Home Blog Page 1429

Bourget Resigns as Wisconsin Women’s Coach

Trina Bourget, head coach for Wisconsin, has announced her resignation.

Bourget has been on medical leave since Jan. 2. In her absence, assistant coach Tracey Cornell and Dan Koch have directed the Badgers. Cornell and Koch will continue with that role until a new coach is named.

“We greatly appreciate Trina’s time as our women’s hockey coach and the leadership she provided for our student-athletes,” UW associate athletic director Cheryl Marra said. “Trina has been on medical leave and felt that it would be in her own best interest now to resign her position. We certainly wish her the best.”

Bourget has been with the women’s hockey program for three years. Originally an assistant coach, Bourget became the interim head coach for the 2000-01 season when then-head coach Julie Sasner left for a position as the assistant coach with the U.S. Women’s National Ice Hockey Team. Bourget led the Badgers to a 21-9-5 mark and a third-place finish in both the WCHA regular season and WCHA Championship tournament during 2000-01.

This past season, Bourget was hired full-time, leading Wisconsin to a 22-10-2 overall mark, 17-6-1 conference record and second-place finishes in the WCHA regular season and at the WCHA Women’s Final Five.

Bourget sports a 69-32-10 record in four seasons as a head coach. She coached at Sacred Heart in Fairfield, Conn., prior to her appointment with the UW.

A national search for Bourget’s replacement will begin immediately.

NCAA East Regional Preview

Rankings, schmankings.

Though some may cry foul about the seedings and the placements, one thing is for sure: in the East Regional most of the bids were earned the old-fashioned way.

In this era of objective criteria — of coaches and administrators huddled about a computer, or deciphering rows of text to decide the field for the national championship — the East Regional includes the ECAC, MAAC and Hockey East tournament champions, the ECAC regular-season champion, and the second- and third-place finishers in Hockey East’s regular season, one of which lost to the top team in the nation in the HEA title game after beating the other in the semifinals.

Yes, the East includes the bottom three seeds among the 12 selections. But two of those three — Quinnipiac and Harvard — earned their way in with conference tournament wins. And as the NCAA basketball tourney has shown year after year, few things are more intriguing than an underdog.

And it’s not like the East Regional is composed of slackers. New Hampshire has been No. 1 in the USCHO.com poll for three weeks. Maine nearly pulled off the upset in the Hockey East final, and Boston University has been strong all year. And Cornell? Exactly one team in Division I boasts fewer losses this year than the Cleary Cup champion, that being UNH.

Speaking of which, another juxtaposition of those two teams could occur in the quarterfinals. Should Cornell beat Quinnipiac in the first round, the Big Red would get New Hampshire next for the right to advance to the Frozen Four at the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul, Minn.

On the other side of the draw, No. 2 seed BU lies in wait for the winner of the Maine-Harvard contest. If the favored Black Bears end the Crimson’s Cinderella run, it would mean a rematch of the Hockey East semifinal of last weekend.

No. 1 New Hampshire (29-6-3, 17-4-3 Hockey East, 1st)

For those who haven’t seen New Hampshire play this year, here are the relevant statistics: in Hockey East games, the Wildcats rank first in team offense, team defense, power-play percentage and penalty-kill percentage. Small wonder, then, that they finished first in the league, won the tournament and are first in the country in both the polls and the PairWise Rankings.

Hobey hopeful Darren Haydar leads UNH.

Hobey hopeful Darren Haydar leads UNH.

The offense, first in the country with a 4.68 per game average, is led by All-America shoo-ins Darren Haydar (31-43–74, 2nd in the country) and Colin Hemingway (31-33-64, 4th). The two play on different lines until a power play develops, but the scoring is spread out beyond just that fact. Nine Wildcats have totaled 25 points or more. One of those, Josh Prudden, missed last weekend with a concussion, but is expected to return.

“We’ve got balanced scoring,” says UNH coach Dick Umile. “You’ve got Darren Haydar and Colin Hemingway, who have had tremendous seasons as far as scoring goals. They’ve put up some pretty balanced numbers [in terms of] goals and assists.

“That being said, the scoring has been spread out in our lines with Sean Collins, a freshman who has also put up pretty big numbers [19-23–42], and everybody [else] has chipped in eight or nine goals. So we’ve gotten balance throughout our lines and that’s really helped us.

“The specialty situations [have been important]. We’ve been able to score on the power play. That’s why the offensive production has been strong this season and much improved over last season.”

What may get overlooked, however, is how strong UNH’s defense is. Ranked ninth nationally with 2.42 goals against per game, the Wildcats are actually better than that mark. Some atypical nonconference games in the first half distort that number. To gain a full appreciation of their defensive prowess, note that their 2.04 league mark was over half a goal better than their closest league rival. Led by Garrett Stafford and Mick Mounsey, the blueliners feature substance over sizzle and plus-minus over goalscoring.

In the nets, senior Matt Carney and sophomore Michael Ayers have rotated through the Hockey East playoffs, but both have had stretches of being the go-to goaltender while the other was sidelined with injury. Ayers set a Hockey East record with a .938 save percentage in league games, but Carney was no slouch at .920.

“Our defensemen have done a terrific job, but it starts from the net out,” says Umile. “Last year, it was Ty Conklin. You’ve got to give credit to both Matt Carney and Michael Ayers.

“It’s a young defense [in front of Matt and Michael]. We don’t have a senior defenseman on the team. But it’s been a commitment to team defense as a whole by the team, the forwards as well as the defensemen and goaltenders. Everyone bought into it several years ago, knowing how difficult it is to play in Hockey East. If you don’t play that style in Hockey East, you’re not going to finish in the top of Hockey East. Guys have realized that.

“Most people look at UNH [as an offensive team] because of the Whittemore Center [and its Olympic ice sheet], and because of the tradition of being a team that is very transitional and likes the offense. But I don’t think they’ve received the credit they’ve deserved defensively as a team. We’re able to play that style as well.”

Unlike its Hockey East brethren in the tournament, BU and Maine, UNH is sure to avoid league foes in its path to the Frozen Four. The Wildcats will face the winner of the Cornell-Quinnipiac contest.

“Going into this thing, knowing that if they kept the teams East, BU and UNH were going to get a bye because of what happened, one of us was going to have to play Maine,” says Umile. “Typically, you just think that they’d put them in the other bracket to protect the number one seed.

“But I think you’ll find Cornell to be a team that is very similar to a lot of the teams in Hockey East. To me, I think they’re going to be a lot like Lowell the way that they play. We’re not playing Maine, but we’re going to be playing a team that plays very similar to Lowell.”

Don’t even talk about the fact that Cornell was the lowest-ranked at-large team in the PairWise at number 10. Or that Quinnipiac at number 23 isn’t getting a lot of respect. Everyone else can talk about how this is the “easy” bracket, but Umile doesn’t want to hear it. Mindful of the widespread disdain that most had for Mercyhurst’s chances last year against Michigan before the Lakers almost pulled off the upset, the UNH mentor is taking nothing for granted.

“Let’s face facts,” says Umile. “Cornell has had a great season. Mike Schafer has done a great job with the program and they’re getting great goaltending. They’re a legitimate team to contend for the NCAA championship, so I don’t consider them an easy task at all. And that’s if they get past Quinnipiac, who beat Mercyhurst.

“I don’t think anybody looks past teams. Everybody gets excited to play in the NCAA tournament. It’s a one-game shot. You lose and you’re out; you win and you continue to play. There’s mutual respect and I think everybody realizes there’s great parity in college hockey right now.

“This is the NCAA tournament. You don’t take anything for granted. You’ve just got to play the game. That’s what we’re going to do. We’re going to play one game at a time. Whoever wins that [Cornell – Quinnipiac] game, we know what time we’re playing and that’s all we’re focused on.’

No. 2 Boston University (25-9-3, 15-6-3 Hockey East, T-2nd)

More than a few people, especially those from the state of Maine, were surprised when Boston University came away the second Eastern bye. After all, the Black Bears had taken five of six points from the Terriers over a three-week stretch.

Colin Shields and Maine beat BU on March 1, but couldn't keep the Terriers from a bye (photo: Scott Weighart)

Colin Shields and Maine beat BU on March 1, but couldn’t keep the Terriers from a bye (photo: Scott Weighart)

However, head-to-head competition is only one of the five NCAA selection criteria. BU had won an earlier contest against Maine, making head-to-head only a single point in the Black Bears’ favor. The two tied in Last 16 games, but BU took the Ratings Percentage Index, Teams Under Consideration and Common Opponents categories.

What was even more at risk going into last weekend was Cornell running the table to take the bye or, after BU’s loss, Michigan State grabbing it with a win over Michigan in the CCHA finals.

“I thought that when we lost to Maine, we’d in all probability blown our chance to get the bye because I didn’t think that Harvard could beat Cornell, Michigan could beat Michigan State and New Hampshire was going to beat Maine,” says BU coach Jack Parker. “All three of those things were going to have to happen for us to have the numbers fall correctly.

“The easiest prediction was that UNH could beat Maine because they were the best team in our league all year. But if either of the other two things didn’t happen, I don’t believe we would have gotten the bye…. I thought Michigan State was going to get a bye [ahead of us] and Minnesota would be here as the second Eastern bye.”

Nonetheless, the Terriers are back in the national championship hunt after an off-year last season.

Those unfamiliar with BU may wonder how the Terriers have been so successful with only one player, Mike Pandolfo (21-18–39), topping 30 points.

“It’s been offense by committee all year for us,” says Parker. “We’ve got four pretty balanced lines as far as size, skill and puck-handling ability. We don’t have the Darren Haydar type of forward who’s going to get you 60 points and 30 goals. We’ve got a bunch of guys who’ve gotten 10 or 12 or 15. There’s a lot of balance to that.

“We do have a 21-goal scorer in Mike Pandolfo and a guy who’s been really hot of late, Jack Baker, who has 15 now and is going strong. But there’s almost a guy on every single line that has at least 10 goals.

“So we think we’re a pretty good offensive team if you add up all the numbers, but that’s not what our team is all about. If we’re going to win, it’s going to be on offense off of defense, playing smart defensively and getting opportunities from [opponents] turning the puck over.”

The blue line is where the Terriers have been able to match up with almost any team this season. Chris Dyment (7-17–24) earned All-Hockey East and Best Defensive Defenseman honors. Ryan Whitney (4-17–21) was the sole blueliner selected to the league’s all-rookie team. And Freddie Meyer and Pat Aufiero have been past league honorees.

“Our defense has really been the strong point of our team all year,” says Parker. “It’s good we had a lot of depth there. We have seven guys who have all played Division I hockey and are talented kids, five returning and two excellent freshmen. So there was depth there and as it turns out we needed that because we had two or three injuries on defense this year that really banged us up.”

The worst have come lately, with Bryan Miller suffering a dislocated shoulder in the Maine series that closed out the regular season and Pat Aufiero going down with a sliced tendon in his foot just before the Beanpot.

“Those two guys were playing terrific hockey for us,” says Parker. “We’ve been going with five defensemen [now] for the most part and wearing them out a little bit, but they’ve played well. We are certainly not as good a team both defensively and offensively without Miller and Aufiero because they are both great defensemen and great offensive defensemen, but in general that’s been our strong point.”

Both Aufiero and Miller remain doubtful for this weekend, but for different reasons.

“I doubt if we’ll get either one of them back,” says Parker. “It’s almost like they’re both almost there, but neither one of them are there. Aufiero has been out for so long, he’s out of shape. His ankle is better; he could probably skate on it, but he doesn’t have nearly the stride he had or the strength he had because his leg has actually atrophied a little bit.

“So he doesn’t have the strength. He’s not going to reinjure it. There’s no problem there. He just looks like it’s August to him.

“Miller, on the other hand, is in great shape. He’s been able to skate the whole time and he hasn’t been out that long. It’s only been a couple of weeks. His problem is that he’s very sore in the shoulder and it’s a dangerous injury. It’s not like it’s a separation where once it heals up, if you take the pain you can play. With the dislocation you’ve got pain, but it can pop out at any time again until you have it fixed.

“We’re concerned about both of them. We’ll wait until our doctor reexamines both of them. With Pat, it’s not so much the doctor. It’s looking at his conditioning. With Miller, it more the doctor giving him the okay. In both cases, they’re doubtful for this weekend.

“The sad part about it is that if we can get by this weekend, with two more weeks before the Frozen Four you’d have a good chance of getting both of them back.”

Unlike the rest of Hockey East’s top teams who at various points have gone with two goaltenders, the Terrier crease is patrolled almost exclusively by Sean Fields (22-6-3, 2.69 GAA, .901 Sv%). One of this year’s most improved players, Fields faltered a bit down the stretch.

“We’ve gotten solid goaltending all year from Sean Fields, but I think this week off — [only one game last week and one game this weekend] — is going to help him a little bit,” says Parker. “He tired a little bit and has not played as well in the last couple weeks as he was all year long. Hopefully, he’ll revert back to the way he played midseason and give us the type of goaltending we need to win big games.

“Obviously, beating either Maine or Harvard is going to be difficult without great goaltending.”

Almost everyone is expecting another BU-Maine clash, but Parker isn’t so sure. He isn’t counting Harvard out yet by a longshot, despite its enigmatic season. However, he isn’t counting the Crimson in, either.

“I have absolutely no thoughts on [a matchup with Harvard] because I have no idea who Harvard is,” says Parker. “We played them earlier in the year and I saw them play three or four other times in the course of the season when I was scouting. I saw them against Cornell. I saw them play in the Beanpot twice. And I saw them play on tape on Friday night against Clarkson.

“The team that I saw beat Cornell has no resemblance whatsoever to the teams I saw earlier and Maine better be aware of that as well. If the team that I saw in somewhat disarray and disinterest in February was to play Maine, Maine would roll over them like a hot knife through butter.

“But if the team I saw play Saturday night against Cornell plays Maine, that’s going to be a helluva college hockey game. The probabilities are that team has just come and found itself and gelled right at the right time and they’ve got an awful lot of confidence after beating Cornell at the ECAC final and having that championship under their belt and living up to some of the expectations they had earlier in the year.

“They don’t care how they got there. They’re the ECAC champion now. I think that they’re going to be a handful for anyone.

“If we play Harvard, it’ll be because they are the real thing. It’s possible that they’re not the real thing and we’ll play Maine or it’s possible that Harvard is the real thing and Maine is just better. But if Harvard can beat Maine, they’re a helluva college hockey team and they will have proved it back-to-back weekends.”

As for their northern rivals, the Terriers may have struggled with the Black Bears lately, but it’s typically been a razor-thin difference between winning and losing. At the FleetCenter, BU held a 23-13 advantage in shots after two periods. The score was tied, 3-3, but the Terriers had to be happy with their play. A controversial too many men on the ice penalty early in the third led to the deciding power-play goal.

“I don’t think there’s any question that Maine is a terrific college hockey team and we knew that before we played them in Boston a couple weeks ago when we lost to and tied them,” says Parker. “We knew it again after losing to them in the FleetCenter. It was a real close game. It was a well-played game in many, many ways.

“The fact is that we played a pretty solid game until the [too many men on the ice] penalty. They only had 13 shots and we’d done a good job defensively. The penalty was a penalty. It’s too bad it was called. It was a mistake by the official.

“That’s over and done with, but the fact is that the official did not kick the puck in the net for them. They capitalized on that penalty and then after they scored, the complexion of the game changed drastically. Maine really revved it up and we didn’t have an answer for them.

“Our concern is that we’ve played them four times now and we’re 1-2-1 against. We’d like to get back to .500. We know we can beat them, because we’ve beaten them in the past and we know we’ve given them pretty good games in the recent past, but the only thing that counts is who’s on top of their game.

“I don’t think Maine was on top of their game in the first half of the game we played [at the FleetCenter], but they were certainly on the top of their game for the second half. I thought we played a real solid game against them in the 4-4 tie in Boston and I thought we played a pretty solid game against them in the 4-3 loss, but neither one of those was good enough to get a win. So we’re going to have to rev it up more than that.”

The question may be whether BU can rev it up a bit more. The Terriers have been a model of consistency, never once losing a game all year to a sub-.500 team. Against Hockey East’s other two top teams, however, they’ve gone 0-2-1 against New Hampshire and 1-2-1 against Maine. Especially with Aufiero and Miller out, BU may just be a shade lower than its two rivals in overall talent.

With the two blue line stalwarts, BU’s defensive superiority makes for an interesting clash with Maine’s greater offensive firepower. Without them, however, there might be a third loss to the Black Bears in four weeks.

What could make up for that against Maine, though, is the first-round bye. Historically, it’s made a big difference to watch from the stands while your next-day opponent wears itself out in the first round.

“How much of a factor is it?” asks Parker. “If you ask any coach in the nation, ‘Would you rather have to win one game or two games to get to the Final Four?’ every one of us would say, ‘I want the bye.’

“But if you ask every one of those coaches again, ‘Let me put it to you this way. You don’t get the bye, but you’re guaranteed of winning the first game and now you’re in the second game. Which would you rather be? A little bit tired, but jacked up because you just won, or sitting there waiting for them?’ I think you might get a 50-50 split on that one.

“So we have a big advantage over both of those teams now because we’re not playing and they are. When the dust clears on Saturday afternoon, we’re not going to have as big an advantage over the winner. We’ll have a huge advantage over the loser because they’re out. But we won’t have much of an advantage on the winner.

“I’ve been through it both ways. I’ve won as a bye team and I’ve lost as a bye team. We went to quadruple overtime as a non-bye team playing St. Lawrence a couple years ago and I don’t think we lost because we were tired. Both teams were exhausted and somebody won the game finally.”

No. 3 Maine (23-10-7, 14-5-5 Hockey East, T-2nd)

In a similar way to New Hampshire holding the top spot in every Hockey East statistic of significance, Maine ranks number two in almost every category: team offense, team defense, power-play percentage, regular season finish (tied with BU) and tournament finish. Other than a so-so penalty kill (fifth in Hockey East), the Black Bears are as consistently excellent, albeit runners-up, as the Wildcats.

Not that the rallying cry in Orono is, “We’re number two!”

It’s just that following a slow start after the death of Maine coaching legend Shawn Walsh — opening 3-4-2 — the Black Bears have been a force down the stretch. Other than a loss to UNH in the Hockey East title game, they’ve gone undefeated in the last five weeks.

A big part of that has been an offense that has climbed to fourth in the nation (4.20 goals per game). There’s depth galore with four players, including All-Hockey East defenseman Peter Metcalf (7-38–45), totaling more than 40 points and 10 players topping 20. Leading the forwards are: All-Hockey East selection Niko Dimitrakos (19-28–47), All-Rookie Team member Colin Shields (28-17–45) and Martin Kariya (16-27–43).

“Our power play has been pretty consistent all year and five-on-five we’ve been able to score in a lot of different ways,” says Maine interim head coach Tim Whitehead. “We’re able to score in transition, we’re pretty good below the dots just cycling, and off of faceoffs. But this time of year, everybody can score.”

Stopping the other team was expected to be the Black Bears’ Achilles’ heel this year in light of a thin and very inexperienced blueline. However, the group has come together over the second half.

“We’re really excited about how the team defense has improved,” says Whitehead. “We started the year with four first-year guys. They got a lot of time and improved plus we moved Mike Schutte back to defense and he’s done a tremendous job.

“He’s a veteran who is real smart. He’s tough; he’s a big body back there. He’s really solidified things back there for us. He played defense all growing up through juniors so he’s had plenty of experience back there. He’s helped quite a bit. Sometimes that one extra guy can make quite a difference, especially when he’s a veteran.”

Goaltender Mike Morrison (18-3-4, 2.17 GAA, .922 Sv%) emerged from the shadows of fellow senior Matt Yeats not only to take the starting position, but also earn first-team All-Hockey East honors. A sub-par game against BU, however, opened the door for Yeats (5-7-3, 3.09 GAA, .885 Sv%), who inserted himself back into the rotation and looked sharp in the process.

The Black Bears’ playoff goalie in years past, Yeats started both games at the FleetCenter last weekend. He played well in the win against BU, but arguably might want back one, or both, of the goals scored by UNH against him in the third period. As a result, it’s anyone’s guess who’ll get the nod this weekend despite the oddity of a first-team all-star potentially sitting on the bench.

“As far as goaltending, we’ve tried to put the goalie on the ice who’s playing the best,” says Whitehead. “For the bulk of the season, that was Michael. Now Mattie is really challenging him for ice time because he’s playing so well. He’s gotten hot at the right time so he played both games last weekend. But we feel we’ve got two goalies that we can call on for this weekend.”

Although many Maine fans are upset at the fact that BU got the bye despite posting an 0-2-1 record against the Black Bears over the past three weeks, Whitehead knew what was coming.

“I kind of expected it after I saw the PairWise and I know that the committee goes pretty much with those PairWise Rankings,” he says. “Obviously, we would have loved to have that bye after stealing the five out of six points from BU over the last three weeks. But it’s a full season you have to look at so we were not surprised by the seeds. BU’s earned that opportunity.”

Whitehead actually feels that Worcester’s purely East flavor — there’s not even a single team from the West — is a positive.

“I think it’s great, actually,” he says. “The people who are going to be in Worcester are going to be familiar with all the teams so it should create a very good atmosphere. In a lot of sports they do it that way, East against East and then you meet the West in the championships. There’s nothing wrong with the format. It’s going to be exciting because there will be so much familiarity with the teams that it should create even more interest.”

On the surface, Harvard looks like easy pickings for the Black Bears. The Crimson entered the ECAC tournament like the proverbial chicken with its head cut off — it’s dead, it just doesn’t know it — having posted a dreadful 2-8-1 record in its last 11 games. However, somewhere Harvard caught a second life, and may be ready to make the most of it at Maine’s expense.

“It’s a very deceptive matchup,” says Whitehead. “Harvard is playing as well as anybody right now. They do have a lot of talent on their team. Their record during the season would be pretty deceiving. So we know we have our hands full with Harvard and it’s going to be a very challenging game for us.

“We have a lot of respect for what they can do. They just ran the table in the ECAC playoffs, which is no easy feat, especially knocking off Cornell in the final. That was quite an accomplishment. They’re playing very good hockey right now so we’re going to have to bring our best game to the table.”

Early in the week, the Maine staff was still gathering information about the Crimson, but was impressed with what little they did know.

“Just from what I’ve heard, they’ve got a real balanced team and their goalie is playing real well right now,” says Whitehead. “They have a lot of threats up on the offensive side of things and their defense is pretty solid. They don’t really have any glaring weaknesses that you can exploit. That’s one of the reasons why they’re playing real well right now.

“We’ll prepare for them, but our number one focus will be doing what we do best. That’s going to be our top concern, playing our game.”

If the Black Bears advance, it’ll be a fourth game in three weeks against the Terriers. (In fact, reader Todd Cioffi notes that factoring in that other winter sport, basketball, Maine and BU will have now met the last five weekends.) Armed with the bye, BU will be rested.

“That’s an advantage that has played out over the years, but at the same time it’s not a guarantee,” says Whitehead. “I don’t want to speculate too much on a game that might not even exist for us, but for sure it’s an advantage for BU and they’ve worked very hard this year to earn that right. I’m sure it’s something that they’ll take advantage of.”

That said, BU won’t be getting any secret tips by scouting Maine during the first-round game. The Terriers also haven’t shown recently that they can beat the Black Bears, although only one contest has failed to be a nailbiter.

“It’s going to be one of those games where both teams know each other really well, so let’s drop the puck and it’s going to be a great hockey game,” says Whitehead. “A lot of times, those are some of the best games, when teams know each other well. There aren’t a lot of mysteries or surprises. It’s drop the puck and see who is at the top of their game tonight.

“But for us, all our thoughts are on Harvard because they’re playing so well. Obviously, that’s the first step in the ladder. If we don’t get by that one, there’s no second step. So clearly we’ve got one game to focus on right now.”

No. 4 Cornell (24-7-2, 17-3-2 ECAC, 1st)

The Big Red didn’t attain one of the goals it set at the beginning, falling one tally shy last Saturday. Nonetheless, the Big Red are set to go after another: the NCAA championship.

“We’re really excited to get into the NCAA tournament; that’s one of the goals we set for ourselves,” said head coach Mike Schafer. “The guys did a great job in the nonconference schedule and in the league to make sure we got the at-large bid.

“The guys are feeling bad, but you have to put things behind you and move on and try to accomplish a goal that you set for yourselves at the beginning of the season.”

The loss to bitter rival Harvard in the championship game didn’t derail the Big Red season, but it did leave a mark, one that has to be gotten over quickly.

“It’s a tough way to lose to your rival, but at the same time we have to let go of that loss,” said captain Stephen Baby. “We have the NCAA tournament in front of us and we’re focused on that. It’s not that easy, but as a team we have to do it, you can’t be looking back on it. We have to be looking at Quinnipiac.”

The Big Red take on the MAAC champion on Saturday in Worcester, Mass. Quinnipiac is a team Cornell has only faced once, and that was last season at Lynah, where Quinnipiac tied the Big Red.

Many are looking at this as the easiest possible draw for the Big Red, but the game last year and some recent reminders are keeping Cornell grounded.

“We aren’t looking past them,” said Schafer. “If you look at the game last year, half of the guys playing in that game aren’t in our lineup now, so we’re a different team, and they’re a different team as well. The guys respect them, and they also know that last year everyone expected Michigan to walk over Mercyhurst. The MAAC has gained a lot of respect. We will have our hands full with Quinnipiac.”

“From last year, I remember that they’re a solid team,” said Baby. “They’re stingy on defense, they played the body and they have some skilled forwards that can put the puck in the net. They have a good offense and we’ll have to contain that.

“We’re definitely focused. We know what Quinnipiac can do. They came into our rink last year and tied us, and there’s no way we’ll be taking this team lightly.”

Instead of looking at Quinnipiac, the Big Red know that they have to look within themselves to bring the game that has given them such a successful season, a team that is great defensively, united in every way.

“We’re a team before anything else,” said goaltender Matt Underhill. “[Rensselaer head coach] Dan Fridgen said that you can take the nameplate off the backs of anyone on [Cornell] and put it on somebody else’s jersey, and it’s the same thing. That’s just a great compliment that suits our team perfectly.

“We roll four lines, three pairs of D, and any goaltender, and that’s where our strength is. I don’t think anybody in the country can say that, and it will help us in the tournament.”

Said Schafer, “It’s critical that we concentrate on ourselves and what made us successful. We didn’t do that against Harvard and we did against RPI [in the semifinal].”

Not to overlook Quinnipiac, but should Cornell win in round one, the Big Red’s goal would go through New Hampshire, the team that is No. 1 in the country.

“If we get to Sunday, we get the number-one team,” said defenseman Brian McMeekin. “And for us to go into it as the underdog team, then it helps us out.”

“It’s a situation that you look at that they have tremendous speed and talent up front,” said Schafer of New Hampshire. “They have great transition and a great power play. When teams get behind they have the chance to blow people away.

“It’s a clash of styles. They play a style that is very high-speed and we need to play our style of bang-and-crash and play physical about them.”

The Big Red attained its first goal of the Cleary Cup, and came within overtime of the second. Now it’s time to go after the third.

No. 5 Quinnipiac (20-12-5, 15-6-5 MAAC, 2nd)

The next stop on the MAAC Express was supposed to be Ann Arbor, Mich.

Everyone knows that the MAAC league champion belongs as the sixth seed in the West Region, don’t they? It was so obvious that Ken Taylor, director of championships for the MAAC, had already bought his plane ticket to fly there.

Luckily for him, the Michigan native can use that ticket another time to visit family, because the NCAA’s emphasis on having teams close to home will keep MAAC champion Quinnipiac in the East Regional this weekend. So instead of the expected sixth seed in the West Region, Quinnipiac got the six-spot in the East, right?

Wrong again! The PairWise Rankings rated ECAC champion and NCAA surprise Harvard below Quinnipiac, and the committee’s mandate to avoid first-round intraconference matchups helped leave it that way, boosting Quinnipiac to the five seed and setting up a first-round matchup with Cornell, the ECAC’s regular-season champion and tournament runner-up.

“We’re obviously excited to go to the NCAA Tournament,” said Quinnipiac coach Rand Pecknold, who admitted that he might not have been prepared for the attention his club has gotten since Saturday afternoon. “It’s an added bonus as we’re a five seed above Harvard. I certainly didn’t expect that.”

Pecknold arrived into his office yesterday to find hundreds of emails. Some were from friends and alums offering congratulations. Others were from folks looking for tickets to the game.

“We’ve only got 250 tickets and we’ll sell those out,” said Pecknold Monday morning. “I could probably fill those in the requests I’ve gotten already.”

Emails and tickets aside, Pecknold has to prepare his team for the biggest challenge it has ever faced.

The standard for this year’s tournament might be a little high. Last year, Mercyhurst, the first MAAC team ever to appear, had little to nothing expected of it. The pressure rested solely on Michigan, its first-round opponent. Fans around the country were calling it a bloodbath waiting to happen. But when Mercyhurst pushed Michigan to the brink before falling 4-3, opinions changed.

Now Quinnipiac is faced with a daunting task. Granted, Quinnipiac would never be considered a favorite. But at the same time, the MAAC champion will not be overlooked, thanks to the efforts of its brethren from Erie, Penn.

At the same time, Quinnipiac can’t underestimate its chances of winning. Though the MAAC has had little success outside of its own league, the league’s only three wins against Big Four conference teams came against the ECAC — this season when Mercyhurst beat Colgate and a year ago when Quinnipiac knocked off then nationally-ranked Union and Sacred Heart defeated — of all teams — Cornell.

Add to that the fact that Quinnipiac tied Cornell last year, 2-2, at difficult Lynah Rink, and you’d have to think that maybe Quinnipiac is licking its chops.

Conversely, Cornell can look at this as an opportunity for atonement: a trip to the regional final to salvage an excellent season after losing in the ECAC finals last week, and a chance to revenge the blemishes that MAAC schools put on Cornell’s schedule one year ago.

Pecknold played down either scenario.

“Cornell’s a top-ten team in the nation and I don’t think they are or there was going to be an easy draw for us,” said Pecknold. “You can analyze it up and down about who you want to play and not want to play. We were going to have to play a top-ten team no matter what.”

Quinnipiac players and coaches found out their NCAA fate on Sunday night, watching the ESPNews selection show at a local restaurant. Needless to say, they were ecstatic.

“It was pretty exciting when the team got together for the selection process,” said Pecknold. “[The announcers] were talking about UNH and said they’d get the winner or the Cornell-Quinnipiac game and everyone here just erupted. I that’s when it hit home that were playing in the NCAA tournament.”

The timing of Quinnipiac’s first visit couldn’t have come at a better time. Athletic director Jack McDonald, who worked hard to bring his hockey program to the Division I level, is serving in his fourth and final year on the NCAA Men’s Division I Ice Hockey Committee. McDonald was appointed chair at the beginning of the year.

“That was a nice feather in Quinnipiac’s caps, because Jack was the chair and we’re in the tournament,” Pecknold said.

McDonald was instrumental in the development of the MAAC hockey league, helping to obtain the league’s autobid for the NCAA tournament and to further the expansion of the Division I tournament, which is likely to grow to 16 teams next season.

With the selection firmly in the rear-view mirror, Quinnipiac now has to focus on what happens on the ice. The Big Red lost only three times in the ECAC, possesses the number-one defense in the country and carries two of the top-rated goaltenders in senior Matt Underhill and rookie David LeNeveu.

“We haven’t seen [Cornell] this year, obviously, but they’re a much better hockey team this year than last,” said Pecknold. “We have to do a good job in the neutral zone and we have to make sure we take care of our own end. The biggest thing is to stay out of the penalty box, because Cornell has a great power play and we have to avoid giving them those opportunities.

Indeed, the Cornell power play is fourth in the country, clicking at 27.4 percent efficiency. In mentioning that, though, you have to talk about the penalty kill, which rates fifth in the nation after allowing only 15 power-play goals all season. Thus, special teams will be crucial to QU’s success.

Critical, too, will be dealing with the pressure surrounding the national tournament, something Quinnipiac has never dealt with. A team that is used to playing in front of no more than 1,000 fans, Quinnipiac prepared itself a bit in past years by traveling to Michigan State, Minnesota and Maine. But none of these trips can be compared to playing for a national championship.

“My guys are excited, and they’re probably going to be a little nervous when the game starts, but I’ll try to enforce that there’s not that much pressure on us,” said Pecknold. “We just have to come out and play hard and play well. If we get a couple of bounces here and we’re in it in the end, we’ll be able to make a run at it.”

But bounces may not be what defines Quinnipiac. This year’s club is a team of character; it may arrive hoping to get some bounces, but one bounce easily could have kept it from the tourney.

Quinnipiac captured the MAAC championship winning, in essence, three one-goal games. QU survived a double-OT quarterfinal against Iona, won a tight-checking 3-2 game versus Sacred Heart and held off a furious Mercyhurst rally to win 6-4 with an empty-netter in the title game.

“The way we [won the MAAC championship] makes it more satisfying,” said Pecknold. “Iona’s a tough team, and they were a tough seven seed. It wasn’t like we had a cakewalk.

“In the first couple of years [of the MAAC], we’d win the first round game 9-1 or 10-1. I don’t think in the past that we’d seen enough adversity to prepare us for the playoffs. This year, in all three playoff games we saw a lot of adversity, and we were ready and responded well.”

With character on its side, and maybe some puck luck, Quinnipiac could be a very dangerous team come Saturday afternoon.

No. 6 Harvard (15-14-4, 10-9-3 ECAC, T-3rd)

It may have started as a pipe dream in many minds, but by Saturday night the thought of Harvard as ECAC champion was a startling reality.

Knocking off two higher seeded teams at Lake Placid, the Crimson silenced its critics by pulling off one of the most improbable upsets in recent ECAC history. Not since the 1998 team from Princeton — led by Syl Apps and Jeff Halpern — has an ECAC team delivered such an unexpected result, in double overtime no less, much like that 1998 team.

Tyler Kolarik scored the goal that put Harvard into the NCAAs.

Tyler Kolarik scored the goal that put Harvard into the NCAAs.

This time around, it was a shot off the stick of sophomore Tyler Kolarik that sealed the Crimson’s 4-3 championship win over top-ranked Cornell, at the 16:11 mark of the second overtime. This is the same Kolarik who is still playing with a broken thumb: a story in and of itself, but the victory for the beleaguered Crimson was the showstopper.

“This is our best game. We had to be at our best to beat them, and that’s a real tribute to [Cornell],” said Harvard head coach Mark Mazzoleni. “Our execution of our game plan [is responsible for the turnaround]. Our kids have bought into what we’ve asked them to do, and I think we’re a pretty well-prepared team when we play.”

Mazzoleni is referring to Harvard’s well-documented struggles over the last half of the season. Yet while many were sharpening their journalistic knives in anticipation of a Crimson collapse at Lake Placid, the players were doing some preparation of their own.

The underdog in this series, the team chose to band together and decided that if they were going out, they would go out fighting. The result was its best pair of games since Mazzoleni took over more than two years ago.

The emotional preparation by the players was a driving factor, but credit must also go to the coaching staff. In the final game against the Big Red, the band of Crimson shut down the neutral zone with a deadly forecheck, won the battle against the boards and essentially did what many thought was impossible: they out-Cornell’ed Cornell.

“They run an ‘I’ coming in [the zone]. What we tried to do was take away their first man and then really get the flow going one way, and reverse back coming out weak side,” explained Mazzoleni. “I give a lot of credit on our game plan to coach [Ron] Rolston and coach [Nate] Leaman. Those guys watch an awful lot of tape. They put a good game plan together. We wanted to stretch them out. In a pro-sized rink there’s 15 feet less, and they can really jam you on the walls, and you can really spread it out more.”

Among the many moments that come to mind from that weekend:

  • Dom Moore’s goal against Clarkson — the team’s first of the ECAC tournament — that eventually set the tone for the team’s title run. Moore, perhaps the most talented honorable-mention all-league selection ever, had one place to put the puck, and he found it in the upper right-hand corner to beat Golden Knights’ netminder Mike Walsh.
  • The team’s first game-winning tally, courtesy of young Tom Cavanagh — a player who carries more Harvard hockey tradition than he probably realizes. His dad watched him bury that goal from the Olympic Center stands, while sitting next to legendary Harvard coach Bill Cleary.
  • Dov Grumet-Morris’ stop late in the championship game that helped to preserve the win, buying time for the eventual game winner by Kolarik.

The result for Harvard was a NCAA berth and a chance to play Maine at Worcester Saturday at high noon. Not exactly an easy draw, especially considering that Maine is playing its best and most emotional hockey of the year. Whereas teams like Cornell suffocate with a stifling defense, Maine has an explosive offense.

Regardless of how Harvard intends to confront the Maine attack, one thing is certain — this team is very different than it was even two weeks ago. The players came up with their best hockey of the year last weekend, and they will need to better that performance if they hope to advance.

Harvard is once again the underdog, but this time around, no one seems to mind.

“Over the last three weeks, especially with the young team that we’ve had, we tried to find a point where our team came together and understand how hard they had to work, and more importantly, how they had to play together as a team,” said Mazzoleni. “Our kids showed tremendous poise … [and are] mentally strong. It’s part of maybe getting into that school. They can handle that, so they hang in there and keep going. Even though we’re young, we have a lot of kids that won before. They know how to win.”

NCAA West Regional Preview

From the talk on the USCHO.com message board and around the nation, you’d think the West Regional draw included the Colorado Avalanche or the Red Army alongside the WCHA and the CCHA’s best.

After Michigan State’s loss to Michigan last Sunday, first-round byes went to Denver and Minnesota, both of which were among the top four in the NCAA’s selection criteria. Both stayed West for the tournament, as did the two CCHA entries.

Rounding out the field are St. Cloud and Colorado College, either or both of which might have been shipped to Worcester, Mass., under previous guidelines for swapping regional seeds.

But this year, with the tragedies of Sept. 11 still in view, the NCAA mandated minimized travel in its championships. That gave college hockey true regionals for the first time in a while, meaning that East is East and West is West, and never — until the national title game — the twain shall meet.

And on paper, at least, the West is the tougher draw. The bottom three seeds according to the PairWise Rankings are all in the East Regional, meaning six of the top nine teams in the selection criteria are in Ann Arbor, Mich., this weekend.

“You look at the six teams in the West Regional, and I truly believe all six are capable of going to the Frozen Four. Not only going to the Frozen Four, but winning it,” said Minnesota head coach Don Lucia.

Maybe so, and not everyone is happy about that. Denver, in particular, might have reason to complain, since its reward for a number-one seed is to play the winner of a first-round matchup between host Michigan — once again peaking at the right time of year — and St. Cloud State, which was number-one in the nation at one point, though the Huskies have been on a cold streak recently.

Minnesota, meanwhile, gets either Michigan State or Colorado College after those teams’ rematch of the 1999 NCAA quarterfinal, which the Spartans won with a last-minute comeback. The Gophers are familiar with both squads, having played CC in the WCHA regular season and MSU at the College Hockey Showcase.

No. 1 Denver (32-7-1, 21-6-1 WCHA, 1st)

You’d think with 32 victories, two WCHA trophies and the top seed in the West Regional, Denver would have more recognizable names.

You’d think wrong.

Everyone seems to know goaltender Wade Dubielewicz, but few seem able to both pronounce and spell his name correctly. (For the record, it’s DOO-bluh-witz) After being named the MVP at the WCHA Final Five last weekend, the Xcel Energy Center scoreboard spelled his name wrong, attempted a correction and still had it wrong.

On the NCAA tournament selection show, the goaltender was called Doo-BIL-a-witz.

DU netminder Wade Dubielewicz

DU netminder Wade Dubielewicz

Dubielewicz can rest, knowing he’s not the only Pioneers player getting this treatment. Greg Keith was known on the selection show as Keith Greg, and Connor James was announced in the starting lineup last Friday as James Connor.

So, now more than ever, the following statement is true: You may not know their names (or their spelling, pronunciation or order), but you probably know their resume.

It includes a 32-7-1 record, the WCHA regular-season championship and the league playoff title, added last weekend in St. Paul, Minn.

The Pioneers are hoping their game Saturday against either Michigan or St. Cloud State will be just a steppingstone to greater things.

They don’t want to just get to the Frozen Four. They want to win it. That was the third of three goals the team set for itself this season — the playoff title and a first-round bye being the first two.

What better note to play off than a 5-2 victory over Minnesota in the Broadmoor Trophy championship game last Saturday?

“Right now, we’re playing the best hockey we’ve played all year long,” Denver coach George Gwozdecky said. “We’re playing extremely well. There’s only been one point of the season where we hit a little bit of a plateau, and that was during that period where my future was being speculated about and that label of No. 1 had just been attached to us.

“We were battling on a number of different fronts. Once all that stuff was over with and we got used to dealing with teams throwing their best game at us, we’ve really improved from that point.”

Gwozdecky’s name was closely tied to head coaching openings at Wisconsin, his alma mater, and Michigan State, where he was an assistant coach. That little bit of uncertainty was enough to throw the Pioneers off course.

They had a three-game losing streak from Jan. 26 to Feb. 2, but since Gwozdecky got a contract extension and announced unequivocally on Feb. 12 that he wasn’t interested in other jobs, the Pioneers are 8-2.

Dubielewicz has played the last six games, going 5-1. After splitting time with Adam Berkhoel all season, Dubielewicz was handed the reins as the playoff goalie before the last weekend of the regular season.

He wowed the crowd and opposing coaches last weekend at the WCHA Final Five, after being named a finalist for the Hobey Baker Memorial Award and the WCHA’s first-team goaltender.

“The accolades, I’m very happy about those things,” Dubielewicz said. “They’re icing on the cake, I guess you could say.”

Gwozdecky didn’t need many words to describe his goaltender: “Wade is the best goaltender in the country. Period.”

Gwozdecky’s team has enough confidence at this point in the season that it can go into Yost Arena with a chance of playing Michigan and not see it as more than the normal NCAA challenge.

The way the coach figures it, his team just won the WCHA playoff title in front of 18,000 Gophers fans; why not earn a trip to the Frozen Four in front of 6,600 Wolverines fans?

“Because of the league we have played in, no matter where you go in this league, you’re playing in front of very challenging crowds,” Gwozdecky said, “whether it’s North Dakota, Wisconsin, Minnesota, CC, you name it.”

No. 2 Minnesota (29-8-4, 18-7-3 WCHA, 3rd)

For the Minnesota Golden Gophers, X really does mark the spot.

Getting to the Frozen Four is special for any team. But when the spotlight is on your community, it means that much more.

Minnesota has done just about everything according to plan this season, getting the Gophers a first-round bye for the NCAA tournament. That puts them one victory away from home-ice advantage at the Frozen Four at the Xcel Energy Center two weeks from now.

Minnesota's John Pohl (photo: Michelle King / Minnesota media relations)

Minnesota’s John Pohl (photo: Michelle King / Minnesota media relations)

For the Gophers, though, the prospect of making the Frozen Four — no matter the site — is the big thing. No one on the team has ever been there.

“I’m not sure how much that plays into it as much as, we’re one game away from the Frozen Four,” Gophers coach Don Lucia said. “Would it mean more because it’s back in St. Paul? Yeah, because the whole community would be pretty excited.

“But at the same time, I don’t think our kids care if it was in St. Paul or St. Petersburg. The guys would be excited to be there; they’ve never been there before. It’s going to take a heck of an effort.”

That effort is going to have to start at the top. There was a marked difference between last Friday’s 4-1 victory over St. Cloud State and Saturday’s 5-2 loss to Denver in the Final Five championship.

In short, the Gophers’ big players found the scoresheet in one and not in the other.

Lucia is quick to credit Denver for playing a dominating game that kept play along the boards in one-on-one battles, not allowing the Gophers to free-wheel their way to chances.

But the statistics don’t lie. Goalscoring leader Jeff Taffe, who scored the key third goal against the Huskies, was minus-4 against the Pioneers. Jordan Leopold, the Hobey Baker finalist and WCHA defensive player of the year, was minus-2 a day after netting a goal and an assist. Johnny Pohl was also minus-2 after scoring two points against St. Cloud.

Credit the Pioneers for getting the Gophers off their game — something that the Michigan State-Colorado College winner is sure to try to do on Saturday — but you have to take into account Friday.

The Gophers and the Huskies combined for 14 power plays — eight for St. Cloud, six for Minnesota — in their semifinal.

“When your top-end guys are on the power play and killing penalties, they get a lot of minutes,” Lucia said. “I think all the minutes they had Friday had a little bit of an effect on Saturday. They didn’t quite have the same jump to their step as what we did on Friday, and that’s a value of only having one game this weekend. You don’t have to worry about what type of legs they have for Game 2.”

Only playing one game this weekend, the Gophers also won’t know who they play until Friday night, something that might not be too bad considering they appear to play better when they’re concerned about themselves and not the opposition.

Their history in Yost Arena is in their favor as well. The seniors and juniors are 2-0 in that building in their collegiate careers, including a 5-2 victory over Michigan on Nov. 23.

Two days later, they tied Michigan State 4-4 in East Lansing, Mich., with Barry Tallackson scoring with 2:09 remaining for the tie. The Gophers split the only two games they played against Colorado College this season.

They’re just one game away from coming home, and in a position that might benefit the team.

“I think we play best when we’re a little on edge and our backs to the wall,” Lucia said. “When our backs are to the wall, that’s when it seems like we play a grittier game, and at times you have to play that way.”

No. 3 Michigan State (27-8-5, 18-6-4 CCHA, 2nd)

It wouldn’t exactly be fair to say that the Spartans limped into the playoffs. For a team with just seven losses in the regular season, such a statement would be downright misleading.

But since Ron Mason announced Jan. 26 that he’ll step down at the end of this season as head coach to take the job as MSU’s athletic director, Michigan State has struggled just a bit, going 5-2-2 down the stretch.

Michigan State will be seeing off head coach Ron Mason, who takes over as MSU's athletic director (photo: Christopher Brian Dudek)

Michigan State will be seeing off head coach Ron Mason, who takes over as MSU’s athletic director (photo: Christopher Brian Dudek)

“We’re not nearly as good defensively as we were last year,” said Mason. “This team here has its moments, and without Maloney’s experience it really puts us behind the eight-ball. We don’t have a lot of depth to replace him.”

Junior forward Brian Maloney (17-16–33), MSU’s third-leading scorer, has been out since the Spartans’ Mar. 8 first-round overtime win over Bowling Green, a game during which he broke two ribs and bruised a kidney. In fact, Maloney wasn’t released from the hospital until late last week, just before the Super Six; his woozy presence gave MSU a boost in the locker room.

Defenseman John-Michael Liles (13-22–35) and forward Adam Hall (19-15–34) are the team’s top two scorers, with Maloney third and freshman Jim Slater (11-21–32) fourth.

After that the scoring drops off sharply. Mason isn’t just blowing smoke; this team doesn’t have the depth of previous Spartan incarnations.

Lack of depth doesn’t mean lack of talent. Everyone around the CCHA is quick to point out that Michigan is a team loaded with rookies, but most folks forget that Michigan State is among the youngest teams in the league. On any given night, the Spartans dress up to seven freshmen and five sophomores.

“People don’t realize how young we are,” said Mason. “There’s a tendency to overlook that because we’re Michigan State, because people think of the big name. We’re very young.”

Because of the youth and lack of depth, 2001 Hobey Baker winner Ryan Miller has had to earn his keep in net. Miller has eight losses so far this year, but excellent numbers, with a 1.76 goals against average and an impressive .936 save percentage.

“He’s our best defensive player,” said Mason. “He’s our best player.”

The Spartans beat Northern Michigan 2-1 in CCHA semifinal action last weekend before dropping the title game to archrival Michigan, 3-2 — not part of MSU’s strategy.

“Unfortunately we lost [Saturday]. That wasn’t part of our plan, but plans change,” Miller said. “We’re just going to take a different route to the NCAA title.”

Hall said that the team isn’t necessarily motivated by Mason’s last run at a national title, because “playing in the NCAA tournament is motivation enough.”

Mason said, “We’ve got our hands full. Colorado College is a deserved tournament pick. They didn’t sneak in or anything like that. They’ve been there all season.”

The Spartans, like just about any team at this point, will concentrate on their own game in preparation for Colorado College. One strength the Spartans have this season, compared to previous NCAA tourney years, is the ability to break out offensively. MSU takes a lot of guff for playing a defensive game, and perhaps in recent years that style of play has hurt the Spartans in the postseason, when they’ve played opponents with more offense.

The flip side of that equation is that the Spartans also give up far more odd-man rushes than in seasons past. If you play a more open style, you run the risk of opening it up for the opposition, and on more than one occasion, that’s exactly what Michigan State has done.

And despite his cautions that MSU doesn’t have the depth and maturity of squads past, Mason said, “It’s nice to play somebody different,” meaning someone outside the CCHA.

He is, however, disappointed that the regionals have become a “league vs. league thing,” and that the Frozen Four is guaranteed two teams from the East, and two teams from the West.

“It’s not set up right. We want the best teams to be there … rather than making it East-West.”

Regardless of who MSU is playing, Mason knows that he and the Spartans have their work cut out for them. MSU’s postseason performance in recent years has been uninspired, and Yost Arena has not been kind, especially in NCAA tournament play.

It was in Yost that the Spartans lost in double-overtime to Ohio State in 1998, a game that sent OSU to the Frozen Four, and MSU home.

No. 4 Michigan (26-10-5, 19-5-4 CCHA, 1st)

If you think the big news in Ann Arbor this weekend is that the Wolverines can’t use their own locker room for the West Regional, think again.

Not only has the NCAA told the Wolverines to remove their center-ice logo from Yost Arena (to make it a more neutral site), but the Wolverines also must relinquish their locker room to teams higher seeded.

But Yost is still Yost, and it’s Michigan’s building. “If that’s one stipulation we have to deal with, we’ll deal with it,” Michigan junior Mike Cammalleri told the Ann Arbor News this week. “We’re just worried about getting there on the ice, and then it will feel like it always does in this building.”

In other words, just drop the puck.

Michigan entered the CCHA Super Six at No. 10 in the PairWise Rankings last weekend, and the Wolverines’ appearance in the NCAA tournament was by no means a given. The Wolverines knew they had to play well and perhaps win out to get an invitation.

After battling tenacious Ohio State through a tough 2-1 overtime win in semifinal play — a close call for the Maize and Blue faithful — Michigan beat Michigan State 3-2 for the league title, earning the automatic qualifier outright.

Cammalleri had a hand in four of Michigan’s five goals on the weekend, scoring the two against Ohio State and assisting on two — including the game-winner — in the 3-2 title match. It’s not surprising, then, that Cammalleri was named the Super Six MVP. It is, however, somewhat surprising that Cammalleri bounced back so well from a virulent strain of mononucleosis that had him sitting out just weeks ago.

In all, Cammalleri missed 10 games because of the virus.

“It’s good to see Mike Cammalleri step up this time of year,” said the understated Red Berenson, Michigan head coach.

Of course, the Wolverines do not consist of Cammalleri only. This is a team with several big guns, a tight defense, team unity — and all of it coming together at about the same time.

It was, perhaps, Cammalleri’s illness that galvanized this young team. With Cammo out, John Shouneyia (10-37–47) and Jed Ortmeyer (14-20–34) stepped up significantly, providing both offense and leadership. Another leader, defenseman Jay Vancik (3-8–11) became one of the steadiest stay-at-home blueliners in the league, and was yet another rock of stability for the Wolverines.

With this team, it’s a package deal. Averaging 3.49 goals per game, this is a potentially explosive offense, with a suitably effective power play (.199). The Wolverines have five players in double-digit goals, and all but five players — including goaltenders Josh Blackburn and Kevin O’Malley — have scored at least one.

Cammalleri (23-17–40) is capable of being a force of one, with nine power-play tallies and seven game winners.

Defensively, the Wolverines are tight. The top six scorers have plus/minus ratios of +18 or higher, and Michigan has outscored opponents 143-94 this season in overall play, allowing 2.29 goals per game on average.

Then there’s the rookie class. Names like Nystrom, Werner, Helminen, and Ryznar will become very familiar to CCHA fans in the coming years, if not to college hockey fans across the country.

The affable Josh Blackburn is perhaps the weakest link on this team, but he is capable of big plays and big games, and the defense in front of him can be extraordinary.

But it’s the difficult-to-define quality of this team that gives it an edge this weekend. This is the most unified Michigan squad in years, with no in-fighting, little ego, and lots of enthusiasm.

The Wolverines are in the comfortable and enviable position of worrying only about their own play this weekend.

Said Berenson, “I thought our team, considering everything we’ve been through, held up well, and did all the little things they had to do. I can’t tell you that it was any special strategy, but it was a lot of character and hard work, leadership, patience, and poise — all the things you need from a winning team.”

Home ice doesn’t hurt, either. Through nearly the end of January, the Wolverines were .500 in their beloved Yost Arena. Starting with a home win over Bowling Green Jan. 26, however, Michigan is 8-1-0 at home, the sole loss coming to Lake Superior State in the first round of the CCHA playoffs.

Hail to the victors? You might hear that a lot this weekend, if you’re heading to Yost.

No. 5 St. Cloud State (29-10-2, 19-7-2 WCHA, 2nd)

A year ago, the St. Cloud State Huskies were the darlings of the tournament. For the first time, they claimed a first-round bye and were just one victory away from the Frozen Four.

Then they got caught seeing stars.

Huskies coach Craig Dahl said his team played the first period of last year’s NCAA quarterfinal game against Michigan like a team that was in awe of its opponent.

St. Cloud had never played Michigan before, you see, and had never been that far in the NCAA tournament. It was over almost before it began for the Huskies.

This year, things have changed — some for the better and some for the worse. The Huskies again play Michigan, so there shouldn’t be a repeat of last year’s timidity against the Wolverines. But they have to play the Wolverines in Yost Arena, so just maybe there will be.

St. Cloud is one of the privileged 12 in the NCAA field. But it wasn’t impressive down the stretch, losing both games at the WCHA Final Five last weekend and five of its last eight.

So even though his team is just one win away from a second straight 30-win season, Dahl said the Huskies will go into the tournament bound to cause the upsets. That’s what a fifth seed has to do.

“I told the boys, it’s a Cinderella story,” Dahl said. “That’s what we’ve got to point at.”

The Huskies have made it to the ball, but they’re going to need to score some goals to dance with anyone.

They were limited to two goals in two games last weekend and have seen shortcomings in both the five-on-five and power-play offenses.

“I’m a bit puzzled by the fact that we scored two goals in two games,” Dahl said. “I didn’t expect to have that happen.”

The Huskies, who entered the Final Five with the nation’s best power play (32.1 percent) were 1-for-12 on it last weekend. They added just one five-on-five goal.

This from a team that had the nation’s third-best scoring offense.

“Our power play has been great all year. I’m not concerned about that because we’ve been getting chances,” captain Jon Cullen said. “Five-on-five we struggled this weekend. We’ve got to play better five-on-five, no doubt.”

After a seven-point weekend against Minnesota-Duluth in the first round of the WCHA playoffs, Mark Hartigan, the WCHA’s player of the year, scoring leader and a Hobey Baker finalist, was held scoreless.

It was the first weekend in which he was held without a point since Nov. 30 and Dec. 1 against Minnesota.

“Nobody feels worse about it than him,” Dahl said. “It was just one of those weekends. He’s a very sensitive guy and he carries a heavy anvil on his back right now, I know he does. He certainly wanted to show why he was the player of the year.

“The worst thing you can do is press. You just have to go play your game the smart way, keep it simple and hope the pucks bounce your way. If it’s meant to be, it’ll be. If not, then it won’t. He feels real bad.”

No. 6 Colorado College (26-12-3, 16-10-2 WCHA, 4th)

Jeff Sanger and the Colorado College Tigers were just 100 seconds away from a trip to the Frozen Four in 1999. Then Michigan State pulled it away from them.

Those Tigers who are seniors now were just freshmen then, but they remember.

They remember the game. They remember the plays. They remember the late goals, each of which was reviewed for an agonizingly long time before the referee came back with his decision. It was 3-3 with 1:40 left, then 4-3 Michigan State with 1:08 remaining.

Sanger was one of those freshmen that day, playing goal for coach Don Lucia for the last time. He was in his hometown of Madison, Wis. He could remember the heartbreak.

What he remembers, though, is what it took to get there.

“I was a freshman then, and the game against Michigan State really hit home after we lost,” Sanger said. “We just battled through our four years here. You realize when you’re a freshman how close you really were to getting to the final four. Now, it’s engraved in your head what it takes to make it there. We’re trying to instill that into the underclassmen, and I think they’re starting to grasp it right now.”

As the collegiate careers of the Tigers’ seniors near the end, they get another chance. By the grace of the NCAA selection committee, Colorado College got matched up with Michigan State in the first round.

It’s a little late for revenge, but the Tigers would be happy to simply get a win and move on to play Minnesota on Saturday.

Despite not winning the WCHA Final Five last weekend, they’re going into the national tournament on a high note. They won two of three games in St. Paul last weekend, which suddenly became crucial late Saturday night.

Had the Tigers not won the WCHA’s third-place game against St. Cloud State earlier in the day, they would have been left on the outside of the 12-team NCAA party because of Harvard’s win over Cornell in the ECAC championship.

“I don’t think we’re necessarily at the top of our game, but I was most happy with the fact that we competed so hard,” Tigers coach Scott Owens said. “We’re not scoring a lot of goals, but we won two out of three games at [the Final Five]. Jeff Sanger was unbelievably strong. Not only did he stop a lot of pucks, but he looked very strong doing it.”

Sanger might have been the very thing that held the Tigers together through a three-games-in-48-hours ordeal last weekend.

He stopped 92 shots in 180 minutes, 53 seconds, allowing only six goals in three games.

It’s that kind of performance the Tigers will need to beat Michigan State.

“You just want to play every game from here on out,” Sanger said. “You don’t want to stop playing. Once you get in a groove, you have to keep going with it and never look behind.”

Said teammate Chris Hartsburg: “I give all the credit in the world to Jeff. Jeff has really put us in a position where we have a lot of confidence in our team right now. Going into the NCAA tournament, I think we can make a little bit of noise here if Jeff continues to play this way.”

Hartsburg should be one to talk. He doesn’t lead the Tigers in scoring (he has 14 goals and eight assists), but has been the heart and soul of the team for most of the season.

He’s one of the reasons the Tigers have killed off 33 straight penalties. They haven’t allowed a power-play goal since Feb. 16 against Minnesota.

“The last two-thirds of the season he’s been unbelievable,” Owens said. “He’s been probably our best player.”

Goodbye Lake Placid, Hello Worcester

As you head past Albany, you continue on a straight line, on a near-desolate highway. When you left home, it was 65 degrees; now, it’s about 35 as you take your exit for Route 73.

It’s a good thing you know where you’re going, because as you get to the bottom of the exit ramp, all the arrows point right, but none of them say the name of your destination. You go left. This is a relatively famous place, right? No matter, better to keep it our little secret.

The approach to town is filled with frozen ponds, chilly streams and glistening lakes. The mountain sides, tentacled with brilliant natural ice sculptures, keep you safe.

Just when the road becomes a little boring, out pops a ski jump, which looks far more treacherous in person than on television. You pass the Olympic Training Center, and you finally reach town. And as you make the turn, you’re on Main Street, that tiny strip of territory where a miracle was celebrated; where the Olympic speed skating oval rests on the front lawn of the local high school.

And you saunter a little more to find quaint shops, eateries, and nightlife, unencumbered by Wal-Mart, McDonald’s and Target. There’s dog-sled rides, and ice fishing.

Assuming there’s a god, this is where he lives; or at least owns a summer home.

Lake Placid. Home of the ECAC tournament. The bane of many fans’ existence. It’s too far, it’s too cold, it’s too small.

Those people have no soul.

When the Muslims pilgrimmage to Mecca, do they make those complaints?

You disparage Lake Placid, you are committing hockey blasphemy.

What better place than to spend three days with 6,000 of my closest hockey friends. Man, I missed that place. After five years, it was great to be back.

Best Wishes

Speaking of closest friends, best wishes to Ken Schott, hockey writer for the Schenectady Gazette and frequent contributor to USCHO. Ken suffered a mild heart attack Friday night while in Lake Placid, and missed Saturday’s games.

Apparently, Ken is doing relatively well, and we continue to root hard for his speedy recovery. We’ll miss him in St. Paul.

That Deserves a ‘Wow!’

Harvard’s run to the ECAC tournament championship — winning the last three games in overtime — came against all odds, just two weeks after being completely written off, even by most of their own fans. And for good reason.

A lot was written by a lot of naysayers about the Crimson’s disappointing season, including one particularly ballyhooed article by yours truly. I went so far as to say the entire Harvard program needs to do some soul-searching and figure out whether it’s really headed in a positive long-term direction.

Looking back, there is complete justification to question Harvard’s performance this season. Most of the players admit they were playing dreadfully. After all this time, the players still hadn’t completely bought into the system, and other teams were labeling them “soft.” True or not, it’s not a good label to have.

“The last two weeks of the season, we were struggling, no two ways about it,” said Harvard forward Dominic Moore.

On the other hand, was it overstating the case to question the long-term direction of the program? Well, they were only questions … not answers. Of course, it didn’t look like any questions would be answered this year, but some certainly have been now.

Whether Harvard won the ECAC Tournament or not, it’s probably still too early to tell whether the Mark Mazzoleni regime will get the program somewhere near the national limelight again. But, even without the tournament championship, there’s no question things are in better shape than when Mazzoleni got here, when the program was at a relative bottom. He’s started to bring in a different kind of player, and instilled a different kind of attitude, even if that wasn’t showing up on the ice. Yet.

And despite all the prognostications, it wasn’t Mazzoleni who was proclaiming his team ready for an ECAC title. He knew the program was still a work in progress.

“Over the last three weeks, especially with the young team that we’ve had, we tried to find a point where our team came togther and understand how hard they had to work, and more importantly, how they had to play together as a team,” said Mazzoleni.

Then, someone flipped a switch.

Some of the negative press fired up the Crimson. But it goes far beyond that. Moore admits that, perhaps some of the naysayers had a point, that the players did need to look in the mirror and take it upon themselves to turn things around.

“Playoffs rolled around, and we actually maybe figured out what we need to do to compete and what we need to do to win,” said Moore. “I think definitely we took a gut check when we were losing all those games. It just took the fresh start of playoffs to make us have a fresh start and go at it with a new attitude, knowing what we had to do; and winning just reinforces that. Once you win, now you know what you have to do to win.”

Was Harvard soft? Who knows. But it was the farthest thing from soft last weekend, mentally and physically.

“The confidence is so key,” said Moore. “Winning three games in overtime, it just does so much for your mental attitude going into every game, and that makes a huge difference in the playoffs. By the same token, we had no confidence when we were losing all those games.

“The first game against Brown [in the first round] we played well, they didn’t play too well. The next night when they played well, and the goalie played unbelievable, we fought through it. When you come out on top after a challenge like that, that’s sorta when you figure things out and say, ‘We can do this.'”

Winning this ECAC tournament championship does not suddenly cure all ills. As NESN television commentator Bob Norton said afterward, “They still have to do it for a full season.” Just because they won this tournament doesn’t mean they are ticketed for the NCAA Finals within three years.

Nevertheless, it was hard not to be truly impressed with the way Harvard performed at the tournament, and with the way the Crimson conducted themselves.

“This is our best game. We had to be at our best to beat them, and that’s a real tribute to them,” said Mazzoleni.

“Our execution of our game plan [is responsible for the turnaround]. Our kids have bought into what we’ve aksed them to do, and I think we’re a pretty well prepared team when we play.”

In the process, Mazzoleni shook off a nemesis of sorts. The Big Red had knocked Harvard out of the postseason in each of Mazzoleni’s first two years with the Crimson. They also eliminated Miami from the NCAA tournament in 1997, when Mazzoleni was the coach there.

Rebound

Losing this tournament seemed to hit Cornell harder than most. The Big Red weren’t overconfident, but they couldn’t help but think this was their year, and that they’d go into the NCAAs on a major high. They won the league by nine points, and Harvard was in third place, 13 points behind.

But they ran into an inspired Harvard team, who brought in a great game plan, and caught Cornell on a night when its defense had its first bad game in a long time.

Sometimes a loss like that can help a team re-focus heading into the NCAAs.

“If you knew the way our guys compete, the way our guys love to compete,” said Schafer, “there will be no problem with our guys coming back and ready to play next week.”

Cornell got a break, to a degree, getting Quinnipiac as its first-round opponent. Of course, Quinnipiac is saying the same thing, considering it tied the Big Red last year, 2-2. But, on paper, it would figure to be an easier first-round game than Cornell could otherwise have hoped for. Assuming things go right for the Big Red, it will give them a chance to get their confidence back before a grueling test against New Hampshire.

“We set the goal to get to the Frozen Four, and we still have something to accomplish,” said Schafer. “We sat around early in the year about wanting to get there, and win. I think if you don’t set a goal to win a national championship at the beginning of the year … then you’re going in the wrong direction.”

200×100

Talk about the Big Red being too slow is foolish, and Cornell didn’t think the big ice surface would negatively impact them at Lake Placid.

But for this game, on this day, it definitely was a factor. Not because the Big Red are slow, necessarily, but because the scheme Harvard used was made possible by the larger ice and was something Cornell wasn’t used to. And the Crimson players executed that scheme perfectly.

“With the Olympic sheet, I thought they could spread us out,” said Schafer. “Which made us have to be patient, which is probably not our strong point. I thought they did a strong job.”

Said Mazzoleni, “We played our game to a ‘T.’ We attacked the whole night, we put pressure on them, we executed our game plan by trying to stretch them out, and I’m very, very proud of our kids.”

In particular, the biggest difference between Saturday’s game and last month’s defeat at Lynah Rink, was the play of the defensemen, who did a tremendous job on the breakout and never allowed Cornell to set up its fearsome forecheck.

“Our kids showed tremendous poise, we were a lot of tape-to-tape coming out,” said Mazzoleni.

“They run an ‘I’ coming in [the zone]. What we tried to do was take away their first man and then really get the flow going one way, and reverse back coming out weak side.”

Mazzoleni wanted to make Cornell skate through center, stand them up and not allow them to gain the red line and dump it in.

“They’re a team that plays a half-court game,” said Mazzoleni. “They like to get it over the red [line] and throw it in. We’ve played this forecheck for a month, and we knew how hard we had to guard the red.

“They had to play behind all the time, and then we were able to get the puck to the weak side of the ice with our ‘D’ strong over our ‘D’ weak, and then forecheck off of it. That never allowed them the flow of their forecheck going, because we never allowed them to dump the puck.”

Harvard forwards were open for more shots than anyone has been against Cornell this season. And over the whole 90 minutes-plus of game time, you couldn’t find a 10-minute stretch where Cornell controlled play.

“I give a lot of credit on our game plan to coach [Ron] Rolston and coach [Nate] Leaman,” said Mazzoleni. “Those guys watch an awful lot of tape. They put a good game plan together. We wanted to stretch them out. In a pro-sized rink there’s 15 feet less, and they can really jam you on the walls, and you can really spread it out more.”

Standard Bearers

Mazzoleni and Schafer had a conversation, where the coaches of two bitter rivals agreed their teams could be the standard bearers for the conference on a national level. And they are right.

If any two ECAC programs should give fans hope it’s Cornell and Harvard. Vermont, Clarkson, RPI and St. Lawrence all have the capability for a lot of success, but Cornell and Harvard are the closest.

“Everybody that’s associated with the ECAC will be extremely proud that Cornell is in the NCAA tournament,” said Schafer, almost defiantly after his team’s loss Saturday to Harvard. The next day, he expanded on his comments.

“One of the things we talked about all year with our team, the ECAC doesn’t get enough credit for the caliber of play,” said Schafer. “On ESPN News [during the selection show] it made it sound like the winner [of Cornell-Quinnipiac] is going to be a walkover for UNH.”

Schafer doesn’t mind carrying the responsibility of the league into the national tournament.

“You better take that responsibility on your shoudlers, and I think Harvard will too,” he said.

Said Mazzoleni, “Mike and I talked about that before we played at Ithaca earlier this year. He said he sees Cornell and Harvard beginning to carry the flame for the ECAC. We’ve been down for a while. When we took this thing three years ago, we knew it was going to take time. I never envisioned this. But the way we’ve come together over the last 2-3 weeks, it wasn’t a fluke.”

Play-In is Out

This year marked the final season for the so-called Play-in game. It started in 1998 when the league decided to scrap the Tuesday night preliminary round in favor of five first-round best-of-three series, with five winners advancing to Lake Placid.

“There were disadvantages and also plusses,” said ECAC assistant commissioner Steve Hagwell, of the play-in round. “That’s why they went to it.”

Next season, all 12 teams make the playoffs, with 5-12 playing a best-of-three series, followed by another best-of-three series the following weekend against the 1-4 teams, with four teams ending up in Lake Placid.

The CCHA went a different route. After deciding to put all 12 teams in the playoffs as well, starting this year, that league stayed with one round of best-of-three series, and sent six teams to the final weekend. The top two seeds earned a bye, while 3-6 played one game for a berth in the semifinals.

ECAC folks are happy with their decision.

“Coaches like it, I like it, the league likes it,” said Hagwell. “Every team is guaranteed two games. [This year], RPI and Dartmouth fans didn’t know if their team would play after Thursday.”

Attendance for this year’s weekend was below capacity, but Hagwell was still pleased with the outcome.

“It was a fabulous weekend. We couldn’t ask for a better weekend,” he said. “People looked at our five teams and wondered what the attendance would be like. Would we like to have this place packed? Certainly, anyone would. But we had a great crowd.”

The key, Hagwell said, it to keep them coming back.

“We want to build it so people will come regardless of who’s in it,” he said. “That’s the key objective from a fan’s standpoint and having a packed house, and not just waiting for people to say Monday, ‘OK we’re in, so we’re going.'”

The ECAC is committed to Lake Placid for at least another few years. This year was the first of a new five-year deal.

Wisconsin’s Choice: Eaves

Mike Eaves, part of Wisconsin’s glory days of the late 1970s, will set out to create another such era as the Badgers’ head coach.

Eaves, 45, was tabbed Tuesday to replace Jeff Sauer, the winningest coach in WCHA history.

EAVES

EAVES

Pressure? Sure, but Eaves, who will leave his post as the head coach of USA Hockey’s National Team Development Program, isn’t exactly looking at it that way.

“When your vocation is your vacation, that’s a great job,” said Eaves, a Wisconsin player from 1974 to 1978. “When the 15th and the 31st come around and you forget that it’s payday, you’ve got a great job. That’s been my life.”

Eaves, a first-team all-American in his junior and senior seasons, is the Badgers’ all-time leading scorer with 267 points. He helped Wisconsin to its second national title, in 1977.

Others in the running for the job were Wisconsin assistants Mark Johnson and Pat Ford; and Don Granato, a former Wisconsin player coaching Worcester of the AHL.

But Eaves was the choice to be the Badgers’ third coach in the last 36 years.

“The process has culminated in what we think is an outstanding person to take over the ranks,” Wisconsin athletics director Pat Richter said. “There’s not many people who have led up the program, starting with John Riley, Bob Johnson and then Jeff Sauer, and we expect that the next person can build on the success that they’ve had and take the program to the level that we all hope to achieve.”

Eaves was honored as one of the WCHA’s top 50 players in celebration of the league’s 50th anniversary this season. He was the league MVP in 1978 and is eighth on the all-time WCHA scoring list.

The Denver native played eight seasons in the NHL, including stops in Minnesota and Calgary.

Prior to his stay with USA Hockey, he had assistant coaching jobs with the NHL’s Pittsburgh Penguins, Philadelphia Flyers and Calgary Flames. He was the top man at Helsinki of the Finnish Elite League, the Hershey Bears of the AHL and Shattuck St. Mary’s High School in Faribault, Minn.

His collegiate coaching experience is limited to assistant positions at St. Cloud State (1987-88) and Division III Wisconsin-Eau Claire (1986-87).

Teaching the game’s finer points is one of the things Eaves said he cherishes.

“As a coach, one of the things I really enjoy doing is being able to take a skill and break it down into its parts, give it to a player and see him understand what it’s all about,” Eaves said. “So many times coaches teach systems and it becomes about systems, but guys want to get better. I think that’s one of the things that makes the game fun, coming to the rink and knowing that they are getting better and you’re able to spend one-on-one time with them and they can see improvement in their own game. That’s fun for them and the coach.”

Eaves will take over a Wisconsin program that finished this season 16-19-4 overall and in fifth place in the WCHA. Sauer announced in January that he would retire at the end of this season, and the school conducted a national search.

The Wisconsin State Journal reported that Eaves will receive a five-year contract worth around $136,000 annually.

“I think that part of our plan is to have the boys understand that we will form a foundation that’s built on good habits,” Eaves said. “We will play hard because by playing hard you give yourself a chance to win. We will play smart because by playing hard and smart your percentages of winning will go up. If you add on to that, play as a team, the byproduct is going to be there. You don’t have to worry about winning if you do those things … the byproduct is going to be there.”

Fahey Takes Gridiron Club Honor

Northeastern’s Jim Fahey was named winner of the 50th annual Walter Brown Award by the Gridiron Club of Greater Boston. The award is given annually to New England’s top American-born Division I athlete.

Bowdoin senior Mike Carosi is the winner of the second annual Joe Concannon Award, given to the top American-born Division II or III player in New England.

Fahey was the defensive leader this season for the Huskies, leading the team in scoring and leading the nation in scoring among defensemen (46 points). Over his career with Northeastern, Fahey missed just two games and totaled 26 goals and 85 assists. Fahey is also a finalist for the Hobey Baker Memorial Award.

The Walter Brown award is the oldest nationally-recognized honor accorded to individual players in the sports of American college hockey and is named for the first athletic director of Boston University.

Carosi totaled a career-high 47 points for the Polar Bears this season and was recently named an Eastern All-American but the American Hockey Coaches Association. The Concannon Award is named for the late Joe Concannon, a long-time writer for the Boston Globe and a strong supporter or college hockey and amateur athletics.

The awards will be presented at the New England Hockey Writers’ Dinner on April 10 in Saugus, Mass.

The Day After … Reaction to the NCAA Pairings

For the first time since the inception of the 12-team bracket in 1988, the Division I NCAA tournament has a strict regionalized arrangement.

Years ago, college hockey put in a series of bracketing rules in order to get away from regionalization, mandating, for example, that the bottom two seeds in each region should flip-flop with each other.

The playing field changed, however, in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 tragedies. This year, the directive came down from the NCAA Championships and Competition Cabinet to avoid air travel if possible. Any team within 400 miles of a regional site must stay in that region and travel by bus. Every Eastern team is within 400 miles of Worcester, Mass., site of the East Regional.

The result: Six Eastern teams, including three automatic bids, all staying in Worcester; and six Western teams, including four that will fly anyway, all in the West Region in Ann Arbor, Mich.

(Complete Bracket | Schedule)

Ultimately, it means the tournament’s bottom three seeds (according to the Pairwise Rankings) are in the East bracket, which, most agree, creates an undesirable imbalance.

“I agree with that,” said Jack McDonald, chair of the NCAA Division I men’s ice hockey committee, and athletic director at Quinnipiac. “I’m not saying we like it, but with the parameters that were given to us, it worked out. The only leeway we had was in the top four [seeds]. Or if Harvard was not in, then someone from the west would’ve had to go east.”

A simple switch of either Quinnipiac or Harvard to the West, with Colorado College (a team that’s already flying) coming East, could have resolved most of the problem. But, again, the committee said it did what it was told.

“It was re-affirmed after the fall sports were done,” said McDonald.

Now, had Michigan State won the CCHA championship, it would have received a bye over BU, meaning one Western bye team would have had to go East, and a bottom East team would have flown West.

One otherwise likely candidate to go East was St. Cloud State.

“My only official comment is that we’re happy to be in the tournament and we’re excited to be playing Michigan again on Friday night,” Huskies coach Craig Dahl told the St. Cloud Times.

The team most negatively affected — at least on paper — is Michigan State (27-8-5), the No. 3 seed in the West. It has to face Colorado College (26-12-3), No. 9 in the PWR, in the first round, as opposed to Harvard or Quinnipiac, which would have been the opponent under past years’ guidelines.

Cornell (24-7-2) winds up as a beneficiary — again, on paper. The Big Red was the last at-large team to make the field, and will play MAAC champion Quinnipiac in the first round. Nevertheless, if the Cornell wins, the “reward” is facing No. 1 New Hampshire (29-6-3).

“We’re happy to be in the tournament,” said Cornell coach Mike Schafer. “Obviously Quinnipiac is a good matchup. When you look at it, things could’ve been worse. … We could have had to play Michigan in their building.

“But the bottom line is, whoever you play, you gotta play. People thought Michigan would have an easy time with Mercyhurst. But it didn’t happen. It’s a one-game format and anything can happen. Our guys already know what happened last year [with Mercyhurst].

“We just have to worry about ourselves.”

Quinnipiac is making its first NCAA appearance after defeating Mercyhurst in the MAAC tournament final.

“We’re obviously excited to go to the NCAA tournament,” said Quinnipiac head coach Rand Pecknold. “It’s an added bonus as we’re a five seed above Harvard. I certainly didn’t expect that.

“Cornell has a storied program going back to the days of Ken Dryden. They’re a top-10 team in the nation and I don’t think they are, or there was going to be, an easy draw for us. You can analyze it up and down about who you want to play and not want to play. We were going to have to play a top-10 team no matter what.”

Quinnipiac and Cornell met last year, and tied.

“We haven’t seen them this year … but they’re a much better hockey team this year than last year,” Pecknold said.

No. 3-seeded Maine (23-10-7) missed out on a bye to Boston University (25-9-3), despite defeating the Terriers in the Hockey East semifinals.

“I kind of expected it after I saw the PairWise and I know that the committee goes pretty much with those PairWise Rankings,” said Maine coach Tim Whitehead. “Obviously, we would have loved to have that bye after stealing the five out of six points from BU over the last three weeks. But it’s a full season you have to look at so we were not surprised by the seeds. BU’s earned that opportunity.”

Maine gets Harvard (15-14-4), because of the Crimson’s improbable ECAC tournament run. Otherwise, Alaska-Fairbanks was the likely opponent for the Black Bears. If Maine wins, it would mean another meeting with BU, whereas, in the past, that rematch would likely have been avoided by flip-flopping seeds.

“We’re excited to be in the East. That was the big thing we worked very hard for,” Whitehead said. “As far as the matchups, we know we have our hands full with Harvard because they’re playing very well right now. If we’re fortunate to get past Harvard, we know it’s a tough challenge the next night.”

The other major gripe has nothing to do with the regional philosophy: No. 1 seed Denver (32-7-1) may have to face No. 4 seed Michigan (26-10-5), winner of the CCHA tournament title, in the Wolverines’ own building in the second round.

“If you can fault us for anything, it’s Denver perhaps having to play at Michigan,” said McDonald. “We struggled with that. But there’s not much we could do. We need more schools to put in bids [to host].”

Denver, the WCHA tournament and regular-season champions, awaits the winner of Michigan and No. 5 St. Cloud. Minnesota (29-8-4), the No. 2 seed in the West, will face the Michigan State-Colorado College winner.

“No question that Michigan has the home-ice advantage in Ann Arbor, but as I told our team and anybody who would listen [Saturday] night, we have trained and prepared for this for the last year or so,” DU coach George Gwozdecky told the Denver Post. “This team is ready, prepared and excited, and no matter who we’ll play, we’re looking forward to that opportunity.”

“I think we proved last weekend, after walking into Minnesota and beating them in front of 18,000 people [in the WCHA final], that will have the ability to overcome whatever we have to go through in Ann Arbor,” DU goalie Wade Dubielewicz told the Post.

Still, with men’s basketball teams travelling all over the country for the NCAA tournament, there remains a lack of explanation why college hockey and other sports were forced to be so strict with their brackets.

“I can’t speak to the comparative,” McDonald said. “Our field hockey team [at Quinnipiac] had to fly to Cal-Berkeley for a play-in game [in the fall]. … We have to rely on the NCAA for what are we doing.”

Despite the potential controversies, McDonald is putting a positive outlook on the situation.

“For the first time in history, there will be three sellouts [both regionals and the Frozen Four],” said McDonald. “The sport is growing, but what regionalization does is maximize the fan interest at each regional.

“It’s a good bracket. We’re pleased and I think in the midst of all that’s gone on in the world, the regionalization for this year is going to ensure safety and, hopefully, sellouts.”


Jim Connelly also contributed to this article.

Q & A With Jack McDonald

The day after the field for the 2002 NCAA Tournament were announced, I had a talk with Jack McDonald, the chair of the Championship Committee for Division I Men’s hockey. We spoke candidly about a variety of things, ranging from this year’s tournament to the future of the championship.

Jayson: What directives were you given in terms of seedings and placing teams in the brackets and how did the field come about?

Jack: We were allowed to take the top four seeds and place them where we saw fit. Or basically in the NCAA terminology, 25 percent of the field as to how we saw fit. Twenty-five of 12 is three, so we had to ask to have the NCAA consider four and they did. We were allowed to take the top four teams and seed them where it was best for the tournament. As it turned out, after Michigan beat Michigan State, we had two byes from the east and two from the west. Then things started to get a little tighter.

After we had some flexibility with the byes, we had to follow the recommendations of the Championship Cabinet regarding regionalization and safety concerns. Once that happened, the NCAA said that if you are within 400 miles of the building you must drive to that building. So, as the seeds broke in the east, NH and BU were driving. Maine was driving, Cornell was driving, Quinnipiac was driving and Harvard was driving.

Once that happened, then the western schools, some could drive and some could fly, once the east was locked into being all mandated to go to Worcester, the west had no choice. That’s where we’re at today.

Jayson: What was the toughest decision in the seeding?

Jack: Two things. None of these were decisions, but they were reaffirming priorities and regionalization.

The other thing was that the biggest discomfort of the whole tournament was Michigan being at home. No offense to east-west, but if I’m in the west and I have to play Michigan, that ain’t good. Now, that being said, the reason we’re in Michigan is because there were really no other bids that had the value of what the University of Michigan put forth. It’s like I said to a coach today, “Why didn’t your school bid?” So, probably the biggest — and, frankly it hasn’t gotten much play — it’s the teams that have to play Michigan in their own building.

North Dakota was knocked out in Michigan’s building by Michigan, [who] then went on to win the national championship. The bids for the regionals happened after that scenario in 1998. Everybody was lobbying, complaining, politicking for Michigan to never get it again in their own building. But, nobody bid. There’s a lot of great cities in this country that could host a tournament, but no one has bid, so that’s an issue as a committee person. We have an incredibly dominant host arena hosting that puts them at an advantage, but there are no other places bidding.

The west is a challenge to be honest with you. You put a game in Albany, Worcester or Providence, you’re going to sell it out, but not in the west. I think the Dane County Coliseum showed that. If Wisconsin doesn’t make it, nobody goes.

Jayson: What was the easiest?

Jack: The automatics. The easiest is the automatics.

Jayson: What are your thoughts on the perceived imbalance in terms of power in the regionals?

"The people involved in the bracketology of the whole thing can be too critical of something that could be the best weekend college hockey has ever seen. And frankly there are no easy ways to get to the championship."

— Jack McDonald

Jack: Based on using the PairWise, there’s no question that if you would pair the PairWise, there are some pretty strong teams out west. But what also is a fact is that the east has three automatic bids, the west has two. Bingo. You combine three automatic bids and the recommendations of the NCAA, you know you’ll have two go west and three go east, so you already have an imbalance. That was the driving factor. Harvard wins, they stay east. Quinnipiac wins, they stay east. New Hampshire wins, they stay east, so yes, there’s a perceived imbalance, but look at basketball. They have a west bracket which is considered to be the toughest. So, there is no easy way to a national championship.

Jayson: Why the decision to go east-east and west-west in the semifinals?

Jack: We assured the east-west final. Because of the dominance of east and west, it made it a lot simpler. We lost a lot of inter-regional play early, but we got it in the final.

Jayson: What is your reaction to the fact that fans in the east will not get to see western teams and vice versa?

Jack: You’re speaking from a hockey purist’s perspective. Most of the people that go to Worcester are not there to watch Colorado College and Minnesota. They’re there to see their team play the team they lost to last weekend, or that they beat last weekend.

I do understand what you are saying, but the Frozen Four allows what you want. It gives you that inter-regional play. I’m not saying that’s the perfect world, but I’m old enough to remember when the Big East had three teams in the Final Four. Certain things happen in certain years and I’m sure there are a lot of people that were upset that Hockey East had three in the Frozen Four, but is that the fault of the bracket? I don’t know.

This year, it’s a little different, so who knows what is going to happen. I think that when a fan spends $25 to go to Worcester, they’re not going there to see St. Cloud, Colorado College or Minnesota, they’re there to see UNH, BU, Cornell.

So, put down your microscopes and enjoy this. The people involved in the bracketology of the whole thing can be too critical of something that could be the best weekend college hockey has ever seen. And frankly there are no easy ways to get to the championship.

Jayson: Let’s put a what-if scenario in place. What if Michigan State had won the CCHA? What happens then? How would you decide who would be removed from the East bracket and sent west?

Jack: We had two brackets. You know the numbers as well as I do. If Michigan State wins, they get a bye, which means three western byes and one eastern bye. Well, you have to make someone move for Michigan State.

Based purely on the numbers, and you know the Pairwise as well as I do, probably either Harvard or Quinnipiac would have gone west. Pairwise, who was better? I’m not telling you who was the better team. Harvard goes west based on the math. I’ll tell you what I told the committee: Who has the better program? Harvard, without doubt. Who’s the better team? Probably Harvard. But that’s not the criteria given to the committee.

So if Michigan State had won, there would have been three western byes, and one team would have had to travel west, and based on the criteria, that team was Harvard. That’s where the mandates come in. This year, it sort of worked too easily. Harvard beating Cornell or Michigan beating Michigan State, it made things break right for the east region. Both for attendance and fan support.

Jayson: Some say that the Sept. 11 tragedy and the 400 mile rule were convenient and an excuse to the brackets. Your reaction?

Jack: That’s not true. The people who take their microscopes to the brackets need to relax a little bit and need to say that now we’re going to have two incredible regionals. There are some who think the west is more difficult than the east or the east is more difficult than the west. I think we have, as far as the fans, student-athletes and families, we now have two really good regionals.

The purists might say, and there are very few of them, might say that we’ve lost the inter-regional flavor of the NCAA Tournament, but with every decision there’s a risk. But right now, it remains to be seen what is going to happen. We’ve ensured an east-west final, we’ve ensured sellouts in each building, we’ve ensured the safety and ease of travel, so I think it’s a pretty good thing.

Jayson: What do you say to those unhappy with the brackets that say that it’s all about money?

Jack: What’s wrong with that? We wouldn’t have 16 teams if we didn’t start talking about money. There’s nothing wrong with that and in terms of being all about money, we’re giving fans two incredible games on Saturday for $25 — you can’t park your car at the FleetCenter for $25. We’re successful because of money.

We also, in addition to generating the most revenue ever, we’ll have the greatest net profit ever because we’re not sending Harvard or Quinnipiac west, or someone east.

Jayson: What was the biggest differences between this year and last year’s seeding procedure?

Jack: The biggest difference was the CCHA game on Sunday. We were joking around that we had to do two brackets and not one. We watched all the games on Saturday night and we were up late, then Sunday we got back up and we had to do two brackets. That was the biggest difference. And then checking the potential mistakes, mismatches or errors, not only with one bracket, but with two.

What really has become a fact is that the selection of 12 is the least difficult of the process. I don’t think anybody doubted Fairbanks not going. Last year it was the same way with New Hampshire and Clarkson. Right now the selection of the 12 has become the last significant issue and the seeding and placement has become the issue.

Jayson: What do you think college hockey should do with 16 teams coming up in the tournament?

Jack: I hope that the visionaries of college hockey realize that we have 60 institutions playing Division I college hockey for only five automatic bids. The math is not in anybody’s favor. We have the opportunity to create more automatics in a very, very easy way.

Do you know what they are? Forget if we don’t expand the bracket. There are two more automatics right under our nose and no one is talking about it. The Ivy League and Big Ten. Whether we’re 12 or 16, those automatics are there and we’re wasting them. The NCAA recommends that half of the field be automatic bids. Right now, we’re at 12, we’ll have six automatics, when we go to 16, we’ll have six, we could have eight.

My point is that by having more automatics, we allow everybody, we could now have 8 automatics for 60 schools, that gives every school a better shot.

Jayson: How should college hockey and fans react to the upcoming changes? What should be their thought process in terms of the championship?

Jack: There’s no question that the Frozen Four, Final Four concept is a good one and we can thank basketball for that. How we need to get there needs to be tweaked a little bit. We’ve got a great product, we’ve got to be careful and I’m a little nervous that if we have an Albany and a Worcester competing with each other in a regional, if we have enough fans to fill 14,000 in Albany and 12,000 in Worcester. Maybe we have to think about Thursday, Friday, Saturday. We don’t want to put ourselves in big buildings and find ourselves competing against each other. That’s something we need to be aware of. The fans buy tickets to the Frozen Four regardless of who’s in it. Will they buy tickets in Albany and Worcester, I don’t know. The west is even more difficult. If we give Minnesota and Michigan the regional and they both don’t make it, will people go? That’s the stuff we have to think about.

Jayson: What would you like to see happen in the future for the championship?

Jack: When I get off the committee I want to do my track coach’s opinion of college hockey. For the future, my personal opinion is that we need to look at a couple of things. One is how we look at the 16-team bracket. There is a natural progression of doing four regionals of four. But, let’s think outside the box a bit. What’s wrong with 8 first round games where all 8 top teams host the bottom 8, then your regionals, then you do your Frozen Four.

I don’t know what the right answer is, but I don’t think we should lock ourselves into the bracket just yet. For example, lacrosse does that. The top 8 host, the second round is two regionals, then the final four. You get more games, more fans and more sellouts and you could have your interregional play. So, that’s the first thing.

If we don’t do that, if we go to the traditional four regionals, in terms of baby steps, I have no problems giving the top four teams the host. So instead of a bye, they get to host. Then, maybe down the road, we take the four byes that got to host and take those teams and move them to larger buildings.

I’m not saying anything is wrong with the way we do thing now, but we’re coming up on some major change. Maybe we should erase the chalkboard of the 60 teams and redraw them. Now is the time.

Jayson: Any final thoughts?

Jack: We need to take the college hockey season and move it later than it is now. In my perfect world I would take our [conference] playoffs and put them where our Frozen Four is now. And then go three weekends in a row because our best attendance is in February and March, but we’re adding games in September and October. The only thing we have to worry about in April is the Masters and some rainy day baseball games. We need to think of moving our season as late as we can and to maximize our fans in my opinion. The best thing that has happened to college hockey is to move the Frozen Four away from the date of the Final Four. What that BC-ND game did [in last year’s final] was immense for college hockey.

Of all the calls I got today, there have been more people angry about the regionalization and not thinking about why it happened. Regionalization happened because of 9/11 and there are people that are angry that Harvard and Quinnipiac are in the east and not about why they’re in the east.

Sweet Redemption

A classic.

No other words will do. When Crimson sophomore Tyler Kolarik ended the ninth-longest game in NCAA championship history, Harvard had put the finishing touches on a most improbable playoff run.

Three straight overtime victories — two in double OT. A hostile environment in Lake Placid; its top rival, Cornell, in the finals. The same Cornell which won the regular season running away and has ended four of the Crimson’s past six seasons.

It was an unbelievable upset, requiring by far the best Harvard performance in a long time. From the opening faceoff, the Crimson took the play to the Big Red, playing a textbook game in the neutral zone, and not allowing the fearsome Cornell forecheck to ever get itself established.

"We have come together and learned what it takes to win. It was no fluke."

— Harvard coach Mark Mazzoleni

“When you get into overtime, it is a matter of will,” said Harvard coach Mark Mazzoleni “And we kept attacking.”

Before the season began, the ECAC championship did not look unlikely for the Crimson. The preseason favorite to take the crown, at the start of February, the Crimson were ranked No. 14 in the nation. But beginning with the Beanpot, disaster struck. Harvard was swept there, got blown out at Cornell, and finished the season losing at Yale and Princeton.

The wheels had fallen off the Crimson wagon, and nobody seemed to have any answers. With Brown and its super hot goaltender, Yann Denis coming into town, Lake Placid looked remote, let alone the Whitelaw trophy.

“There was no doubt down the stretch that we were struggling,” said junior forward Dominic Moore.

Ever since Harvard made the NCAA Frozen Four in 1993-94, the whole program has struggled. During the 1980s, Harvard was a perennial contender. The Crimson made the finals three times, capturing it all in 1989 and had three Hobey Baker winners along the way. After losing to Lake Superior State in the semifinals in 1994, the Crimson went .500 the next year and didn’t top the mediocre mark until last season.

It was in this light that Mazzoleni was hired to replace Ronn Tomassoni in 1999. The Crimson needed a fresh start. Mazzoleni certainly recruited talent; Tyler Kolarik and Tom Cavanagh, the OT heroes of Lake Placid, are the product of his salesmanship.

By the start of this season, Mazzoleni had silenced the questions on Harvard’s talent, but during the Crimson’s February tailspin, the critics shifted to Harvard’s heart, and wondered whether the whole program was ever going to stop spinning its wheels.

“When you consider how young our team is, I never expected to be here today,” Mazzoleni said. “But we have come together and learned what it takes to win. It was no fluke.”

There can be no doubts about the Crimson’s will to win after surviving Denis, Clarkson, and top-rival Cornell. It was as if Harvard turned on the switch and reached its potential once the playoffs began. While the Crimson has a ways to go until it relives the halcyon days of Bill Cleary, it has earned its trip to the NCAA tournament.

“Our legs were tired, but our hearts weren’t.” Moore said.

A classic performance. One almost a decade in the making.

A Season Of Firsts

This season New Hampshire has formed a monopoly on the number one. The Wildcats finished the season first in Hockey East, first in team offense, first in team defense, first in power play percentage and first in penalty kill. Nationally, they were first in the polls and first in the Pairwise Rankings.

Two nights earlier, UNH had likewise swept the league’s top awards: Player of the Year, Darren Haydar; Coach of the Year, Dick Umile; and Rookie of the Year, Sean Collins.

In other words, three more firsts.

Seemingly, the only way for the Wildcats’ stranglehold on the number one to get any more extreme would be for them to take away Sesame Street’s use of the digit and leave preschoolers to learn a number system that begins with two.

Except…

Except that UNH still hadn’t won a Hockey East tournament.

At the FleetCenter, the Jumbotron trivia question repeated with near metronomic regularity, “What is the only team that has won the regular season title and never won the tournament title?”

The answer, of course, was New Hampshire.

Which would allow cheap shot artists masked as opposing fans to say with derisive glee that “UNH” stood for “University of No Hardware.”

There would be only one way to shut them up. Just win, baby.

Standing in their way was the Wildcats’ nemesis, their neighbors from the north, the Maine Black Bears. In six all-time playoff contests with Maine, UNH had finished on the losing end each time.

Five came in the Hockey East playoffs, but the unkindest cut of all came in the 1999 NCAA Championship Game. Ten minutes into overtime, Marcus Gustafsson scored on a rebound of his own shot to give the Black Bears their second title while the Wildcats were left still searching for their first.

“It was tough,” said Darren Haydar. “I couldn’t bring myself to watch it [on tape] until the start of this year. I actually kind of forced myself to watch it to relive what it was like.”

Clearly, nobody had made it any easier for the Wildcats to get over the Hockey East championship hump this time. The Black Bears were no slouches themselves in the national rankings, coming in at number seven, and seemed to have history on their side.

UNH drew first blood in the opening period, but Maine rallied to tie the game after two. When Sean Collins gave the Wildcats a 2-1 lead early in the third period, their devoted fans held their breath and scarcely exhaled until Steve Saviano scored a big insurance goal to make it 3-1 with under four minutes remaining.

As the clock ticked down, the jubilant Wildcat faithful began to toss the derision back in the faces from which it had come earlier, chanting, “Where’s your hardware?”

And when the buzzer sounded and the clock read 0:00, New Hampshire had exorcised its Hockey East tournament title and its Black Bear playoff demons in one fell swoop.

“Oh man, it’s awesome,” said Colin Hemingway. “We made history tonight. Like Coach said in the dressing room, there have been a lot of guys come through UNH season after season after season who never had the opportunity to win this thing. We did that as a team and that shows the depth and the character and leadership of our team.”

And if on a scale of 1-to-10 a national championship is a 10, what would this be?

“Definitely around an eight,” said Haydar. “As Coach always stresses, sometimes it’s harder to win a Hockey East championship than it is the NCAA tournament. Teams know about each other. Playoff hockey is so much different than the regular season and guys are bitter at each other and want to get at each other. You have great players in this league and great teams. But look at where we are now.”

The view atop Hockey East is a sight to behold for both players and Umile, the architect of what has become a perennial powerhouse.

“I think we’ve learned from past experience that we maybe put too much emphasis on getting into the NCAA tournament before we got there,” said Umile of past frustrations. “So the guys made a commitment. We got a plaque in the locker room that says, ‘Game By Game…’

“It’s a commitment the team made back in September — win the regular season, win the Hockey East championship. Now you guys [in the media] are going to have to find something else to talk about because now we’ve won one.

“It’ll make my life a little easier, I’ll tell you that.”

Now, in this season of firsts, one remains. A national championship. Then the UNH monopoly on the number one will be complete.

“I’m satisfied tonight,” said Haydar, “but tomorrow morning I’m going to wake up and that NCAA tournament [championship] isn’t going to be there. We want to win that. That’s obviously the main goal.

“We’ve [fulfilled] two out of the three goals that we established at the start of the year as team and we’re working on that third one. We won’t be fully satisfied until we do that.”

The final number one not in UNH’s possession may soon be headed to Durham, New Hampshire.

Watch out Sesame Street.

Division I Women’s Playoff Schedule

WCHA

Single elimination
All games at Fogerty Arena, Blaine, Minn.

Play-In
Thursday, March 7
No. 4 Ohio State 5, No. 5 Bemidji State 3

Semifinals
Friday, March 8
No. 2 Wisconsin 4, No. 3 Minnesota-Duluth 1
No. 1 Minnesota 4, No. 4 Ohio State 1

Consolation/Championship
Saturday, March 9
Consolation: No. 3 Minnesota-Duluth 6, No. 4 Ohio State 2
Championship: No. 1 Minnesota 3, No. 2 Wisconsin 2

ECAC North

Quarterfinals
All series best-of-three

Friday-Sunday, March 8-10
No. 8 Colgate at No. 1 Dartmouth
Game 1: Dartmouth 11, Colgate 1
Game 2: Dartmouth 6, Colgate 0
Dartmouth wins series, 2-0
No. 7 Yale at No. 2 Brown
Game 1: Brown 5, Yale 0
Game 2: Brown 7, Yale 0
Brown wins series, 2-0
No. 6 Cornell at No. 3 St. Lawrence
Game 1: St. Lawrence 4, Cornell 3
Game 2: St. Lawrence 2, Cornell 1, ot
St. Lawrence wins series, 2-0
No. 5 Harvard at No. 4 Princeton
Game 1: Harvard 3, Princeton 2
Game 2: Harvard 3, Princeton 1
Harvard wins series, 2-0

Semifinals
Teams are reseeded
Single elimination
All games played at Thompson Arena, Hanover, N.H.

Saturday, March 16
No. 1 Dartmouth 4, No. 4 Harvard 2
No. 2 Brown 3, No. 3 St. Lawrence 1

Championship
at Thompson Arena, Hanover, N.H.
Sunday, March 17
No. 2 Brown 4, No. 1 Dartmouth 3, ot

ECAC East

Quarterfinals
All games single elimination

Friday, March 8
No. 1 Niagara 8, No. 8 Quinnipiac 1
No. 2 Northeastern 4, No. 7 Boston College 0

Saturday, March 9
No. 3 New Hampshire 4, No. 6 Connecticut 1
No. 4 Providence 5, No. 5 Maine 3

Semifinals
Teams are reseeded
Single elimination
All games played at UConn Ice Arena, Storrs, Conn.

Friday, March 15
No. 4 Providence 3, No. 1 Niagara 2, 2ot
No. 2 Northeastern 2, No. 3 New Hampshire 0

Championship
Saturday, March 16
at UConn Ice Arena, Storrs, Conn.
No. 4 Providence 1, No. 2 Northeastern 0

GLWHA

Play-In
Single Elimination

Saturday, February 23
No. 2 Findlay 4, No. 3 Wayne State 1

Championship
Sunday, February 24
No. 1 Mercyhurst 4, No. 2 Findlay 2

Analysis: Picking The Field

The bubble has burst.

Harvard’s dramatic double-overtime victory over Cornell in the ECAC championship game effectively sealed the field of teams that will be included in the NCAA tournament. Alaska-Fairbanks and Northern Michigan, the top two teams that had outside chances of being included, now have virtually no chance of making the tournament.

The five automatic qualifiers will go to the conference champions: either Michigan or Michigan State in the CCHA, Harvard in the ECAC, New Hampshire in Hockey East, Quinnipiac in the MAAC, and Denver in the WCHA.

At-large bids should go to Minnesota, Boston University, Maine, St. Cloud, Colorado College, Cornell, and the loser of the CCHA championship game. A sizable gap between No. 10 Michigan and the next two teams, No. 11 Alaska-Fairbanks and No. 12 Northern Michigan, in both the Ratings Percentage Index and in number of comparison wins, has effectively eliminated teams ranked lower than 10.

So the field is set, but the question that remains is seeding. Even this process is significantly simpler than in past years, however, due to NCAA legislation put in place following the September 11 attacks. These rules state that any team that is under 400 miles from a particular venue cannot choose to fly there; they must bus it. So the previous rules about swapping the bottom two east and west seeds to provide a “national feel” to the tournament are not in effect for this year.

The only schools that are greater than 400 miles from a venue are Minnesota and St. Cloud, which are over 600 (driving) miles away from Ann Arbor; and the two Colorado schools, which are over 1,200 miles the nearest regional, in Ann Arbor. All four schools will be flying, and so can fly to either venue.

As of the finish of the Cornell-Harvard game, but before the CCHA final game, here are the top 10 teams, plus automatic qualifiers Quinnipiac and Harvard:

 Rk Team        GP W- L- T Win% Rk   RPI Rk PWR
1 New Hampshire 38 29- 6- 3 0.8026 2 | 0.6239 3 | 26
2 Denver 40 32- 7- 1 0.8125 1 | 0.6259 1 | 25
3 Minnesota 41 29- 8- 4 0.7561 5 | 0.6242 2 | 24
4 Boston University 37 25- 9- 3 0.7162 8 | 0.5991 4 | 22
5 Michigan State 39 27- 7- 5 0.7564 4 | 0.5982 5 | 22
6 Maine 40 23-10- 7 0.6625 12 | 0.5883 7 | 20
7 St. Cloud 41 29-10- 2 0.7317 6 | 0.5947 6 | 19
8 Colorado College 41 26-12- 3 0.6707 11 | 0.5824 8 | 19
9 Cornell 33 24- 7- 2 0.7576 3 | 0.5794 9 | 19
10 Michigan 40 25-10- 5 0.6875 9 | 0.5770 10 | 19
23 Quinnipiac 37 20-12- 5 0.6081 15 | 0.5037 25 | 4
24 Harvard 33 15-14- 4 0.5152 26 | 0.4997 27 | 3

These split nicely into six eastern teams and six western teams:

 East
1 New Hampshire 38 29- 6- 3 0.8026 2 | 0.6239 3 | 26
4 Boston University 37 25- 9- 3 0.7162 8 | 0.5991 4 | 22
6 Maine 40 23-10- 7 0.6625 12 | 0.5883 7 | 20
9 Cornell 33 24- 7- 2 0.7576 3 | 0.5794 9 | 19
23 Quinnipiac 37 20-12- 5 0.6081 15 | 0.5037 25 | 4
24 Harvard 33 15-14- 4 0.5152 26 | 0.4997 27 | 3
 West
2 Denver 40 32- 7- 1 0.8125 1 | 0.6259 1 | 25
3 Minnesota 41 29- 8- 4 0.7561 5 | 0.6242 2 | 24
5 Michigan State 39 27- 7- 5 0.7564 4 | 0.5982 5 | 22
7 St. Cloud 41 29-10- 2 0.7317 6 | 0.5947 6 | 19
8 Colorado College 41 26-12- 3 0.6707 11 | 0.5824 8 | 19
10 Michigan 40 25-10- 5 0.6875 9 | 0.5770 10 | 19

The easiest thing would be to seed the teams this way. However, there is one crimp in these plans: the CCHA championship game. Right now, the top three teams are clear, but there is a virtual tie for the fourth and final bye, between Eastern team Boston University and Western team Michigan State.

Should Michigan State defeat Michigan, the tie would be broken in MSU’s favor, and the Spartans should receive the bye. Should Michigan win, Boston University should get the better of the comparisons, and hence the bye.

If Michigan wins, the seedings should look very much like what is above, with Michigan moving past Colorado College:

East
1 New Hampshire
2 Boston University
3 Maine
4 Cornell
5 Quinnipiac
6 Harvard

West
1 Denver
2 Minnesota
3 Michigan State
4 St. Cloud
5 Michigan
6 Colorado College

If Michigan State wins, then three western teams receive byes, complicating the picture. One western bye team must come east and one non-bye eastern team must go west.

Which team goes east? The three western byes would be Denver, Minnesota and Michigan State, in that order. Both Denver and Minnesota are outside the 400 mile driving mandate from the NCAA, so either team would fly, meaning either team could get to either location. In this situation, Denver should receive the No. 1 seed in the West, with Minnesota getting the No. 2 seed in the East.

Which team goes west? Almost all teams would be inconvenienced similarly, so the lowest seeds should be penalized, meaning either Harvard or Quinnipiac. Harvard going west would make it easier to avoid a first-round matchup with Cornell, but Harvard would draw more fans in the east. I think, in this instance, we’ll see Quinnipiac go west, but I’ll hedge my bets by listing both possibilities:

East
1 New Hampshire
2 Minnesota
3 Boston University
4 Maine
5 Cornell
6 Harvard/Quinnipiac

West
1 Denver
2 Michigan State
3 St. Cloud
4 Colorado College
5 Michigan
6 Quinnipiac/Harvard

These two arrangements avoid all first-round intraconference matchups without any further playing with the brackets, and satisfy the new travel stipulations handed down by the NCAA.

There might be some complaints with these brackets, although I challenge anyone to come up with some brackets that do not raise a few eyebrows.

Specifically, however, two things stands out.

No. 1W Denver, in either scenario above, is “rewarded” for winning the WCHA regular-season and postseason titles by being placed in the same bracket as Michigan at the Wolverines’ home rink, Yost Arena. The last time this happened, No. 1W North Dakota ended up not advancing to the Frozen Four, as the Wolverines won in front of thousands of screaming fans.

Looking at the East bracket, we see that in one scenario, No. 4E Maine, which just lost to New Hampshire in the Hockey East finals, could be in the same bracket as New Hampshire. And in the other scenario, No. 2E Boston University is rewarded for its loss in the Hockey East semifinals with a first-round bye.

Neither option seems right; based on head-to-head results, which include the Maine win over the Terriers in the Hockey East semifinals, we might see Maine get the bye rather than BU, or, in the other scenario, Maine and BU swapped so that Boston University, which hasn’t played the Wildcats in a while, placed in the bracket with New Hampshire rather than Maine. The latter seems more likely than the former, since even with the semifinal loss to Maine, BU still handily wins that particular comparison:

 Boston University vs Maine
RPI 0.5991 1 0.5883 0
L16 11- 4- 1 0 10- 3- 3 0
TUC 12- 7- 1 1 11- 7- 5 0
H2H 1 2
COP 18- 5- 2 1 15- 5- 4 0
============================================
PTS 4 2
============================================

Swapping the No. 3E seed with the No. 4E seed seems like much less of a big deal than the No. 2E seed and the No. 3E seed, with the bye. The byes, of course, would be eliminated if the tournament were to expand from 12 to 16 teams, which is proposed legislation and seems likely to pass and be in effect for next season.

To see the final brackets, tune in to the NCAA Selection Show, which will air at 9:00 p.m. (EST) on ESPNews on Sunday, March 17. USCHO.com will have the brackets available as soon as they are announced.

A Natural Progression

When the Notre Dame Fighting Irish made an appearance at Joe Louis Arena at the end of the 1999-2000 season, even though the Irish lost 4-0 to Michigan State in the semifinal round, the players were just happy to have been there, happy to have taken a step for the program.

This year, when Notre Dame dropped a tough 3-1 decision to Northern Michigan, there was a sense of accomplishment, but tempered by the disappointment of almost.

That, said head coach Dave Poulin, is step in the right direction.

“The last time we were here two years ago, we came in and were no match at all for Michigan State. We were beaten four-nothing, and it was over early in the game. Tonight obviously that wasn’t the case. We’ve taken that step as a team. Hopefully, next time we’re back at Joe Louis we can take another step.”

There is reason for the Irish to hope. With a total of 15 freshmen and sophomores on this year’s roster, Notre Dame went into the Omaha Civic Center — arguably the toughest playoff venue in the CCHA — and beat the Mavericks two games out of three in the first-round playoff series Mar. 8-10, forcing a Game Three by winning in overtime Saturday, after losing in double OT the night before.

As tough as the loss to the Wildcats in the CCHA Quarterfinals was to take, Notre Dame can look at the trip to the Super Six as a necessary lesson learned.

“There’s only one way to get experience, and that’s to go through it,” said Poulin. “The experience we had out in Nebraska, I can’t tell you how much that meant to us to go into an environment like that and win, especially to win after losing the first game in double overtime, to come back and win in overtime Saturday night and to beat them Sunday … that’s got to be a learning experience for us.”

After the loss, Notre Dame freshman netminder Morgan Cey said that he was not satisfied at all with coming to JLA only to lose. “I’m really, really disappointed right now, but at the same time I have a lot of excitement for the future. We’ve shown everyone the great team we’ll have in the next few years.”

“I’m excited,” echoed junior forward Connor Dunlop. “We’re not losing too many guys — obviously, the big guy in David Inman. The majority is coming back … a great solid group.”

To what can this Irish turnaround be attributed? Two things: coaching and chemistry.

At the start of the season, Poulin and his staff emphasized offense, since the Irish had struggled with scoring in recent years. Midway through the campaign, however, Poulin realized that Notre Dame was sacrificing defense for offense, and the coach adjusted his system to play a simpler game that relied on good defense to create solid offense.

“We were doing well offensively for a while, but we were giving up way too many goals,” said Dunlop. “After that we switched our system around and we all bought into it right away. It was a lot more defensive-minded, but at the same time it allowed some of the guys who are a lot more offensive-minded to still have that freedom, so it worked out well.”

As for the chemistry, both Dunlop and Inman said that this year’s team was one cohesive unit. “This was just a great team this year,” said Dunlop. “There were no cliques, there were no problems with the team, there was just a great group of guys. From day one, we jelled.”

Inman, who scored the only Irish goal in his last collegiate hockey game, “In the last two months, this has been the best team I’ve been a part of, not only on the ice but away. We’re a really tight team. As soon as we had some success, we started believing in each other, and we started playing with confidence.”

In the postgame press conference following the 3-1 loss to Northern Michigan, Poulin was already putting this game behind him, already looking ahead to Notre Dame’s potential for next season.

“We had two seniors in the lineup,” said Poulin, “five freshmen and sophomores on defense, and a freshman goalie. Fifteen minutes the game, I’m very excited about the future of this team.”

Miller Repeat POTY, Mason Honored By CCHA

The CCHA honored its league award winners at the 2002 CCHA Awards presentation Thursday night in Detroit’s historic Fox Theatre.

For the second straight year, Michigan State goaltender Ryan Miller was named the league’s Player of the Year. Alaska-Fairbanks head coach Guy Gadowsky is the 2001-02 Coach of the Year, and Western Michigan’s Pat Dwyer was named Rookie of the Year.

The evening also included a moving tribute to MSU head coach Ron Mason, who is stepping down at the end of the season to become Michigan State’s athletic director.

In a video clip, Red Berenson, head coach of MSU archrival Michigan, joked that Mason has been promising to take him fishing for a number years. “Now that he’s retiring, maybe he’ll actually do it,” said Berenson.

Mason — college hockey’s all-time winningest coach — was honored with a lifetime achievement award, presented by Detroit Red Wings head coach Scotty Bowman — hockey’s all-time winningest coach.

On receiving the award, Mason talked about the connection between professional and college hockey in Michigan, and said, “I think hockey in particular, is a really solid small family.”

Other highlights included the presentation of Best Defensive Forward to UAF’s Bobby Andrews, who said, “I’d really like to thank my old man for preaching that [defensive side of hockey].”

Michigan goaltender Kevin O’Malley received the Mike and Marian Ilitch Humanitarian Award for his extensive volunteer work. O’Malley’s acceptance speech was the best of the evening by a player. “I did some research,” said O’Malley, “and the last Wolverine to win this award was Blake Sloan. Two years later, he won the Stanley Cup with the Dallas Stars, so I’m really looking forward to 2004.”

Ohio State’s Scott Titus was given the Terry Flanagan Memorial Award, named after the former Bowling Green assistant coach who died of cancer in 1991. After the 1999-2000 season, Titus had surgery on his upper right arm to remove a staph infection that spread through four inches of bone. Doctors originally diagnosed Titus with bone cancer. The Buckeye defenseman missed the 2000-01 season because of the extent of surgery.

Not surprisingly, Ryan Miller was named the league’s Best Goaltender. Best Offensive Defenseman honors went to Miller’s teammate, John-Michael Liles. Ferris State’s Rob Collins was singled out as the league’s leading scorer — the first Bulldog to achieve that honor. Michigan’s Mike Komisarek is the 2001-02 Best Defensive Defenseman.

The league also honored All-Conference Teams, named earlier in the week.

2001-02 All-Conference Team

First Team
Rob Collins, senior forward, FSU
Jeff Hoggan, senior forward, UNO
Chris Kunitz, junior forward, FSU
Mike Komisarek, sophomore defenseman, UM
John-Michael Liles, junior defenseman, MSU
Ryan Miller, junior goaltender, MSU

Second Team
Bobby Andrews, senior forward, UAF
Mike Cammalleri, junior forward, UM
John Shouneyia, junior forward, UM
Andrew Hutchinson, senior defenseman, MSU
Greg Zanon, junior defenseman, UNO
Dan Ellis, sophomore goaltender, UNO

2001-02 Bauer All-Rookie Team

Pat Dwyer, forward, WMU
Eric Nystrom, forward, UM
Jim Slater, forward, MSU
Aaron Voros, forward, UAF
Eric Werner, defenseman, UM
Matt York, defenseman, FSU
Mike Brown, goaltender, FSU

2001-02 All-Academic Team

Bobby Andrews, senior forward, UAF
David Cousineau, junior defenseman, WMU
Brad Fast, junior defenseman, MSU
Adam Hall, senior forward, MSU
David Inman, senior forward, ND
Miguel Lafleche, junior forward, OSU
Peter Michelutti, junior forward, NMU
Daniel Samuelsson, senior defenseman, UNO
Jared Sylvestre, freshman forward, UAF

2001-02 Perani Cup Winners

Lance Mayes, junior goaltender, UAF
Tyler Masters, junior goaltender, BGSU
Chris Kunitz, junior forward, FSU
Matt Violin, freshman goaltender, LSSU
David Burleigh, junior goaltender, Miami
Josh Blackburn, senior goaltender, UM
Ryan Miller, junior goaltender, MSU
Dan Ellis, sophomore goaltender, UNO
Chad Theuer, senior forward, NMU
David Inman, senior forward, ND
R.J. Umberger, sophomore forward, OSU
Jeff Reynaert, senior goaltender, WMU

Big Green Renaissance

Dartmouth came into this season with high expectations, with prognisticators thinking ECAC championships and NCAA berths.

The season never quite worked out that way. Despite some nice highlights, the Big Green finished fourth in the league, and finally saw the season end Thursday in the ECAC tournament play-in game.

Nevertheless, with head coach Bob Gaudet’s first recruiting class having played their last game, it was time for some deeper reflection afterward. With that, a better appreciation of just how far the program has come begins to emerge.

Gaudet got emotional at the post-game press conference Thursday, talking about the character of his seniors, and the bond he had with them.

Gaudet

Gaudet

Gaudet returned to him alma mater before the 1996-97 season, after helping Brown’s program rise from the ashes to become a league contender and even an NCAA participant. The expectation became Gaudet would do the same for the Big Green, a program that had fallen on hard times.

Perhaps that hasn’t quite happened yet, but it’s still apparent the program is lights years ahead of where it was.

One of the first things Gaudet did was change the atmosphere on the team. He stressed a community awareness, and brought in players willing to latch onto that. Winning games certainly helped bring more fans out, but it was the new atmosphere that had as much to do with it. The season-ticket holder base at Thompson Arena improved from 300 to 1200, and one of the league’s undiscovered jewels of a building became a hopping place to be.

“[Forward Dan] Casella is up for the [NCAA] Hockey Humanitarian Award, and it’s very deserving,” said Gaudet. “And his classmates are the same way. They do a lot of charity work, working with youth hockey.

“They just ran with it. We let them know it was important. Too many people only see athletes with negativity.”

The group that led the way will be gone next year, seven seniors that leave the program not quite fulfilling their promise, but leaving the program in better shape for them having been there. They are all forwards: top-scorer Mike Maturo, Jamie Herrington, Chris Baldwin, Chris Taliercio, Frank Nardella, Gary Hunter and Casella.

“We had a great group of guys that meant so much to me,” Gaudet said. “I can’t say enough about them. They are so modest, but they did a helluva good job on a day-to-day basis. … It’s a long year, and they kept everyone motivated.”

Gaudet knows the team may have to take a step back next year before it can go forward again, but is not necessarily conceding that point.

“I don’t know what our situation will be,” said Gaudet. “We won’t have seven seniors. We’ll be a lot younger. I hope we can turn it back on quickly.

“Our goal is to win it, but we want to be realistic. I don’t want to give our kids unfair expectations. … It remains to be seen. I’m proud of our guys to get to this point.”

Gaudet will lean more heavily on a defense that will have three seniors in Trevor Byrne, Pete Summerfelt and P.J. Martin. But a big question is whether Byrne will be back. The junior is sure to get an enticing offer from the St. Louis Blues to leave school a year early.

“It depends on St. Louis,” said Gaudet. “He’s this close to graduating, he may not want to give that up.”

One of the biggest on-ice differences for Dartmouth since Gaudet arrived has been the play of the goalies. Gaudet was a former netminder himself, and shoring up that spot, one that was a major sore spot for the Big Green in the past, was essential.

With Nick Boucher, Darren Gastrock and Dan Yacey all capable of being good goalies, the Big Green will need to rely even more on that spot next year considering all the offense that graduates.

“We have all three goalies back and we should be solid up front,” Gaudet said. “We need to be stronger physically. We’ll have a different style.”

Different style on the ice, but certainly not a different approach. Gaudet’s approach has put Dartmouth back on the college hockey map, and that is quite an accomplishment in and of itself.

Calm Before The Storm

Jason Crain, Yan Des Gagne, and Mike McCormick have seen it all. In 1998-99, their rookie year with Ohio State, the Buckeyes went to the NCAA tournament, bowing out after a 4-2 loss to Maine.

At the end of the 1999-2000 campaign, the Buckeyes found themselves watching the CCHA playoffs from the bleachers, having missed postseason play for the first time in nearly 20 years.

Last year, it took the favored Nebraska-Omaha Mavericks three games to eliminate Ohio State in the first round of the CCHA playoffs, a series in Omaha that was decided by one goal.

This year, the Buckeyes dispensed with Western Michigan in the first round of CCHA playoff action in two games, in Kalamazoo, en route to the Super Six. After beating Alaska-Fairbanks in a thrilling 6-5 overtime quarterfinal contest, OSU finds itself facing top-seeded Michigan in the semifinals.

The Buckeyes began the 2001-02 season strong, slumped through the second half, and have now one three consecutive playoff games.

At this point, while fans around the league question the strength of the OSU program, the three-member Buckeye senior class finds only one thing about this season surprising, and that would be the slumping.

For Ohio State, this has been a quiet year. No locker-room drama. No early departures. No obvious personality conflicts.

In short, all’s quiet on the Buckeye front, and that’s just fine with Crain, Des Gagne and McCormick, the three remaining soldiers in the class of 2002.

“It wasn’t easy,” said Des Gagne, who watched three members of his class depart early. “Looking at the facilities we have, it would be hard for me to play anywhere else. We’ve got a good program, and I’m happy I stayed.”

Former members of the OSU class of 2002, Matt Weber and Jeff Marshall, left of their own accord, and Nick Ganga was dismissed toward the end of last season. Scott Titus and Ryan Smith were originally classmates of Crain, Des Gagne and McCormick, but each had to take a medical redshirt in different years, making them members now of the class of 2003.

Said McCormick, “You deal with adversity while you’re here, and you try to change the negatives to positives.”

Crain, the captain of this year’s Buckeyes squad, said the mood of the team is calm, positive, and focused, and while he would have liked to have seen this kind of team unity in previous seasons, he’s happy to have it now.

“We’re more mature as a team,” said Crain. “We still have a lot of young guys, but in years past we’ve had guys going in many different directions, whereas this year it seems that we’ve come together and we’re all working as hard as we can for one goal. It feels really good.”

The tightness of the team is reflected in the defensive corps, which is the heart and soul of Ohio State’s style of play. As goes the defense, so go the Buckeyes.

“My freshman year, we had a tough one,” said junior blueliner Pete Broccoli. “When tempers get going, the guys lose focus on what they’re supposed to be doing. Our main goal this year was to keep focused on the game. When things go wrong, don’t worry about it, just keep working. That’s what we’ve been doing so far.

“There’s a lot of good camaraderie on the team. On the ice, you know that each one of those guys will have your back.”

The Buckeyes provided tangible evidence of that camaraderie the week before they played Western Michigan, when nearly every member of the team bleached his hair, as light as he could get it. The idea was sophomore Scott May’s. Housemates Chris Olsgard and Mike Betz were quick to endorse it, and to persuade other players that the platinum look could lead to postseason success.

“It was a house thing,” said Betz.. “We all live together. Next thing you know, we’re calling up the guys [asking], ‘Who wants to dye their hair?’ It was an inertia kind of thing — the more guys we got, the harder it was for each guy to say no.”

Crain, a natural blond, and Des Gagne and McCormick — decidedly brunets without the help of peroxide — are enjoying the sense of team unity in this, their senior year.

“It’s all about reaching that team goal,” said Crain. “We’re mature. We’re focused. All the guys get along.

“It’s a good feeling.”

Dubie: MVP

It’s only been a couple weeks since Denver head coach George Gwozdecky tabbed junior netminder Wade Dubielewicz as his goaltender for the remainder of the season.

And after Dubielewicz’s performance at the WCHA Final Five this weekend, Gwozdecky’s decision is making him look pretty smart.

“I’ll tell you what,” Gwozdecky said. “Wade Dubielewicz is the best goaltender in the nation, period.

The coach might be right. Dubielewicz backstopped the Pioneers to their first postseason championship since 1999 and in the process was named Most Valuable Player of the Final Five.

He stopped 26 shots Friday afternoon as Denver shut out Colorado College 3-0, and then made 38 saves in the Pioneers’ 5-2 over Minnesota in the title bout Saturday night.

“This weekend as a lot of fun,” said Dubielewicz following the celebration. “We really wanted to win this tournament; all the accolades are like icing on the cake.”

A cake that has a few layers. Not only did he earn MVP honors at the Final Five, he was named first team All-WCHA on Thursday, and one of the ten finalists for the Hobey Baker Memorial Award, which will be presented during the Frozen Four.

Dubielewicz’s rise has been a guided one. For the majority of Denver’s season, he split time with Adam Berkhoel. Heading into the Final Five, Dubielewicz had appeared in 22 games, while Berkhoel saw time in 18.

Gwozdecky made the decision to go with Dubielewicz, whose 1.68 goals against average led the league, in the playoffs. Both goaltenders knew their coach was only going to go with one down the stretch, but their camaraderie didn’t turn to competition.

“It was bittersweet,” said Dubielewicz. “I was happy to get to play, but Adam had such a great year that it was hard to be happy.”

“We have the best goaltending tandem in the entire country and Adam Berkhoel, who had an outstanding year, is one of the reasons we are here,” added Gwozdecky. “If Adam was on any other team in the country he would be the starting goaltender and they would be riding him through the playoffs.”

Berkhoel’s numbers are second to only one goalie in most statistical categories. It just turns out that that one is on his team.

Dubielewicz’s record now stands at 20-3. He is stopping almost 95 percent of the shots he is seeing to go along with that minuscule GAA, and has helped carry his team to into the NCAA tournament with his play the past two weekends.

However, Dubielewicz, like the rest of his teammates, knows that the job is not yet done.

“From day one we had three goals,” he said. “We wanted to win the WCHA playoff, get a first-round bye and win the national tournament. We accomplished two of them tonight.”

Number three will start in Ann Arbor, Mich., where Dubielewicz and the Pioneers will go into the first round of the NCAA tourney as the West Region’s top seed. If the netminder continues to resemble a brick wall, the Pioneers might need another layer on that cake: one that holds a much bigger prize.

One Chance

One game.

Having a single game decide a championship is nothing new. Having a single game decide an NCAA tournament bid is also nothing new.

Having it happen in an otherwise-meaningless third-place game, a game in which one team has nothing to play for and the other, everything?

Now that’s a little more interesting.

The much-maligned WCHA third-place (not “consolation,” mind you) game once again carried NCAA tournament implications Saturday. With Colorado College ninth in the PairWise Rankings entering the afternoon, a loss by the Tigers would leave them vulnerable to upset champions in the CCHA and ECAC.

That vulnerability, though, can be traced all the way back to the start of the season.

One year ago, the Tigers reached the national quarterfinals after a fourth-place finish in the WCHA. After losing only Paul Manning, Justin Morrison and Mike Colgan as significant contributors, CC was the coaches’ pick to win the league this year.

Mark Cullen was the preseason pick for Player of the Year. Jeff Sanger was back in goal, and Rookie of the Year Peter Sejna was expected to improve on his already-impressive numbers. All the pieces appeared to be in place.

Then the Tigers actually hit the ice, and the bottom fell out immediately.

CC took two losses — one bad, one close — in Grand Forks to North Dakota, then lost two heartbreakers in a home-and-home with Denver before getting pasted by St. Cloud on a Friday night on the road.

In between, two nonconference wins over UMass-Amherst did little to ease the pain. Two and a half weeks into the season, the preseason favorites were suddenly 0-5 in conference play.

“The beginning of the year was a tough time for us,” said Mike Stuart. “That Monday after the fifth game, we just came back to work like we ordinarily would.

“We’ve had to work through adversity this year with this team.”

The turnaround was just as sudden. A five-game unbeaten streak followed — albeit most of it against the bottom half of the league — plus two nonleague wins against Clarkson.

Still, not everyone thought Colorado College could salvage the season. Five straight losses to start matters was just too much. But the Tigers went 16-5-2 in the WCHA after that point, getting back to fourth place for the second year in a row.

The Tigers followed that up by sweeping their first-round playoff series, then won two of three games at the Final Five. The third-place tilt, in particular, was a 60-minute gut check which CC simply would not lose even as St. Cloud increased the pressure late. Tired legs, nerves, one of the nation’s top offenses trying to rally: none of its was enough to keep the Tigers from the win.

“Nothing’s easy for us — ever since the 0-and-5 start and the high expectations,” said head coach Scott Owens. “It’s been a struggle right through the 41st game.”

For CC’s seniors, it is their last shot at the Frozen Four. The Tigers reached the NCAA quarterfinals in 1999, then lost a stunner, 4-3, to Michigan State when the Spartans scored two goals in the last two minutes of regulation.

“The game against Michigan State really hit us hard when we lost,” said Sanger. “You realize how close you were.”

“You don’t know what you’ve got ’till it’s gone,” agreed Chris Hartsburg, who scored the game winner Saturday. “You don’t know if you’re ever going to make it back again.”

Thanks to their win Saturday, the Tigers have a shot to do exactly that. Two games may now separate CC’s senior class from their goal: a return visit to the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul, site of the 2002 Frozen Four.

“We really stressed that after the [semifinal loss to Denver], that we didn’t want our season to end,” said Hartsburg.

And it looks like it won’t.

Division I Playoff Schedule

CCHA

First Round
All series best-of-three
Friday-Sunday, March 8-10

No. 12 Lake Superior at No. 1 Michigan
Game 1: Lake Superior 4, Michigan 3
Game 2: Michigan 4, Lake Superior 1
Game 3: Michigan 4, Lake Superior 1
Michigan wins series, 2-1
No. 11 Bowling Green at No. 2 Michigan State
Game 1: Michigan State 4, Bowling Green 3, ot
Game 2: Michigan State 4, Bowling Green 2
Michigan State wins series, 2-0
No. 10 Miami at No. 3 Northern Michigan
Game 1: Northern Michigan 4, Miami 0
Game 2: Northern Michigan 5, Miami 3
Northern Michigan wins series, 2-0
No. 9 Ferris State at No. 4 Alaska-Fairbanks
Game 1: Alaska-Fairbanks 6, Ferris State 3
Game 2: Alaska-Fairbanks 2, Ferris State 1
Alaska-Fairbanks wins series, 2-0
No. 8 Notre Dame at No. 5 Nebraska-Omaha
Game 1: Nebraska-Omaha 3, Notre Dame 2, 2ot
Game 2: Notre Dame 2, Nebraska-Omaha 1, ot
Game 3: Notre Dame 2, Nebraska-Omaha 1
Notre Dame wins series, 2-1
No. 7 Ohio State at No. 6 Western Michigan
Game 1: Ohio State 3, Western Michigan 2, ot
Game 2: Ohio State 3, Western Michigan 1
Ohio State wins series, 2-0

Winners advance to Joe Louis Arena, Detroit, and are reseeded

Play-In Round – Friday, March 15
No. 3 Northern Michigan 3, No. 6 Notre Dame 1
No. 5 Ohio State 6, No. 4 Alaska-Fairbanks 5, ot

Semifinals – Saturday, March 16
No. 1 Michigan 2, No. 5 Ohio State 1, ot
No. 2 Michigan State 2, No. 3 Northern Michigan 1

Championship – Sunday, March 17
No. 1 Michigan vs. No. 2 Michigan State

CHA

Dwyer Arena, Lewiston, NY
First Round – Thursday, March 14
No. 3 Alabama-Huntsville 4, No. 6 Findlay 1
No. 5 Air Force 5, No. 4 Niagara 3

Semifinals – Friday, March 15
No. 3 Alabama-Huntsville 5, No. 2 Bemidji State 2
No. 1 Wayne State 3, No. 5 Air Force 1

Championship – Saturday, March 16
No. 1 Wayne State 5, No. 3 Alabama-Huntsville 4

ECAC

First Round
All series best-of-three
Friday-Sunday, March 8-10

No. 10 Yale at No. 1 Cornell
Game 1: Cornell 2, Yale 1
Game 2: Cornell 4, Yale 2
Cornell wins series, 2-0
No. 9 St. Lawrence at No. 2 Clarkson
Game 1: Clarkson 3, St. Lawrence 1
Game 2: Clarkson 6, St. Lawrence 1
Clarkson wins series, 2-0
No. 8 Brown at No. 3 Harvard
Game 1: Harvard 3, Brown 1
Game 2: Harvard 2, Brown 1, 2ot
Harvard wins series, 2-0
No. 7 Colgate at No. 4 Dartmouth
Game 1: Dartmouth 5, Colgate 4, 2ot
Game 2: Dartmouth 4, Colgate 1
Dartmouth wins series, 2-0
No. 6 Princeton at No. 5 Rensselaer
Game 1: Rensselaer 5, Princeton 3
Game 2: Rensselaer 6, Princeton 0
Rensselaer wins series, 2-0

Winners advance to 1980 Olympic Arena, Lake Placid, N.Y., and are reseeded

Play-In – Thursday, March 14
No. 5 Rensselaer 2, No. 4 Dartmouth 1

Semifinals – Friday, March 15
No. 1 Cornell 3, No. 5 Rensselaer 0
No. 3 Harvard 3, No. 2 Clarkson 2, ot

Consolation/Championship – Saturday, March 16
Consolation: No. 5 Rensselaer 4, No. 2 Clarkson 3
Championship: No. 3 Harvard 4, No. 1 Cornell 3, 2ot

Hockey East

All series best-of-three

Quarterfinals
Thursday-Saturday, March 7-9
No. 6 Boston College at No. 3 Maine
Game 1: Maine 7, Boston College 3
Game 2: Maine 4, Boston College 2
Maine wins series, 2-0
No. 5 Northeastern at No. 4 UMass-Lowell
Game 1: UMass-Lowell 5, Northeastern 2
Game 2: Northeastern 4, UMass-Lowell 2
Game 3: UMass-Lowell 3, Northeastern 1
UMass-Lowell wins series, 2-1

Friday-Sunday, March 8-10
No. 8 Merrimack at No. 1 New Hampshire
Game 1: New Hampshire 6, Merrimack 2
Game 2: New Hampshire 5, Merrimack 4, ot
New Hampshire wins series, 2-0
No. 7 Providence at No. 2 Boston University
Game 1: Boston University 3, Providence 2
Game 2: Boston University 4, Provdence 2
Boston University wins series, 2-0

Winners advance to FleetCenter, Boston, and are reseeded

Semifinals – Friday, March 15
No. 1 New Hampshire 4, No. 4 UMass-Lowell 3
No. 3 Maine 4, No. 2 Boston University 3

Championship – Saturday, March 16
No. 1 New Hampshire 3, No. 3 Maine 1

MAAC

Quarterfinals – Saturday, March 9
No. 1 Mercyhurst 2, No. 8 Army 1
No. 2 Quinnipiac 6, No. 7 Iona 5, 2ot
No. 6 Connecticut 6, No. 3 Holy Cross 5
No. 4 Sacred Heart 3, No. 5 Canisius 2, ot

Winners advance to Hart Recreation Center, Worcester, Mass., and are reseeded

Semifinals – Thursday, March 14
No. 1 Mercyhurst 5, No. 6 Connecticut 0
No. 2 Quinnipiac 3, No. 3 Sacred Heart 2

Championship – Saturday, March 16
No. 2 Quinnipiac 6, No. 1 Mercyhurst 4

WCHA

First Round
All series best-of-three
Friday-Sunday, March 8-10

No. 10 Michigan Tech at No. 1 Denver
Game 1: Denver 5, Michigan Tech 1
Game 2: Denver 8, Michigan Tech 1
Denver wins series, 2-0
No. 9 Minnesota-Duluth at No. 2 St. Cloud
Game 1: St. Cloud 5, Minnesota-Duluth 4, ot
Game 2: St. Cloud 6, Minnesota-Duluth 2
St. Cloud wins series, 2-0
No. 8 North Dakota at No. 3 Minnesota
Game 1: Minnesota 7, North Dakota 2
Game 2: Minnesota 4, North Dakota 3, ot
Minnesota wins series, 2-0
No. 7 Alaska-Anchorage at No. 4 Colorado College
Game 1: Colorado College 6, Alaska-Anchorage 1
Game 2: Colorado College 1, Alaska-Anchorage 0
Colorado College wins series, 2-0
No. 6 MSU-Mankato at No. 5 Wisconsin
Game 1: Wisconsin 3, MSU-Mankato 2, ot
Game 2: Wisconsin 7, MSU-Mankato 3
Wisconsin wins series, 2-0

Winners advance to Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul, Minn., and are reseeded

Play-In – Thursday, March 14
No. 4 Colorado College 3, No. 5 Wisconsin 2, ot

Semifinals – Friday, March 15
No. 1 Denver 3, No. 4 Colorado College 0
No. 3 Minnesota 4, No. 2 St. Cloud 1

Consolation/Championship – Saturday, March 16
Consolation: No. 4 Colorado College 2, No. 2 St. Cloud 1
Championship: No. 1 Denver 5, No. 3 Minnesota 2

Ifs And Buts

When you have the heavyweight champ on the ropes, you better put him away when you have the chance. If you let him hang on too long, all of a sudden a left hook will come out of nowhere and you’ll be on the canvas looking up at a referee counting to 10.

That’s why heavyweight champs are the champs.

With its season on the line, UMass-Lowell stared down Hockey East’s heavyweight champ, New Hampshire, and then put it on the ropes for a good portion of the league semifinal.

Leading 2-1 after a first period in which they outshot the number one team in the country, 9-4, the River Hawks dominated the opening minutes of the second period. As it progressed, they had several great opportunities to put the champs on the canvas with a two-goal lead.

“We had a lot of chances to go up 3-1 there,” said Ed McGrane. “Peter Hay had a nice chance. There was a nice two-on-one there. But those things happen in hockey.”

The River Hawks were landing punches, rendering the heavyweight champ vulnerable.

“We’ve played in so many tight games down the stretch trying to get home ice, games with very significant consequences and ramifications,” said UML coach Blaise MacDonald. “So we were used to that sort of pressure.

“UNH, on the other hand, has not had to play under that level of desperation. So I felt that we would have gotten stronger if we had gotten that third goal.

“But… ifs and buts.”

Ifs and buts indeed.

Instead, UNH tied the game at 2-2 off a strange goal from an unlikely source, Kevin Truelson, who had only one previously this season.

“Lowell was really controlling the game when we got that lucky break,” he said. “It’s good that I didn’t miss the net because they probably would have gone off the other way three-on-oh.”

Lowell rose from the canvas, but soon found itself on its backside once more when UNH scored again just 2:10 later for a 3-2 lead.

Having landed most of the punches but been floored by a devastating counterpunch, the River Hawks fought back, going on two power plays. On one, a McGrane tip of a Laurent Meunier shot hit the post and caromed tantalizingly along the goal line and out of the crease.

Ifs and buts.

Moving in for the kill as champs are wont to do, UNH held Lowell to only four shots in the third period and took a 4-2 lead with a Mick Mounsey goal in the opening minute, yet another tally by a defenseman who had scored only once all season.

Lowell narrowed the score to 4-3 off a McGrane goal at 9:46, but as it turned out, the champ could by then only be beaten by a TKO.

And despite pulling the goaltender and getting the puck into the offensive zone in the closing seconds, the River Hawks couldn’t knock out the champs. They’d had their chance, but he’d slipped through their grasp.

“Our guys put it all on the line, I think,” said McGrane. “I’m proud of the guys. I think everyone should hold their head up high.

“No one on this team is a quitter. That’s from day one. If we were going to go out, we were going to go out fighting. That’s the way it was.”

And what of the two goalposts that Lowell hit and the opportunities squandered? Was UNH a little lucky to escape?

“Good teams get a lot of good breaks,” said MacDonald. “When I watch game films on UNH and Maine, in particular, it seems like they get a tremendous amount of puck luck. They work for that puck luck.

“[UNH is] a very, very opportunistic team. Us, on the other hand, we work very hard for our opportunities and then when we get them, we don’t yield as well as UNH in terms of converting those opportunities.”

All of which is not to suggest that UMass-Lowell would have looked out of place in next week’s NCAA Tournament. The River Hawks’ 22-13-3 record leaves them just barely on the outside looking in, but is hardly indicative of them at their best.

“They can play with anybody,” said UNH coach Dick Umile. “They’ve proved that. There’s no question that Lowell is a team that could win it.”

That’s true now and it was true for most of the year. However, Lowell’s season is over because it wasn’t true for a critical five-week stretch that began in mid-January. During that time, the team went 1-7-2, largely because three of the River Hawks’ best players left for the Olympics to play for Team France.

Prior to that disastrous skid, the River Hawks were first in Hockey East and third in the country with a 16-3-1 record. Not only was an NCAA berth theirs for the taking, but a trip to the Frozen Four at St. Paul, Minnesota, seemed a reasonable possibility. And from there….

Ifs and buts.

Since the 1-7-2 stretch did count — and counted in pivotal ways in the NCAA tournament selection criteria — Lowell had to TKO the champ or go home.

As it turned out, they’re going home.

“It’s one of those seasons where you look back and we had 22 wins and we played great… when we had our full team intact,” said MacDonald.

“Do I think we’re an NCAA tournament team? Do I think we could go to St. Paul?

“Absolutely! I think we’re that good. But if you lose three of your best players at the end of the year for seven or eight games — even after they got back it took them a while to get into the swing of things — for a team like Lowell because our margin of error is so slim, it’s very hard to recover from that.

“I think we showed everybody that with them, we’re a real good team. Without them, it’s a very slim margin of error. Our record isn’t a true indicator of how good we were this year.”

Indeed.

Ifs and buts.

Latest Stories from around USCHO