State had a pair of individuals honored; freshman Luke Erickson was named the league Rookie of the Year and Tom Serratore the Coach of the Year. In a vote of league coaches, Ehgoetz and Ross were named first-team selections on all eligible ballots, as was fellow junior Brendan Cook of Bemidji State.

The First Team All-CHA defensemen are Bemidji State senior Bryce Methven, also a unanimous selection, and Alabama-Huntsville sophomore Jeremy Schreiber. Niagara sophomore goalie Jeff VanNynatten rounds out the first-team.

Ehgoetz, a second-team All-CHA pick last season, shares the national lead in scoring with 50 points, on 25 goals and 25 assists. That ties him for second on the league’s all-time single-season scoring list. He recorded a hat trick, Oct. 25, in leading the Purple Eagles to a 5-2 win over then top-ranked New Hampshire.

Ross, one of two repeat First Team selections, became the first CHA player to earn the College Sports Television/Hockey Commissioners’ Association national player of the month award after scoring 11 goals and 21 points in 10 games in January. He led the nation in points per game and assists per game, tallying 30 assists and 47 points in 30 game. Cook led Bemidji State with 23 goals and 39 points through the regular season. He is currently second in the nation in game-winning goals (7), tied for second in shorthanded goals (5) and tied for fourth in power-play goals (10).

For leading his team to its first CHA title, Serratore was named the league’s Coach of the Year by his peers. In his third season at the Beaver helm, he led BSU to a 16-3-1 league mark and a 19-12-3 overall record. In three seasons, he has compiled an overall record of 45-44-16.

Meanwhile, Methven also is a repeat First Team selection after anchoring a defensive corps that led the league in scoring defense (2.59) and fewest shots allowed per game (24.76). Schreiber earned all-rookie honors last year and has become the league’s only defenseman this season to reach double figures in goals, scoring 10 while adding 11 assists for 21 points. VanNynatten earns First Team all-conference honors after finishing 10th nationally in winning percentage (.673) while leading the CHA with 16 victories and a pair of shutouts.

The All-CHA Second Team is led by Niagara senior Joe Tallari. The coaches’ preseason choice for league player of the year honors, and a Hobey Baker Award finalist a year ago, Tallari started the season slowly but finished tied for fourth in scoring with 31 points on 14 goals and 17 assists.

Three of the six members of the league’s all-rookie team were unanimous picks, led by CHA rookie of year Luke Erickson of Bemidji State.

The CHA all-academic team consists of 50 players representing all six league institutions. Air Force senior Mike Polidor becomes the first goalie in league history to earn the student-athlete of the year award while being named to the academic squad for the third consecutive year. An astronautical engineering major, he has a 3.89 grade point average.

2004 All-College Hockey America Teams

First Team

F Brendan Cook, Jr., Bemidji State
F Barret Ehgoetz, Jr., Niagara
F Jared Ross, Jr., Ala.-Huntsville
D Bryce Methven, Sr., Bemidji State
D Jeremy Schreiber, So., Ala.-Huntsville
G Jeff VanNynatten, So., Niagara

Second Team

F Riley Riddell, Jr., Bemidji State
F Joe Tallari, Sr., Niagara
F Kris Wiebe, Jr., Findlay
D Peter Jonsson, Jr., Bemidji State
D Andrew Lackner, So., Niagara
G Grady Hunt, Sr., Bemidji State

All-Rookie Team

F Mike Batovanja, Fr., Findlay
F Luke Erickson, Fr., Bemidji State
F Nate Higgins, Fr., Wayne State
D Kenny Macaulay, Fr., Findlay
D Pat Oliveto, Fr., Niagara
G Will Hooper, Fr., Findlay

CHA Co-Players of the Year — Barret Ehgoetz, Jr., C, Niagara; Jared Ross, Jr., C, Alabama-Huntsville

CHA Rookie of the Year — Luke Erickson, Fr., RW, Bemidji State

CHA Student-Athlete of the Year — Mike Polidor, Sr., G, Air Force

CHA Coach of the Year — Tom Serratore, Bemidji State

Academic Team

Air Force — Matt Bader, So., F; Buck Kozlowski, Sr., D; Ross Miller, Jr., D; Mike Polidor, Sr., G; Brooks Turnquist, So., D.

Alabama-Huntsville — Ryan Brown, Jr., D; Steve Milosevski, Sr., LW.

Bemidji State — Jesse Balsimo, Sr., D; Travis Barnes, Sr., F; Wade Chiodo, Sr., F; Brendan Cook, Jr., F; Lou Garritan, So., F; Jean-Guy Gervais, So., F; John Haider, Jr., D; Jared Hanowski, Sr., F; Ryan Huddy, So., F; Peter Jonsson, Jr., D; Andrew Martens, So., D; Bill Methven, Sr., F; Bryce Methven, Sr., D; Dannie Morgan, Sr., G; Andrew Murray, Jr., F; Anders Olsson, Sr., D.

Findlay — Mark Bastl, Jr., C; David Erickson, Jr., D; Nate Markus, Sr., D; Christian Olson, Sr., C; Paul Prefontaine, Jr., D; Andrew Radzak, So., C; Rigel Shaw, Jr., LW; Brian Sherry, Sr., C; David Vogt, Jr., LW; Aaron Weegar, Sr., LW; Kris Wiebe, Jr., RW.

Niagara — Shayne Baylis, Jr., D; Rob Bonk, Jr., G; Ryan Gale, Jr., F; Casey Handrahan, Jr., D; Brian Hartman, So., D; Dave Hominuk, Sr., D; Hannu Karru, Sr., F; Nick Kormanyos, Sr., F; Andrew Lackner, So., D; Jordan Meloff, Sr., F; Bryan Mills, So., D; Paul Muniz, Sr., F; Jeff VanNynatten, So., G.

Wayne State — Marc Carlson, Sr., G; Matt Kelly, So., G; Steve Kovalchik, So., D.

Norwich to Host D-III Men’s NCAA Championship

For the second straight year, Norwich will be the host institution for the NCAA Division III men’s ice hockey championship.

The semifinal games will be played Friday, March 19, at Kreitzberg Arena.

Top-ranked St. Norbert (26-2-2) will face Plattsburgh (23-4-3) in the 3:30 p.m. game, while defending champions Norwich (24-3) will face arch-rival Middlebury (25-3) at 7:00 p.m. on Friday.

Norwich's Kreitzberg Arena will host the D-III men's championship for a second straight year.

Norwich’s Kreitzberg Arena will host the D-III men’s championship for a second straight year.

Norwich was chosen because “they were the highest remaining seed that met the site selection criteria,” according to Chris Schneider, NCAA assistant director of championships. The NCAA men’s D-III hockey championships manual states that “the highest seeded team that meets all site selection criteria will be selected as the host institution, provided geographic proximity is maintained.”

Middlebury has announced that it will host the women’s D-III championship, but no official word from the NCAA had been released at the time of the men’s announcment.

The championship game will be Saturday night at 7:00 p.m.

This will be the third time that Norwich has hosted, and the first time that any institution has hosted the Divsion III men’s championship in back-to-back years.

Last year, Norwich knocked off Oswego, 2-1, in the championship game. Norwich also hosted in 1999, when Middlebury defeated Wisconsin-Superior, 5-0, to win the title.

Complete ticket information will be available Monday afternoon on the Norwich University web site at www.norwich.edu and at 802-485-2500.

UConn’s Olsen Tabbed AHA Player of Year

Connecticut junior forward Tim Olsen has been selected the inaugural Atlantic Hockey Player of the Year. The Atlantic Hockey Awards were voted upon by the league’s nine head coaches.

The Vadnais Heights, Minn., native led Atlantic Hockey in scoring, finishing the year with 19 goals, 18 assists for 38 points in conference play. His 19 goals was a league best while his 18 assists ranked him second amongst his peers. Olsen’s 38 points also gives him the Atlantic Hockey Regular Season Scoring Trophy. During the regular season, Olsen was named Atlantic Hockey Player of the Year four times.

Sacred Heart’s Pierre Luc-O’Brien garnered this year’s Atlantic Hockey Rookie of the Year honors. The freshman forward, who hails from Nicolet, Quebec, tallied nine goals, 12 assists for 21 points for the Pioneers this season.

Jamie Holden took home the Atlantic Hockey Goaltending Award. This award is presented to the goaltender that has the best goals against average during the regular season in Atlantic Hockey league games only. Holden, a junior from Telkwa, B.C., went 9-4-3 in league play, had a goals against average of 1.91 and saving percentage of .942.

Holy Cross coach Paul Pearl was tabbed the Atlantic Hockey Coach of the Year. The Crusaders skated to a 17-4-3 conference record and finished as the regular season Champions. Pearl now focuses his and his teams’ attention as the top seed in the Atlantic Hockey Tournament. Pearl’s overall record is 135-123-23.

Rounding out the other individual awards: The Best Defensive Forward Award went to Holy Cross senior captain Greg Kealey. The Best Defenseman Award belongs to Mercyhurst’s T.J. Kemp. Holy Cross’ Tim Coskren was given the Atlantic Hockey Sportsmanship Award. Coskren, a senior forward from Walpole, Mass., played 24 league games and only had three penalties for six minutes.

American International receives the Team Sportsmanship Trophy for lowest penalty minutes per game over the course the regular season in league play. The Yellow Jackets averaged 10.8 penalty minutes per game for 2003-04.

Atlantic Hockey All-Conference

First-Team

F Jeff Dams, Holy Cross
F Tim Olsen, Connecticut
F Guillaume Caron, AIC
D T.J. Kemp, Mercyhurst
D Eric Nelson, Connecticut
G Jamie Holden, Quinnipiac

Second-Team

F Garrett Larson, Sacred Heart
F Mike Carter Mercyhurst
F David Wrigley, Mercyhurst
D Reid Cashman, Quinnipiac
D Konn Hawkes, Sacred Heart
G Tony Quesada, Holy Cross

All-Rookie Team

F Pierre-Luc O’Brien, Sacred Heart
F Matt Scherer, Connecticut
F James Sixsmith, Holy Cross
D Reid Cashman, Quinnipiac
D Jamie Hunt, Mercyhurst
G Scott Tomes, Connecticut

This Week in the CHA: March 11, 2004

What is your favorite hockey move of all time: Slap Shot or Miracle?

In the CHA playoffs this year, you can take your pick. On Friday in Kearney, Wayne St and Alabama Huntsville will faceoff and one team may have to dress the Hanson brothers and in the other contest Findlay will play Air Force and Oiler coach Pat Ford will try and do the best Herb Brooks impression this side of Kurt Russell.

That’s before Niagara and regular season champ Bemidji State get a crack at the winners all with a trip to the NCAA Tournament on the line.

While the two teams with automatic bids may have the best shot at joining hockey’s frozen dance, with the Chargers possessing one of the league’s best players in Jared Ross, and the Oilers having so much pride on the line, the Warriors playing their best hockey of the season right now, and the Falcons as pesky as ever, nothing is guaranteed.

After all, this columnist had been preaching for weeks about last week’s supposedly dramatic final series between the Purple Eagles and the Beavers only to have the Oilers spoil those predictions. So let’s take a look at the tournament, starting with the first round.

No. 4 Findlay vs. No. 5 Air Force

With all due respect to Air Force and the valiant job that coach Frank Serratore does with that program under enormous handicaps, the sentimental favorite for this tournament is Findlay.

The next Oilers loss will be the last in program history. Findlay played its final home games ever last week-to crowds of 153 and 358 on Friday and Saturday-but ever since the school announced in January that this would be the team’s coup de grace the season has been only about one thing-the Findlay players and their resourceful coach.

“I told my team when this all went down that we could either fall apart or come together as a team,” Ford said. “This is something that we will never forget.”

The Oilers have certainly coalesced at the right time. The team is 5-2-1 in its last eight games, including a stunning sweep at Niagara two weeks ago that cost the Purple Eagles a chance at the CHA championship.

In that weekend against the Purple Eagles, the Oilers displayed an offensive ability that it had not before, scoring 14 goals. The team was able to rotate its lines and steamroll Niagara. The fearsome Barrett Ehgoetz line was held without a point. The defensemen are reinforced by two top-flight goaltenders in Jon Horrell and Will Hooper that have straight platooned all year.

In other words, Findlay is primed to upset someone.

“Nobody remembers what you do in November, December and January,” Ford said. “We played a very tough non-conference schedule. Look at how many members of the top-15 we played. That has put us in position for the playoffs.”

Air Force, however, won’t roll over so Ford can forestall his program’s demise. The Falcons emphatically snapped a four-game losing streak this past weekend at Wayne State. Co-captains Shane Saum and Spanky Leonard will not end their own college careers without giving their opponent a helluva fight.

Saum had two goals against the Warriors over the weekend and looks to get Leonard going. It’s tough to see Air Force pulling off a series of upsets this weekend, however. The team had a chance to be spoiler, playing Niagara and Bemidji on consecutive weekends in February and did not win a game.

However, the Falcons have had success against Findlay, going 2-1-1 this year. The final Air Force win, a 2-1 victory on Feb. 7 particularly stung the Oilers because they were winning with five minutes to go and Air Force’s Brian Gineo scored twice in the span of a minute to give his team the victory.

Findlay has tried to use that defeat as motivation before the weekend, but Ford also has a more well-known source of inspiration.

“If we do manage to somehow win it all, it would be our own version of a Miracle on Ice,” he said. “It would be a made-for-Hollywood script, the story of the Oilers. You never know.”

No. 3 Alabama-Huntsville vs. No. 6 Wayne State

The teaser lead-in at the top of the column compared this series to Slapshot, but actually you only need to look at the recent Philadelphia Flyers-Ottawa Senators matchup for a potential blueprint of this game.

When these two teams last met on Feb. 27, a 4-1 victory for the Warriors, the game features 187 penalty minutes, several major penalties and a game disqualification. Tempers flared and both teams took some liberties with each other.

More than any competition on the ice, the question is have tensions cooled?

“I would think that you won’t see what you saw in the last game because of the stakes involved,” said Wayne State coach Bill Wilkinson. “This is the playoffs and there just isn’t any room for it.”

Wayne State likes to play a physical game and last time the Chargers retaliated. The hitting should be fierce for this one game, but odds are that Wilkinson is right because no player wants to commit the fatal penalty that sends his team packing.

The only fear is that if the score gets out of hand, that’s when somebody may seek retribution. (Lest we forget, Todd Bertuzzi’s abomination occurred when his team was losing 8-2).

If this game is not marred by penalties than the match-up is fairly simple, UAH’s offense versus Wayne State’s defense and goaltending.

The Chargers feature a potent attack led by co-CHA Player of the Year Jared Ross. The Warriors counter with goaltender Matt Kelly, who made 80 saves two weeks ago when his team executed the sweep down in Huntsville.

This was the ideal first round for Wayne State because it’s sweep of UAH broke a 10 game winless streak and it followed that weekend by getting swept by Air Force. The Chargers could use the extra energy jolt as well, breaking a five game winless streak of its own by defeating the Oilers on the last game of the season.

UAH brings the most talent to the series, but Wayne State has one intangible factor-playoff tradition. To the extent that any CHA team has a track record, the Warriors have one, winning the last three CHA championships.

While few people on this present roster have actually hoisted the Bruce McLeod Trophy, the coaching staff, at the very least, is seasoned at Kearney.

“I think that our past record doesn’t help up so much as it just shows that its doable,” Wilkinson said. “We would like to win at least one playoff game.”

Hopefully, whichever team wins, they will have enough players left for the second round.

The Big Picture

Regardless of first round results, this tournament should belong to the two teams with the automatic bids. While a one-game upset is certainly possible for anybody, it is very difficult to win three straight games. All season long, the Purple Eagles and the Beavers have been the best two teams in the conference. They have the most offensive depth and quality goaltending. While Ross could get hot or Findlay’s goaltenders, the finals will and really ought to be Niagara vs. Bemidji, sentiment for the Oilers aside.

If the Beavers make the CHA finals, they will win the championship. This season has been about the maturation and ultimate reward of their magnificent senior class. Niagara fans should take some solace, their captain and co-CHA Player of the Year, Barrett Ehgoetz will return next year, all the more hungry for a championship.

Predictions

Findlay def. Air Force. The Oilers are playing the better hockey and will get the better goaltending.

Alabama-Huntsville def. Wayne State WSU will certainly make it tough, but the Chargers have too much offensive ability to not at least advance one more round.

Bemidji def. Findlay Here’s hoping that the CHA fans at Kearney all give the Oilers the ovation they deserve as they skate of the ice for the final time. Would’ve give the Oilers more of a shot of an upset if they played the Purple Eagles, because Niagara is not as consistent as Bemidji. But this is BSU’s year.

Niagara def. Alabama-Huntsville. Battle of the co-Player of the Year winners, Ross and Ehgoetz. Ehgoetz has the bigger supporting cast.

Bemidji def. Niagara Last Saturday, Bemidji destroyed the Purple Eagles, 5-0 to salvage a weekend split. Score won’t be as lopsided but the results remain the same.

CHA Awards

On Thursday, March 11, the CHA announced their end-of-the-year awards. Congratulations to the winners:

First Team

F-Brendan Cook, Jr., Bemidji State
F-Barret Ehgoetz, Jr., Niagara
F-Jared Ross, Jr., Ala.-Huntsville
D-Bryce Methven, Sr., Bemidji State
D-Jeremy Schreiber, So., Ala.-Huntsville
G-Jeff VanNynatten, So., Niagara

Second Team

F-Riley Riddell, Jr., Bemidji State
F-Joe Tallari, Sr., Niagara
F-Kris Wiebe, Jr., Findlay
D-Peter Jonsson, Jr., Bemidji State
D-Andrew Lackner, So., Niagara
G-Grady Hunt, Sr., Bemidji State

First Team, All-Rookie

F-Mike Batovanja, Fr., Findlay
F-Luke Erickson, Fr., Bemidji State
F-Nate Higgins, Fr., Wayne State
D-Kenny Macaulay, Fr., Findlay
D-Pat Oliveto, Fr., Niagara
G-Will Hooper, Fr., Findlay

CHA Co-Players of the Year-Barret Ehgoetz, Jr., C, Niagara; Jared Ross, Jr., C, Alabama-Huntsville
CHA Rookie of the Year-Luke Erickson, Fr., RW, Bemidji State
CHA Student-Athlete of the Year-Mike Polidor, Sr., G, Air Force
CHA Coach of the Year-Tom Serratore, Bemidji State

And Lastly….

I would be remiss if I didn’t extend my best wishes to Steve Moore for a speedy recovery. We were in the same class year at Harvard and so his injury particularly hit home. Moore was always a pleasure to cover and was an asset to the Crimson program and college hockey in general. The whole Moore clan, older brother Mark and younger brother Dom were all class acts. It was neat to watch Steve develop at the NHL-level and find a role amidst all the stars in Colorado. His game earlier this year against the New York Rangers where he squared off against his brother Dominic felt like the harbinger of good tidings for a deserving family.

I greatly look forward to the day when he dons an NHL uniform again, and I fervently hope that Bertuzzi doesn’t get to do so before Moore does.

This Week in Atlantic Hockey: March 11, 2004

It’s Showtime

Forget the regular season. Throw out all of the statistics.

Beginning today, none of that matters.

The second season is here and with it is the inaugural Atlantic Hockey tournament. This year’s tourney will be played at an entirely (well, semi-)neutral site in Army’s Tate Rink. The league’s top facility is expected to have solid crowds this weekend, particularly with Army playing in the tournament’s first game, Friday’s play-in.

“We’re excited,” said Army head coach Rob Riley. “We want to put on a good show with entertaining games. We have our own team and games to worry about so it’s a little bit distracting, but we’ll make sure this thing is run well.”

Despite the fact that Army’s students are on spring break this week, Riley still hopes that crowds will be good, particularly with the fact Army is favored to survive into a second day.

“I would guess we’ll have big crowds,” said Riley. “Last weekend we had 5,000 for the two games combined and we’ve sold more than 600 all-game passes and whatnot, so I think there will be some good crowds.”

Hopefully those crowds will be treated to top-notch hockey. Here, then, is a breakdown of how things will shake out:

Play-in Game
Friday, March 12, 7:00 ET

No. 8 Army (8-17-3, 6-15-3 AH) vs. No. 9 American Int’l (4-24-4, 3-17-4 AH)

Season Results: Army leads series, 2-1-1
October 18, 2003: at Army 2, American Int’l 1 (nonconference)
November 23, 2003: at American Int’l 4, Army 1
January 9, 2004: at Army 5, American Int’l 2
January 10, 2004: Army 2, at American Int’l 2 (OT)

The inaugural Atlantic Hockey tournament will open with a game unique to both its participants. With the playoff format change that now includes all teams, the tournament now features a “play-in” game between the lowest seeds — Army and AIC.

Tournament organizers might have been secretly excited when Army fell from the seventh seed to number eight last weekend, meaning that the gate for the play-in game would be significantly higher that if Army, the tournament’s host, wasn’t playing. Add to that the fact that Army is favored and suddenly this eighth-seeded team might pull in two large crowds for the league, if not more should upset city rear its head.

That, though, is not the thought process for Army head coach Rob Riley, who obviously would have preferred to give his club one fewer game in this tough playoff stretch. Still, Riley recognizes the excitement factor surrounding this weekend.

“It’s kind of a new experience for everybody,” said Riley. “We’re used to being the lower seed and heading on the road to play a quarterfinal game.”

Riley, never one to overlook AIC, did still mention that should his club advance, it would set up an interesting matchup with No. 1 Holy Cross.

“The team that wins on Friday has a little experience and has things turned around so there’s a little less pressure [against Holy Cross]. “The top teams have played well all game but now it’s a 60-minute game where if they fall behind they might be asking, ‘What’s going on?'”

AIC head coach Gary Wright agrees, but realizes that getting past this first game is a difficult enough task.

“We certainly have our work cut out for us, but that’s what we deserve [after finishing ninth],” said Wright. “One of the great lines from Rob Riley on media day was when he mentioned that not only was his club in the playoffs, but they also have home ice.”

Regardless of seeding, any team that faces Army this weekend will be playing what amounts to a road game against a team that had five of its eight wins at home this season.

“I think that perhaps makes it more intriguing,” said Wright. “It will be a real playoff atmosphere in that first game on Friday.”

When talking pressure, one would think that there’s little on AIC, the underdog no matter who it faces, but particularly against host Army Friday night. Wright, though, says that’s not completely true.

“In one respect going into these playoffs, there’s not as much pressure,” said Wright. “But on the other hand, we’ve had a rough season so there is a little bit of an edge and it would help us if we had some success in the playoffs.”

The key in this opening game is goaltending. Army’s Brad Roberts was all-league last season in the MAAC but struggled this year due to what Riley classified as a breakdown in team defense. It got to the point that Riley gave senior Billy Moss three of the final four starts of the season and saw, initially, some positive signs.

But a rocky performance last week for Moss against Connecticut combined with Roberts’ experience will make the sophomore Riley’s choice for the playoffs.

“Billy Moss put together a couple of good games, but … Brad has been the experienced guy so I think that we’re going to have to turn that way for the weekend,” said Riley.

His club will face a goaltender who doesn’t posses the best record in the country but is near tops in the nation in save percentage. Frank Novello has had only three wins his junior season, but his .923 SV% ranks him 11th in the nation.

“Novello has played great against us,” said Riley. “He’s a very good goalie and one of the top two or three in the league this year.”

“It’s definitely on our minds that [Novello] has had a tremendous year,” said Wright, who wouldn’t go so far as to suggest that Novello would steal a playoff game, but admitted that it was a possibility. “He missed a number of games this year with injuries, but when he’s played he’s been a big time goalie for us.

“There’s no one in hockey when you talk about playoffs that goaltending doesn’t come up and I feel comfortable about our goaltending situation.”

Prediction: Too hard to pick against the home team in this one. Army, 3-2

Quarterfinal No. 1
Saturday, March 13, 10:00 AM ET

No. 4 Sacred Heart (12-16-5, 12-8-4 AH) vs. No. 5 Connecticut (12-15-7, 9-10-5)

Season Results: Sacred Heart leads series, 2-0-1
January 30, 2004: at Sacred Heart 4, Connecticut 2
January 31, 2004: Sacred Heart 6, at Connecticut 5
February 24, 2004: Connecticut 4, at Sacred Heart 4 (OT)

The opening quarterfinal this year might be one of the earliest-in-the-day college hockey games ever played.

With the four-games-in-a-single-day format, the league set the first quarterfinal between Sacred Heart and UConn to begin at 10 a.m. on Saturday. Most teams in Atlantic Hockey are accustomed to the usual 7 p.m. start, and maybe an occasional 3 p.m. game on a Saturday.

But 10 a.m.?

UConn coach Bruce Marshall had plenty of humor when asked how to prepare for such a start time.

“I might have to ask my eight-year-old,” said Marshall likening his schedule to a youth hockey game. “We might have to put cartoons on and have their parents tie [the players’] skates.”

All joking aside, Marshall didn’t think that the game time would have much effect on college students used to being up at 8 a.m. for class. Still, on the other side, Sacred Heart head coach Shaun Hannah isn’t taking any chances with that.

“The routine is different. We’d usually be getting up for a morning skate at the time we’re playing the game,” said Hannah. “So all week, we’re on [spring] break, so we’ve been getting the guys up every day at 6:15 a.m., and I think that’s been good. The guys have been fresh and getting to bed at night so I think it will be a good thing for us.”

On the ice, this is a matchup that should intrigue. Each team has had a hot second half. Each club is young and needed time for players to mature. Each team should have momentum coming off a solid home stretch in the second half of the season.

In other words, this is a battle of confidence versus confidence.

“We’ve played well against [UConn] and I think we match up pretty well with them,” said Hannah, whose club was a first-round favorite a year ago but was upset by Bentley. “In the latter stages of the season, we were missing a little and not firing on all cylinders. But we’ve talked to the guys this week about bringing our game together on Saturday at 10 a.m.”

Hannah thinks a critical part to his club’s success was its ability to mature quickly.

“With the schedule we played this year and the way we played in the second half our team has really come together,” Hannah said. “They’ve matured a lot from the early season. They’ve suffered through a lot of battles but conquered in some of those battles.”

Much of the same can be said for UConn, which will play 13 freshmen on the average night. Needing to do a lot of growing up throughout the year, the Huskies got that, particularly from goaltender Scott Tomes.

“I think Scott has matured so that he doesn’t worry about what happens as much,” said Marshall. “Early in the season sometimes he’d collapse in a tough situation but now he’s at the point he can put things behind him.”

The same can be said for this freshman class.

“It will be a first playoff game for a lot of guys on this team,” Marshall said. “But that’s boded well for us in that these guys haven’t know what to expect so they’ve just kind of taken things as they come.”

The fact that UConn couldn’t beat Sacred Heart this season obviously is in the mind of Marshall. But having worked all week on changing the way his team played against the Pioneers, he hopes will improve UConn’s chances.

“We see the type of goals that they’d scored against us [during the year] and that concerns us,” said Marshall. “Hopefully, having watched film we won’t give them those types of opportunities. Hopefully when it matters most we have figured it out.”

Prediction: UConn is the darkhorse in this tournament. The Huskies will figure out Sacred Heart, and be extremely dangerous moving on. UConn, 4-3.

Quarterfinal No. 2
Saturday, March 13, 1:15 PM ET

No. 3 Quinnipiac (15-13-6, 12-6-6 AH) vs. No. 6 Canisius (9-15-8, 9-11-4 AH)

Season Results: Canisius leads series, 2-1-0
January 9, 2004: at Canisius 3, Quinnipiac 0
January 10, 2004: at Canisius 4, Quinnipiac 2
February 6, 2004: at Quinnipiac 3, Canisius 2

Call it an aberration. Call it bad luck. Call it whatever you want.

For the first time since the formation of the MAAC, Quinnipiac did not finish in the top two. That doesn’t make head coach Rand Pecknold very happy.

“We weren’t happy with a third-place finish, but we’re ready to make amends for that,” said Pecknold — and that despite the fact that the Bobcats did put on a late-season rally, beating first place Holy Cross and Sacred Heart on the road to close the season last weekend.

“We did have a nice last week with two wins on the road against tough teams in tough places to play. I was happy it was third and not fourth, but we set a standard that we sort of dipped below.”

Pecknold’s Bobcats could look to making amends in Saturday’s second semifinal. The only problem is that first they’ll face a Canisius team, the tournament’s six seed, that has done well against Quinnipiac, winning the season series.

“When we faced them, [goaltender Bryan] Worosz played well in all three games,” said Pecknold. “He was excellent in the two games up there and was good even in our own rink when we won. [Canisius] did a good job of not giving us a lot of scoring opportunities.”

One important factor for Quinnipiac will be which team arrives on Saturday afternoon. In two road losses to Canisius, Pecknold felt the Griffs outplayed a Quinnipiac squad that simply didn’t show up.

“The two games up there they outplayed us,” said Pecknold. “We were flat on back-to-back nights, and even the game we won I thought we were flat and they were hungry. They’re a very good defensive team with guys up front that can finish.”

This is a rematch of last year’s MAAC quarterfinal when, as the number-two seed, Quinnipiac rallied from a 2-0 deficit to beat Canisius, 3-2. Pecknold knows that falling behind this year wouldn’t be advisable, and he hopes to lean on net play to avoid that.

“It’s one and done so you have to have some good play from your goaltender,” said Pecknold, who possesses two of the top goaltenders in the country in Jamie Holden and Justin Eddy. “You have to have your kid playing well if you’re going to go to the NCAA tournament.”

Asked if his decision was made about which goaltender he will start, Pecknold answered, “Yes.” Would he share that decision? “No.”

And thus the gamesmanship begins.

One thing is for certain in terms of goaltending: there’s about a 100% chance we’ll see Worosz in net for the Griffs. Worosz has recorded decisions in all but six games this year with the junior holding a respectable .895 save percentage.

Add to that the recent play of young guns like rookies Billy Irish-Baker (10 points in his last seven games) and Michael Cohen, the team’s leading scorer, and you have a club that could pose a lot of difficulty for the Bobcats as a first-round opponent.

Predictions: Though the Bobcats have struggled at times, this won’t be one of them. Quinnipiac, 4-1

Quarterfinal No. 3
Saturday, March 13, 5:30 p.m. ET

No. 1 Holy Cross (19-9-4, 17-4-3 AH) vs. Play-in Game winner (No. 8 Army/No. 9 AIC)

Season Results

vs. Army, 3-0-0 vs. AIC, 3-0-0
Dec. 5: at Holy Cross 3, Army 1 Nov. 7: at Holy Cross 5, AIC 2
Dec. 6: at Holy Cross 3, Army 0 Nov. 8: at Holy Cross 3, AIC 2
Feb. 22: Holy Cross 5, at Army 2 Feb. 24: Holy Cross 1, at AIC 0

If ever there was a team that limped into the playoffs as the number-one seed, Holy Cross (as well as Boston College in Hockey East) is it.

The Crusaders, after losing just two league games all season got swept in its final weekend of the season and have not won a game since clinching the regular-season title against Mercyhurst on February 27 (0-2-1).

That, though, hasn’t been too much of a concern to head coach Paul Pearl.

“We played okay [last weekend],” said Pearl. “We ran into good goaltenders and good teams. We got 70-something shots but only scored one goal.”

Indeed Holy Cross threw everything but the kitchen sink at Quinnipiac’s Jamie Holden and Bentley’s Simon St. Pierre last weekend, 76 shots total, but came away without a point. But now, as Pearl points out, this is a new season. It’s one that threatens the league’s top teams since any club can come in, play well for 60 minutes and move on.

Add to the mix that the Crusaders, the only team that doesn’t yet know its first-round opponent, could face host Army, and the equation gets even more interesting.

“We knew we were going to have to play a good team in the first round,” Pearl said. “I’ve said it all year that the league is very balanced, one through nine. So if that team happens to be Army, so be it. I can’t get caught up in all of that stuff.”

Pearl admitted, though, that his game plan with differ depending on the outcome of the play-in game.

“We’ll look at both teams differently,” said Pearl. “We’ll have a couple of different points of emphasis, depending on who we play.”

One point is the power play. Though it didn’t score in either of last weekend’s games, he likes the way the puck is moving. And everyone knows that come playoff time, the ability to grab that goal with the man up can mean the difference between winning and losing.

Pearl is also satisfied that he has one of the more experienced clubs in the tournament. Though they’ve never battled past the semifinals (Holy Cross lost last year, 3-0, to Quinnipiac) there is enough senior leadership to be a factor.

“We’ve got some guys who have been through the wars here,” said Pearl, “so we have a lot of positives going into this.”

Now Pearl has to hope that his club can also have a positive coming out, as well.

Prediction: The No. 1 will advance no matter who it plays. The only difference is the score: vs. AIC, 5-2; vs. Army, 3-2 (OT).

Quarterfinal No. 4
Saturday March 13, 8:45 PM ET

No. 2 Mercyhurst (19-13-2, 16-7-1 AH) vs. No. 7 Bentley (9-18-4, 7-13-4 AH)

Season Results: Mercyhurst leads series, 3-0-0
January 9, 2004: at Mercyhurst 2, Bentley 1
January 10, 2004: at Mercyhurst 3, Bentley 2
February 28, 2004: Mercyhurst 7, at Bentley 1

For the first time in four years, Rick Gotkin’s Mercyhurst Lakers do not enter the tournament as the number-one seed. The Lakers, who put together three straight regular-season titles and won the postseason tournament two out of those three years, never could catch first-place Holy Cross, which started out the year hot and never quite relented.

Still, Gotkin’s club almost has an advantage. By finishing second, the Lakers take on Bentley in the first round, a team that Mercyhurst demolished, 7-1, last weekend. At the same time, Mercyhurst avoids the potential first-round match up with Army, the tournament’s host.

But Gotkin knows that in no way is his club immune to upset.

“That would not surprise me,” said Gotkin when asked if a lower seed could make the finals or even win the tournament. “You have to like your favorites, but in that one-game scenario, the bounce of a puck can keep your season going or end your season. The parity has gotten better and better every year and anything can happen.”

To advance, Gotkin will look to rely on two aspects that have carried Laker clubs of the past: goaltending and special teams.

The first is an up-in-the-air proposition for Mercyhurst. Gotkin said he still has not decided on whether Andy Franck or rookie Jordan Wakefield will play. Both goaltenders have given Gotkin what he needs this year — the chance to win — and both have save percentages over .900.

“This time of year, the team that’s getting great goaltending and is really good on the special teams is usually the team that’s continuing to play,” said Gotkin. “We like where we’re at this time. With the peaks and valleys we’ve had this year, the program has still taken a lot of steps out of conference. We’re hoping those experiences with help us as we get ready to drop to puck on Saturday night.”

Probably the strangest feeling will be the game time. The 2 vs. 7 game will be the last of four Saturday, not set for the drop until 8:45 p.m. (barring overtimes in previous games). The league has guaranteed that whichever team advances will play the late game on Sunday, but still there could be disadvantages.

“I don’t think it’s going to make a great difference [on Saturday] because both teams are in the same boat,” said Gotkin. “The only place it comes into play is for the team that advances and has to play the next day. You could have a situation where the winner of the late game could play the winner of the 10 a.m. game.”

The opponent for Mercyhurst is an always dangerous Bentley club. Though their record this season was less than impressive, the Falcons are still the team that a year ago surprised everyone and qualified for the league final four. Returning a lot of that experience will be a positive that could help in pulling off an upset.

“We definitely had a great year last year,” said Bentley coach Ryan Soderquist. “We prided ourselves with having to work hard to win last year. But I think we forgot how hard you have to play in the first half of the season. We had a decent second half with a tough schedule.”

Bentley, though, has the unenviable task of facing the defending champ and the best offensive team in the tournament.

“We know [Mercyhurst] is a top team to play,” said Soderquist. “But everybody’s goal should be to win the tourney, not just get through the first round. So if we’re going to have to beat a team like Mercyhurst, I’d rather have to do it the first night when we’re fresh than any other time.”

Soderquist made it clear that if his club is to beat the Lakers, it’ll need to ride the coattails of goaltender Simon St. Pierre.

“St. Pierre is playing his best hockey right now,” said Soderquist. “Some of our success last year was based upon him playing well.

“This past weekend was the first time that he really seemed to be perfect and play his best game. If he’s on his game early and he’ll thrive off that, he could walk out of the building having given up one goal.

“This is a nice time to prove that we are a good team. We have nothing to lose coming in as the seventh-place team.”

Prediction: It won’t be a cakewalk, but Mercyhurst should survive. Mercyhurst, 4-2.

Semifinals: Sunday, March 14, 4:30 and 7:45 PM ET. Teams will be reseeded

Predictions: Based on my picks above, I see one upset and one status quo game. UConn will take out Holy Cross and Mercyhurst knocks out Quinnipiac, leaving a Lakers vs. Huskies final.

This Week in Hockey East: March 11, 2004

A Road “Favorite”

Although the matchup between the number four and five seeds is almost always a closely fought battle, this year’s three vs. six could be the most interesting one of all. That’s because one could make a pretty good case that the number six team, Massachusetts-Lowell, is actually the favorite.

Yes, the favorite, even though the River Hawks finished only a point ahead of seventh-place Merrimack, thereby saving themselves from a first-round trip to Alfond Arena.

“Essentially, we’ve already played two playoff games,” UML coach Blaise MacDonald says. “That Merrimack game [last Thursday] was like a playoff game for us. There were huge implications to that game and then we go to Providence and it’s really like another playoff game with huge implications. So that’s kind of the precursor to our playoff picture.”

In the last four weekends, Lowell has suffered a sweep at the hands of Boston College — join the club on that account — but has otherwise split with New Hampshire and Maine and then taken the three-of-four points last week from Merrimack and Providence.

“The first thing is we’re not beating ourselves,” MacDonald says. “The second thing is we’re playing pretty consistent hockey in all three zones. When we’ve had success, we’ve gotten timely saves from both goalies.”

But why the “favorite” label? Two reasons.

First, if you do away with the forfeits Lowell sustained because of using an ineligible player — an administrative foul-up involving a forward who tallied one point in nine games — and just reverted to the on-ice results, the standings would have this before-and-after look.

Before (with forfeits):

Team W L T Pts
Boston College 17 4 3 37
Maine 17 5 2 36
Massachusetts 12 9 3 27
New Hampshire 10 8 6 26
Providence 7 11 6 20
UMass-Lowell 7 12 5 19
Merrimack 6 12 6 18
Boston University 6 13 5 17
Northeastern 5 13 6 16

After (no forfeits):

Team W L T Pts
Boston College 17 4 3 37
Maine 17 5 2 36
New Hampshire 10 8 6 26
UMass-Lowell 10 9 5 25
Massachusetts 10 11 3 23
Providence 7 11 6 20
Boston University 6 13 5 17
Northeastern 5 13 6 16
Merrimack 5 13 6 16

While one might argue that the bottom three places might have played out a little differently than shown had the teams been basing decisions on the no-forfeit standings — Merrimack, for example, might have approached some games as more life-and-death — there wouldn’t seem to be any such argument for the top six teams. In fact, one could make a case for Lowell moving even higher without the forfeits because the River Hawks went a wind-out-of-their-sails 0-2-1 immediately after the announcement that they’d lost five wins, three in league play.

So point number one is that in on-ice results, Lowell was a home-ice team that would be hosting UMass instead of the buses traveling in the reverse direction.

“We’d be in fourth place hosting a home playoff series with essentially 18 freshmen and sophomores,” MacDonald says. “You want to talk about miraculous, that’s miraculous. It’s unheard of and the fact is that we as a team know we accomplished that and feel good about it and you can’t take that away.”

The second advantage Lowell has is that it is coming in on a string of high notes rather than the low ones UMass must fight through. The Minutemen are 0-6-1 in their last seven games and other than a four-game winning streak that preceded that seven-game drought had won only one other game dating back to Thanksgiving. That is, since UMass opened the season with a blazing 9-2-1 record, it has fallen to 5-11-5.

“You know, their record [in the last seven games] doesn’t really speak to the quality of their team,” MacDonald says. “Clearly they’ve played some great opponents [UNH and BC] and played very desperate opponents in BU and Northeastern. That’s why the league is awesome, because that can happen.

“With UMass, they’re just a real good team that got a taste of it last year and they know they’re 0-0, hosting their first home playoff series ever. So they’re looking ahead, not behind.”

And MacDonald doesn’t really want to hear about favorites and underdogs.

“We’re approaching it that it’s a real good matchup,” he says. “They’re an excellent team that presents plenty of challenges and we’ve really enjoyed competing against them.

“I’m not looking at it like something magical has to happen for us to win the series. But I also know that I just watched them four times [on tape] beat New Hampshire handily, 4-1.

“So I know they’re awfully good. I’m just excited to go West as opposed to North.”

It should be a hair-raising series. (A comment that will explain itself for anyone who is there for player introductions.)

Playoff Observations

  • The Northeastern Huskies deserve a boatload of credit for the way that they finished the season. They took seven of their last possible eight points to put themselves within a Boston University overtime goal at UNH of making the playoffs.
  • That same group of Terriers that narrowly avoided the Hockey East basement is also tied for 21st in the PairWise.
  • It’s hard to believe that Boston College’s “reward” for finishing atop Hockey East is a 1 vs. 8 playoff matchup against… archrival BU. While BC has defeated BU in all four tries this season and while every top-seeded coach pays lip service to how tough the number eight seed is, I’m not sure that any potential eighth seed matchup has generated more “you gotta be kidding me” responses since 1993-94.

    If you recall, that was the year that Maine sustained 14 forfeits and, despite having an excellent team, dropped to eighth place in the then eight-team league. That year’s BU team had dominated the league, running away with a 21-3-0 record to finish 10 points ahead of second-place UMass-Lowell, only to be handed the Black Bears in the opening round. The Terriers swept the series, but the matchup certainly got some BU fans sweating.

  • If you ask me, the team with the least chance of emerging from the quarterfinals is Merrimack. That’s no knock on the Warriors, but there’s a reason Maine held a stranglehold on first-round series in its barn until last year. Merrimack will be facing the number two ranked team in the country in the quarterfinals’ most hostile environment. Not a good combination.

    Of course, I also thought the eighth-seeded Warriors had no chance against a juggernaut BU team in 1998, especially with a lame-duck head coach in Ron Anderson and a long losing streak.

  • UNH-Providence is an interesting set of matchups: UNH’s superior offense to PC’s superior defense. (How many years do you have to go back to hear a reference like that regarding the Wildcat defense?) The battle between Hockey East’s two best power plays — PC (21.5 percent) to UNH (21.3) — and two oft-struggling penalty kills — PC (80.4, 7th in HEA) and UNH (a much improved 82.5, 4th). And of course, goaltenders Mike Ayers vs. Bobby Goepfert.

    Power Play Prowess From The Point

    If you look at any successful power play, you’ll see strength at the points. Sometimes that manifests itself in smooth passes that find the open man. Other times, you see a pointman who has a cannon of a shot and can score the goals himself.

    Hockey East has four defensemen who all season long separated themselves from the field in scoring power-play goals: Thomas Pöck (UMass) and Brian Yandle (New Hampshire) with nine each, Stephen Wood (Providence) with six and Bryan Schmidt (Merrimack) with five. (Boston University’s Ryan Whitney scored three of his four man-advantage tallies in the last six games.)

    Pöck will get his due in another piece, so let’s begin with Yandle, a sophomore who only totaled six points last year, but has blossomed into an 11-goal, 26-point scorer.

    “He’s done it right from the beginning,” UNH coach Dick Umile says. “He’s been doing it on the power play and he’s been doing it five-on-five. He’s got a terrific stick. He’s got a great shot. He’s very accurate and he’s got good vision out there.

    “He’s been on the unit with Justin Aikins. Aikins is a great distributor of the puck and has found Brian in spots and Brian puts it away. He’s consistently scored goals; he’s having a really good year.”

    Schmidt is another sophomore defenseman, although one who made his mark earlier in the league than Yandle, earning a berth on the Hockey East All-Rookie team. After nine goals and 21 points as a freshman, he’s followed that up with another 21-pointer this year.

    “I think he’s a guy you’ve really gotta watch for,” Merrimack coach Chris Serino says. “Our power play was rolling along at a really thick clip maybe a month ago. You could see teams trying to shut him down on the power play.

    “He can make big plays, he can make big shots and he can make big passes. I think he’s one of the very few defensemen in the league that’s capable of taking over a game, offensively, defensively, special team-wise. I think he’s a special player.”

    Which, of course, makes him the subject of special attention.

    “What we try to do is put the puck in his hands,” Serino says. “Even if you’re keying on him, we think he’s good enough that he’ll pass up the shot and make the good pass.

    “Obviously, if you’re keying on him and you’re taking him away, then something is open and we feel pretty confident that he’ll find the open guy. We’re still going to try to put the puck in his hands and we feel that he can make the decisions with the puck that are going to benefit our team.”

    Wood is the grizzled veteran of the trio, a senior who earned second-team All-Hockey East honors with his 29 points last year. His 11-goal, 28-point stat line make him a strong candidate for those honors again this year.

    “Obviously, he handles the puck well,” PC coach Paul Pooley says. “The [special] thing that he has is a patience threshold. He’ll hang onto the puck and not panic with it. A lot of guys don’t have that. The second thing he has is a good shot, either wrist shot or slap shot.

    “So those are the two things we try to utilize with him. The challenge at this point is trying to get him open since everybody knows that that’s where we want to go. So the last few weeks we’ve tried to run some plays or situations and we need to keep adjusting that to try to get him open.

    “Our power play this year is a lot more successful than last year percentage-wise simply because we’re distributing the puck and he’s getting it more than he did last year.”

    Which brings up this writer’s personal pet peeve, fans screaming at their own team’s point men, “Shoot!” Whether the shot has been set up or not and whether a defender is likely to have the puck bounce off his pads leading to a breakaway or not, the bloodthirsty scream is, “Shoot!” That, despite the fact that the best power plays are typically patient. They’re willing to spend some time working for a quality opportunity.

    “You can shoot the puck, but if nobody’s in front, why shoot?” Pooley says. “That’s where the normal fan doesn’t [understand]. He sees a guy wide open at the point, but a good player is going to see if somebody is in front of the net before he shoots it. If you just shoot with no one in front, it’s almost like giving up a turnover and throwing it down the ice.”

    Stats Notes

  • Jim Howard’s goals against average has now dropped to 1.18. He has three shutouts in his last four games, four in his last six and other than an early-November game against Boston College hasn’t allowed more than two goals in a single game all year. Can you spell E-V-E-I-S? (That’s sieve spelled backwards. Ba-doom.)
  • Michigan Tech’s Chris Conner has eight shorthanded goals this year. Eight! His nearest competitors are at five: Todd Jackson (Maine), Sean Collins (UNH) and Brendan Cook (Bemidji State).

    The Lone Geezer

    It’s not as though his teammates listen to 50 Cent and Eminem while he’s grooving to Jefferson Airplane, the Platters, and — heaven help us — the Andrews Sisters.

    Nonetheless, Lowell captain Jerramie Domish stood alone last Thursday for the River Hawks’ Senior Night since he’s the lone elder statesman on this youth-laden roster.

    Just the one senior and four juniors. Care to think how good Lowell will be next year and the year after?

    At The Other End Of The Spectrum

    One of Lowell’s top contributors on the blueline has been 19-year-old freshman Cleve Kinley, who last weekend factored in yet another big goal that helped the River Hawks defeat Providence, 4-3. It’s not a new story, just one that isn’t well-known.

    “Cleve Kinley is an unbelievable defenseman for us who goes unnoticed by most,” MacDonald says. “He plays close to 30 minutes a game and he’s been our top defenseman this year [since] we lost Matt Collar for a month. The kid has to be one of the best, if not the best, freshman defenseman in the league.

    “He takes what the game gives him. He doesn’t force it too much on the offensive side, but when he gets an opportunity he knows what to do. He makes a lot of plays.

    “He’s most valuable, I think, in traffic, in chaos, in his own defensive zone. He not only comes up with loose pucks, but he makes a play. He’s very poised.”

    Well Shiver Me Timbers

    My colleague Lynn Burke forwarded the following nugget from a New York Times story about high school athletic programs in Alaska.

    In ice hockey, many of the teams play in outdoor rinks. Keeping good ice is not a problem, but getting the whole schedule played sometimes is, because Alaska has a rule that no outdoor game can start if it is colder than minus-15 degrees.

    “We’re not crazy about that rule,” said Tim Delaney, athletic director at Kenai Central High, 100 miles down the Cook Inlet from Anchorage.

    “Minus 15 isn’t really that cold. Shoot, we practice in it all the time.”

    One Final Note About Wesleyan

    Congratulations to the three award-winners from this year’s Wesleyan Cardinals. Coach Chris Potter earned the NESCAC Coach of the Year Award after leading the team to its best finish in 15 years. Will Bennett was named NESCAC Rookie of the Year; his 15 goals led the team and ranked fifth in the league. And goaltender Jim Panczykowski took home second-team All-NESCAC honors after posting a 2.93 GAA and a .919 save percentage. His 733 saves, an average of 33 per game, trailed only two other netminders in all of Division III.

    Great season!

    Trivia Contest

    First off, no I didn’t know that “Tyler Durden,” one of two winners last week, was a fictitious name based on a character in the movie “Fight Club.” I haven’t seen the film — my viewing schedule is pretty erratic, especially during the hockey season — and this is one I missed. Yes, I know, I need to get out more often…

    In any case, last week’s question noted that UNH goaltender Mike Ayers had shut out Boston University a remarkable four straight times and asked you to name the other two Hockey East schools that Ayers had posted consecutive shutouts over. One of those two streaks was current, the other was not. The answers were UMass (not current: Feb. 26 and Nov. 24, 2002) and — back-to-back weeks for tricks — Vermont (current: Oct 12, 2002 and Oct. 11, 2003).

    There's a little something missing here...

    There’s a little something missing here…

    First to answer was three-time winner Ankur Patel, who has chosen to go the visual route with his cheer. Mindful of the UNH-Providence series this weekend, Ankur shows us a ticket stub with the Friars minus their A game.

    With a shift to playoff previews after next week’s final column, that wraps up this season’s trivia contests. Thanks to all for participating, whether as readers, losing contestants or winners.

    And Finally, Not That It Has Anything To Do With Anything, But…

    • Last week’s column had only the following note in this segment: “Mark down the date. This week I have nothing more to say.” Strangely enough, my lack of words prompted more of a response than my words usually do. (Folks, that’s not a good sign for a writer.) My favorite monosyllabic friend wrote, “Wow.” But what I want to know is, who is the anonymous reader who replied, “Do you believe in miracles? Yes!”

    • Congratulations to my niece Cherie and the Brooks Girls hockey team for winning the New England Division II championship. Cherie scored all three goals in the semifinal overtime win over Gunnery and then was on the ice for all three Brooks goals in the title game, won 3-2 in dramatic fashion with the game-tying and winning goals coming in the final five minutes. Cherie was named MVP of the tournament. MVP! MVP! MVP!

    • Congratulations also to my nephew Kevin for winning the Brooks Boys hockey team “Hard Hat” Award. Given after each game to the player who “gave it their all and really worked hard for the team — that could be scoring, goaltending, saying something to get the team going in the locker room, etc.,” Kevin took the season-long version, a well-deserved honor as anyone who has watched him can attest. Way to go, Kev!

    • This is my final column of the year, folks. Scott Weighart will be filling in for me next week. Thanks for reading and stick around for the NCAA playoff previews.

  • This Week in the CCHA: March 11, 2004

    Same As It Ever Was

    Congratulations to the Michigan Wolverines, winners of this year’s CCHA regular-season title. Michigan has won outright or shared in eight regular-season titles, including three of the last four.

    This isn’t news.

    What is news is that the Wolverines had to get a little help from some strange friends south of the border. Do you think Red Berenson has sent John Markell a thank-you note yet?

    Michigan looked good for the title going into last weekend’s series with Michigan State – good, but not great. Three points ahead of second-place Miami in the regular-season standings before last weekend’s games, the Wolverines needed just two points to take the division.

    Instead, the Wolverines found themselves waiting for the outcome of Saturday’s Miami-OSU game because Michigan took just one point from the Spartans between Friday and Saturday – a 4-4 tie in Munn and a 1-0 loss in Joe Louis Arena – and the RedHawks had beaten the Buckeyes in Oxford Friday.

    Any coach will tell you that a win is a win, a title is a title, but having to depend on another team’s loss to come out on top is no way to end a season. Another way not to end a season is to go 0-3-1 in your last four games, as did Michigan.

    “In the last four games, we’ve picked up one point,” said Berenson after Saturday’s game. “You can’t be proud of that.”

    Quote of the Week

    “I’m a big Ohio State fan right now.” Jeff Tambellini, after the Wolverines lost to the Spartans Saturday.

    This Close

    While the Wolverines were waiting for news of their fate, the RedHawks were trying to write a story with a happier ending – for Miami.

    Midway through the third period of the Miami-OSU game at the Schott in Columbus last Saturday, the Miami bench got word that Michigan had lost. Mike Kompon had just scored his second goal of the third period to even up an intense hockey game, 4-4, and the RedHawks knew that if they took one point, they’d share the league title with Michigan.

    A win would make them champs outright.

    But the Buckeyes were determined to tell another story, one that featured a season-ending victory – the first for OSU’s senior class – and a storm to rain on Miami’s parade.

    “We didn’t want anyone to win a title on our ice,” said OSU senior forward Chris Olsgard. “That was great motivation for us, not to let them win. That was the guiding force for me, personally.”

    So, with less than two minutes left in regulation, Olsgard muscled his way into the Miami zone between two defenders and, from behind the goal line, threw the puck at the crease. There it went in off a RedHawk skate, the goal credited to Lee Spector – who had been brought down in the crease, the right wing to Olsgard’s left – and the Buckeyes won, 5-4.

    Miami head coach Enrico Blasi immediately protested the goal; he thought it was directed into the net by Spector’s skate. In defeat, though, Blasi was gracious. Carrying his two-and-a-half-year-old daughter, Sophia, into the press conference, Blasi gave a moving statement.

    “We put ourselves in a great position all year long to play for a championship, and that’s where we were tonight. We’re extremely proud of our team. I think we have a gutty team that comes to play regardless of the situation. It’s disappointing, but the way we played in that third period, I just love every single one of those guys.”

    The assist for Olsgard was poetic justice; the night before, in Miami’s 4-3 overtime win, it was Olsgard who was in the penalty box when Chris Michael scored the game-winning, power-play goal for the RedHawks.

    Overheard in the Tiny Goggin Press Box

    “Doesn’t Walt know that if he wins they have to go to Alaska?” This was Friday, and the Wildcats were beating the Bulldogs.

    NMU’s reward for winning? A 2,540-mile commute for a best-of-three, first-round CCHA playoff series in Fairbanks.

    And the pundit wasn’t even thinking about UAF’s 12-4-0 home record.

    Same As It Ever Was, Part 2

    The Ann Arbor News reported Monday that the Michigan hockey team “deserved” the regular-season title.

    Hmm. I can’t argue with that. The Wolverines seem to find a way to win, season after season, and this eighth title is the most by any school in the conference.

    But writer Antoine Pitts took it one step further when he wrote, “The eight league losses were the most ever for a CCHA champion, but who else deserves the title?

    “Certainly not Miami, which came into Yost Ice Arena three weekends ago with the CCHA lead and got destroyed.

    “And certainly not Michigan State, which had a 7-5-2 league home record, including sweeps by Ohio State and Miami.”

    Miami could very well have won the league title Saturday by virtue of Michigan’s one-point weekend against the Spartans and they didn’t, but had they beaten OSU, would they have been any less deserving of a league title than the Wolverines?

    Pitts’ logic is based on head-to-head play in Yost Arena, and he has a valid point; the Wolverines were undefeated in league play at home in the 2003-04 season. But Michigan had been swept just the weekend before by Notre Dame – on the road, of course – a team that just squeaked into sixth place.

    Does that mean that Notre Dame was somehow a more deserving team this season than Michigan?

    There’s no need to justify Michigan’s title. The Wolverines finished the season by the necessary margin – one slim point – ahead of Miami, and so earned the title. There’s no need to trash the RedHawks, who held the top spot in the league for nine long weeks this season.

    “Obviously, we would have liked to have won the games, but we’ve earned it,” Michigan associate head coach Mel Pearson told the press after all was said and done.

    Earned. Quite different from deserved.

    Wrong Again

    Yes, I know you’re shocked. Last week I wrote, “I’ve seen the face of the CCHA’s Super Six Tournament twice this season, and he couldn’t skate either time.”

    I stand corrected. Joe College does not, in fact, represent the CCHA per se. Joe College is the representative of college hockey at Joe Louis Arena, meaning that he is a marketing tool belonging to Olympia Entertainment and not to the Central Collegiate Hockey Association.

    And One More Time

    Two weeks ago, I predicted that Notre Dame’s Aaron Gill would be the recipient of this year’s Chris Richards Man-Most-Likely-To-Be-Overlooked Memorial Award, so I was pleasantly surprised that Gill was named to the CCHA All-Conference Second Team.

    Imagine my surprise, too, when I realized that I should have given that award to OSU’s Doug Andress. The outstanding senior defenseman made my all-league team, but garnered just an honorable mention for CCHA All-Conference honors.

    Oddball Note of the Week

    OSU’s Nate Guenin is the first sophomore to be named to the CCHA All-Academic team since former Falcon Brian Holzinger was so honored as a sophomore in 1993.

    Holzinger was just traded to the Columbus Blue Jackets from Pittsburgh. All that brainpower in one city is frightening.

    Guenin was the only defenseman honored; everyone else named is a forward.

    Two weeks ago, I named Guenin to my All-Goon Squad. Every time he’s called for a penalty, I have great confidence in the official’s judgment.

    Guenin’s appearance on this list brought this protest from a local Buckeye fan:

    “My son Michael, age 4 ½ , knows most of the players and give them five coming on and off the ice. Nate is his favorite player. Last Saturday, Nate gave Michael a framed picture which he personalized for him. This is not something that a ‘goon’ would do.”

    Well, apparently it is.

    There’s no question that Guenin is a nice guy. Most hockey players are nice guys, which is what makes covering this sport so rewarding.

    So, now you know that Nate Guenin is a smart, nice guy who takes way too many penalties – or would, if he were playing. He’s still out indefinitely.

    It’s the Most Wonderful Time of the Year

    Sure, sure, the NCAA Tournament begins in two weeks and the Frozen Four is just around the corner, but the CCHA playoffs are still fascinating for those of us who aren’t obsessing over the bigger picture, and anyone who’s been following this league this season can argue – persuasively – that the CCHA playoffs and subsequent Super Six tournament is the most compelling hockey to be found for the next 14 days.

    A few weeks back, before the final season standings could gel, I picked six teams to head to The Joe. Those six teams, as luck and fate would have it, are hosting first-round playoff series. I still think those six teams go to Detroit, and that each will sweep in the first round.

    Of course, I’m often wrong.

    No. 1 Michigan (23-11-2, 18-8-2 CCHA) vs. No. 12 Nebraska-Omaha (7-24-5, 5-19-4 CCHA

    It’s too easy to dismiss this series. In fact, I can’t resist. Michigan is 13-0-0 at home this year, while UNO is, well, struggling.

    The Mavericks lost 9-1 to Minnesota State-Mankato last Saturday, their second-worst loss in program history. In that game, UNO gave up four first-period power-play goals.

    Still, UNO head coach Mike Kemp was upbeat when talking to the Omaha World-Herald this week. “We’re in the playoffs now, and we’re at zeroes all the way across the board. The opportunity is there to do something that nobody thinks we can do.”

    Zeroes across the board? Only in the sense that two wins advances a team to the Super Six. There are other numbers, however, that are far more revealing, and few of them resemble zero.

    Michigan has won its last 14 home first-round playoff series, and just three of those have taken three games to decide. While the Mavericks did upset the Wolverines in 2000 at Joe Louis Arena, Michigan leads this all-time series 10-2-2.

    The Wolverines are 1-0-1 against UNO this season, having played two games in Omaha in December. Michigan has the No. 1 offense and No. 3 defense overall in the CCHA to UNO’s No. 11 offense and No. 10 (tie) defense.

    Chris Holt (.895 SV%, 3.36 GAA) will start in net for the Mavericks.

    To be sure, it will be an exciting weekend for UNO; playoff games in Yost Arena are electric. And every team gets “up” for Michigan. But the Wolverines won’t start losing at home now.

    The guy to watch this weekend: sophomore Jeff Tambellini, who will remember what it feels like to score and score again.

    Pick: Michigan 4-2, 5-2

    No. 2 Miami (20-12-4, 17-8-3 CCHA) vs. No. 11 Lake Superior State (9-18-7, 7-16-5 CCHA)

    This interesting series pairs the league’s best power play with the team that takes the fewest penalties.

    The Lakers will be no easy opponent for the RedHawks, and that’s not slamming Miami. LSSU plays disciplined hockey, has consistently tough goaltending, and lately has been scoring goals.

    Yes, you read that correctly. In the final two games of the weekend, the Lakers scored a total of nine goals. This may not seem earth-shattering to you, but when you consider that LSSU netted just 12 goals in nine games for the month of January, you can get a sense of how this might be a factor this weekend.

    Miami will have something to prove after last weekend’s split with OSU, and every aspect of the RedHawk game looks solid. Miami is fast, plays smart defense, has good goaltending from Brandon Crawford-West when needed, and playmakers Mike Kompon (12-30-42), Greg Hogeboom (17-22-37), and Derek Edwardson (17-26-43) will be playing for all the marbles, as this is the last time they can do so.

    The guy to watch: Marty Guerin. How can you take your eyes off of him when he’s on the puck? He was the best player on the ice last weekend.

    Picks: Miami 3-2, 5-2

    No. 3 Michigan State (21-15-2, 17-9-2 CCHA) vs. No. 10 Ferris State (15-18-3, 10-17-1 CCHA)

    I do believe in Jim Slater. I really do.

    I failed to mention last week that Slater was named the RBC Financial Group CCHA Player of the Month for February. Why? Because I have some sort of weird mental block when it comes to Slater.

    Maybe it has something to do with how his teammate, Mike Lalonde, described him to my esteemed colleague Neil Koepke of the Lansing State Journal this week.

    “He’s an unreal player. He’s the heart and soul of this team.”

    Fittingly, Slater set up the play that led to Lalonde’s game-winning goal Saturday, when the Spartans tried their hardest to ruin the Wolverines’ chances for a regular-season title.

    MSU head coach Rick Comley told Koepke that Slater “plays a game of speed. He hits. He gives you all-out effort every single shift.”

    But the Spartans are more than the sum of one player who is apparently so good that I can’t wrap my brain around his very existence. Don’t forget the league’s best goaltender, Dominic Vicari (.925 SV%, 2.10 GAA), whose seven shutouts on the season – including Saturday’s 1-0 win over Michigan – lead the nation.

    The Bulldogs are 2-6-0 in their last eight games at Munn Arena.

    The guy to watch: Mike Lalonde, who leads the Spartans with 21 goals and plays on line with Slater.

    Picks: MSU 4-2, 4-2

    No. 4 Ohio State (21-15-0, 16-12-0 CCHA) vs. No. 9 Bowling Green (11-16-9, 9-13-6 CCHA)

    There’s one thing that could derail the Buckeyes en route to Joe Louis Arena: Jordan Sigalet. The CCHA All-Conference First Team goaltender has a .918 save percentage overall and a 2.72 goals-against average in over 2,000 minutes played this season.

    However capable Sigalet has been this season, OSU has put a total of eight goals past him in just over 70 minutes, having beaten Bowling Green 7-0 and 4-3, both games in BG (Sigalet left the second game due to injury after 10-plus minutes). Dave Steckel scored twice, shorthanded, in the second period of the 7-0 contest, and once in less spectacular fashion in the 4-3 game.

    Steckel and his classmates are the reason OSU will win this series. The Buckeye senior class is playing a first-round series at Value City Arena for the very first time; last year, OSU hosted UNO at Nationwide Arena because of a scheduling conflict at the Schott. The only other time OSU has hosted at VCA was in 1998-1999, the first year the building was open.

    After playing a spoiler at home against Miami last weekend, don’t look for OSU to fold against Bowling Green. The games will be intense and chippy, and this series may go to three games – but I doubt it.

    The guy to watch: Scott May. He really, really, really wanted to score last weekend, and the line of May, Andrew Schembri, and Dan Knapp is pure hockey joy.

    Picks: OSU 4-2, 5-4

    No. 5 Notre Dame (18-12-4, 14-11-3 CCHA) vs. No. 8 Western Michigan (16-16-4, 12-13-3 CCHA)

    This is the series most likely to go to three games, in this girl reporter’s opinion. Why? The Broncos haven’t gone without a win in five straight games all season. They’re 0-3-1 in their last four. WMU split with OSU Feb. 20-21, tied and lost to Miami in Oxford Feb. 27-28, and finished the season with a 6-4 home loss to Bowling Green March 4.

    (Note to Jim Culhane: Avoid all things Ohio.)

    Senior WMU forward Jeff Campbell told the Kalamazoo Gazette, “Losing last week might have been kind of a kick in the but for us. It kind of got guys refocused for this weekend.”

    Campbell’s classmate, Paul Davies, said, “It’s all or nothing this week. We have to win to go to The Joe, so guys are pretty positive right now.”

    To get to JLA, the Broncos have to beat a hard-working Notre Dame hockey club that doesn’t lose often at home. In fact, the Irish are 12-1-2 at the Joyce Center this season, beloved, old, half-building that it is.

    As motivated as the WMU seniors sound, you can bet that ND’s senior class – one of the larger senior classes in the league – will be at least equally motivated.

    The guys to watch: Morgan Cey (.927 SV%, 2.15 GAA) and David Brown (.930 SV%, 2.12 GAA). I suspect these two are both playoff goaltenders, and each may see time in net this weekend – and beyond.

    “It’s a pretty nice option to have,” Notre Dame head coach Dave Poulin told the South Bend Tribune this week. “I’ve spoken to both of them , and it may take both of them to go where we want to go. We may have to play an awful lot of hockey in a very short period of time.”

    Picks: ND 4-3, 4-3

    No. 6 Alaska-Fairbanks (16-17-1, 14-13-1 CCHA) vs. No. 7 Northern Michigan (18-14-4, 13-13-2 CCHA)

    The Nanooks are hosting a first-round playoff series for the second time in three seasons, and the last time they did so they went to The Joe.

    This year should be no different.

    Last weekend, the Nanooks did what any CCHA team should do when it wins a cup: they skated around the arena with the Governor’s Cup aloft, and chanted, “We got the Cup,” and, “U-A-F!”

    (Miami, OSU, BGSU, NMU, LSSU – are you listening?)

    The Nanooks needed a shootout to beat intrastate rival Alaska-Anchorage, and it all came down to walk-on goaltender Keith Bartusch, who allowed two shoot-out goals but then stoned the Seawolves to give UAF the win and the Cup – and a high to end the regular season.

    UAF earned its first two wins in program history against NMU this year, Jan. 16-17, 1-0 and 5-2 victories at the Carlson Center. NMU leads this all-time series 13-2-3, but the series is tied 2-2-1 in the last five.

    Both teams play home games on Olympic sheets, so for once the Nanooks won’t have that specific edge in a series; but UAF has a senior class that remembers what it was like to go to The Joe, and wants to return.

    NMU has a senior goaltender, Craig Kowalski, who is streaky and may be impaired by a groin injury this weekend.

    The guy to watch: Aaron Voros. Smart hockey or liability?

    Picks: UAF 4-3, 4-1

    Comeback of the Year

    March 7, 2004. Thanksgiving Day for Joe Exter and family.

    “Actually, every day is Thanksgiving for us now,” says the former Merrimack College goaltender, whose near-fatal on-ice accident last March gripped the entire sports world. “I think we’d be missing the boat if it wasn’t.”

    One year ago today, Exter lay motionless on the ice at Conte Forum clinging to life after a frightening high-speed collision with Boston College player Patrick Eaves. The force of impact flung the helmet off the Cranston, R.I., native, whose head violently struck the ice, leaving him in a coma with a fractured skull and severe hemorrhaging of the brain.

    Now, 12 months later, the professional backup goalie for the Wheeling (W. Va.) Nailers finds himself celebrating life as well as his deep faith in the one he believes saved his.

    Joe Exter has recovered from a near-fatal on-ice collision in his final college game, and one year later, is playing pro hockey for the Wheeling Nailers of the ECHL.

    Joe Exter has recovered from a near-fatal on-ice collision in his final college game, and one year later, is playing pro hockey for the Wheeling Nailers of the ECHL.

    “God has a plan for us, and without God I wouldn’t have been able to get through this,” Exter says. “Just the support system that I had and the lessons that so many people around me have learned about the power of prayer, that in itself has been great. Without my faith, there is no way I would have been able to get through it.

    “People always say that everything happens for a reason, and I have a job to find that reason.”

    Right now, his job is as a minor-league goaltender in the Pittsburgh Penguins organization. Exter has been in West Virginia since late December after his remarkable seven-month rehabilitation program culminated with him agreeing to a contract with the National Hockey League franchise on Christmas Eve.

    Life as a professional, however, has been a challenge for the former Merrimack captain. It took time for him to convince his new employers that playing him was worth the risk. Then it took more time to persuade his head coach he was worth starting. Last week, he failed to convince that coach he was worthy of staying in the game for an overtime shootout.

    Still today, with his mother Donna paying him a special visit, Exter is a grateful man.

    “It’s more than just another day,” says Exter, who owns a 3-1-0 record with a 2.37 goals-against average with the Nailers.

    “It’s a definitely a day just to think about all that’s happened in the past year and just the story itself. The only one who could have planned a story like this is God. He’s put me in a position that I don’t think anybody thought I was going to be a year from that day.”

    . . .

    Donna Exter finds herself a mother torn today. She’s thrilled her son is back playing hockey. She also dreads it.

    Still, she longed to be at WesBanco Arena tonight to watch her son likely start against the Johnstown Chiefs on the anniversary of his accident.

    “It’s a long way from home, but maybe I needed to be here more than he needed me,” says Donna from Exter’s duplex apartment.

    "You look at that tape [of the accident] like a lot of people have and you think, ‘What possible good could come out of that?’ I have trouble finding the negative things that have come out of it."

    — Joe Exter

    “I don’t know why I feel weepy, but I do … and I shouldn’t,” she adds, her voice cracking as she begins to tear up. “Everything’s wonderful right now. We’re so blessed to be here in Wheeling, W. Va.”

    A true matriarch during the crisis last March, Donna Exter still finds it difficult to accept Joe’s determination to realize his dream of playing professional hockey after all that’s happened. So much so that Friday’s Nailers game in Johnston, Pa., was just the second time she has even seen him in skates since the injury.

    “I’m nervous and have very mixed feelings about it all,” Donna confesses. “The easy thing would be to say, ‘Oh, Joe, this is so wonderful. Just don’t do that hockey stuff anymore and stay here.’ But that would be too easy and it wouldn’t be him.

    “But I know he’s given it a lot of thought and prayer that this is what he wants to do, and I have confidence in his judgment. You look at your passion in life, your purpose, and that is it for him. So you give him your blessing and you pray.”

    Joe Exter admits that most difficult part of the rehabilitation process — most of which took place at Merrimack College — was convincing the people closest to him that playing hockey again was the best medicine of all.

    “In the beginning, I’m sitting there saying I want to do this, this is something I have a passion for, and everybody was thinking I’m crazy,” he says. “I was being questioned a lot if this is really what I wanted to do. I knew for sure it was. I had to give it a shot because I didn’t want to look back with any regrets.

    “But on this long journey, there wasn’t always a light at the end of the tunnel. You never knew how long it was going to go, and I started comparing it to a marathon. There were highs and lows. Even when I got down here [to West Virginia], it didn’t go smoothly.”

    After weeks of trying to convincing Wheeling head coach Pat Bingham he was in game shape, Exter finally cracked the lineup for mop-up duty in late January. He later earned his first professional start and victory Feb. 7 — 11 months to the day after the accident — with a 20-save performance in a 4-3 overtime win at Cincinnati.

    But last week, in a 2-2 overtime situation, Exter was removed from the tiebreaking shootout because the coach was wary of his inexperience. Wheeling won the game, but Exter was at a loss.

    “I was upset and felt I should have been in there,” says Exter, who made 32 saves that night. “But the other coach put it the best when he said, ‘I think Joe Exter’s been through a lot worse in his life than being taken out of a shootout.’

    “It’s a business, though, and obviously I’m blessed to be doing it. It’s going to test you the whole time, though, whether it’s on the ice or off. What you make out of that adversity is going to determine where you’re going to end up.”

    . . .

    Today’s anniversary is another milestone for Exter in a year filled with them.

    From being discharged from Spaulding Rehabilitation Center in less than a week, to receiving his diploma with the rest of the Merrimack College senior class, to returning to the ice for the first time last May at Hockeytown USA in Saugus, Exter has been defying the odds, not to mention the people who set them.

    “Remarkable? I think it’s miraculous,” says Tim Grinnell, Merrimack assistant athletic trainer, who volunteered to coordinate Exter’s rehab program.

    Exter was 31-47-8 in three seasons with Merrimack.

    Exter was 31-47-8 in three seasons with Merrimack.

    “When we were first thinking what was Joe going to be doing a year from now, it was not playing hockey, even though he was in the background saying, ‘I’m going to be playing hockey.’ In the back of my head, I was saying, ‘Wow, I can’t even imagine thinking about playing hockey if this happened to me.'”

    Grinnell worked in concert with Dr. Heechin Chae at Spaulding in bringing Exter along slowly — or so they thought.

    “The first time I visited him the rehab facility,” Grinnell recalls, “he was up asking his doctors, ‘What to I need to do?’ They gave him a list of six or seven things and he did them all that day. Then he says, ‘OK, can I leave now?’

    “Then he started doing that type of thing with me. We set goals for him on what he had to do. As far as rehab, he worked on getting his neck stronger and his shoulders stronger and working on his flexibility and balance. And I was like, ‘Oh my God, this kid is progressing every single day.’ I’ve never seen anybody have that desire.”

    Though pleased by the progress, Grinnell, who assisted Merrimack traveling team physician Gregg Christie with the life-saving intubation measures on the ice within minutes of the collision, still had his doubts. That was until last summer when he witnessed Exter stepping in front of live shots for the first time.

    “It really didn’t click with me until I saw him taking live shots, coming out and challenging players shooting at him. I couldn’t believe he was coming out of the net and being just as aggressive as he was before he was injured. That was absolutely amazing from my perspective because I was a little gun-shy just watching him do it,” Grinnell says, chuckling.

    Merrimack players Marco Rosa and Brent Gough worked out Exter early mornings before class last fall, helping their former captain rediscover the skills that earned him second team All-Hockey East honors last season. Head coach Chris Serino several times invited his former team leader to join the Warriors during practice while Exter prepared to audition for visiting NHL scouts.

    “I’ve thanked [Rosa and Gough] 100 times for going out there, but sometimes the words ‘thank you’ don’t accurately describe how you feel,” Exter says.

    “I’ve talked to kids who have gone to big-time schools, the Michigans of the world and BUs. When they leave there, they might have won something, but they don’t leave there with the feeling that I have. At Merrimack, they care about you more than just as a player, more than just somebody that can get you a victory. Coach Serino cares about you as a person, and you can’t beat that in life.”

    . . .

    So many people, several of whom he will never meet, have come into Joe Exter’s life this past year. His parents are still filling boxes at their Cranston home with well-wishers’ cards and letters from around the world.

    However, none have meant so much than his parents, Donna and Mark, older brother David and girlfriend Erin Van Bruggen. The couple are planning an engagement this summer.

    “She’s been my rock,” Exter says.

    Even though he will never get the opportunity to properly thank the masses of people who make up what he calls his “support system,” Exter is convinced continuing his playing career is the next best thing.

    “People ask if it makes me feel uncomfortable, the hassle about being approached about the injury every day. Absolutely not,” Exter insists. “Some people in life hope to have an impact on just one person. I think I’ve been given a pretty good opportunity to have that impact on many.

    “You look at that tape [of the accident] like a lot of people have and you think, ‘What possible good could come out of that?’ I have trouble finding the negative things that have come out of it. It’s amazing how many good things have come out of that incident.”


    Update: Since this article was originally published, Joe Exter has recorded back-to-back shutouts on consecutive nights, March 9-10. His shutout streak is at 139:42, and he has a 6-1-0 record with a 1.81 GAA and .939 save percentage.

    This article originally was published in the March 7, 2004 edition of the Eagle-Tribune. It has been re-published with permission.

    This Week in the ECAC: March 11, 2004

    Four teams gone, four teams return to action. Welcome to the quarterfinals, where the top four finishers from the regular season — bye week behind them — host best-of-three series against last weekend’s victorious quartet. Here’s how the teams stack up just one week away from a trip to Albany.

    No. 8 St. Lawrence (13-19-6, 7-12-3 ECAC) at No. 1 Colgate (19-10-5, 14-6-2)

    This Season
    SLU 5, Colgate 1 in Canton (11/14/03); Colgate 3, SLU 2 in Hamilton (12/28/04)

    Recent Playoff History:
    2003 First Round at Colgate: Raiders over Saints 1-2, 3-2 (ot), 5-2

    Top Five Scorers
    Colgate – Jon Smyth, So., LW, 21-18-39; Adam Mitchell, Jr., F, 13-18-31; Kyle Wilson, So., C, 13-17-30; Kyle Doyle, Sr., F, 13-15-28; Darryl McKinnon, Jr., C, 10-11-21.
    SLU – Rich Peverley, Sr., F, 16-25-41; T.J. Trevelyan, So., W, 23-16-39; John Zeiler, So., F, 8-27-35; Ryan Glenn, Sr., D, 7-19-26; Kyle Rank, So., F, 7-11-18.

    Between the Pipes
    Colgate – Steve Silverthorn, Jr., 16-7-4, 1.91 GAA, .922 save percentage
    SLU – Mike McKenna, Jr., 8-8-3, 2.59, .912

    An Inside Look
    The Saints (4-12-2 away) enter the quarterfinals after a thrilling opening-round sweep at Yale in which both contests were decided in overtime. In a fast-paced series with a ton of shots allowed on both sides, SLU benefited from a more balanced offensive contribution and the continuing stellar play of netminder Mike McKenna. The junior has started the last 11 games for the Saints and has posted a 2.10 GAA and .932 save percentage. The fact that his record in those games is 5-4-2 is no fault of his.

    “He’s seeing the puck real well,” Saints coach Joe Marsh said about his netminder. “He’s very vocal now with his defense. He’s played well in the past, but now he is playing consistently well. He’s elevated his play even in practice and the guys have a lot of confidence in him and are playing hard in front of him. One hand washes the other.”

    Colgate (10-5-1 at home) returns to action after earning a first-round bye and winning the regular season title on the final night of conference play. Ironically enough, the Raiders had to beat St. Lawrence to capture the Cleary Cup. Since then, they’ve used the time off to get healthier and are focused on what they need to do this weekend.

    “We’re quite thrilled with our level of consistency,” said Colgate coach Stan Moore. “But we really like how St. Lawrence plays as a team. They have a lot of emotion and play well with it. We will need to match that.

    “There’s also that spoiler mentality for them coming in against us. The regular season is over and they are not that far off from the top. The game we played against them early in the year (a 5-1 loss) was one of only two games where we did not play up to the level of our opponent. We didn’t lose that game, we were beaten.

    “This last game, coming down to the last seconds, we resembled a cat hanging by one claw on the toilet bowl. We had to deal with a lackluster start and fight to the end.”

    Feline references aside, the Saints will have their work cut out for them as well, but are confident of how they need to play to be successful.

    “That’s a tough rink to play in,” commented Marsh. “We had two different types of games against them this year, with everything going well for us in November.

    “We’ll have to play at the top of our game. They are a tough team to move through the middle of the ice against offensively and you’re just not going to get many second and third chances. We have to have real good puck support, use all five of our guys and make some indirect passes. They are a good transition team.”

    Over the last seven contests, St. Lawrence’s special teams have improved dramatically, especially the power play, which has clicked at a 21.8 percent rate over that span. The penalty-killing unit has been effective at 84.3 percent over the last 32 shorthanded situations.

    “If you love to compete and have success, you don’t want anything less,” explained Moore about playing a Saints team that is also the healthiest it’s been all season. “You don’t want to hear that they are down nine players because of injuries, you want the test.”

    This series will likely come down to depth and strong defense. Up front, each club has strong first lines. St. Lawrence’s Rich Peverley leads the ECAC in overall points (41) followed by linemate T.J. Trevelyan (39) — the league leader with 23 goals and a nation-best 13 power-play tallies — and Colgate’s Jon Smyth (39). The Raiders, however, have a more balanced attack with five forwards having scored 10 or more goals this season compared to just two for the Saints. In addition, Colgate has 11 players with 12 or more points; the Saints have six.

    And while McKenna and the Raiders’ Steve Silverthorn are both on a roll, Colgate blueliners have proven more effective in their zone this year. As a team, the Raiders have allowed 2.15 goals per game (1.94 at home) while the Saints have given up 3.03 per contest — including 3.56 on the road.

    Our pick: Colgate in two games.

    No. 7 Clarkson (15-16-5, 8-12-2) at No. 2 Cornell (15-8-6, 13-6-3)

    This Season
    Cornell 2, Clarkson 2 (ot) in Potsdam (11/14/03); Cornell 2, Clarkson 1 in Ithaca (2/28/04)

    Recent Playoff History
    2000 ECAC Preliminary Game in Lake Placid: Big Red 4, Golden Knights 2

    Top Five Scorers
    Clarkson – Mac Faulkner, Jr., LW, 14-25-39; Chris Blight, Jr., RW, 17-17-34; Jay Latulippe, Jr., LW, 13-15-28; Rob McFeeters, Sr., RW, 5-16-21; Trevor Edwards, Sr., LW, 9-9-18.
    Cornell – Matt Moulson, So., F, 18-16-34; Ryan Vesce, Sr., F, 10-15-25; Mike Knoepfli, Jr., F, 4-16-20; Byron Bitz, Fr., RW, 5-14-19; Shane Hynes, So., F, 9-8-17.

    Between the Pipes
    Clarkson – Dustin Traylen, So., 12-13-5, 2.53, .921
    Cornell – David McKee, Fr., 15-8-6, 1.68, .927

    An Inside Look
    Like its North Country neighbors, Clarkson (7-6-2 away) is full of confidence after an opening-round road sweep in which it overwhelmed Union by a combined 13-5 score. The Knights advanced to the quarterfinals for the 41st time in the 43 years of the ECAC playoffs, but reality is about to smack them in the face.

    Cornell rookie David McKee is first in the ECAC and second in the nation in GAA and second in the league and fifth in the country in save percentage. In addition, the Big Red allowed just 1.76 goals per game (second-best nationally) and killed off 88.6 percent of penalties, fifth-best in the country. With all due respect, these aren’t the Dutchmen.

    Clarkson could play Cornell (6-5-5 at home) six or seven times and still not score 13 goals against the Big Red. If the Knights have any plans to win this series, they’ll need Dustin Traylen to match the goaltending prowess of McKee … and still hope for a timely goal or two.

    Traylen has been the key to Clarkson’s solid play since the team lost six in a row down the stretch. The sophomore netminder is 4-1-0 since then and the team has allowed more than two goals in a game just once in that span. In addition, solid offensive efforts are coming from multiple lines now, including Jay Latulippe (held without a point just four times in 2004) and even Fairfield transfer Lyon Porter, who didn’t score a goal all season until he potted two last Friday.

    “It is the first time,” said Knights’ coach George Roll, “[that] we put back-to-back solid games together. We got another strong goaltending performance from Traylen, balanced scoring and strong specialty teams play. We got a lot of good efforts from a lot of different guys.

    “Dustin was Dustin. He made the key saves when we needed him to.”

    Meanwhile, many seem to have forgotten that Cornell is the defending ECAC champion and must be considered a slight favorite to win in it all again. Why, you ask?

    Simply put, this team knows how to win come playoff time. The Big Red have a conference-best 73 wins in the postseason (Clarkson and Harvard are second at 68) and have won a record 10 ECAC titles. Their style of play is perfect for this time of year; whether you call it “tight defense” or “clutching-and-grabbing” is up to you.

    The also have the best postseason coach in the conference in Mike Schafer. Since returning to Ithaca as the bench boss, the Cornell grad has won three ECAC tourney titles and made four trips to the NCAAs.

    If we were in Vegas, our money would be on the Big Red to repeat. That’s not a slight against any of the other teams who, this year especially, all have the chance to win the crown, but Cornell seems to be made for the playoffs. Last year, everything the Big Red did was with the intent of getting back to the title game against Harvard and win. They did. Would they love to repeat as champs? You bet.

    Oh, and they are healthy now too.

    “We’ll be dressing a fully healthy team for the first time in a long time,” said Schafer about the advantage of the week off.

    “Clarkson is playing its best hockey of the year,” he continued, “and gained some more confidence by going into Union and winning. We just have to play solid defense and capitalize on our chances.

    “That’s been the key difference between success or not for us.”

    Roll, meanwhile, hopes for a repeat performance of the Knights’ trip to Union.

    “That is the type of effort we [need] if we are going to continue to have success this weekend at Cornell. We just got done playing in that building. For our freshmen, it will not be their first taste of Lynah Rink. It is still fresh in their minds.

    “I think we were a little intimidated there two weeks ago, but I don’t think that will be the case this time. We had a lot of guys step it up this past weekend and I feel pretty confident in our play going into the quarterfinals.”

    All in all, this is sure to be a low-scoring series with a lot of intensity and a good level of physical play. If the games were in Potsdam, Clarkson would have a better chance, but the teams are further downstate and we just can’t see any visitor winning two of three at Lynah.

    Our pick: Cornell in three games.

    No. 6 Harvard (14-14-3, 10-10-2) at No. 3 Brown (15-9-5, 13-7-2)

    This Season
    Brown 2, Harvard 0 in Cambridge (11/01/03); Brown 2, Harvard 1 (ot) in Providence (1/31/04)

    Recent Playoff History
    2002 ECAC First Round at Harvard: Crimson over Bears 4-1, 2-1 (2ot)

    Top Five Scorers
    Harvard – Tom Cavanagh, Jr., F, 13-17-30; Tyler Kolarik, Sr., F, 10-18-28; Tim Pettit, Sr., F, 8-20-28; Brendan Bernakevitch, Jr., F, 8-15-23; Dennis Packard, Sr., F, 9-12-21.
    Brown – Brian Ihnacak, Fr., F, 10-20-30; Brent Robinson, Sr., F, 11-18-29; Les Haggett, Jr., F, 5-23-28; Scott Ford, Sr., D, 6-9-15; Vince Macri, Sr., D, 6-8-14.

    Between the Pipes
    Harvard – Dov Grumet-Morris, Jr., 12-13-3, 2.36, .913
    Brown – Yann Danis, Sr., 15-9-4, 1.70, .946

    An Inside Look
    What a difference a few games make. Left for dead multiple times this season, the Harvard (5-5-2 away) bandwagon is getting mighty crowded these days. The new “sexy” pick to win it all, the Crimson come into the quarterfinals having completely dominated an exhausted and shorthanded (due to injuries) Vermont team, squeezing the remaining life out of the Cats and sweeping the first round.

    “When you look at it,” said UVM coach Kevin Sneddon, “you never want to make excuses, but they were a stronger team. We just had too many injuries and our tanks were running low going into the series. I hate losing more than anything, but [it] was a big step forward for our program.”

    How’d Harvard finish them off?

    Timely goals, excellent penalty killing and a little thing called the neutral-zone trap. That combination does wonders in the postseason: just ask the New Jersey Devils. The Crimson intended to ride it all the way to the Pepsi Arena in Albany — coincidentally the home of the Devils’ AHL franchise.

    “One of the real keys to the whole weekend,” said Harvard coach Mark Mazzoleni after beating the Cats, “[was] the penalty killing. And at five-on-five, we pretty much had the advantage all weekend.”

    On his team’s improved and emotional play, Mazzoleni had a simple explanation.

    “It’s hard to have good chemistry and fun when you’re not winning. It’s good to see the players rewarded for all of their hard work.”

    Ah, but let’s not forget about the Brown Bears (8-3-2 at home). In first place for the majority of the season until a February slide dropped them into the third slot, the week off may have helped Brown regain its focus.

    “I thought we played some pretty good hockey [down the stretch],” said Bears’ coach Roger Grillo, “but we didn’t get the results we wanted. We’re ready to go and very confident going into the series. Harvard is a good team, but we have to do what we do best: play hard, smart and disciplined.”

    Hosting their first playoff series against Harvard after seven series losses at Bright Hockey Center, the Bears are still the most dangerous team in the league if, for no other reason, than they have Yann Danis between the pipes. The best netminder in the ECAC, he can win games all by himself and has done so throughout his career. As a senior, he’s extra motivated — if that’s possible — to go out with a bang.

    Danis doesn’t just make big saves, he makes momentum-shifting stops, especially on the power play. Coaches say that a team’s best penalty killer is its goalie, which explains the Bears’ 90.7 percent PK effectiveness that ranks them atop the national statistics.

    “Some of the older guys have stepped up too,” said Grillo. “including [defensemen] Vince Macri, Scott Ford, Gerry Burke and Paul Crosty.”

    On offense, the Bears are improved over last season, including a 21.3 percent conversion rate on the power play, which ranks seventh in the country.

    The Crimson, while holding down Vermont, still took some ill-advised penalties. That’s something it can’t afford against Brown, which has scored 33 of its 76 tallies this season with the man-advantage. Harvard will want to keep the game at even strength, where it has allowed only two goals while playing five-on-five in the last four games.

    Expect another big series from the Crimson’s Tyler Kolarik, whose ECAC playoff totals for his career include six goals and 19 points, while Ryan Lannon and the defensive unit attempt to shut down Brown rookie Brian Ihnacak and upperclassmen Brent Robinson and Les Haggett.

    And how does Grillo expect to break Harvard’s trapping style?

    “We need to be patient and take care of the puck. We don’t want to force the issue … we don’t want to be in that position.”

    This should be another close, low-scoring series. It’s a tough call on which way it will go, but, despite Harvard’s renewed confidence and aggressiveness, we keep getting lured back to the Bears’ side because of Danis and their strong play at Meehan Auditorium.

    Our pick: Brown in three games.

    No. 5 Rensselaer (21-13-2, 13-8-1) at No. 4 Dartmouth (12-8-9, 10-5-7)

    This Season
    Dartmouth 1, RPI 1 (ot) in Troy (11/15/03); Dartmouth 4, RPI 3 in Hanover (1/30/04)

    Recent Playoff History
    2002 ECAC Preliminary Game in Lake Placid: Engineers 2, Big Green 1
    2001 ECAC First Round at Dartmouth: Big Green over Engineers 4-2, 5-1
    2000 ECAC First Round at Rensselaer: Engineers over Big Green 7-2, 3-2 (ot)

    Top Five Scorers
    RPI – Kevin Croxton, So., F, 18-21-39; Kirk MacDonald, So., F, 14-18-32; Nick Economakos, Jr., F, 9-19-28; Scott Basiuk, Sr., D, 10-15-25; Ben Barr, Sr., F, 8-15-23.
    Dartmouth – Hugh Jessiman, So., F, 16-16-32; Lee Stempniak, Jr. F, 14-18-32; Grant Lewis, Fr., D, 3-22-25; Mike Ouellette, So., F, 13-8-21; Nathan Szymanski, Jr., F, 9-12-21.

    Between the Pipes
    RPI – Nathan Marsters, 20-11-1, 2.12, .920
    Dartmouth – Dan Yacey, Jr., 11-8-8, 2.64, .906

    An Inside Look
    How odd a year has this been? Dartmouth (6-2-4 at home) finished the regular season with three fewer wins than Rensselaer’s 13, but won the higher seed in a tiebreaker. You can thank the Big Green’s seven league ties to RPI’s one for pulling it even in points and winning percentage. The tiebreaker was head-to-head record and it gave Dartmouth the first-round bye.

    “It was good to have the week off,” said Big Green coach Bob Gaudet. “We were banged up and heading into finals, so we were able to get some academic work done. It’s a tough time of year for us with finals and the playoffs. We’re healthier now.”

    Continuing along the pathway of the strange, the Engineers (12-6-0 away) have nine more wins than their opponents this weekend and are the only ECAC club with more than 20 victories. Of course, all that gets them is the third-best overall winning percentage among conference mates and a road series in Hanover — which RPI earned after sweeping Princeton in the opening round for its first four-game winning streak of the season.

    All that aside, these two teams line up pretty evenly in some other statistical categories, including special teams, where Rensselaer ranks slightly better in power plays (20.5 percent to 19.4) and penalty killing (85 to 78.8).

    “They are a really good team,” said Gaudet. “They have had a great season and Marsters has been outstanding in goal. They are a good offensive team and excellent defensively; they present a lot of challenges for us.”

    A strong road team, RPI plays a tough, physical style that makes it dangerous regardless of the opponent. The Engineers, and this may come as a surprise to many, lead the ECAC in overall scoring with 113 goals and 3.14 tallies per game. Defensively, they allow a fourth-best 2.25 per contest. Across the ice, the Big Green rank fourth in offense with a 2.90 scoring average — down from 3.74 last season — and seventh in defense, allowing 2.86 per game.

    Dartmouth and RPI are also similar on the blueline with Rensselaer senior Scott Basiuk and sophomore Brad Farynuk playing similar roles to Dartmouth’s senior Brian Van Abel and rookie sensation Grant Lewis — who would have had to sit out with an injury were it not for the bye week. Gaudet also admitted that this weekend marks the healthiest Van Abel has been in quite some time.

    However, where the series will likely be decided is between the pipes. Marsters has strung together an excellent final season in Troy and has been a quiet force in goal — winning 20 for the first time and posting a career-high five shutouts. For Dartmouth, junior Dan Yacey enters his first postseason as the go-to guy. He began the season on a tear, leading the Big Green to a 4-0-3 start, but was as inconsistent as his teammates up until February. Over a 20-day span last month, he was 3-0-2 before losing the season finale at Harvard.

    “It really doesn’t matter who we play,” Gaudet said. “We have to play hard, stay out of the box and generate offense. We really need to focus for every shift.

    “It should be fun. It is a great time of year to be playing and we are very excited to be playing them at home.”

    In such a close series, home ice usually is a factor, but RPI’s excellent performance away from the Capital Region could nullify Dartmouth’s Thompson Arena advantage. RPI has won five straight road games, allowing just two goals or fewer in those contests, and is 6-1-0 in its last seven away from home. That lone loss? To Dartmouth, of course.

    That said, and with all other aspects fairly even, the series will come down to who plays better in goal and our money is on Marsters, the tested playoff veteran of every RPI postseason game (13) in his four-year career.

    Our pick: RPI in three games.

    Rangers May Dip Into ECAC

    Those of us who have been longtime observers of the National Hockey League are still a bit surprised to see the New York Rangers finally undertaking a rebuilding effort. Cursed in unimaginable ways after seemingly selling their franchise’s soul for the 1994 Stanley Cup, the Blueshirts spent the days leading up to the NHL’s Tuesday trade deadline unloading most of their marketable dead wood: Alexei Kovalev, Brian Leetch (!), Petr Nedved, Chris Simon et al.

    The Rangers are serious — for now — about remaking the club, so much so that the ECAC, of all leagues, could feel the effects.

    The New York Post recently reported that the Rangers’ mess in goal is leading them to explore a series of alternatives to Mike Dunham and Dan Blackburn — the one-time “franchise” netminder. Apparently, the Rangers have their sights set on Brown’s Yann Danis, a free agent once the Bears’ season ends. They’ll have competition for Danis, though, as the Post claimed that at least six other teams are interested in the netminder.

    In a surprise to no one, the Rangers are also expected to try and sign Dartmouth’s Hugh Jessiman at season’s end and place him with their AHL affiliate, the Hartford Wolfpack. Drafted last summer by the Blueshirts, Jessiman didn’t hide his excitement when he visited Rangers training camp at UVM before the season. The big sophomore never participated in camp. According to the Post, Rangers management is intent on signing him to a contract “as quickly as possible.”

    A Broken Neck and A Black Eye

    Baseball and hockey have always been my favorite sports. They shared the number-one spot in my heart for years until hockey finally took the lead. I love the game, the strategy, the speed, the physical aspect, the finesse … all of it. I’m as happy at a 1-0 defensive battle as I am at a 7-6 shootout.

    As hockey fans, we defend our sport, all the while wondering why others don’t get as fired up as we do each night. And then it happens. All of the stereotypes about hockey get reinforced with one cheap shot that gets replayed as often as a passionate 10 seconds of a Howard Dean speech.

    Thank you, Todd Bertuzzi.

    He and his Vancouver Canucks have had their sights set on Colorado’s Steve Moore since the former Harvard Crimson KOed Markus Naslund with a shoulder to the head. The hit was finally “avenged” this week when Bertuzzi, his team getting blown out at the time, sucker-punched Moore from behind, then, using the force of his 245-pound frame, drove the Avalanche center’s head into the ice — fracturing Moore’s neck.

    Nice.

    One of the most interesting aspects of hockey is how the game polices itself, so you knew retribution was coming against Moore. But what Bertuzzi did wasn’t just inexcusable, it was appalling.

    It’s one thing if Bertuzzi wants to skate up to Moore and drop his gloves — Moore was involved in a first period fight, by the way — but for the league’s best power forward to jump a smaller player from behind is pathetic and cowardly.

    What’s worse is that the premeditated play — encouraged by Vancouver coach Marc Crawford — could have killed or paralyzed Moore. Did Bertuzzi intend to break Moore’s neck? Not likely. Did he intend to hurt Moore? Absolutely. And for that, Bertuzzi needed to be punished accordingly. Forty games. A full season. Something harsh.

    Unfortunately, the NHL took the cowardly way out also. On Thursday the league suspended Bertuzzi for the remainder of the regular season and the playoffs — a minimum of 17 games. Commissioner Gary Bettman said he’ll decide on further punishment at next year’s training camp when he sees how Moore has progressed. Of course, with a lockout looming there may not be a training camp in the fall.

    What’s worse is that the punishment shouldn’t be dependent on where Moore’s recovery is in a few months. Bertuzzi’s punishment should be based on the act, not on whether a miracle saved Moore’s life, his mobility and his career.

    Once again, the NHL proved it doesn’t want to be taken seriously. It turned away from its responsibility to all of hockey and because of that, more than anything else, the sport as a whole is worse off.

    Our Two Cents …

    Princeton fired head coach Len Quesnelle earlier this week, which opens up a vacancy in a league known for hiring from within. The Tigers announced that they will have a national search for a new coach, but their best bet may already be toiling in the conference. If Princeton is serious about bringing its program back to respectability and future success, we think the powers that be need to call Stan Moore as soon as Colgate’s season is over.

    The Raiders’ interim head coach took over for Don Vaughan weeks before the season began, lifted his club out of its emotional shock and led Colgate to its first regular-season title since 1991.

    “We had some seniors in tears trying to deal with the change,” said Moore, recalling last fall. “They had a picture of what their last year would be like. I leaned on my wife and we chatted about it. We always say, ‘Intelligence is the ability to adjust,’ and softly, we had to say it to the players.”

    Moore’s performance this year has not been a fluke.

    In his first season at Union (1996-97), Moore took a seven-win team and led it to an 18-13-3 record. That total still stands as the most wins in any of the program’s Division I seasons and is the last time Union finished above .500.

    Moore and the Dutchmen struggled through a 6-22-4 season in his final year in Schenectady. But aside from that blemish, he’s won 37 games in two seasons under tough conditions. That’s certainly worthy of consideration.

    In Case You Missed It

  • Clarkson’s victories at Union marked the first time this season that the Knights earned a pair of wins on the same weekend from an ECAC team.
  • Golden Knights co-captains Tristan Lush and Rob McFeeters sat out last Friday’s game against the Dutchmen when they took responsibility for a violation of team policy committed by several other Clarkson players. It was the first game Lush has missed in his collegiate career.
  • Knights junior Mac Faulkner is one point away from being the first Clarkson player to score 40 points since Erik Cole notched 41 in the 1998-99 campaign.
  • (Tastiest) Stat of the week: Harvard is undefeated at home in the playoffs (8-0-0) when Assistant Director of Athletic Communications Jamie Weir provides baked goods (her homemade cakes) in the press box. Now there’s a superstition we can all rally behind.
  • Eight of the 30 power play goals allowed on the season by the Crimson were scored by Vermont.
  • The Crimson’s Dov Grumet-Morris set a modern school record for consecutive shutout minutes with a streak of 184:35 into the third period of game two of the UVM series.
  • With Friday night’s win, Rensselaer reached the 20-win plateau for the fourth time in the last six seasons.
  • St. Lawrence’s sweep of Yale marked the first time since 1964 that the Saints have advanced as a road team in the ECAC playoffs and the two wins were the third and fourth for SLU as a visiting team in their tournament history.

    What’s on Tap

    No. 8 St. Lawrence at No. 1 Colgate: St. Lawrence leads the overall series between the two teams by a 56-51-3 margin, but Colgate holds the edge at home 27-21-2. The Saints have won just twice in their last 11 trips to Starr Rink.

    No. 7 Clarkson at No. 2 Cornell: Clarkson leads the all-time series 44-42-9, but Cornell boasts a six-game unbeaten streak (5-0-1) and an 8-1-1 mark over the last 10 games. The Knights have not won at Lynah since March 1999. Clarkson’s most familiar opponent in the ECAC playoffs, the Knights and Big Red have played 19 times with Cornell owning a 12-6-1 lead.

    No. 6 Harvard at No. 3 Brown: Harvard leads the all-time series with Brown by a 96- 36-8 margin, with the Bears winning both games this season. Roger Grillo is 6-9-1 against the Crimson, while Mark Mazzoleni is 7-5-0 against Brown. The Harvard bench boss improved his ECAC playoff record to 12-4-0 with the sweep over UVM. The Crimson also own a 6-1-0 record against the Bears in tournament history, which includes a perfect 5-0 mark in quarterfinal matchups.

    No. 5 Rensselaer at No. 4 Dartmouth: Rensselaer leads the overall series 33-19-4, but Dartmouth has had the upper hand of late, posting a 4-1-2 mark over the last seven head-to-head matchups. Rensselaer head coach Dan Fridgen is 14-10-2 in his career against the Big Green.

  • Bracketology: D-I Women

    How hard can it to be to pick the four teams for NCAA Women’s Hockey tournament? Only four teams, no conference automatic bids, and there’s only one site in Providence to place them. Easy, right?

    Judging by the short history of national championship women’s hockey, the answer is a resounding no. With only four teams to pick out of 30, in four conferences with a tiny number of interconference results available, all that comes easily to the selection process is controversy.

    Consider the first NCAA Frozen Four in 2001, when Minnesota was the defending national champion, the WCHA regular-season champion and the inaugural Frozen Four host. Seeing as the sport only had two conferences back then and Minnesota was the regular-season champion of one of them, conventional wisdom suggested the Gophers would make the tournament, even though they placed a dismal fourth in their conference tournament.

    But they didn’t, and instead the berth went to St. Lawrence, a team that placed third in the ECAC regular season and lost its conference semifinal game by a 7-1 margin. The move probably meant smaller crowds for the Frozen Four, but the committee was vindicated when the Saints stunned season-long No. 1 Dartmouth 3-1 in the first NCAA women’s hockey tournament game ever played.

    While Minnesota’s demise shocked conventional wisdom, it wasn’t unforeseen by those in the know. The USCHO.com D-I Women’s PairWise Rankings (PWR) predicted the Gophers’ impending disaster, as well as the entire four-team field that made the Women’s Frozen Four, and its predictive success has continued each of the last three years.

    That, combined with the success of PWR on the men’s side, has made the PWR so revered that various media outlets have inadvertently implied that they perfectly predict the Frozen Four selection process. While the PWR can’t perfectly match the NCAA process, it does use the same criteria as the NCAA, so it always come close.

    Although the D-I Women’s PWR has had a successful history, this year’s rankings might be deceptive for a couple reasons:

  • The NCAA women’s selection criteria are written in language that is less rigid than the men’s criteria. This flexibility hasn’t resulted in Frozen Four picks distinct from the PWR yet, but that is no guarantee for the future.
  • The NCAA Women’s Ice Hockey Committee implemented changes in one of its selection criteria, the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI). USCHO.com has not yet implemented these changes into its RPI and PWR calculations that are updated after each D-I game result.

    Both these complicated observations require further explanation. But first let’s get to the point — what are the implications for this season?

    The former observation is favorable for teams like No. 5 Wisconsin and No. 6 Minnesota-Duluth, who are not having much luck with the rigid numbers of the current PWR. But the latter observation is dreadful news for those same teams, if those schools have been abiding by the PWR as an accurate indicator of their selection prospects.

    The direct implication of the NCAA’s new RPI adjustment is that three teams (Minnesota, Harvard, and Dartmouth) have built a nearly insurmountable lead in RPI over the rest of the country. St. Lawrence, Wisconsin, and UMD all appear to be close in the old RPI, but in the corrected RPI, St. Lawrence has a sizeable advantage.

    St. Lawrence’s current edge is so large, in fact, that even if the Saints advance to the ECAC semifinals and lose there, Wisconsin will have to win the WCHA to surmount St. Lawrence’s RPI, and UMD cannot surmount it.

    In the PWR resulting from the new RPI, Minnesota has already clinched a top-four spot, as will Harvard if it sweeps its ECAC quarterfinal series. Dartmouth will also clinch a top-four spot with an ECAC quarterfinal sweep, but by a slim margin.

    If St. Lawrence sweeps its ECAC quarterfinal series, it will be in the top four as long as Wisconsin doesn’t win the WCHA tournament. And if St. Lawrence wins its ECAC semifinal, it will be ahead of Wisconsin if the Badgers win the WCHA. UMD cannot earn a top four spot if the top three ECAC teams all sweep their quarterfinal series.

    Does this mean Wisconsin has to win the WCHA tournament to make the Frozen Four? If the Frozen Four gets picked solely based on the PWR numbers, then the answer is yes. But that’s where that first observation above comes back into play. If Wisconsin falls in the WCHA final or earlier, then the desire to have a Frozen Four field of two from the East and two from the West is going to come into conflict with any interpretation of the PWR numbers.

    The rest of this column is divided into several sections — one explaining the new RPI adjustments, one discussing the looser language of the women’s criteria, and the rest going over adjusted PWRs based on a variety of conference tournament outcomes. Those less concerned with details and more concerned with applications should skip the next two sections.

    Explaining the NCAA’s RPI Adjustment

    Here’s the new adjustment, which is indicated by an asterisk next to the definition of RPI in the NCAA women’s ice hockey tournament handbook:

    “If points awarded for up to four regular-season game wins lower a team’s average RPI, those points will not count toward the RPI. Points awarded for postseason tournament wins that lower a team’s average regular-season RPI shall not count toward a team’s RPI.”

    Note that in women’s hockey, RPI is a weighted average of won-lost record, opponents’ winning percentage and opponents’ opponents’ winning percentage, where the weights are 35 percent, 50 percent and 15 percent, respectively.

    To understand what that rule is saying, first observe that a single-game RPI can be calculated for each game a team plays in the context of the opponents’ results, and the season RPI can be written as the average of all game RPIs. For instance the game RPI of a win over Minnesota this season is about .86. The game RPI of a loss to Minnesota-Duluth is about .40. The season RPI of a hypothetical team that beats Minnesota in 15 games and loses to UMD in 15 games is about .63, which is the average of the above two numbers. (Note: Two different teams might get slightly different game RPIs for the same opponent depending on their head-to-head histories, but this is a technicality beyond the scope of this column.)

    Next, understand that some opponents have records so poor that a win against them actually lowers a team’s season RPI. For example, the game RPIs this season for wins over Union, Vermont and Bemidji State were about .44, .51, and .52 respectively. Note that a win over Vermont is worth about as much as a loss to Minnesota in RPI terms. A win over Union is worth about as much as a loss to UNH.

    Also, observe that teams like Harvard, Dartmouth, and St. Lawrence — which have RPIs greater then .60 — would all have higher RPIs had their conference allowed them to avoid Union and Vermont entirely. What the new rule does, roughly speaking, is to calculate what RPIs these teams would have had they not played games that lowered their season RPI

    Here are the results for the top nine teams in the PWR. Listed are each team’s Old RPI, New RPI, and the four wins dropped from each team’s New RPI calculation.

    Team Old RPI New RPI Wins Dropped
    Minnesota .6618 .6803 Bemidji State (4)
    Harvard .6401 .6660 Union (2), Vermont (2)
    Dartmouth .6362 .6615 Union (2), Vermont (2)
    St. Lawrence .6099 .6287 Union (2), Vermont (2)
    Wisconsin .6050 .6167 Vermont (2), Bemidji State (2)
    Minnesota-Duluth .5971 .6065 Bemidji State (4)
    Mercyhurst .5921 .5999 Bemidji State (2), Quinnipiac (2)
    New Hampshire .5906 .5961 Vermont (1), Boston College (3)
    Princeton .5757 .5913 Union (2), Vermont (2)

    (Note that the wins dropped for each team do not necessarily coincide with the teams’ opponents who have the lowest RPIs. They coincide more with lowest win percentages, but not exactly. The explanation for this is beyond the scope of this column.)

    As the numbers show, the ECAC teams — in particular the Ivy teams — receive a greater boost from the new RPI than other teams. To see why, recall that the game RPI for Union was about .44 and the game RPIs for Vermont and Bemidji State were .51 and .52, respectively, so removing the Union games from the ECAC teams’ season RPI calculation provides a larger boost than removing the Bemidji State games. The Ivy teams get the largest boost because they played fewer regular season games, so the Union games had been dragging them down more than their ECAC peers.

    For a practical interpretation of RPI numbers, note that if a team plays 35 games, its RPI would increase by .01 (.35/35) if the team could turn one loss into a win. This heuristic can be used to compare two teams, effectively controlling for their strength of schedules. The gap between Dartmouth is Wisconsin can then be interpreted as more than four wins, while the gap between St. Lawrence and Wisconsin is about one win.

    The second part of RPI adjustment is the exclusion of postseason wins that bring down RPI. It turns out that the only team affected by this is Harvard, whose ECAC quarterfinal opponent Cornell is the only postseason team weak enough for this to be an issue (a win over Cornell gets a game RPI of about .54). So playing Cornell will lower Harvard’s RPI that gets calculated on-the-fly by USCHO.com and used in the current PWR, but it will not affect the RPI used by the NCAA.

    Just How Rigid Are The Women’s Criteria?

    First, read the exact wording of the women’s criteria as it appears in the handbook:

    “The committee will evaluate won-lost record and strength of schedule using the following categories: (not in preferential order) Rating Percentage Index (RPI); Head-to-head competition; Results versus common opponents; Results during the last 16 games; and Results against teams under consideration.”

    (“Teams under consideration” means those with records greater than .500 here.)

    The men’s criteria are written more rigidly, stating specifically that team comparisons are made in each category with a point awarded for each category victory, except for head-to-head where a point is awarded for each head-to-head victory, and that RPI is used as a tiebreaker. This is also the methodology applied in the men’s and women’s PWR. But that specific language is absent from the women’s handbook.

    Note that last year, Harvard was ahead of UMD in the PWR immediately prior to NCAA selections, but UMD earned the top seed and played Dartmouth, while Harvard earned the No. 2 seed and played Minnesota. This is the only NCAA tournament seeding that has ever differed from the women’s PWR in its history.

    Looking at the comparison, Harvard had a head-to-head win over UMD, a slight edge in results during the last 16 games, and a slight edge in results against teams under consideration. But UMD had a sizeable advantage in both RPI and results versus common opponents. It remains unknown whether this discrepancy from the PWR was a result of Harvard’s smaller edge in various categories or the committee’s desire to avoid semifinal intraconference matchups. Perhaps it was a combination of the two.

    While the committee has made one decision that differed slightly from the PWR, there’s no precedent for the committee making decisions that would turn the PWR entirely on its head. It’s conceivable the committee might give weight to a category victory that’s decided by about a point or an RPI differential below .005, but it’s unlikely a team will get preferential treatment for the sake of regional parity or appeasing a conference. The selection of St. Lawrence over Minnesota in 2001 went in favor of the PWR numbers and against just about every intangible consideration.

    Another observation about selection decisions is that even though the women’s criteria does not say RPI will be tiebreaker, it tends to carry the most weight because it is the only criterion that evaluates a team based on the entire season’s results.

    Tournament Projections

    Now it’s time to project the implications of various conference tournament results on NCAA selection decisions. These will be addressed in a Frequently Asked Questions style.

    Before browsing these results, note that all these responses take for granted (unless otherwise stated) that the top three ECAC seeds — Harvard, Dartmouth, and St. Lawrence — sweep their quarterfinal series. At this point their three opponents — Cornell, Yale, and Colgate — haven’t proven themselves capable of beating the top three ECAC teams, only hanging with them.

    One implication of this is that Colgate will cease to be a team above .500. If these teams can prove this assumption wrong this weekend, then the implications will be discussed in next week’s bracketology column.

    Also, projected RPIs will be given rounded to three decimal places, indicating their lower precision relative to current RPIs calculated in the first section. Consider the first two digits to be precise and the third digit to be slightly fuzzy. Details regarding the error of these projections are beyond the scope of this column.

    Finally, note that the top teams in the PWR right now are No. 1 Minnesota, No. 2 Harvard, No. 3 Dartmouth and No. 4 St. Lawrence. The teams just outside the bubble appear to be No. 5 Wisconsin and No. 6 UMD.

    What does Wisconsin have to do to make the NCAA Frozen Four?

    This is the hot-button issue of the day, especially now that Wisconsin coach Mark Johnson has said at his Monday press conference that if his team beats UMD in Saturday’s WCHA semifinal, he feels comfortable with his team’s position. But going by the numbers, Wisconsin shouldn’t feel too comfortable even with a win over UMD, and Wisconsin definitely does not control its own destiny.

    To make the first point, consider a Wisconsin team that loses to Minnesota in the WCHA final. Wisconsin is compared to a St. Lawrence team that loses to Dartmouth in the ECAC semifinals, and a Dartmouth team that loses to St. Lawrence in the ECAC semifinals (two results that cannot happen simultaneously, but these comparisons are used because Wisconsin could beat out either team to make the PWR top four).

    St. Lawrence vs Wisconsin
    RPI 0.629 1 0.618 0
    L16 13- 3- 0 0 13- 2- 1 1
    TUC 11- 7- 1 0 11- 6- 3 1
    H2H 0 0
    COP 6- 1- 0 1 7- 1- 3 0
    PTS 2 2
    Dartmouth vs Wisconsin
    RPI 0.655 1 0.618 0
    L16 11- 5- 0 0 13- 2- 1 1
    TUC 10- 6- 2 0 11- 6- 3 1
    H2H 0 0
    COP 4- 2- 0 1 6- 5- 1 0
    PTS 2 2

    Under conventional PWR rules, St. Lawrence wins the former comparison based on an RPI advantage of .011, which is roughly the equivalent of one win. The common opponent comparison is fair because St. Lawrence’s performance edge over Wisconsin against Northeastern (1-0-0 vs. 0-0-2) was better than Wisconsin’s over St. Lawrence against UMD (3-1-1 vs. 1-1-0). It’s a close comparison, but not one Wisconsin should feel comfortable about winning. The Dartmouth comparison isn’t nearly as close, particularly because of Dartmouth’s huge RPI advantage.

    Now look at the same comparisons, except assume Wisconsin defeats Minnesota in the WCHA final:

    St. Lawrence vs Wisconsin
    RPI 0.629 0 0.630 1
    L16 13- 3- 0 0 14- 1- 1 1
    TUC 11- 7- 1 0 12- 5- 3 1
    H2H 0 0
    COP 6- 1- 0 1 7- 1- 3 0
    PTS 1 3
    Dartmouth vs Wisconsin
    RPI 0.655 1 0.630 0
    L16 11- 5- 0 0 14- 1- 1 1
    TUC 10- 6- 2 0 12- 5- 3 1
    H2H 0 0
    COP 4- 2- 0 1 7- 4- 1 0
    PTS 2 2

    Wisconsin wins the comparison with St. Lawrence under standard PWR rules but only by the tiniest of margins. Dartmouth wins the latter comparison by conventional PWR rules, but look more closely at the numbers there. Subtract off the two wins over Vermont from each team’s common opponent total, and it reveals common opponent records that are fairer indicators of relative performance (2-2-0 vs. 5-4-1). This category should be a push, because both teams performed the same against Vermont, Dartmouth had a slightly better performance against Minnesota, and Wisconsin had a slightly better performance against UMD.

    Yet Dartmouth does have the huge edge in RPI, by a margin of .025 — roughly 2.5 wins, and it’s questionable whether the committee would analyze the common opponent category as closely as above. It would be interesting to see what the committee would do in evaluating the above Dartmouth-Wisconsin comparison.

    Conclusion: Going straight by conventional PWR rules, Wisconsin won’t make the tournament if it doesn’t win the WCHA and the top ECAC teams win their quarterfinals. If Wisconsin wins the WCHA over Minnesota in the final, the Badgers are in good shape, but they will be much safer if St. Lawrence loses its ECAC semifinal. Also, note that it’s important Wisconsin beats Minnesota in the final — without that additional resume-building win, Wisconsin will be in trouble. The Badgers are definitely not in control of their own destiny.

    Are Minnesota and Harvard Frozen Four locks?

    Consider a Minnesota team that has a 2001-like collapse to fourth place in the WCHA tournament compared to a Dartmouth team that loses in the ECAC semifinals (this is a worst-case scenario for the Gophers):

    Dartmouth vs Minnesota
    RPI 0.655 0 0.661 1
    L16 11- 5- 0 1 10- 5- 1 0
    TUC 9- 5- 2 0 17- 5- 2 1
    H2H 1 1
    COP 2- 1- 2 0 7- 1- 0 1
    PTS 2 4

    This is an unambiguous win for the Gophers. Minnesota also wins comfortably over the Badgers and UMD on basis of RPI and head-to-head victories. Minnesota also wins comparisons comfortably over a St. Lawrence team losing in the ECAC semifinals. Any way you cut the data in the worst-case scenario, the Gophers are still in.

    Consider a Harvard team that loses in the ECAC semifinals compared with a WCHA champion Wisconsin team, or ECAC champion Princeton and St. Lawrence teams. (Note: The Princeton and St. Lawrence results cannot happen simultaneously)

    Harvard vs Wisconsin
    RPI 0.656 1 0.630 0
    L16 14- 2- 0 0 14- 1- 1 1
    TUC 11- 4- 1 1 12- 5- 3 0
    H2H 0 0
    COP 7- 0- 1 1 8- 1- 3 0
    PTS 3 1
    Harvard vs Princeton
    RPI 0.656 1 0.620 0
    L16 14- 2- 0 1 12- 4- 0 0
    TUC 10- 3- 1 1 10- 7- 0 0
    H2H 1 2
    COP 23- 2- 0 1 17- 7- 0 0
    PTS 5 2
    Harvard vs St. Lawrence
    RPI 0.656 1 0.647 0
    L16 14- 2- 0 0 14- 2- 0 0
    TUC 9- 4- 1 0 13- 4- 1 1
    H2H 2 0
    COP 23- 4- 1 0 24- 3- 1 1
    PTS 3 2

    Each comparison is a clear win for Harvard. So does that mean Harvard’s a lock if it sweeps its ECAC quarterfinal? The numbers support that view, but there could still be trouble ahead if Harvard slips in the semifinals. Consider the following scenario: Wisconsin wins the WCHA, St. Lawrence wins the ECAC, and Dartmouth and Harvard each lose in the ECAC semifinals. In that situation, conventional wisdom says, Minnesota’s already in, there’s pressure to take the two league champions, and if it comes down to Harvard-Dartmouth, guess who has the head-to-head edge?

    It’s a situation that sounds reminiscent of the 2000 AWCHA national tournament, when Dartmouth was taken over Harvard based only on head-to-head results. But a difference between then and the above hypothetical is that Harvard has comparisons locked up over St. Lawrence and Wisconsin, even if those teams win their conference titles. Also, Harvard would still have a slight comparison edge over Dartmouth if both teams lost in the ECAC semifinals, though the RPI is too close to call.

    Dartmouth vs Harvard
    RPI 0.655 0 0.656 1
    L16 11- 5- 0 0 14- 2- 0 1
    TUC 8- 6- 2 0 11- 2- 1 1
    H2H 2 0
    COP 19- 5- 1 0 22- 2- 1 1
    PTS 2 4

    These results raise the question of why Harvard has an edge over Wisconsin that Dartmouth lacks. It’s mainly because Harvard has better results against UMD and Northeastern than Wisconsin, while Dartmouth lacks that common opponent edge over the Badgers.

    Conclusions: Minnesota seems to be a mortal lock. Harvard’s close to it given an ECAC quarterfinal sweep of Cornell. Of course either team would prefer to have a superb showing in its conference tournament to be sure. The PWR is not infallible.

    Are UMD, Mercyhurst, UNH, and Princeton all finished in terms of Frozen Four hopes? Which team(s) might have the best shot?

    Believe it or not, UMD’s Frozen Four hopes are still alive, although they are on life support. To prove this, let’s see how a WCHA champion UMD team stacks up against a St. Lawrence team losing in the ECAC semifinals.

    St. Lawrence vs Minnesota-Duluth
    RPI 0.629 1 0.623 0
    L16 13- 3- 0 1 11- 4- 1 0
    TUC 10- 6- 1 1 12-10- 2 0
    H2H 1 1
    COP 4- 3- 0 0 3- 2- 1 1
    PTS 4 2

    St. Lawrence appears to have a decisive edge in the comparison, but just one Colgate win over St. Lawrence in the first round would be enough the sway this comparison to UMD’s win column. Note that even if the Bulldogs beat out St. Lawrence, they would have to win a close comparison with Wisconsin to make the Frozen Four cut. UMD would have the RPI edge over Wisconsin in that scenario, but a Wisconsin third-place loss might be necessary to sway the comparison. This result will be examined more closely if UMD does win the WCHA title this weekend.

    Princeton’s in a similar situation as UMD. Dartmouth, Harvard and Minnesota are too far away for Princeton to catch. St. Lawrence would be in striking distance were it not for two head-to-head losses to the Saints. Even if Princeton wins the ECAC, a St. Lawrence team losing in the ECAC semifinals would still have an RPI edge of nearly .01 over Princeton. So Princeton, like UMD, could use some help from Colgate this weekend.

    Mercyhurst and New Hampshire, because they play in weaker conferences, will not be able to gain the ground in RPI that they would need to make a run at the top four spots in these last two weeks. They’re both out of the running.

    So that’s the story for now. Please send any corrections, questions, requests or comments about the D-I Women’s PairWise Rankings or this column to [email protected]. Stay tuned to future columns for the implications of the upcoming weekend’s WCHA and ECAC tournament results, possible tournament seedings and more critical views of the NCAA selection criteria.

  • This Week in Women’s Hockey: March 11, 2004

    The tightness and uncertainty of the NCAA women’s hockey selection process can create some strange incentives. For instance, whoever wins Saturday’s 1:05 p.m. WCHA tournament semifinal at Ridder Arena between No. 5 Wisconsin and No. 6 Minnesota-Duluth might be best served by turning into Maroon and Gold superfans at 4:05 p.m. when the No. 1 Gophers play in the other semifinal. To those inexperienced at cheering for the home team, remember, it’s nine letters, M-I-N-N-E-S-O-T-A, although it might take some practice.

    The Badgers and Bulldogs cheering on the Gophers? Indeed, and both teams’ NCAA hopes depend on the Gophers’ success. For all the gritty details, browse through Thursday’s D-I Women’s Bracketology column, but the simple explanation is that both teams have to impress some computers if they want to make NCAAs and another win for either of these teams over Minnesota State or Ohio State in the WCHA final won’t be impressive enough. Count Wisconsin as one of those teams that sometimes gets frustrated looking at the USCHO.com PairWise Rankings (PWR), the best indicator of NCAA selection prospects available. There’s the hope expansion will lead to eight teams and automatic bids, but it’s too late for this year.

    “I don’t look at them a lot, but when I do look at them, I get a little confused as I’m sure many of you do,” said Badger coach Mark Johnson at his Monday press conference. “We’ve lost one game since early December and we don’t seem to make a lot of headway in the rankings. But you know, as I tell our team as they get frustrated sometimes when they look at things that way, you can control what you can control and we just need to keep winning hockey games.”

    He’s right. While there’s so much talk of NCAA pairings at this time of year, that looming controversy shouldn’t take away from what should be an exceptional WCHA tournament. And with the event being held at Ridder Arena, the percentage capacity seems destined to top that of any women’s hockey event in the country this year, including the Frozen Four. Those fans will see a Minnesota team ranked No. 1 in the country looking to win a title on its home ice, a Wisconsin team playing for its NCAA lives, and a three-time defending champion UMD looking to finish strong. Plus it could be the last collegiate weekend for Jenny Potter, one of the greats in the history of Minnesota and the sport.

    Wisconsin: A Closer Look

    The Badgers are well renowned for their D, which ranks second nationally and first in the WCHA in giving up 1.13 goals per game. Never this season has an opponent scored three goals against Wisconsin. Yes there was that 5-4 game against Maine on Oct. 19, but that deserves an asterisk because the Badgers scored two goals on themselves that day — one kicked in and one shot in.

    The Badgers have three defensemen with senior national team experience — Molly Engstrom (U.S.), Carla MacLeod (Canada), and Nicole Uliasz (U.S.) — playing in front of two young goaltenders, who have gone from being the team’s question mark to the team’s strength. Both sophomore Meghan Horras and freshman Christine Dufour have put up great numbers, but Horras — the national leader in save percentage and goals against average — has earned all the team’s starts against UMD and Minnesota this calendar year.

    All this success, 12 wins in the Badgers’ last 13 games, has come despite several Canadian national team disruptions to the roster. They’re the one team with these problems that never seemed fazed by it.

    While the Badgers D has been strong from the start, the story of the second half of the season has been their offensive surge. The Badgers have averaged 4.5 goals over their last 13 games, this after scoring just 3.1 per game over their first 19. Back at the start of January, Wisconsin scored just four goals total over two games against Northeastern and one against UMD. Then the Badgers smoked the Bulldogs 5-2, and that began the current scoring tear.

    “The puck has gone in and it’s a credit to the kids because they battled through some adversity early on in the year with not being able to score a lot of goals and their hard work and persistence has certainly paid off in the last couple of weekends,” Johnson said.

    Johnson says one explanation for the scoring surge is the growth of the freshmen class having been through the WCHA lineup of opponents more than once. Freshmen Sara Bauer and Lindsay Macy have been leading the way. The 5’11 Macy has 14 goals and 7 assists in her last 13 games — after just 2 goals and 5 assists in her first 19 — to suddenly lead the Badgers in goal scoring. The more diminutive 5’3 Bauer has 5 goals and 14 assists in her last 13 games, after 2 goals and 10 assists in her first 19. She leads Wisconsin in scoring for the season. The two were placed on the same line 12 games ago and have taken off since then.

    And the Badgers have plenty of depth aside from the two freshmen. Meghan Hunter, the team’s all-time leading scorer, has settled into her roll as the third-leading scorer on this squad. Her linemates Jackie Friesen and Karen Rickard have put up comparable numbers.

    The Badgers’ biggest weakness has been on the penalty kill, which has struggled against the WCHA’s elite. UMD went 5 of 14 against Wisconsin’s PK this year and scored a PP goal every game. Minnesota went 5 of 12. Wisconsin did limit the Gophers to 1 of 5 in the most recent series, but that was when U.S. Olympian Natalie Darwitz was out of the Gopher lineup.

    Next up is UMD, a matchup that seems to bode well for Wisconsin because the Badgers are the only team ever to beat the Bulldogs in the WCHA tournament. The Badgers seems to have made a step up with every UMD series. The first series, a split, was more a chance for Wisconsin to see where its talent stood this season. The second series, when Wisconsin took three of four points, shifted the balance of power in the WCHA as Wisconsin asserted itself as the league’s No. 2 team. Now, Wisconsin has to sweep this weekend to assert itself as one of the top four teams in the nation.

    Recall that this season UMD has tended to be tougher on the first day of the weekend (10-4-2 record) and Minnesota is tougher on the second day (15-1-0 record). Wisconsin must overcome both of those challenges to be the WCHA champions.

    Greener Maroon and Gold

    Well so much for stability in the Gophers’ lineup. When Natalie Darwitz returned for the Ohio State series three weeks ago, it seemed like it might be the last lineup adjustment. Now freshman Danielle Ashley has been suspended for the season, and the Minnesota Daily is reporting that the status of both captains Kelsey Bills and La Toya Clarke is uncertain for the weekend.

    When Minnesota brought in Ashley and U.S. Olympian Lyndsay Wall as freshmen this year, the two seemed like the perfect combination to boost size and strength of the Gophers’ blue line. Now Wall is out for academic reasons and Ashley is gone for undisclosed reasons, and the Gophers are left with four sophomores and a freshman on defense. The good news for the Gophers is that Jody Horak has been playing stronger over the last several weeks. Minnesota has been splitting Horak and Brenda Reinen lately, but Reinen has suddenly given up five goals in her last two starts. She did, however, earn the victory over the Badgers in the last Minnesota-Wisconsin meeting.

    More good news is that the forward lines have found some stability. The younger forwards have developed enough defensively that Minnesota coach Laura Halldorson feels comfortable with an all U.S.-national line of Krissy Wendell, Darwitz, and Kelly Stephens. That instant offense will come in handy against either Ohio State and Minnesota State, two teams that have each limited the Gophers to a single goal in ties this season. But a repeat performance will be a tougher task, with the Minnesota forwards on fire and a WCHA title on home ice at stake.

    The Last Stand

    This may be the curtain call for the three-time defending champion UMD Bulldogs. If so, it’s the end of line for Jenny Potter, the school’s all time leading scorer, Tricia Guest, the scorer of the game-winning goal in the 2002 NCAA final and veteran defenseman Satu Kiipeli.

    UMD coach Shannon Miller has said all season that she knows she has a young team with 10 freshmen and that she’s seen plenty of progress. The line with Potter and Caroline Ouellette has been steady, but the defense behind them and the other lines have not, especially over the course of back-to-back tough games in a given weekend. Last weekend against Minnesota State, a week after UMD suffered a sweep to Minnesota, everything came together as the Bulldogs blew the Mavericks away by margins of 9-0 and 3-0, avenging the two losses from the start of the season. It was the most dominant performance by anyone against Minnesota State this season. Now UMD has some more avenging to do.

    As the Bracketology column explains, UMD’s tourney hopes are slim. But UMD still has plenty of pride to play for. Don’t expect the Bulldogs to go out quietly this weekend.

    ECAC Action

    The ECAC will have to wait another full week for its championship to decided, because first there are best-of-three quarterfinal bouts to be settled.

    No. 9 Princeton and No. 10 Brown is expected to be the closest of them, and whatever team loses that series will probably have the distinction of being the best team not to advance to its conference semifinals, as St. Lawrence was last year.

    The two teams split their season series, with the most recent game being a 6-3 Princeton win just this past Saturday. Brown took a 3-1 lead early, but the Tigers came roaring back.

    The game features too high powered, high-scoring forward, Princeton’s Gretchen Anderson and Brown’s Jessica Link. “Gretch-sky” as her teammates call her had a pure hat trick in the third period, while “Linker-Dinker” nearly had a pure hat trick of her own in the first period when she scored twice to get Brown up to a 2-0 lead. Both Link and Anderson were named First Team All-Ivy this past weekend.

    Brown is one location that will turn into an ECAC hockey festival this weekend as both the men and women have reached the quarterfinals. The other double site is Dartmouth, where the women will be hosting Yale. The Bulldogs’ Sarah Love has been hot lately, limiting Harvard to just one goal last weekend, but Dartmouth hasn’t had as much trouble. Dartmouth scored six goals and four goals against Love in two regular season meetings.

    The other two matchups are Colgate at No. 4 St. Lawrence and Cornell at No. 2 Harvard. Colgate is one team that just about everybody out west will be rooting for because the Saints are the ECAC team that’s clearly most on the bubble right now, and a Colgate win here will keep a lot of team’s playoff hopes alive. Cornell is back in the playoffs after a dramatic 2-1 win overtime win over Vermont last weekend, in which it scored the extra attacker goal it needed to clinch a playoff berth in the final seconds of overtime. A playoff series with Harvard for the second year in a row is the Big Red’s award.

    Bittersweet CHA Moments

    No. 7 Mercyhurst is the heavy favorite to repeat as CHA champions having gone 11-1 to take the league regular season title. The Lakers playoff run would have greater national significance if they were still in Frozen Four contention, but their loses to Princeton and Niagara these past two weeks have effectively ended that possibility. That said, it’s still been a successful season for the Lakers once again. They have a young team, and they’ll be back strong next season.

    It’ll be a crueler fate for the Findlay women’s hockey program, which closes out for good this weekend. The Oilers take on host Niagara semifinals, and a win there would give them another shot at Mercyhurst, who they fell to in overtime in their last meeting. USCHO wishes all those Findlay players the best in their future endeavors.

    This Week in Division III: March 11, 2004

    Well, it wouldn’t be the NCAA selection process without some controversy, and there was plenty this time around, albeit the same complaints that have surfaced the past few seasons.

    Once again the events of last weekend produced a 6-3 East-West split, forcing the three Western teams, St. Norbert, Wisconsin-River Falls and St. Thomas, to play down to just one, virtually assuring that the Division III semifinals and finals will be held in the East. This would be the eighth time in the past 10 seasons that an Eastern school has hosted.

    Through the final weeks of the season, and even going into Sunday, it looked like it was going to be a 5-4 split, with both Pool C bids going to western teams. This looked like even more of a certainty when St. Thomas upset St. John’s in the MIAC final. Only a Curry loss to Wentworth would change things, and, sure enough, the Leopards spoiled the party by upsetting the Colonels 5-4 in the ECAC Northeast title game, with Wentworth’s Vince Guiducci scoring the winning goal with just 1:11 to play.

    Ed Trefzger explains it all in CSI:NCAA, while I had some fun playing NCAA selection committee in D-III Bracketology. I did my analysis while the Curry-Wentworth game was going on, coming up with two scenarios based on the outcome of that game. The fact that the NCAA and I arrived at the identical pairings means that the criteria laid out at the beginning of the season was followed to the letter. I simply plugged in all the numbers. It looks like the NCAA did the same thing.

    “It went by the numbers,” said Plattsburgh head coach Bob Emery, former chair of the committee, who was not on the conference call this time, his tenure having expired at the end of last season. “Maybe some folks would like to go back to the good-old-boy network we used to have, but I don’t think so.”

    Still, it’s a bitter pill to swallow for Western schools, especially St. John’s, which was highly ranked all season and was riding an NCAA-best 16 game winning streak coming into the MIAC championship game, which the Johnnies lost to St. Thomas 4-3 in overtime.

    It’s also hard to accept that St. Norbert, the consensus No. 1 team in Division III, has to play the winner of a game between two very good teams: St. Thomas and Wisconsin-River Falls, to make the D-III Frozen Four, arguably the toughest path to the semifinals. Also, the Green Knights were the favorites to host the finals, provided that they got past the quarterfinals. Now, it’s almost certain that they will wind up playing at Plattsburgh, Middlebury or Norwich.

    One Western coach on the USCHO.com Division III poll was so incensed that he sent in a bogus ballot on Monday, listing mostly ECAC Northeast teams as well as several other last-place teams in the East. “If the NCAA can do it, so can I,” was his explanation.

    The NCAA followed the process, but what can be done about the process itself? Nothing, at this point. The same process is used for all Division III sports, which, for better or for worse, strongly favors conference champions as well as requiring regional matchups in the early rounds.

    Things should be better with changes on the horizon. Next year, the tournament will expand to 10 teams, allowing for another at-large bid. In two years, the NCAA will begin to hold the semifinals and finals at neutral, predetermined sites, promising to rotate locations as much as possible.

    The Elite Eight

    The quarterfinals are this weekend, and by Sunday we’ll know the field and the location for the Division III Frozen Four. Here’s a quick breakdown of the four quarterfinal games.

    Curry at Plattsburgh

    The Colonels must recover from their upset loss to Wentworth in the ECAC Northeast title game, while the Cards are riding high, coming off two overtime wins against archrival Oswego in the SUNYAC championships.

    It was touch-and-go on Sunday night for Curry, which had to sweat it out to see if it would get one of the two at-large bids available. As it turned out, Curry was high enough in the criteria that it was never in doubt. But according to coach Rob Davies, his team felt like it was do-or-die in the ECAC Northeast championship game.

    “You think that every game like that you play, you have to win (to move on),” he said. “As a coach, you have to think that if you can’t win your tournament, you don’t deserve to go. But there are a couple of second chances, and we were happy to get the reprieve.”

    Davies says that his team must play better than they did on Sunday if they want to advance.

    “Most teams who make the tournament are playing well at this time of the year,” he said. “And we’re not right now.”

    Plattsburgh coach Bob Emery says the Colonels are playing well enough.

    “They’re a strong team,” he said. “They’ve beaten some good teams, teams that could beat us.”

    Both squads feature a talented group of forwards. The Colonels are lead up front by freshman Brett Adams (50 points) was well as juniors Brian Doherty (47) and Michael O’Sullivan (45).

    “I saw some of their forwards in action before they were in college and they’re a good group,” said Emery.

    Plattsburgh’s top gun is David Friel, whose 24 goals are twice as many the Cardinals’ next leading scorer. Friel has five game-winners. Craig Nelson has been the main man in goal this season, posting a 14-4-3 record and a .913 save percentage.

    This one might come down to intangibles. Plattsburgh is healthier at the moment than Curry, and will enjoy the home ice advantage. “I’m glad we’re at home,” Emery said. “We’ve played pretty well here this season.”

    Wentworth at Middlebury

    It’s been a rollercoaster ride for the Wentworth Leopards, who were in Curry’s shadow all year and had to overcome the midseason dismissal of coach Bill Bowes, the architect of Wentworth’s success in recent years. Injuries also plagued the Leopards, most notably the loss of all-star goaltender Raj Bhangoo for several games at a critical point.

    The Leopards’ 5-4 win early Sunday evening sent shockwaves through Division III, affecting literally every other team in contention for the tournament.

    “It certainly had a ripple effect,” said interim coach Jonathan Deptula. His team never gave up even when the consensus was that Curry, which beat Wentworth 7-2 in the regular season and was undefeated in conference, would roll through the ECAC Northeast playoffs.

    “When I took over, I told the guys, ‘This is our goal, to win a championship’. We’ve got a strong enough team to do that, even if we haven’t played particularly well this season.

    “It was a great emotional win for us. The guys played with a lot of heart.”

    Next up for Wentworth is Middlebury, which has looked unstoppable recently. The Panthers have won 15 of their last 16 games and coasted through the NESCAC tournament, outscoring the opposition 16-5 in three games.

    Led by Player-of-the-Year candidate Kevin Cooper (30 goals, 20 assists) and goaltender Marc Scheuer (1.46 GAA, .921 save %), Middlebury presents a formidable challenge to Deptula’s team.

    “I haven’t seen them this season, but I was the assistant the past few times we’ve played them,” he said. “They are a very skilled skating team, and they like to spread the ice out.”

    Still, Wentworth has shown it can come up big against top-ranked teams.

    “We’re going to have to continue to be aggressive,” Deptula said. “We can’t sit back.”

    Hobart at Norwich

    Is it midnight yet, or will Cinderella stick around? Hobart has proved that it can play with anyone, including a Norwich team that has struggled in recent weeks. Coming off a 6-2 loss to Middlebury on February 21, Norwich was strongly challenged in the ECAC East playoffs by Salem State and Babson, which took the Cadets into overtime in the title game.

    “I hope we can open up a little bit more and get things going offensively so that we do not have to rely so much on our defense and goaltending,” said coach Mike McShane.

    “We have to get better, and worry about our game, and how good we have to be if we are going to have success in the national tournament.”

    Hobart comes in as one of the hottest teams in Division III, winning 10 of its last 11 games. The Statesmen are led by junior forward Craig Levey (33 points) and goaltender Adam Levelle, who was almost untouchable last weekend (1.50 GAA, .949 save %).

    A challenge for the Statesmen is to get over the thrill of winning their first-ever ECAC West title and concentrate on the next game.

    “I’m not really worried about us feeling like we’re just happy to be here (in the NCAA tournament),” said Hobart coach Mark Taylor. “Really, we’re not anywhere yet. To me, ‘being there’ means playing in the Final Four or the championship game.”

    “Hobart is very well coached,” said McShane. “They are turning around their program, and I have had teams in that position before. Hobart has built up momentum and has lot of confidence, and that’s a dangerous team.”

    Norwich will counter with Player of the Year candidate Curtis McLean (32 goals, 20 assists), as well as Paul Mattucci (37 points) and the goaltending duo of Mike Boudreau (2.15 GAA, .927 save %) and Kevin Schieve (1.84 GAA, .924 save %). The two netminders have been alternating starts through most of the season.

    Wisconsin-River Falls at St. Norbert

    While disappointed that just three Western teams got bids to the NCAAs, St. Norbert head coach Tim Coghlin wasn’t surprised.

    “We’ve laid it out this way for our players from the beginning,” he said. “It’s not ideal, but we expected it to happen.”

    With Wisconsin-River Falls defeating St. Thomas 3-2 in overtime on Wednesday, it sets up a rematch of the NCHA final played last Saturday.

    “We talked about it before the Peters Cup final, how we should plan on playing on Wednesday if we lost or Saturday of we win, and how we could be seeing (Wisconsin-River Falls) again, depending on what happened in the Wednesday game.”

    Even though St. Norbert is the No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament, the selection and pairings process gives the Green Knights arguably the toughest road to the semifinals, as Wisconsin-River Falls has been considered to be in the top five teams in Division III all season.

    “You can’t call (Wednesday’s game) a play-in game, not when you have the second and third ranked teams in the West playing in it,” Coghlin said. “River is a great team. They’ve beaten us once this year already.”

    That win came at River Falls, 6-4 back on February 6. The Falcons are 0-7 all-time at the Cornerstone Community Center against St. Norbert and 1-10 there overall.

    The Green Knights currently lead all of college hockey in power-play percentage at 33.3 percent (53-for-159). St. Norbert has five skaters with at least 30 points this season. Junior forward Jason Deitsch leads the team with 51 points (18-33-51). Sophomore forward Spencer Carbery (18-20-38) and freshman Andy Cote (21-17-38) are tied for second.

    Senior goaltender Chancy Colquhoun has seen the majority of action in net, going 14-1-2 with six shutouts. Sophomore Eric Van Den Bosch has also played well, posting a 1.75 goals against average in 13 games

    The Falcons are led up front by a trio of seniors: Jim Murphy (32 points) Matt Elsen (26) and Jess Johnson (26).

    Andy Scanlon has seen the majority of action this season between the pipes, posting a 13-3-3 record with an impressive 1.73 goals against average and .937 save percentage.

    Expect a low-scoring, hard-fought affair.

    Mixed Emotions

    I had the pleasure to see all of the ECAC West playoffs last weekend, and all four games were excellent, hard-fought affairs. The Statesmen proved they deserved their top seed and home ice advantage, defeating Utica 4-2 and then RIT 4-3 to win the school’s first-ever hockey championship.

    Head coach Mark Taylor has built a national contender in just four seasons, turning the Statesmen from also-rans to champions in the ECAC West. After losing at least two and usually more times each season to RIT over the past 12 years, Hobart turned the tables, defeating the Tigers in their final regular-season game to gain home ice in the ECAC West tournament and then again for the title.

    The Statesmen’s reaction when the final buzzer sounded was the release of years of frustration for players and fans, and was pure joy, as intense as any title celebration I’ve seen. It was a great moment.

    Unfortunately, the moment and many others were spoiled by the behavior of several fans, who were openly consuming alcohol and visibly drunk. Three times the championship game had to be halted due to beer cans being thrown on the ice, and several spectators from visiting schools were also pelted with cans, bottles and obscenities. In 20 years of watching college hockey, I’ve never seen anything like it.

    The open air, semi-enclosed rink presents unique crowd-control problems, and the security force, comprised mainly of students, was unwilling or unable to enforce the typical rules for NCAA contests (no alcohol, no beverage containers, no banging or hanging on the glass, etc.). Many fans were Hobart students attending their first hockey game.

    “Most of the students that attended the games this weekend probably had never been to the rink before,” wrote a Hobart student on USCHO’s message board. “What we are is a bunch of kids … who work hard and party harder. While we do enjoy drinking our fair share, we stand behind our school.”

    “So there were 1,500 drunk Hobart fans,” said another. “If you schedule a game for 7:30 on a Friday or Saturday night the chances are that a great number of the students will be drunk.”

    Ouch.

    I’m sure that the next time Hobart hosts a postseason or “big” game — and there will be a next time, as this is an up-and-coming team that will challenge for titles for the foreseeable future — things will be different.

    Good luck to all teams this weekend.

    This Week in the WCHA: March 11, 2004

    Calling All Upsets

    Some thoughts this week, while pondering whether we’ll see any upsets this weekend after all.

    • Three of those series last weekend were so good, we’ll do them again this weekend.

    • Paging St. Cloud State. The bus to the NCAA tournament is leaving. The Huskies had a ticket. Anyone see where they went?

    • Is this a case for coach of the year honors? Wisconsin’s Mike Eaves saw his team improve five spots and 17 points over last season. Only two teams — Rensselaer and Colgate — nationally moved up more spots from last season to this one than the Badgers. One would think the award will come down to Eaves and Minnesota-Duluth’s Scott Sandelin, and Sandelin won the head-to-head battle last weekend.

    • Colorado College has to go on the road for the playoffs for the first time in 11 seasons. Maybe going to Denver, however, is making the best of a bad situation. CC is 8-2 all-time at Magness Arena. Either that win total hits 10 this weekend or the Tigers’ season is done.

    • On the other hand, things aren’t so bright for St. Cloud State if you believe in history repeating itself. Minnesota has never lost a playoff game at the new Mariucci Arena. How big was that win last Saturday for the Gophers, then? If the Huskies had won, the series would have been in St. Cloud.

    • Michigan Tech’s Chris Conner won Phase 2 of the fan vote for the Hobey Baker Award, but the real test comes next Wednesday, when the 10 finalists are revealed.

    • News came Wednesday that the Wisconsin band won’t make the trip to the Final Five next week if the Badgers advance. It won’t be at this week’s Big Ten men’s basketball tournament, either. The reason? Bad conduct on the way back from the Big Ten women’s hoops tourney last week. There’s something you don’t see every day.

    • And finally, all the talk a while back was that it seemed almost sure there was going to be at least one upset — meaning a road team winning a series — in the first round. Doesn’t seem so sure now, does it? It has happened only six times in the nine seasons since 10th-seeded Michigan Tech’s landmark victory over top-seeded Colorado College, and three of them came in the 1996 playoffs. So what do you have, Huskies (squared), Tigers, Seawolves and Mavericks?

    New Season, Same Mentality

    The common perception is that the regular season ends and everything changes.

    The reality of the WCHA this season is that many teams have been playing playoff-type games for a month, only without the stakes being as high as the playoffs.

    Take Denver for example. Not too long ago, the Pioneers were out of the top five and looking like they would be traveling for the playoffs. Nine-game unbeaten streaks have a way of taking care of that.

    They’ve had to be at the top of their game for a while, so it has been a playoff mind-set.

    “I don’t think the approach will be any different at all,” Denver coach George Gwozdecky said. “We’ve had to gear up our game to be in playoff mode for the last month because of the position we found ourselves in in January. But try as you might to be in that playoff mode, there’s always the knowledge during the season that you’re going to play next week.

    “In the playoffs, you know very well that if you don’t win you’re not going to be playing next week. So I think that’s the big difference — or maybe the only difference — in what our approach has been.”

    Even eighth-place Alaska-Anchorage doesn’t have much of a jump to make.

    The Seawolves’ series with rival Alaska-Fairbanks last weekend brought out the emotion and the intensity that normally is associated with the postseason.

    “Had we been playing a WCHA team, knowing that we were in eighth place and it wasn’t going to matter — it’s hard to know what the mind-set of young guys is,” Seawolves coach John Hill said. “But for us last weekend, it was our Governor’s Cup trophy, the games were in Anchorage and it was real emotional. Our guys were down on Monday (UAA lost the trophy in a shootout), but they seem to have lifted and picked each other up and they seem to be in good spirits.”

    That emotional state likely carries around the league. Wisconsin and Minnesota-Duluth have been involved in a frantic chase for a high spot in the WCHA, concluding with a sometimes-nasty series last weekend. The Denver-Colorado College and Minnesota-St. Cloud State series last weekend got the intensity going from the rivalries.

    Here’s a look at this weekend’s first-round matchups:

    No. 10 Michigan Tech at No. 1 North Dakota

    The season series: North Dakota won 4-0.

    In statistics fitting the matchup between the league’s top team and its bottom one, the Sioux overwhelm the Huskies in all categories.

    All but one, that is. In the 28-game WCHA regular season, UND was third in the league in power play (21.3 percent), while Tech was fourth (20.0 percent).

    So if the Huskies have any chance of making some noise in this series, it’s likely going to be because of their power play.

    Three of the six goals Tech scored against the Sioux this season were on the power play. Both of the goals the Huskies scored in twin 5-1 losses last weekend in Grand Forks came while playing a man up.

    Otherwise, it’s all Sioux. They had the league’s top scoring offense; Tech was 10th. They had the top scoring defense; Tech was ninth. They had the best penalty kill; Tech was last.

    “We need to play almost a near-perfect game to beat these guys,” Michigan Tech captain Brett Engelhardt told USCHO’s Patrick C. Miller after last Saturday’s game. “We haven’t put up the goals against them that we should be.”

    The Huskies can’t change the disparity in the season statistics, but one thing they’ll have to remedy is the gap in shots on goal. North Dakota’s advantage in the four games it played against the Huskies was 10.75 shots on goal per game.

    No. 9 Minnesota State at No. 2 Minnesota-Duluth

    The season series: Minnesota-Duluth won 3-0-1.

    Minnesota-Duluth was nowhere near dire straits last weekend. But after Friday’s 2-2 tie with Wisconsin, the Bulldogs were in a minor slump.

    “We were 0-2-1 and we needed to end the year on a win,” UMD coach Scott Sandelin said.

    A solid-top-to-bottom effort did just that. Junior Lessard had a pair of goals and backup goaltender Josh Johnson came within 32.8 seconds of a shutout in a 4-1 victory.

    “The guys went out there and played a great game,” Sandelin said. “Junior had two goals, key guys came through, we got good goaltending, the penalty kill did a great job. We played a solid game for 60 minutes, and that’s a great way to end the year.”

    Better yet, it’s a great way to go into the playoffs.

    Minnesota State knows the feeling. The Mavericks swept Nebraska-Omaha in a home-and-home nonconference series last week to capture their first three-game winning streak of the season. It’s also their first unbeaten streak of longer than two games.

    “I think we’re as high as we’ve been on that roller coaster all year,” Minnesota State coach Troy Jutting told USCHO’s Dusty Sedars last Saturday. “It’s nice to get our first three-game winning streak of the season.”

    Of course, the rollercoaster could come down just as quick as it climbed. This season has been a big fall for the team that tied for second place and made its first Division I NCAA tournament appearance last season.

    The Mavericks have been a decent scoring team but have been plagued by injuries to their defense and haven’t found consistent goaltending. There’s a chance they’ll be able to keep up with the Bulldogs this weekend in the scoring column, but the battle between the pipes figures to swing decisively to Isaac Reichmuth and UMD.

    No. 8 Alaska-Anchorage at No. 3 Wisconsin

    The season series: Wisconsin won 2-0.

    Alaska-Anchorage scored one goal in two games against the Badgers two weeks ago in Anchorage, thanks largely to the goaltending of Wisconsin’s Bernd Brückler.

    So now Seawolves coach John Hill wants to see more offense from his team. He has identified scoring at least three goals a game as the key to beating the Badgers. He knows that won’t be easy against the team that tied with North Dakota for the best defense in the WCHA, allowing 2.21 goals per game.

    “We as a team and as a coaching staff feel that both [goalies] Chris King and Kevin Reiter will give us a chance to win each night,” Hill said. “So now it’s up to us to score three goals. In saying that, we’re going to have to take chances and maybe activate our defensemen and have them play with the thought process that any time they see an opening, go and try to help us offensively because it’s hard to score goals against Wisconsin.”

    And it’s going to be key for UAA, which is 0-22 all-time in the WCHA playoffs, to score early.

    “I think our players feel this is a good matchup for us,” Hill said. “We’ve got pretty good team speed, but the one thing about Wisconsin is they’re strong and they do a real good job in the defensive zone. For us, if we don’t score early in the game, a lot of times it’s like you can feel our bench get deflated.”

    Wisconsin, which enters the playoffs on the heels of one of its worst games of the season, likely will have to make its playoff run the same way it played in the regular season — defensively. The Badgers have been opportunistic on offense when they have been successful this season. But Brückler is the key.

    He won the league’s goaltending battle with a 2.11 goals against average and a .928 save percentage, and played the first 27 conference games before yielding to Brian Elliott for the regular-season finale.

    A central goal Eaves had for his team at the start of the season was to make the Final Five, but now expectations are higher.

    “I don’t want to set the bar at any level because they may go past any expectations we set, so I don’t want to limit them,” Eaves said. “I think the one thing that has been fun about watching this group grow is the fact that they keep forging themselves into a good team and where they will continue to grow. Let’s not put a lid on that. Let’s let them go where they take us.”

    No. 7 Colorado College at No. 4 Denver

    The season series: Denver won 3-1.

    With Denver knowing it was headed for a home playoff series and Colorado College knowing it was going on the road, the teams played last Friday’s regular-season finale like an old-time rivalry game.

    They combined for 42 penalties and 87 penalty minutes, including a major crosschecking call on Denver’s Matt Carle. Denver got the win and the Gold Pan, the trophy for the winner of the season series between the teams.

    “It was rough, it was tough, it was emotional,” Gwozdecky said, “and at times players, I think, let their emotions get away from them.”

    But don’t expect that this weekend.

    “I know a lot of people were saying, ‘Wow, this is unusual,'” Gwozdecky said. “I think this weekend is going to be much more similar to the way both teams play against each other because of what’s at stake. Both teams are good teams, both teams have great discipline. I know both teams are going to be looking at moving on, and the only way you can move on, especially in the playoffs, is if you really minimize the amount of plays that aren’t going to help your team.

    “That means the self-discipline, the restraint and the understanding that taking a bad penalty might cost you. You’re going to take penalties, but taking the bad penalties usually are the difference in the playoffs, whether it’s a short or long series.”

    Both teams know what to expect from the other, so the teams were probably ready to start this series last Saturday. Colorado College will treat this like a normal road trip despite the fact the school is only an hour away from Denver.

    “It’s basically a matter of dropping the puck and playing,” CC coach Scott Owens said.

    It certainly is in the minds of the Tigers that if they don’t win this series, their season is done. They started the week in a tie for 16th in the PairWise Rankings.

    “The fact that if you lose, you’re done might affect it a little bit because there’s nothing after this weekend for us if we don’t win,” Owens said. “Last weekend, the stakes were high too, but we knew we’d be playing in the playoffs.”

    If last weekend’s series is any indication, special teams figure to be the thing to watch this weekend. Denver was 3-for-14 on the power play, while the Tigers were 0-for-9. Because CC tends to play so many close games, that might be the difference.

    No. 6 St. Cloud State at No. 5 Minnesota

    The season series: Minnesota won 2-0.

    The Huskies find themselves in a situation similar to Colorado College. Lose and go home. For good.

    What a turnaround from a few weeks ago, when St. Cloud State was battling for third place with Wisconsin. It has been all downhill since a series with the Badgers three weeks ago left the Huskies with only one point and a tenuous hold on fourth place.

    Since then, the Huskies are 0-4 and slipped to fifth and then sixth place. More importantly in a NCAA sense, they dropped to 15th in the PairWise and may not be as fortunate as last year if they lose again in the first round. Last season, St. Cloud lost to Minnesota-Duluth in three games but still got a spot in the NCAAs.

    “Both teams know what’s on the line and all that type of thing,” St. Cloud State coach Craig Dahl said. “For us, based on our last couple of weekends, we have to win these games to have a chance to go to the NCAAs. I think everybody knows what the scoop is.”

    The Huskies haven’t won in their last six games, their longest stretch since an eight-game skid in the 1995-96 season.

    To break that, they’re going to have to get better goaltending. St. Cloud has allowed seven goals twice in its last four games. Last weekend, Tim Boron gave up seven on Friday and Adam Coole allowed four on Saturday.

    Dahl said he’s going with Coole for the first game this weekend.

    “I think the key to the series is, can we get better goaltending?” Dahl said. “And if we do — the shots both nights [last weekend] were within one or two of each other — it should be a pretty good series.”

    The Gophers picked things up nicely last weekend after being swept by Denver in their previous series. Now the challenge is to stabilize.

    Minnesota has alternated sweeps and being swept in the last five weekends, with offensive shortcomings being one of the biggest reasons for the losses. If the Gophers can get their high-level offense running consistently, they’ll be a force in the playoffs.

    Tough Loss

    Connor James’ collegiate career might be over.

    The Denver senior forward who is second on the team in scoring broke his right fibula against Colorado College last Friday. Word has it there’s a chance James could be ready to play if the Pioneers make it to the Frozen Four, which is less than a month away.

    The Pioneers’ plan is to move Jon Foster to James’ spot with Greg Keith and Kevin Ulanski.

    “We’re not expecting Jon Foster to do what Connor James did for us,” Gwozdecky said. “But we’ve had challenges all year long with injuries. We’ve met many of these challenges, and this is just another challenge that this team is going to take head-on. I’m very confident that our team will look forward to this challenge of not only playing CC but playing without Connor. Our players will be able to do their best, what they’re capable of, and let the chips fall where they may.”

    Leaving, Returning

    Minnesota junior forward Garrett Smaagaard is out for the season with an injured right knee that requires surgery. Smaagaard was hurt on Feb. 27.

    It’s another bit of bad luck for Smaagaard, who missed his entire senior hockey season at Eden Prairie (Minn.) High School after suffering a knee injury in the state championship football game that season.

    Ryan Potulny, meanwhile, decided to return to the Gophers last Saturday and forgo a medical redshirt for the season.

    Potulny, the younger brother of Gophers captain Grant Potulny, suffered a knee injury at North Dakota on Nov. 8 — the team’s eighth game of the season — and wasn’t expected to return this season.

    But when he came back, he made an immediate impact, scoring the winning goal in last Saturday’s 4-2 victory over St. Cloud State.

    In Other Words

    WCHA players of the week were North Dakota’s David Lundbohm and Minnesota’s Thomas Vanek on offense, Denver’s Adam Berkhoel on defense and North Dakota’s Chris Porter as the top rookie. … Wisconsin’s Brückler was the national player of the month for February and Denver’s Carle was the rookie of the month, as named by CSTV and the Hockey Commissioners’ Association. … Minnesota-Duluth’s Lessard and North Dakota’s Brandon Bochenski shared the WCHA scoring title with 39 points. Lessard had 19 goals; Bochenski had 16. … The percentage of WCHA games that were decided by one goal or less slipped to 36 percent this season from 44 percent last season. …

    North Dakota’s WCHA regular-season championship was the school’s 13th since the league was formed in 1951. … Former Michigan Tech coach Bob Mancini, currently a scout for the Edmonton Oilers, has been named the general manager for the OHL’s Saginaw Spirit. … The Colorado Avalanche traded away the rights to WCHA defensemen Keith Ballard of Minnesota and Tom Gilbert of Wisconsin this week. … Alaska-Anchorage and Alaska-Fairbanks tied their season series 2-2, so the battle for the Governor’s Cup went to a shootout, which the Nanooks won.

    Bracketology: March 10

    Just when you thought things were getting easier, they aren’t. After last weekend, you thought you had it all figured out. You had your travel plans made, hotels booked, and what happens?

    The games.

    With one more week gone by, it’s time for our regular look at how the NCAA tournament might shake out if the season ended today. It’s something we call “Bracketology” — a look into the thought process behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament.

    This is the fifth installment; we’ll be bringing you a new one every week until our final picks just before Selection Sunday. If you take a look at the sidebar, you’ll see our brackets from last week and you can compare and contrast on your own.

    Here are the facts:

  • Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.
  • There are four regional sites (East – Albany, N.Y., Northeast – Manchester, N.H., Midwest – Grand Rapids, Mich., West – Colorado Springs, Colo.)
  • A host institution which is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host, and cannot be moved.
  • Seedings will not be switched, as opposed to years past. To avoid undesirable first-round matchups, including intraconference games (see below), teams will be moved among regionals, not reseeded.

    Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the Championship Committee:

    In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities:

  • The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals.
  • Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.
  • No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4.
  • Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.
  • Once the six automatic qualifiers and 10 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1 through 16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”

    Additionally, the NCAA recently clarified its selection criteria to include a bonus factor in the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) for “good” nonconference wins.

    And one more note: Massachusetts-Lowell’s forfeits have not been taken into account because the NCAA has not taken official action. Therefore, the results of the games played are used here. However, it is unlikely that the NCAA will change the results.

    Given these facts, here are the top 15 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), plus Holy Cross and Bemidji State, the current leaders in Atlantic Hockey and the CHA (through games of March 10, 2004):

    1 North Dakota
    1 Boston College
    1 Maine
    4 Minnesota-Duluth
    5 Minnesota
    6 Denver
    7 Michigan
    8 Wisconsin
    8 New Hampshire
    8 Miami
    11 Ohio State
    12 Michigan State
    12 Colgate
    14 Notre Dame
    15 St. Cloud State
    27 Bemidji State
    28 Holy Cross

    The principal difference is that even though North Dakota swept Michigan Tech and Maine swept Boston College, there is now a three-way tie for first.

    Denver makes the biggest move as its sweep of Colorado College propelled the Pioneers to number six. And Notre Dame’s split with Lake Superior did not help the Irish at all. Colgate, while not playing last weekend, jumps into a tie for the number 12 spot.

    Step One

    From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.

    We break ties in the PWR by looking at the individual comparisons among the tied teams, and add Holy Cross and Bemidji State.

    From there, we can start looking at the bubble and ties in a more detailed fashion.

    There are three ties to break this week, at number one, eight and 12.

    Let’s look first at the tie at number 12 between Colgate and Michigan State. Head-to-head, Michigan State wins the comparison, so Michigan State is 12 and Colgate is 13. That is a huge tiebreak, because that’s the difference between a three and a four seed.

    Now we’ll move to the tie at eight between Wisconsin, New Hampshire and Miami. At stake, a two seed. It’s a full round-robin, folks and it’s circular. Oh, what to do? Break it on RPI, which is how the committee is expected to do it. Wisconsin is therefore eight, UNH nine and Miami 10.

    Now we move to the top spot. Once again it’s circular among North Dakota, Boston College and Maine. Again, let’s use RPI to break the tie: North Dakota, then Boston College, then Maine.

    Thus, the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:

    1 North Dakota
    2 Boston College
    3 Maine
    4 Minnesota-Duluth
    5 Minnesota
    6 Denver
    7 Michigan
    8 Wisconsin
    9 New Hampshire
    10 Miami
    11 Ohio State
    12 Michigan State
    13 Colgate
    14 Notre Dame
    15 Bemidji State
    16 Holy Cross

    Step Two

    Assign the seeds:

    No. 1 Seeds — North Dakota, Boston College, Maine, Minnesota-Duluth
    No. 2 Seeds — Minnesota, Denver, Michigan, Wisconsin
    No. 3 Seeds — New Hampshire, Miami, Ohio State, Michigan State
    No. 4 Seeds — Colgate, Notre Dame, Bemidji State, Holy Cross

    Step Three

    Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals, starting with No. 1 North Dakota.

    North Dakota is placed in the West Regional.
    Boston College is placed in the Northeast Regional.
    Maine is placed in the East Regional.
    Minnesota-Duluth is placed in the Midwest Regional.

    This hasn’t changed in a while. It’s still all pretty much the same.

    Step Four

    Now we place the other 12 teams, eventually so as to avoid intraconference matchups.

    Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that in these bands, teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional). Instead, the seeds are set such that the quarterfinals are played by No. 1 v. No. 8, No. 2 v. No. 7, No. 3 v. No. 6 and No. 4 v. No. 5.

    Therefore:

    No. 2 Seeds

    No. 8 Wisconsin goes to No. 1 North Dakota’s Regional, which is the West Regional
    No. 7 Michigan goes to No. 2 Boston College’s Regional, which is the Northeast Regional
    No. 6 Denver goes to No. 3 Maine’s Regional, which is the East Regional.
    No. 5 Minnesota goes to No. 4 Minnesota-Duluth’s Regional, which is the Midwest Regional.

    No. 3 Seeds

    Making the same analysis, the first-round matchups should be No. 9 v. No. 8, No. 10 v. No. 7, etc., so:

    No. 9 New Hampshire, as the host, goes to No. 7 Michigan’s Regional, which is the Northeast Regional.
    No. 10 Miami goes to No. 8 Wisconsin’s Regional, which is the West Regional.
    No. 11 Ohio State goes to No. 6 Denver’s Regional, which is the East Regional.
    No. 12 Michigan State goes to No. 5 Minnesota’s Regional, which is the Midwest Regional.

    No. 4 Seeds

    One more time, taking No. 16 v. No. 1, No. 15 v. No. 2, etc.

    No. 16 Holy Cross goes to No. 1 North Dakota’s Regional, which is the West Regional.
    No. 15 Bemidji State goes to No. 2 Boston College’s Regional, which is the Northeast Regional.
    No. 14 Notre Dame goes to No. 3 Maine’s Regional, which is the East Regional.
    No. 13 Colgate goes to No. 4 Minnesota-Duluth’s Regional, which is the Midwest Regional.

    The brackets as we have set them up:

    Midwest Regional:

    13 Colgate vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
    12 Michigan State vs. 5 Minnesota

    West Regional:

    16 Holy Cross vs. 1 North Dakota
    10 Miami vs. 8 Wisconsin

    East Regional:

    14 Notre Dame vs. 3 Maine
    11 Ohio State vs. 6 Denver

    Northeast Regional:

    15 Bemidji State vs. 2 Boston College
    9 New Hampshire vs. 7 Michigan

    Our first concern is avoiding intraconference matchups. We have none. Can you repeat that? Wow.

    Now let’s consider other issues.

    We’ve said in the past that we would love to get Denver in the West Regional. But can that happen? We could switch Denver with Minnesota and Wisconsin. That doesn’t interfere with the integrity of the seeds too much. Likewise, to improve attendance at Albany, we can switch Colgate and Notre Dame. We also switch Bemidji State and Holy Cross for travel purposes.

    So our brackets as of right now are:

    Midwest Regional:

    14 Notre Dame vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
    12 Michigan State vs. 8 Wisconsin

    West Regional:

    15 Bemidji State vs. 1 North Dakota
    10 Miami vs. 6 Denver

    East Regional:

    13 Colgate vs. 3 Maine
    11 Ohio State vs. 5 Minnesota

    Northeast Regional:

    16 Holy Cross vs. 2 Boston College
    9 New Hampshire vs. 7 Michigan

    I’m going to tweak the system one more time. Let’s go back to how we broke the ties. Remember that we had a tie at 12 with Michigan State and Colgate? Look right above them — Ohio State is just one comparison win above the two. There is a discernable bubble right there.

    For the fun of it, let’s put all three of those teams in a head-to-head-to-head comparison. We see that Michigan State wins two comparisons and Ohio State one. So if you look at it this way, Michigan State could be the 11 seed, not the 12 seed, and Ohio State is the 12 seed, not the 11 seed.

    So now we’ve made the bracket a little more ordered.

    Midwest Regional:

    14 Notre Dame vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
    11 Michigan State vs. 8 Wisconsin

    West Regional:

    15 Bemidji State vs. 1 North Dakota
    10 Miami vs. 6 Denver

    East Regional:

    13 Colgate vs. 3 Maine
    12 Ohio State vs. 5 Minnesota

    Northeast Regional:

    16 Holy Cross vs. 2 Boston College
    9 New Hampshire vs. 7 Michigan

    That’s our bracket this week without the bonus.

    Bracketing the Frozen Four, if all four number-one seeds advance, then the top overall seed plays No. 4, and No. 2 plays No. 3. Therefore, the winners of the Midwest and West Regionals face each other in one semifinal (Minnesota-Duluth and North Dakota’s brackets), while the winners of the East and Northeast Regionals (Maine and Boston College’s brackets) play the other semifinal.

    But, we may have just wasted all our time and brainpower because…

    Bonus Time

    We know there is a bonus component to the criteria, the NCAA’s tweak to the system which rewards “good” nonconference wins.

    Without official word on the size of the bonuses, we take these numbers: .005 for a good road win, .003 for a good neutral win and .001 for a good home win, and then we break ties using the method as above.

    Does anything change? Absolutely.

    1 Boston College
    2 Maine
    3 North Dakota
    4 Minnesota-Duluth
    5 Minnesota
    6 Denver
    6 Michigan
    8 Wisconsin
    9 New Hampshire
    9 Miami
    11 Ohio State
    12 Colgate
    13 Notre Dame
    13 Michigan State
    15 St. Cloud State
    27 Bemidji State
    28 Holy Cross

    That three-way tie for first is broken with BC coming out on top, Maine second and North Dakota third. Colgate also moves up into a third seed. Bemidji State moves ahead of Holy Cross here and St. Cloud is still out in this bonus.

    Let’s break the ties here. At six, Denver wins the head-to-head, so the Pioneers get the sixth seed and Michigan the seventh.

    At 13 Notre Dame defeats Michigan State head-to-head, so Notre Dame is 13 and Michigan State is 14.

    There is a tie at nine, so let’s break it. But hold on a minute. Let’s look at the band of 9-12, i.e. New Hampshire, Miami, Ohio State and Colgate. The comparison wins are so close, let’s call this a bubble.

    Now let’s go head-to-head-to-head-to-head amongst these four teams.

    There are a total of six comparisons to look at here. If you look at it, New Hampshire and Ohio State win two comparisons and Miami and Colgate win one each. We now have separation. New Hampshire and Ohio State will compete for 9 and 10 and Miami and Colgate will compete for 11 and 12.

    Let’s break 11 and 12 first. Colgate defeats Miami in that comparison, so we give Colgate 11 and Miami 12.

    Now let’s move to UNH and Ohio State. Head-to-head Ohio State defeats UNH. That gives Ohio State nine and UNH 10.

    All right, here are our teams in seeded order:

    1 Boston College
    2 Maine
    3 North Dakota
    4 Minnesota-Duluth
    5 Minnesota
    6 Denver
    7 Michigan
    8 Wisconsin
    9 Ohio State
    10 New Hampshire
    11 Colgate
    12 Miami
    13 Notre Dame
    14 Michigan State
    15 Bemidji State
    16 Holy Cross

    So, our new brackets, using the same logic as above:

    West Regional:

    14 Michigan State vs. 3 North Dakota
    11 Colgate vs. 6 Denver

    Midwest Regional:

    13 Notre Dame vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
    12 Miami vs. 5 Minnesota

    Northeast Regional:

    15 Bemidji State vs. 2 Maine
    10 New Hampshire vs. 7 Michigan

    East Regional:

    16 Holy Cross vs. 1 Boston College
    9 Ohio State vs. 8 Wisconsin

    We would love to get a Michigan teams into the Midwest Regional. If we switch Notre Dame and Michigan State, it wouldn’t hurt seeding integrity because they were tied in the PairWise anyway.

    We also wouldn’t mind getting Colgate into the East Regional. Can we switch Ohio State and Colgate? It’s a big step, because it throws the integrity a little out of whack, but we’re going to do it.

    I like attendance factors, thanks to Denver in the West, Michigan State in the Midwest and Colgate and Boston College in Albany.

    So our final bracket with the 5-3-1 bonus is:

    West Regional:

    13 Notre Dame vs. 3 North Dakota
    9 Ohio State vs. 6 Denver

    Midwest Regional:

    14 Michigan State vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
    12 Miami vs. 5 Minnesota

    Northeast Regional:

    15 Bemidji State vs. 2 Maine
    10 New Hampshire vs. 7 Michigan

    East Regional:

    16 Holy Cross vs. 1 Boston College
    11 Colgate vs. 8 Wisconsin

    3-2-1

    What if we took these numbers: .003 for a good road win, .002 for a good neutral win and .001 for a good home win?

    1 North Dakota
    1 Boston College
    1 Maine
    4 Minnesota-Duluth
    5 Minnesota
    6 Denver
    6 Michigan
    8 Wisconsin
    9 New Hampshire
    9 Miami
    11 Ohio State
    12 Colgate
    13 Notre Dame
    13 Michigan State
    15 St. Cloud State
    27 Bemidji State
    28 Holy Cross

    It looks like our “without bonus” ranking, except that Michigan and Denver are tied, Wisconsin is alone at eight, and Colgate moves into 12 all by its lonesome.

    North Dakota, Boston College and Maine wind up in that order after breaking ties. Denver is ahead of Michigan, and I am doing the exact same thing as with the 5-3-1 bonus for teams 9-12. That means Ohio State, New Hampshire, Colgate and then Miami. And Notre Dame beats Michigan State.

    With those changes, the bracket changes slightly.

    West Regional:

    16 Holy Cross vs. 1 North Dakota
    11 Colgate vs. 8 Wisconsin

    Midwest Regional:

    13 Notre Dame vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
    9 Ohio State vs. 5 Minnesota

    East Regional:

    14 Michigan State vs. 3 Maine
    12 Miami vs. 6 Denver

    Northeast Regional:

    15 Bemidji State vs. 2 Boston College
    10 New Hampshire vs. 7 Michigan

    There are some tough ones here. Again, we make some switches for attendance purposes. Miami and Colgate switch. Notre Dame and Michigan State switch. Let’s also switch Denver with Wisconsin for attendance. And one more switch — Holy Cross with Bemidji State. This way only one team flies, not two, which is a priority for the NCAA.

    And here we go, our brackets:

    West Regional:

    15 Bemidji State vs. 1 North Dakota
    12 Miami vs. 6 Denver

    Midwest Regional:

    14 Michigan State vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
    9 Ohio State vs. 5 Minnesota

    East Regional:

    13 Notre Dame vs. 3 Maine
    11 Colgate vs. 8 Wisconsin

    Northeast Regional:

    16 Holy Cross vs. 2 Boston College
    10 New Hampshire vs. 7 Michigan

    RPI

    You may have heard about the new RPI rule in effect for this season. Essentially, the new rule states that if a team wins a conference playoff game against a team so weak that the win still lowers its RPI — yes, that is unfortunate, but possible — then the game does not count for RPI purposes for the winning team.

    (Conversely, if a team loses, that game counts no matter what.)

    The rule is meant to protect teams advancing in their conference tournaments from losing ground in the RPI compared to teams that lose out and go home. It sounds simple, though it really isn’t once the computations are all done. Trust me.

    Next Week

    After this weekend, we’ll have a handle as to who is in the tournament and who still has a chance to be a spoiler. Then we’ll really get down to it and see what the tournament might look like.

  • Gophers’ Ashley Suspended for Remainder of the Season

    Minnesota women’s coach Laura Halldorson has suspended freshman defenseman Danielle Ashley for the remainder of the 2003-04 season for violating team policies.

    Ashley played in 26 games for the No. 1 Gophers, scoring two goals and 13 assists for 15 points. She was also the national leader in penalties with 37, all minors. Minnesota had sat Ashley for both of last weekend’s wins over St. Cloud.

    Ashley is the second Minnesota freshmen defensemen to be lost for the season. Lyndsay Wall, a 2002 U.S. Olympian, was declared academically ineligible back in January.

    This is also the second consecutive year that a Minnesota player has been suspended for the entire season in its final two months. Kristy Oonincx was suspended on Feb. 6, 2003 and later transferred to St. Cloud State.

    The No. 1 Gophers next play on Saturday in the WWCHA Final Five, which they are hosting at Ridder Arena.

    Youthful Feel on All-CCHA Team

    This year’s All-CCHA First Team has a distinct youthful feel.

    logos/conf-cc.gif

    For just the second time in the conference’s 33-year history, two freshmen have been named to the CCHA First-Team. Michigan forward T.J. Hensick and Michigan State defenseman A.J. Thelen are the first freshman duo to be chosen First-Team All-Conference since Lake Superior forward Pat Tims and goaltender Kim Gellert made the squad in 1973-74.

    The team also includes a sophomore, two juniors, and one senior.

    Hensick

    Hensick

    Michigan State placed two players on this year’s squad, the third straight year the Spartans have placed at least two players on the team. Miami had two players selected to the First Team for the first time since 1996-97. Bowling Green makes its first apperance on the First Team since 1998-99 with one selection, while Michigan returns a player to the First Team after a one-year hiatus. Miami and Michigan were also represented on the Second Team, along with players from Notre Dame and Northern Michigan. The teams, which include five seniors, three juniors, three sophomores and two freshmen, were selected by a vote of the league’s head coaches and are based on performance in league games. Coaches were not allowed to vote for their own players.

    Miami senior foward Derek Edwardson, the conference scoring champion with 35 points, and Michigan State junior forward Jim Slater, this year’s only first-team returnee, led the way at the forward position. Hensick, who led the league in assists, completes the forward line. Thelen, who led all reargaurds in scoring, and Miami sophomore Andy Greene, who was named to the All-Rookie Team last season, round out the blueline. Bowling Green junior Jordan Sigalet, the NCAA leader in minutes played, was chosen as the goaltender for the First Team. Sigalet becomes the first BGSU goaltender to make the First Team since Gary Kruzich was chosen in both the 1985-86 and 1986-87 seasons.

    Miami senior forward Greg Hogeboom, who enters the postseason with a streak of 151 consecutive games played, heads up the Second Team. Notre Dame senior Rob Globke, who received two first-place votes, and fellow Irish senior Aaron Gill, round out the forward line. Three players, Notre Dame senior Brett Lebda, Northern Michigan sophomore Nathan Oystrick and Michigan junior Brandon Rogers, all first time Second-Team selections, comprise the defense; a tie in the balloting made it necessary for three Second-Team Defenseman. Michigan sophomore Al Montoya, who was named to last season’s All-Rookie Team, is the All-Conference Second Team goalie.

    2003-04 CCHA All-Conference Teams

    FIRST TEAM

    F Derek Edwardson, Sr., Miami
    F Jim Slater, Jr., Michigan State
    F T.J. Hensick, Fr., Michigan
    D A.J. Thelen, Fr., Michigan State
    D Andy Greene, So., Miami
    G Jordan Sigalet, Jr., Bowling Green

    SECOND TEAM

    F Greg Hogeboom, Sr., Miami
    F Rob Globke, Sr., Notre Dame
    F Aaron Gill, Sr., Notre Dame
    D Brett Lebda, Sr., Notre Dame
    D Nathan Oystrick, So., Northern Michigan
    D Brandon Rogers, Jr., Michigan
    G Al Montoya, So., Michigan

    Honorable Mention: Craig Kowalski, Sr., G, Northern Michigan; Nate Guenin, So., D, Ohio State; Doug Andress, Sr., D, Ohio State; Mike Kompon, Sr., F, Miami; Kelly Czuy, So., F, Alaska Fairbanks; Kevin Bieksa, Sr., D, Bowling Green.

    CCHA Stats

    Between the Lines: March 10, 2004

    Our thoughts go out to Steve Moore, former Harvard skater who has made himself into a quite respectable NHL player. Unfortunately, he’s been involved in a reprehensible act of on-ice violence, perpetrated by a star of the league, encouraged, apparently, by his coach. It started when Moore hit Vancouver star Markus Naslund, leading to a concussion for Naslund. This raised the ire of the Canucks, and in the next meeting, Moore was target No. 1. They thought the incident was behind them after Moore got into a fight in the first period, and held his own. But alas no, as the Canucks continued to take runs at Moore throughout the entire game. That is until power forward extraordinaire Todd Bertuzzi sucker punched Moore, and drove him face first into the ice, breaking Moore’s neck and leaving him in a pool of blood. Moore is out for the year (he’s lucky that’s all), Bertuzzi is indefinitely suspended.

    The entire Moore hockey-playing family, all Harvard alums including recent graduate Dominic Moore, have always been known to be class acts. It’s hard to believe his original hit on Naslund was intentional, nevermind that it deserved the retaliation he got. But the stupidity of it is the reaction from fight lovers. They say that the incident could have been avoided had there not been an instigator rule in effect in the NHL. Theory being, without the instigator rule, a player could’ve started a fight with Moore during the original game, and gotten it over with. But because of the rule, which tosses a player who clearly starts a fight, nothing happened. I’m trying to understand the logic of this. This rule certainly didn’t prevent the Canucks from headhunting Moore all night in the recent meeting. And it certainly has nothing to do with Bertuzzi’s gutless cheap shot to Moore’s temple.

    Quickies

    Speaking of former college players and bad NHL incidents, former St. Cloud State star Tyler Arnason was recently involved in strange one with his Chicago Blackhawks coach Brian Sutter. Apparently, in a bar somewhere, Sutter confronted Arnason about the need to work harder and play better. The New York Post’s Larry Brooks said that Arnason’s “laid-back manner and inconsistency have irritated Sutter throughout his three-year tenure behind the Chicago bench.” The confrontation apparently became physical. Sutter certainly is not the first coach to get frustrated with Arnason — just ask Craig Dahl. But fisticuffs is another matter. On the other hand, Arnason did go out and score two goals the next game — a game which featured the NHL debut of former Cornell All-American goalie Matt Underhill. … The worst part, though, is that apparently the incident was witnessed by Chicago management and swept under the rug for four days until a newspaper broke the story. …

    Last Thursday, Steve Saviano picked up his first penalty of the season. Prior, the Hobey Baker Award candidate had been channeling the honor’s namesake. Hobey Baker took one penalty in his college career, and, the legend goes, he didn’t deserve it, and it made him very upset. No one was arguing Saviano’s call.

    Good Luck

    It’s never easy to see someone you know and like get fired, in any walk of life. Such was the case this week when Princeton’s Len Quesnelle was let go by the university, after 20 years of service as a player, assistant coach and then head coach.

    logos/pri.gif

    Obviously, it’s hard to defend eight wins in two seasons and a 17-game winless streak to end this one. But Princeton athletic director Gary Walters has to ask himself, who can win at Princeton? Did he ask himself that question? Well, first of all, we’ll never know, because Princeton’s publicity office is deflecting all media requests for interviews, saying that Walters is busy for the next month as a member of the Division I men’s basketball committee. Oooooh-K.

    But Don Cahoon, who coached from 1991-2000, was the only relatively successful coach at Princeton since the early ’30s. And his teams never finished higher than fourth in the standings. Of course, the Tigers did win an ECAC tournament championship under Cahoon, and had three seasons of 18 wins or higher.

    Thing is, Don Cahoon can sell ice to an eskimo. And he’s one of the best coaches out there. He is an extremely rare personality and coach. I’m not even sure an older Don Cahoon today, minus a little energy from 12 years ago, could do now what he did at Princeton then. Especially when you add in the fact that the whole ECAC is down.

    Admissions at Princeton are a big problem that are going to hamper any coach. Harvard forward Tim Pettit, he of the best release in the ECAC, is from a legacy family that dates back to the 1800s at Princeton. Yet he couldn’t get in. Assistants, and lead recruiters, Brian Wiseman and Mike Bois are getting paid paltry wages. This kind of thing won’t be solved with a new coach.

    I’m not sitting here telling you that Len Quesnelle is a great coach and just a victim of circumstance. You could argue his case back and forth all day. But until other things on campus change, I don’t think a new coach has a ceiling of any higher than 10 wins. I just know that he’s all class and deserves to land on his feet.

    As for some candidates, let’s throw out some names. New Hampshire assistant, and former Lake Superior head coach, Scott Borek, interviewed for the position after Cahoon left. Dartmouth’s Dave Peters is one of the more experienced Ivy League assistants. How about USNTDP Under-18 coach David Quinn? He was willing to be a masochist at Union, where he interviewed for that recent opening, and he shares Cahoon’s BU heritage. As does John Hynes, also at the USNTDP. I’ve seen the name John Messuri thrown out there, a Princeton alum who coaches high school hockey in Massachusetts. And Jeff Kampersal, another alum who currently coaches the Princeton women’s team. Pat Ford, current coach of the soon-to-be disbanded Findlay program, is an intriguing thought. How about Mark Dennehy, formerly a Princeton assistant now with Cahoon at UMass? I’ve long touted Dennehy as one of the next good young coaches out there, along with BC assistant Ron Rolston. I’d love to mention Middlebury coach Bill Beaney, whose son Trevor recently graduated from Princeton, but we’ve been down that road too many times to make that mistake again.

    Greatness

    Despite its growing popularity, college hockey is still the world’s best-kept secret. And its greatness was on full display again this past weekend.

    First Northeastern. Needing a sweep to get into the Hockey East playoffs — the only playoffs that eliminates a team — and no better than two ties out of Boston University, Northeastern had every reason to feel confident going into the weekend. Despite the long odds, it was playing a struggling Massachusetts, while BU was facing New Hampshire in a home-and-home. BU hadn’t scored off UNH goalie Mike Ayers since early last season, over four games ago. But BU managed a 3-3 tie with UNH on Thursday, while Northeastern drew closer with a win on Friday. … Switch to Saturday, Northeastern is getting pounded, outshot 15-1 in the first period, yet leads 1-0. The Huskies go up 3-0 before UMass rallies to make it 3-2. Just as this is happening, New Hampshire finally ties up BU. If it stays like this, Northeastern is in, and BU is out. But just like that, BU scores again, and the Terriers lead. Back in Amherst, the Huskies hang on by a thread to win, just as New Hampshire ties it. Celebration time in Northeastern-land, eh? Not quite. Boston University, struggling to score all year, and shut out four straight times by Ayers heading into the weekend, comes up with an overtime game winner, on the road, and stuns UNH — thereby preventing UNH, by the way, from passing UMass — and avoids missing the HEA playoffs for the first time ever. Craziness.

    What does this mean for UMass? The Minutemen got swept on the last weekend and struggled down the stretch. Though Don Cahoon has a way of finding playoff magic just when you think all has been lost. Now they face Massachusetts-Lowell, which shut out UMass twice earlier in the season. Those losses though, coming at a time when UMass was without two of its best players, were reversed because of Lowell’s use of an inelgible player. Now UMass has its guys back, and Lowell has its team set, and I guess we’ll find out for real who is better. Isn’t it amazing how these matchups just have a way of happening?

    Meanwhile, BU now gets Boston College in the first round, just the second time that’s ever happened. Again, these matchups just work out. It’s like the WCHA, where three of the five playoff series are rematches of the series that just happened this past weekend.

    Michigan State's Dominic Vicari stood toe-to-toe with Michigan's Al Montoya again.

    Michigan State’s Dominic Vicari stood toe-to-toe with Michigan’s Al Montoya again.

    In the CCHA, things were just as crazy, if not moreso, considering that the positions being fought for were at the top, not the bottom.

    Friday, three teams are separated by four points, and No. 3 is playing No. 1, who just happen to be bitter rivals. Meanwhile, No. 2 (Miami) is playing No. 4 (Ohio State), which is no slouch, but is out of the first-place hunt. So Miami makes a great comeback to overtake OSU, and draw even with Michigan, for the time being. Meanwhile, in East Lansing, you not only have the rival teams, by Al Montoya and Dominic Vicari are squaring off between the pipes — last year’s star freshman goalie, and this year’s. They exchanged shutouts the last time these teams met, in December. Then they were teammates when the U.S. won the gold in Finland at the World Junior Championships, and became good friends. They are locked in a tight battle until four goals are scored in a two-minute stretch of the second period, Michigan still up 3-2. But the Spartans, a great third-period team all year, score twice early in the third against a team, the Wolverines, which was 17-0-0 when taking a lead into the third. With a national television audience (and Oxford, Ohio) watching, and MSU trying to hold on, the Spartans get a power play late in the third. This looks in the bag. But wait, Joe Ryznar scores a shorthanded goal! to tie it up, and the Wolverines remain on top by a point.

    Elsewhere Friday, Notre Dame, looking so impressive the previous weekend in sweeping Michigan — and thus setting up all of this top-of-the-standings drama — gets a crushing blow, getting shutout by Lake Superior upstart goalie Jeff Jakaitis. Just when prosperity was standing at the door, the Irish let it walk away. Notre Dame won the next night, but its NCAA status is shaky.

    So we go to Saturday, where again, Montoya, balky hamstring and all, and Vicari are locked in a battle that stays scoreless until the third. Mike Lalonde’s backhander eventually gives MSU a big 1-0 win, and the Spartans wind up just two points out of first. Meanwhile, Miami, seemingly inspired by all this, again rallies to tie Ohio State. But the RedHawks need a win, and they are pressing — which opens the door for the Buckeyes to take advantage with a late goal and a 5-4 win. Michigan celebrates, as its bitter football rival, Ohio State, wins.

    Michigan State was one shorthanded goal allowed away from creating a three-way tie atop the standings. As it is, Michigan’s eight losses are the most ever by a CCHA regular-season champ, which is just what happned in the ECAC the week before with Colgate. Can you say more parity?

    By the way, I don’t want to hear about this “backing in” nonsense. Michigan went 0-3-1 in the last four, and won the title anyway, so some say they “backed in.” That is baloney. It’s an overused term, and 99 percent of the time, it means nothing. There’s a reason they play games in November too. They all count. Losing a couple games at the end is far more likely to simply be coincidence than anything. Sometimes you can tell a team is limping to the finish and is due for a playoff collapse. But it rarely is actually the case.

    So how about the ECAC? Just four series this past weekend involving teams 5-12 in the standings, so no big deal, right? Well, Clarkson coach George Roll sits his captains, Tristan Lush and Rob McFeeters, for disciplinary reasons just before the big games. All Clarkson does is come out and roll Union to the tune of 8-3, on the road. The next night, the Golden Knights crush them again, and Union’s strong play down the stretch is nothing but a distant memory. The Dutchmen have now lost 13 straight playoff games, including the last four at home, its only ECAC Division I home playoff games ever.

    St. Lawrence advanced in the ECAC playoffs with two OT wins.

    St. Lawrence advanced in the ECAC playoffs with two OT wins.

    Meanwhile Friday, Yale jumps out to a 2-0 early lead, and St. Lawrence’s Adam Hogg is tossed from the game. Nothing is going right for the Saints. But they get a goal and there’s life, and then all of a sudden, early in the second period, Yale goalie Josh Gartner — son of NHL Hall of Famer Mike Gartner — who has played just about every minute for Yale this season, gets tossed from the game for butt-ending. This also means Gartner will miss Game 2. The Saints sense an opening, and take advantage. But not so fast, because little-used senior backup Peter Dobrowolski comes in and stands on his head. The game goes to overtime. St. Lawrence eventually does win, putting 59 shots on net against one of the nation’s worst defenses. Saturday night, St. Lawrence in control, but Yale, still without Gartner, manages to get off the deck and tie the game in the last minute, forcing overtime again. And again, St. Lawrence wins.

    Amid all of this conference maneuvering, there are NCAA implications galore. And the intricacies of the PairWise system is such that, with teams hanging on the edge of being considered a Team Under Consideration or not (defined as a team with an RPI of .500 or better), then every win or loss by one of those teams winds up throwing the PairWise for a loop. If Northeastern falls off the TUC bubble, who gets helped or hurt? What about BU? And Harvard? Say what you want for the PWR system, you gotta love this kind of intrigue (just bring your slide rule).

    All of this on one weekend. And we haven’t even reached the heart of the playoffs.

    We touched on the WCHA earlier. There was basically just playoff positioning on the line, but the games were fun to watch. Saw Minnesota-St. Cloud State and Wisconsin-UMD on the dish both nights. Entertaining games. I’m still waiting for any defense at all to show up to last Friday’s Gophers game. … The real shame of the weekend, though, was the injury suffered by Denver senior Connor James. The senior forward broke his leg, ending his college career. He had never missed a game previously in his four-year career.

    Motley Rule

    The fact that scoring is down, across the board, is no longer news. Everyone in hockey has been discussing it extensively. It’s down more than ever. Thirty percent in the NHL just over the last decade alone. College hockey is showing similar trends. (Just don’t tell the wide open WCHA, which is looking more like 20 years ago sometimes.)

    The news, however, is the proposed NHL rules changes. And NHL rules changes have a way of seeping down to the college level eventually — though this time, we’re hoping some college rules seep up to the NHL. Here are some that have been bandied about, though not all are proceeding to a final vote by the NHL.

    • Reducing size of goalie pads. A no brainer.

    • Goalies can’t handle the puck behind the net. I hate it. Rules should not be made that directly restrict a valid skill of a player. Has the fact that goalies play the puck better than ever attributed to hockey’s scoring decline? Absolutely. But that is not a reason to outlaw it. Sports should be about encouraging particular skills, not eliminating them. It’s like when the dunk was outlawed in college basketball for a few years in the ’70s.

    • Shootout. An abomination to sports. Play 10 minute OTs at 4-on-4, that’s fine with me. The argument that shootouts is “entertaining” is not valid. Naked women shooting fire darts at players would be entertaining. But I don’t think we should add that (though I’d take that over shootouts).

    • Widen the ice. I’ve long been against widening the ice to Olympic size of 100 feet. But something like a five-foot boost, to 90 feet, might be good. Of course, many college arenas are already wider, though the trend in recent years has been to go to 85 feet again. Too many people believed the game slowed down too much with 100-foot surfaces, and there was less hitting. This is very true in college, though there is probably more validity to widen the ice in the NHL, because the players are so big and fast across the board.

    • Widen the neutral zone. This includes making the blue lines thicker, and moving the nets back close to the boards, where they used to be. These are no brainers.

    • Full two-minute power plays. I don’t like this. I realize that, originally, power plays were always two minutes, whether the power-play team scored or not. And that it was changed in the ’50s as an artificial way to limit Montreal’s potency. Further, I don’t think power plays are that exciting. You may see further scoring, but excitement in hockey comes from scoring off the rush, or a bang-bang play in the zone. The power play is deliberate and slow most of the time. You may get more goals, but not more excitement, which is really the issue.

    • Remove the red line. Would love to see it in the NHL. Maybe in the AHL as an experiment to start. But there’s no reason not to do it. There was a day and age when you couldn’t pass forward. I think we can allow passes over two lines.

    • Make the nets bigger. I’ve talked about this before. Huge thumbs up. Goalies are bigger, the nets need to be bigger. It’s that simple.

    2004 CCHA All-Academic Team

    F Paul Davies      Sr.  Western Michigan  Pre-Medicine
    F Derek Edwardson  Sr.  Miami             Exercise Science
    F Rob Globke       Sr.  Notre Dame        Marketing
    D Nate Guenin      So.  Ohio State        Undeclared
    F Tom Herman       Sr.  Alaska Fairbanks  Business
    F Mike Kompon      Sr.  Miami             Physical Education
    F Dana Lattery     Sr.  Western Michigan  Pre-Medicine
    F D'Arcy McConvey  Sr.  Bowling Green     Financial Economics
    F Derrick McIver   Sr.  Ferris State      Computer Information Systems
    F Andrew Wong      Sr.  Nebraska-Omaha    Finance

    HONORABLE MENTION

    ALASKA FAIRBANKS: Paul Austin, F; Jordan Hendry, D; Jared Sylvestre, F.
    BOWLING GREEN: Kevin Bieksa, D; Alex Rogosheske, F; Jordan Sigalet, G.
    MICHIGAN: Andrew Ebbett, F; Al Montoya, G.
    MICHIGAN STATE: Colton Fretter, F; Steve Swistak, F.
    NOTRE DAME: T.J. Mathieson, D.

    SPECIAL MENTION

    ALASKA FAIRBANKS: Kelly Czuy, F; Cramer Hickey, F; David Keough, D; Preston McKay,G; Cory Rask, F; Corbin Schmidt, D;
    Scott Vockeroth, F.
    BOWLING GREEN: Ryan Barnett, F; Steve Brudzewski, F; Bob Frazee, G; Chris Pedota, D; John Sitko, D.
    FERRIS STATE: Trevor Large, F; Greg Rallo, F; Nick Scheible, F.
    LAKE SUPERIOR: Tim Krueckl, F. MIAMI: Matt Davis, D; Brian Sipotz, D.
    MICHIGAN: Charlie Henderson, F; Brandon Kaleniecki, F; Noah Ruden, G; Jeff Tambellini, F.
    MICHIGAN STATE: David Booth, F; Lee Falardeau, F; Joe Markusen, D.
    NEBRASKA-OMAHA: Mike Gabinet, D; Dan Hacker, F.
    NORTHERN MICHIGAN: Kevin Gardner, F; Geoff Waugh, D.
    NOTRE DAME: Tom Galvin, D; Brett Lebda, D; Neil Komadoski, D; Cory McLean, F; Chris Trick, F.
    OHIO STATE: Thomas Welsh, D; Reed Whiting, D.
    WESTERN MICHIGAN: Jeremy Cheyne, D; Lucas Drake, F; Mike Jarmuth, D.

    Jutting Honored by USA Hockey

    USA Hockey today named Minnesota State’s Troy Jutting its 2003 National Coach of the Year.

    In August 2003, Jutting coached the U.S. Under-18 Select Team to its first-ever gold medal at the Under-18 Junior World Cup in Piestany, Slovakia. The team registered a perfect 5-0-0 record, including two victories over Russia, as well as handing seven-time defending champion Canada a 4-3 loss. Jutting is in his fourth season as the men’s head coach of Minnesota State. During the 2002-03 campaign, he was named the WCHA Coach of the Year, leading the Mavericks to a 17-game unbeaten streak during the regular season, a second-place finish in the WCHA regular-season standings and a berth in the NCAA Tournament.

    “Last year, Troy was able to take an exceptional group of players and, in a short time, mold them into a team that was able to capture USA Hockey’s first-ever gold medal in the Under-18 Junior World Cup,” said USA Hockey’s Coaching Education Program director Mark Tabrum.

    Also recognized was former BU forward David Quinn as USA Hockey Developmental Coach of the Year. Quinn is part of the U.S. National Team Development Program in Ann Arbor. The Volunteer Coach of the Year is Leo Bronston of Onalaska, Wis., involved in the Wisconsin Amateur Hockey Association for nearly 15 years.

    The three USA Hockey Coaches of the Year have also been nominated for the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) Coach of the Year in each of the categories. Coaches are nominated in all sports represented within the USOC family.

    The five finalists in the National and Developmental categories and the winner of the USOC Volunteer Coach of the Year title will be honored May 1-3 at the Colorado Springs Olympic Training Complex. The USOC National Coach of the Year and USOC Developmental Coach of the Year will be announced during a May 2 dinner at the Cheyenne Mountain Resort in Colorado Springs, Colo.

    Four-Year Plan

    When you consider the accomplishments of incumbents during this Election Year, you’ll be hard-pressed to find a better four-year term than the one delivered by Minnesota-Duluth coach Scott Sandelin.

    Arriving at Duluth in Fall 2000, Sandelin faced the challenge of replacing Mike Sertich, who coached the Bulldogs to three regular-season championships, four NCAA Tournament appearances, and two Frozen Fours in the 1980s. In response, Sandelin has led a program that now stakes its claim to the title of “Most Improved” over his first four years. Of course, he wasn’t the only arrival in the Fall 2000: a freshman from Quebec named Junior Lessard was another key newcomer to Duluth, along with Minnesota native Beau Geisler, a defenseman. Although it wasn’t obvious at the time, it’s no coincidence that these three began at the same time that the program began its ascent in the WCHA as well as on the national picture.

    In the first season for this new trio in Duluth, the Bulldogs posted a lowly 7-28-4 record — the lowest winning percentage that the program had endured since 1968-69. Lessard’s debut was forgettable, as he recorded a modest 4-8–12 in 37 games played that year.

    It has taken four years, but Minnesota-Duluth coach Scott Sandelin is ready to bring the Bulldogs back to the national stage.

    It has taken four years, but Minnesota-Duluth coach Scott Sandelin is ready to bring the Bulldogs back to the national stage.

    In 2001-02, the turnaround officially began, as the team put up a 13-24-3 record. Lessard blossomed nicely, posting 17-13–30 in 39 games. Last year, the Bulldogs made a true Great Leap Forward, going 22-15-5 and coming up one win short of qualifying for the NCAA Tournament. After upsetting North Dakota in the WCHA play-in game, Minnesota-Duluth had to play their fifth game in eight days against powerhouse Colorado College, only to fall in overtime. Many irate Bulldog fans e-mailed USCHO to vent when the team was bypassed for an at-large bid in the NCAA Tournament, but Sandelin knew that the team had come up short.

    “We were close but yet we were still far,” said Sandelin. “Because I knew what we had to do — we had to win three games. Looking back, we didn’t get in because we didn’t win certain games and our strength of schedule within the league was not as good as probably this year. But it was a real positive step.”

    This year they aren’t leaving anything to chance. With a 23-10-4 record, the Bulldogs have already surpassed last year’s mark and are currently fourth in the PairWise Rankings. After taking three of four points against Wisconsin last week, the team is assured of an NCAA berth. Lessard is just as much of a lock to be a Hobey Baker finalist, seeing that he is third in the nation in scoring with totals of 23-25–48 in 37 games played.

    In light of all these glowing achievements, it appeared to be an opportune time to find out the story behind the program’s remarkable rise to the top, starting with last season.

    “Last year we had some inconsistencies the first half of the year,” Sandelin said. “Obviously the key was getting solid goaltending. Our freshman [Isaac] Reichmuth came in last year and really stabilized that position and gave everybody confidence. We started to play a little bit better in the second half; I think through recruiting we had a little better depth through our four lines. I think those guys really became a team.

    Junior Lessard is expected to be named a Hobey Baker Award finalist.

    Junior Lessard is expected to be named a Hobey Baker Award finalist.

    “Things started clicking, and we had that good finish to the year. We had the opportunity to get to our Final Five, and we were certainly close to being in the tournament.”

    There have been two major factors in this year’s success: upperclassmen now comprise the majority of the lineup, and they have had several years together to build great chemistry. Additionally, there have been some stunning contributions from unexpected sources.

    “We’ve got a big junior class,” Sandelin said. “We’ve got four seniors, and we’ve got our 12 juniors. Certainly when you look at some of the successful teams and programs, you always talk about not being able to win with a big group of freshmen or a loaded group of freshmen and sophomores. That’s been a key — that those of guys have gained experience over the years. We’ve had some different players — kind of like last year — step up and have good years. Guys that maybe you didn’t expect last year, guys like Evan Schwabe and Tyler Brosz are having great years for us; Lessard and Geisler, two of our seniors, are having outstanding years for us.”

    Lessard may get the most ink, but Schwabe’s metamorphosis into one of the top scorers in the nation has been an absolute revelation. As a sophomore, Schwabe scored just six times with four assists in 39 games, playing third or fourth-line center. Now he is tied for ninth in scoring nationally with 41 points in 37 games.

    “He’s in better shape; he showed up ready and is getting a chance to play,” Lessard said of Schwabe, his centerman on the top line. “He’s such a quick skater and great playmaker, and he also can finish well. Those are probably his strongest parts of the game. I’ve been playing with him all year, and he’s been underestimated a bit–If you don’t pay attention to him and give him lots of room, he’s going to make you pay.”

    Likewise, junior Brosz has jumped from 17 points in 31 games to 38 points in 34 games thus far this season. He’s also a bit of a character.

    “He’s a very outgoing guy on the ice,” captain Beau Geisler said. “He cracks jokes but then all of a sudden he’s down to business and gets right at it. He’s a very hard worker, a good guy to have on your team. He makes you laugh and have fun.”

    Both Geisler and Lessard also mentioned defenseman Tim Hambly as another key to the team’s improvement, given that he went from five points last season to 23 to date during this campaign. “He’s having an exceptional year, playing great ‘D’ and getting a lot of points,” Geisler said.

    There’s always those bragging rights, but … I think the guys have taken that in stride really well, talked about getting points against Minnesota than the actual beating them four times.

    — UMD coach Scott Sandelin

    As Sandelin indicated, though, it may be the stabilizing presence of Reichmuth in goal that helped this team believe that they could hold their own against the likes of Minnesota and North Dakota.

    “I think he’s pretty spectacular,” Lessard said of Reichmuth. “He’s got pretty good technique, and most of the time doesn’t get himself out of position, but he had such a good year last year and was the main reason for our success at the end of the year. This year he had kind of a tough start, but the expectations for him were so high. After Christmas, he’s been outstanding. Every game he gives us a chance to win. The defense feels more confident with him and takes chances they wouldn’t have taken before.”

    While Reichmuth holds the fort in the defensive end, Lessard certainly is the standout on the other end of the ice.

    “Certainly this year he’s gotten quicker and stronger, and obviously as a senior you have a confidence level from playing a lot of games,” Sandelin said. “He’s a real leader for us. He’s not going to be a dynamic player; we’ve got a lot of those guys in our league in [North Dakota’s] Zach Parise and [Michigan Tech’s] Chris Conner — guys with great speed, flashy, dynamic guys. Junior’s more of a good strong power forward who can score goals. He’s a tough guy to knock off his feet. He gets abused a lot in a lot of games, but he keeps going back into those tough areas. From a team standpoint, when you see one of your leaders doing that, it picks up everybody. He’s slowly each year improved his game, and this year is maybe the culmination of all that hard work.

    “He usually scores from around 10 or 15 feet; he’s very good around the net. He’s not a Zach Parise, who can dangle you and beat you one-on-one; Junior’s more of a Brett Hull-type player who finds his spots and tries to get his shot off. He’s one of those guys who will stand in front of the net and get cross-checked and tip pucks and get rebounds. He shoots the puck very well; those are reasons he’s scored 20-plus goals the last two years.”

    Curiously, Sandelin and the two seniors agree that the turning point of the season was an apparently meaningless exhibition game against the Latvian National Team. Coming on the heels of a tough sweep at Grand Forks against the Sioux, the game gave the team an opportunity to right itself before Christmas break.

    “It was a fun game to play; it was obviously important to go into that break winning,” Sandelin said. “Guys came back refreshed and ready to go, and things just started to click.”

    They sure did: The team proceeded to go on a 13-0-1 roll, including a 1-0 win at Denver that Sandelin believed was the key win in the streak.

    UMD's chance at the MacNaughton Cup was stopped when it tumbled against North Dakota recently.

    UMD’s chance at the MacNaughton Cup was stopped when it tumbled against North Dakota recently.

    “If you look at the third period, we didn’t deserve to win because they outshot us pretty badly with some power plays, and we blocked a lot of shots and did some things I like to see, certainly got some great goaltending,” Sandelin said. “I had a good feeling after that game — the excitement in the room — and that kind of carried us through. We won games in different ways, had a great stretch with the 14 games.”

    One emotional high point of the streak was beating the Golden Gophers twice to complete a first-ever four-game sweep of their southern rivals. Celebrating the sweep, Bulldog fans at the DECC showered the ice with brooms after the final buzzer sounded. But Sandelin downplays the event’s significance.

    “I think it’s better for the fans,” Sandelin said. “There’s always those bragging rights, but … I think the guys have taken that in stride really well, talked about getting points against Minnesota than the actual beating them four times. But it’s certainly been a good topic around our community.”

    Now the team looks forward to their first national tournament together.

    “I don’t think we care where we go or who we play,” Sandelin said. “Guys are just excited about getting there and having that experience. For me it would just be a real positive step for this program. Once you get in there, you never know. They’re one-game shots; you never know how far you can go.”

    “It’s very exciting for us as a team,” acknowledged Geisler. “It’s rewarding after last year: We knew what had to do; we had to beat CC that night to jump up in the PairWise, but we didn’t do it. We kind of knew that we didn’t get it. We knew that this year we had to do more: We had to win the little games to make it to the national tournament. This year it looks like we can do it.”

    However far the team may go, the coach’s seniors agree that Sandelin deserves considerable credit for the program’s success.

    “He expects a lot,” Lessard said. “He’s pretty fair: If you show up every day and work hard, he’s going to give you a chance to play. His system is pretty good, and he got the players to buy into it. Our special teams have been a lot better too. We work hard on them, but we have to give him a lot of credit for that. He knows his hockey really well, and players just follow up on what he says.”

    “He wants to see us strive to be the best we can,” agreed Geisler. “Sometimes he’s a little hard on us, but we know it’s for a good reason.”

    Even with Lessard and Geisler graduating after this season, the 14 juniors should mean that the team will be a contender once again — even if the Latvian National Team is not available for a not-so-insignificant exhibition game next December.

    Whether or not the Bulldogs make it to Boston for the more important of the two major conventions in that city this year, it’s enough to make a Minnesota-Duluth fan chant “Four more years!”

    Latest Stories from around USCHO